Hi,

I hope this finds you well.

**** I have included this in the form of a witness statement etc (see below where the press insist on using my adopted identity that was… illegally leaked by the Murdoch crime family with what were proved to be false allegations from inside New Scotland Yard) because the legal issues are so important, and to clarify (some of what you chose to not take agreed notes about) following my visit to two of your offices on 6th and then 7th January 2025, and your two emails to me on 7th January 2025 and 28th January 2025. ***

In summary:

It is my intention to guarantee several important… legal precedents in Australia and the UK/Europe using my British High Court Habeas Corpus Court from 16th April 2008 from a Justice Owen and British civil jury lawsuits (the Murdoch crime family and Ambassador Rudd has also as the former PM, FM & PM et al illegally concealed while I was also successfully repealing unlawful ss 132/138 SOCPA 2005 legislation that was a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the UK) about:

1. adoption (my adoption court order very clearly does constitute a… false imprisonment because I certainly do not have the same freedoms people who are not adopted/dual national adoptees do)
   
   the legal situation for… adoptees is quite different from that of even either our own families or people who pose as our parents because they don’t have an adoption court order that can (illegally) be used by politicians and judges to stop them standing in for example federal politics in Australia
   
   The ‘iron curtain’ of the global adoption industry is the worst ‘official secrets act’ there is.
   
2. the legal use of audiovisual recordings in British Magistrates Courts (which will obviously transform the British legal landscape so that it can not be exploited by wealthy people like the Murdoch crime family or politicians)
   
   It is common-sense judges and courts cannot -legally- go around accusing members of the public of doing something wrong in court, or dispute evidence more generally ie: as in CO/4002/2006) when it is the judges and courts themselves who refuse/d without ‘reasonable excuse’ to make audiovisual recordings of court proceedings.
   
3. so that I am then like people who are not adopted, also able to choose if I wish, to stand in national or federal politics in the UK, Australia (and even France) without judicial etc interference
   
4. financial compensation including for unlimited universal health care of my own choosing because the British and Australian governments refused without lawful excuse to hand over CCTV I own, to me, including in a timely manner because they knew that any competent medical professional would… immediately know they intended to cause life threatening permanent harm to major organs etc etc
   
   (The fact is politicians will illegally conceal evidence of life threatening physical harm caused to adoptees)
   
   
5. I reasonably believe there could legally be an office in the contested city of Jerusalem with a magistrate (I would happily do it) to rubber-stamp… universally recognised court certified copies of… acknowledgements adoptees of any race, religion, politics or none have ditched adoption court orders made while we were minors without needing the permission of anyone else, to exercise our absolute right of return to our own identity (that isn’t necessarily the same as living somewhere in particular)
   
   (For the avoidance of doubt, I only advocate for the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy which I would have a referendum to be included in… any constitution, instead of the inequality of the institution of monarchy or whatever a republic can be made to mean)
   
   to peacefully settle my highly unusual transnational adoption case.

**** I can’t see that any legal purpose is served by forcing adoptees to leave our own homes overseas, to return to an “originating court” in Australia, for an indefinite time, only to then get trapped during a global pandemic, having cancer twice, along with other serious illnesses ? ****

(I thought you would know, the Victorian Law Society are supposed to provide access to a half hour of free legal representation but for “some reason” failed to get back to me in December 2019 when I filled out the necessary forms. You can if you wish share my witness/statement/statutory declaration/resume with the Victorian Law Society, for the purposes of a lawyer saving me time, by drawing up a draft court order according to my instructions below -including importantly universal health care of my own choosing- to settle my lawsuits.

A former NSW Supreme Court adoption Judge Mr Brereton now Head of kNACCkered (most members of the public could do a better job than him) has been… misleading the public about quite a lot, including about “tricking and forcing” (he wrote the general principles himself !! but just doesn’t apply it to adoptees) to return to the “originating court” for no valid legal reason, but to try and force adoptees to sign any old “waiver” to be free from adoption court orders that do constitute a… false imprisonment:

…curiously, not a peep out of politicians, about Brereton, during an election…

The courts do not have… jurisdiction in any sense of the word, because it is commonsense it is a basic legal right of adult adoptees to make our own decisions about ditching an adoption court order made while we were minors, without paying money to or having the permission of any court who can only acknowledge our decision.

