Welcome
Home About Info

Home About Info

Latest: 05.12.2025

Donna Bugat

Donna Bugat (aka Nonna Donna): My precedent setting ‘Commonwealth Statutory Declaration’ & ‘Public Interest Disclosure’ ditches ‘false imprisonment’ of ‘adoption court order’ from Australia (without… additional trauma from ‘abuse of process’ of ‘court proceedings’ etc) because my transnational case -proves- politicians own ‘regulatory regime/s’ is -punishment- ‘not prescribed by law’, that -also- arbitrarily stops my having -freedom- politicians do to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia & elsewhere etc 06.11.2025

… the beauty of life: the serendipitous peace, harmony & tranquility of butterflies, flowers & a cool summer Breizh, when I was living in my modest stone cottage built into the pink granite countryside of Cotes-d’Armor, in France with my very own nature lovers paradise including a small forest that has the most amazing symphony of birdsong…

November 15, 2025

Donna Bugat (aka Nonna Donna) re: My addendum to Commonwealth Statutory Declaration & Public Interest Disclosure including Universal Jurisdiction means British journalist & fmr MP, Mayor of London, FM, PM Johnson & Australian Ambassador to US & fmr MP, PM, FM, PM Rudd both banned in perpetuity from Melbourne CBD in Australia, where I currently live, ‘unless they are attending court’ (it would be sensible for Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family to peacefully settle my British High Court jury lawsuits -before- I stand for democratic election, anywhere (14.11.2025)

Welcome

‘Schrodinger’s Democrat’

My own identity of Donna Bugat (formerly known by my adoptee name of Babs Tucker) is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to peaceful self determination.

Nonna Donna @ Australian (High) ‘Court of Disputed Returns’ re: Australian ‘bully boy’ PM’s very own ‘AUKUS’ with ‘Ambassadors’ Rudd (US) & Smith (UK) a busted flush illegally abusing public office, incl to also parachute Murdoch Crime family & govt funded ‘PCA’ adoption propagandist into my Melbourne electorate to illegally try & continue to refuse to settle my High Court jury lawsuits in UK (incl when Steve Jago spoke to Smith et al’s Australian Foreign Office on 7th October 2009 etc etc) (16.05.2025)

Screenshot

The Murdoch family’s unelected and undemocratic ‘Time'(s) Lord for hire/rent boy:

The Westminster Village staged their various inquiries into the Murdoch family in 2011 etc while distracting from the Murdoch Crime Family’s undemocratic Private Members ‘Parliament Square Management’ Bill 2011 in the unelected British House of Lords, which was also intended to illegally cover up CO/11393/2007 & HQ11X00563 involving the same Mr Ingledew et al from 19th May 2006 who switched between the MET Police & Westminster Council to try and swerve CO/11393/2007 etc:


I was born on 10th February 1962, and raised in Melbourne, Australia, where a dual national British Anglo-Saxon adoptee heritage was imposed on me. My own actual origins which were “officially” completely erased, are overlapping dual national Mediterranean and Celtic, from Italy (Carni) including County Clare and Galway in Ireland etc. My own parent’s marriage certificate etc was illegally excluded from my adoption hearing in Case 352 that resulted in an adoption court order dated 28th May 1963, from the County Court, in Melbourne, Australia.





email: bgt39athotmail.com
mobile: +610451647128


I was married in New Zealand and divorced in the UK, and have two beautiful sons who were born and live in the UK and New Zealand.



    • A Public Square:


The multiplicity of court cases in the UK against us (that involved Australian politicians) were illegally intended from the beginning to stop our having a peaceful 24 vigil in Parliament Square Central London. The only difference with a 24/7 vigil that had been outside South Africa House many years earlier, was ours was outside the British Houses of Parliament. The British Houses of Parliament of “both houses and black rod” (the revolving doors of politicians and journalists) always intended to unlawfully stop our peacefully campaigning in a public space, of Parliament Square, Central London, for any political change. In particular Westminster did not want members of the public, meeting up in Parliament Square, Central London, to share views and ideas, including to peacefully start a new political party or standing in politics ourselves.

I did prove in helping to force the repeal of a particularly libellous political ban on peaceful freedom of expression called ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 that would have happened very swiftly if the government et al had not illegally done all they could to delay and stop High Court jury lawsuits that while wealthy people like the Murdoch crime family may buy politicians and legislation, what they could not guarantee was the ordinary law abiding members of the public like we did, might come along and force the repeal of unlawful legislation as we did.

It is still important to set the legal precedent in settling outstanding lawsuits that British Magistrates have no ‘reasonable excuse’ to refuse to make audio/audiovisual recordings of courts so that they cannot illegally imprison people without legal representation or trial on non-imprisonable alleged offences. There is no legal reason that any member of the public is legally obliged to just go along with whatever may be politically convenient for any judiciary in the British Magistrates Courts, instead of having a reasonable expectation that the British Magistrates Courts conduct themselves in a professional manner that does not resort to or rely on a refusal to make accurate and contemporaneous records of court proceedings to illegally accuse members of the public of something or to hide evidence that is tendered in the court. The audio/audio visual recording of proceedings in the British Magistrates is a long overdue necessity that will actually transform the entire British legal landscape.

@ourtinycottage



It is clearly unreasonable (and a political trap) to expect adoptees who are Australian citizen to return indefinitely to Australia, where politicians have illegally been… withholding court certified copies/extracts of adoption court orders from all adoptees with all manner of excuses (that are not legal) to try and ditch the adoption court order etc:

I was legally entitled to a court certified copy of the adoption court order, to file in my High Court jury lawsuits in the UK.

The Australian politicians et al always knew my home address in Breizh, France (see official copy of property title etc above) because they sent me their version of other “official” documents (below) there in April 2015:

Latest Posts

🍄

Blah di blah updating