** There is a version of my witness/statement etc (labelled ‘donnaresume03032025’) that was filed on 3rd March 2025 with a government agency, I was asked by someone else to do, specifically so that the government et al cannot deny they know, or keep trying to pass the buck etc, including while illegally stopping me standing in national or federal politics in the UK, Australia (and even France) that I can also amend/update etc** 

The politicians did not have a referendum

The politicians would need to have had and have not had a… national referendum, for them to… legally be able to use state adoption !! legislation to open the door to judicial interference in dual national adoptees standing in federal politics in Australia. Of course the Australian courts cannot possibly have had jurisdiction to stop me ditching my adoption court order to stand for election in the UK or France with my own identity.

(I am pretty sure that Australian politicians who staged their dual nationality extravaganza for a couple of illegally misleading headlines in 2017 while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France and… they knew about my British lawsuits, would need to have a referendum if they intended that state… adoption legislation, could be used to stop a dual national adoptee having the same freedom they have to ditch a dual nationality, without needing to pay money to or have the permission of a judge which can be refused. 

It is really that central point that highlights generally the legally unworkable use of adoption court orders against adult adoptees is an unlawful interference with very wide ranging consequences that can be abused by unscrupulous state actors like the Murdoch crime family, because all the horse-trading whisperer has to say into the ears of politicians, is that they don’t want jury lawsuits etc, and that is how the Murdoch patriarch secured the deceit of the Victorian Adoption Act 1984, before he tried the same in the UK in 2011, directed at me.

‘Schrodinger’s Democrat’ & Political asylum ?

It would be helpful if you also make enquiries about where it may be possible for me to safely claim political asylum, because I am obviously illegally excluded from participating in any meaningful way in a supposed democracy in Australia, this ‘Schrodinger’s Democrat certainly does not live in.  

This could have been legally resolved before the latest general election.  

I currently live in Australia but not the same Australia that people who have the freedom to stand for election in federal politics without judicial interference because they are not dual national adoptees, have.

I don’t believe for one minute Mr Bandt from the Green Party in Melbourne, cared for one minute about people in Libya, with all his Vitol Oil war propaganda because he doesn’t care this adoptee had my… Mediterranean identity illegally completely erased in whites only Australia.

Nobody thought we two adoptees were siblings so you have to spend your whole life answering questions about your private life because of… other people’s lies…

The British far from Commonwealth just use endless war to also keep populating the colonial halfway houses.

I make no apologies if it is a bit scrappy because I cannot change I am not very well at the moment, because of the medical treatment for the rare illness that has no cure (so there obviously isn’t much medical research) so I shouldn’t have the additional stress and burden of doing this, but I always hope I will improve, and obviously every day is a bonus. I should not have to spend any more days settling my lawsuit/s, because I am legally entitled to move on with… my own life, instead of politicians unlawfully interfering in my life, by illegally using the adoption court order.

_______________________________________________________

Donna: 

** I make this witness/statement/statutory declaration and resume in my own identity of Donna, knowing it to be true** 

Résumé:

I am a Nonna, Mum, sister, daughter, an international citizen, universal peace campaigner, with Celtic and Mediterranean heritage (incl Australian and Italian, that was illegally switched to British and Australian), a whistleblower, successful repealer of unlawful political legislation etc who is more than qualified to be a Magistrate, or stand for political national, and federal elections in the UK, Australia and France. 

(The adopted identity some state agencies refer to, I do not choose to use personally, is Barbara Tucker, that is the identity that was illegally leaked by the Murdoch crime family (press) in the UK who admitted operating in New Scotland Yard etc

There was an unlawful agreement between politicians in the UK and Australia (not just “both houses and black rod “in the UK) on 26th March 2006 when the Murdoch crime family’s henchman Blair was grandstanding in Australia before I was unlawfully arrested in the UK o 26th March 2006) 

The government illegally refused to put an Inspector Lyons from 26th March 2006, with a witness statement, because that is when it was contrary to the false statement made by New Scotland Yard agreed the unlawful arrest on Mothers Day, was a High Court civil jury lawsuit:

It is my intention to guarantee several important… legal precedents in Australia and the UK/Europe using my British High Court Habeas Corpus Court from 16th April 2008 from a Justice Owen and British civil jury lawsuits (the Murdoch crime family and Ambassador Rudd has also as the former PM, FM & PM et al illegally concealed while I was also successfully repealing unlawful ss 132/138 SOCPA 2005 legislation that was a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the UK) about:

1. adoption and  (my adoption court order very clearly does constitute a… false imprisonment because I certainly do not have the same freedoms people who are not adopted/dual national adoptees do)
   
   the legal situation for… adoptees is quite different from that of even either our own families or people who pose as our parents because they don’t have an adoption court order that can (illegally) be used by politicians and judges to stop them standing in for example federal politics in Australia
   
   The ‘iron curtain’ of the global adoption industry is the worst ‘official secrets act’ there is.
   
2. the legal use of audiovisual recordings in British Magistrates Courts (which will obviously transform the British legal landscape so that it can not be exploited by wealthy people like the Murdoch crime family or politicians)
   
3. so that I am then like people who are not adopted, also able to choose if I wish, to stand in national or federal politics in the UK, Australia (and even France) without judicial etc interference 

4. financial compensation including for unlimited universal health care of my own choosing because the British and Australian governments refused without lawful excuse to hand over CCTV I own, to me, including in a timely manner because they knew that any competent medical professional would… immediately know they intended to cause life threatening permanent harm to major organs etc etc
   
   (The fact is politicians will illegally conceal evidence of life threatening physical harm caused to adoptees)
   
5. I reasonably believe there could legally be an office in the contested city of Jerusalem with a magistrate (I would happily do it) to rubber-stamp… universally recognised court certified copies of… acknowledgements adoptees of any race, religion, politics or none have ditched adoption court orders made while we were minors without needing the permission of anyone else, to exercise our absolute right of return to our own identity (that isn’t necessarily the same as living somewhere in particular)
   
   (For the avoidance of doubt, I only advocate for the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy which I would have a referendum to be included in… any constitution, instead of the inequality of the institution of monarchy or whatever a republic can be made to mean)
   
   to peacefully settle my highly unusual transnational adoption case.

As you know, before I visited your offices, I spoke with the Supreme Court about jurisdiction (because as I explained I can’t see how any court in Australia has any jurisdiction over the decision of an adult adoptee to ditch an adoption court order) but I can pass along the paperwork they gave me to you, if you like, and then as I mentioned, I spoke with a very helpful person from a law library who gave me all the paperwork/commentary from the former NSW Supreme Court Adoption Judge (and now supposedly troubled) head of NACC, Brereton who talks (Haylesbury et al) about how the use of coercion with regard to issues of … jurisdiction (which is what is going on with adoption because politicians illegally want a waiver, from lawsuits) is obviously as I have been saying… illegal. Adoptees like myself who have been permanently living overseas in our own homes, are illegally being… forced to return to an “originating court” in Australia, for no valid or discernible legal reason. 

I cannot see there is any legitimate legal purpose served by forcing adoptees to leave our own homes overseas, to return to an “originating court” indefinitely to then get trapped during a global pandemic, having cancer twice or other serious illnesses ?

The Murdoch crime family who are the biggest global propagandists about adoption with their cult of celebrity who are all illegally paid by government, are extremely offensive because the basic premise that an adult adoptee cannot make our own decision to ditch an adoption court order made while were minors without the permission of politicians and courts, is legally untenable in natural and all reasonable and rational law.

There are so many adoptees affected all around the world by the systemic corruption in the adoption industry anywhere, for essentially the same reason, that politicians and their horse trading whisperer, the Murdoch patriarch, do not want to admit we are legally entitled to as adults ditch adoption court orders made when we were minors without having the permission of anyone else. The failure of politicians to acknowledge that central point is what directly leads to all the continuing… exploitation and further trafficking of an adoptee, by the likes of the Murdoch crime family. 

****** I have never actually had the freedom to make my own decision on where I would choose to live because the systemic corruption of the adoption court order and adoption industry has… always forced me to have to do what best suits others, which I simply cannot do anymore, because it is not at all healthy for me***** 

I would personally recommend that no adoptions should ever take place unless an adoptee is guaranteed unlimited free legal representation, because of all the legal problems adoptees can face that can be attributed to systemic corruption in the global adoption industry. Such a basic right to ditch an adoption court order made while a minor without needing the permission of anyone else, is just being ‘sidestepped’ for the political convenience of others.

It is unfortunately, as I said, the case that Labour politicians used the fact and exploited me when I was seriously ill with cancer twice to dump me over the border from Port Phillip (as I mentioned) into the Melbourne CBD and electorate of a Mr Bandt because they knew Mr Bandt really wouldn’t want members of the public to know about my adoption case (let alone for me to stand against him) because he couldn’t explain in any court, the seriously illegal deal he really did with Labour in 2010, while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, and you will remember a Sir Ken Jones from ACPO in the UK had illegally become DAC in Victoria, Australia by covering up his involvement in a case involving me in the UK (CO/11393/2007) which was ongoing and still a serious legal issue when Mr Bandt illegally joined the melange of British and Australian politicians, already caught up in a massive political scandal in CO/11393/2007. 

The politicians et al couldn’t find a way to ‘swerve’ around CO/1193/2007 so they just did everything they could to illegally delay or try to ‘overtake’ it which is what the illegal deal between Rudd, Gillard and Mr Bandt involved.

Th facts are Ambassador Rudd did as PM illegally give the green light to a) my being illegally imprisoned in 2008 in the UK and b) then the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK, to try and cover the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 2008 up (he was able to launder the $1.4 billion payoff from the British government through his ‘welfare queen’ at Ingeus in the UK of which he was also a financial beneficiary. Of course Ingeus always relied solely on government contracts in any country which is why Rudd typically went from public/civil servant to politician to guarantee those government contracts, including by inventing the clearly unlawful not so ‘mutual obligations’ that have… no due process. The governments can then outsource the cover up of their own corruption to private companies, who rely on the government contracts to make money. When the British government privatised the probation service in the UK around 2015 (which failed) the politicians put in place a similar ‘mutual obligations’ style racketeering, by making it mandatory for anyone imprisoned for… over a day in the UK, to have to jump through the obstacle course of a privatised probation industry… for a year, because otherwise it was not profitable for private companies. The politicians also knew much could be laundered through British Magistrates Courts so no-one would know if any abuses were going on, because of the British Magistrates courts which are arguably worse than Russian lower courts, refuse without lawful excuse to have audiovisual recordings of court proceedings.

The Australian Labour Party were caught out falsifying state records in Australia when I first had cancer (that I first knew about in 2022 that I was told dated back to 20th October 2020) I complained about the falsified state records and even phoned the now former Premier Andrews Office because his constituency staff advised me to do that, but politicians refused to amend the records, along with their also falsifying Federal records (other people discovered that I didn’t even know about) to falsely claim… I own property in Australia (yet nobody could identify where so the person who… illegally had access to those state and federal records… about me, without my knowledge, did know when they falsified the records they were… lying) which of course the hospitals themselves knew wasn’t true, but only all came out because I was repeatedly hospitalised with the cancer and then someone wrote a statutory declaration I recited to them and then took me to a police station so it was also signed by a police officer at a Victorian Police station. I reasonably believe it was more likely than not, one of Rudd’s former Chief’s of Staff who was at the DOJ etc called a Ms Corrie McKenzie who was the person who orchestrated or falsified the records herself, because she had previously threatened me when I pointed out she had an undeclared conflict of interest in my lawsuits in the UK, when she had contacted me out of the blue. So she was a busted flush who then slithered sideways to the NDIS which I obviously can’t use with her there. Of course, Ms Corrie McKenzie is not really a civil servant, she is a political appointee, which is particularly legally problematic with regard to her interactions… with members of the public because she is really only acting as a… political appointee)

** The ‘smoking gun’ of ‘DC’: “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006, in CO/11393/2007 about unlawful political interference** 

So it is true the Australian Labour Party would know… that a Mr Bandt the federal Green Party MP for Melbourne most certainly would not want members of the public to know the dodgy deal he really did with the Labour Party in 2010 to try and hide the hugely controversial political scandal in CO/11393/2007 and my lawsuits. It’s fair to observe he wasn’t supporting protesters like myself in Parliament Square Central London, when he was a cheerleader along with the Murdoch crime family, Rudd and the Sir Alan Duncan Tory Vitol Oil ‘Libya Oil’ cell (which was exactly the same usual suspects of Rudd, Murdoch and Duncan, that led to my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008) for the Libya war (which hasn’t aged well) and adoption propaganda about ‘forced adoptions’ which is illegally… misleading the public about legal proceedings, and which Bandt won’t be repeating in an court. 

A Mr Bandt would not dare repeat the adoption propaganda about ‘forced adoptions’… in any court because it is not a legally recognised or defined term. It is literally political language designed to illegally try and hide my lawsuits in the UK that came first, as an… adoptee. The legal situation of an adoptee is quite distinct, and not the same as our own families or the people who pose as our parents.

It is… illegal for politicians (and the press) to… mislead the public about any including very serious legal proceedings which is what they are doing.

When I had found the ‘smoking gun’ in CO/11393/2007 in the UK (which was just another political scandal I could have done without) which was ‘DC: and the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006 (the inclusion of black rod and not the sergeant of arms in the House of Commons was obviously also odd) when it was finally handed over after the…. 3rd March 2009 because it was so controversial, I asked one of the Murdoch crime family lawyers at the MET Police called Winfield, who the Murdoch crime family obviously admitted in 2011 they were working with, what the document meant to her/them.

The government refused to put ‘DC’ (the stalker) who acted on behalf of “both houses and black rod” on the witness stand.

The prison governor had illegally withheld the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from me, until she came to see me personally and said she would not release me unless I signed a waiver for her ( which I refused to do, but she had to release me anyway, and I then knew she was the one who collected the big brown envelope) so it was the same, as how the 1984 Victorian Adoption legislation illegally…really works

A perjured witness statement (above) produced for Tory Sir Alan ‘Vitol Oil’ Duncan for 160,000 pounds, who…. illegally…. misled the public with false statements on video in the Telegraph and in the Daily Mail… The witness statement was given to me by the ‘DC‘ (acting on behalf of) “both houses and black rod” (document dated 19th May 2006) who the government also refused to put on the witness stand

CO/11393/2007 on 3rd March… 2009

I did not… agree to be limited to a civil lawsuit...

I legally named agent provocateurs in legal proceedings and courts… (it only mattered what I could prove in court) and the government went to extreme lengths to avoid their agent provocateur/s being put on the witness stand.

… The Undercover Policing Inquiry, is a completely sanitised whitewash (that continues to cover up for the likes of Starmer, the latest PM and former Chief Prosecutor with Special Counsel ant Doughty Chambers) …. (as though the government just stopped using agent provocateurs)…. the politicians, police, prosecutors and press like Murdoch crime family do not just put their hands up and admit they use agent provocateurs and go ‘oh whoops’ terribly sorry….

What the bogus ‘Undercover Policing Inquiry in the UK will not be doing any time soon, is inviting a transcript of the 21st June 2010 in the British High Court because of course that is what it is really like when you legally identify agent provocateurs et al...

The audio was illegally…. edited and published to hide the real headline was agent provocateurs from Democracy Village cover up unlawful arrest by coming forward as the… complainants (which was not something they admitted in court or in the press, but synchronised audiovisual proves)…

I would just repeal the GLA Act, because the public shouldn’t be funding legal representation for the monarchy, who are hardly a charity, and were only illegally trying to ‘sidestep’ a counterclaim…

Rudd and Bandt spinning the war propaganda of the Murdoch crime family and Vitol Oil Duncan which hasn’t aged well (it’s the usual suspects along with Rudd from 2008) and yet they don’t care act all about an Australian… adoptee whose ummm… Mediterranean identity has illegally been completely erased….

Racketeering Rudd and his $1.4 billion dollar welfare queen at Ingeus,

The Murdoch crime family keeping in touch with their mates….

…zero intelligence from the Iraq war joined the Murdoch crime family too for a payoff……

It’s really difficult for adoptees everywhere…

The government invented excuses… to delay responding to my claim (it was none of my business who the Home Secretary for example might want as legal representation) that came first (they had also pulled a fast one and switched my CO/12316/2011 with their agent provocateurs CO/12361/2011, while they were planning 16th January 2012 in the background…

There was also no stay on HQ11X00563 on 16th January 2012 which they had really lost in January 2011 which was why Mr Barrow had to resign (he was after all caught on American TV having to admit I hadn’t done anything wrong, so… they couldn’t put him on the witness stand (the government never dared put their agent provocateurs on the witness stand in the same court as me. The purpose of the agent provocateurs case was to… lose (for public consumption) while I just carried on and collected another High Court jury lawsuit (there were MET Police and City of London Police on 16th January 2012, which is why we were later ambushed leaving the High Court by 666 et al from the City of London in the ongoing far from legal intimidation etc:

The government were very much in a hurry, unlike with our CO/11393/2007 and HQ11X00563 etc they had lost:

Ms Winfield said the MET Police considered it and I quote, their “get out of jail free card” I also refer to as a canard. Once I started very publicly naturally complaining about how it had been illegally withheld from so many cases in the preceding years (so rather like court certified adoption court orders then) it was the Murdoch crime family who publicly put out the hit on me on Sky News live, that Rudd gave the green light to, that resulted in the torture and attempted murder of me.  

There are clearly all manner of related documents that have illegally been withheld.

Of course, the fact politicians have always refused to inform all adoptees who had DES, the cancer causing/endocrine disrupting drug that can also cause other anatomical anomalies tested on them, is really the only absolute proof that is needed politicians never cared about the health of any adoptees.

The politicians intentionally enacted the Victorian Adoption Act 1984 without it having any due process because they intended to illegally try and stop… as many lawsuits as possible through a variety of unlawful means that include a) refusing to notify all adoptees they are adopted b) refusing to provide all adoptees with court certified copies of adoption court orders, and c) refusing to have court hearings including proper court hearings. The County Court in Melbourne (for example) illegally refused to have a hearing when I turned up at court with cash to have a hearing to at least put a permanent stay on the adoption court order. They spent about two hours on their phones trying to work out how to try and wriggle out of that because of course I was legally entitled to a hearing. 

(I obviously complained to the Supreme Court in Victoria, about) politicians illegally using Victoria Police in December 2021 to interfere in… politics, because a Ms Corrie McKenzie was illegally using Victoria Police (presumably because they had already been involved in the UK) The politicians cannot legally use police to stop adoptees ditching adoption court orders to have the freedom to stand in federal politics. 

The first time I even saw the Victorian government’s version of photocopied court records was only in July 2019. The Adoption (Dis) Information Service refuse to send even photocopies of that overseas.  The AIS refused to even provide me by… email with one complete set of what they claim are my adoption records in July 2019 after they disgustingly lied and said I didn’t have it because I had failed to attend a meeting which wasn’t true. 

There is obviously no provision made to pay for adoptees like me who have our homes overseas, and live permanently overseas, to return for what has illegally become indefinitely for the legally unworkable obstacle course that I was legally entitled to have settled through my civil jury lawsuits in the UK.

There is hidden very dirty war waged on refusenik adoptees.

I have clearly taken all reasonable steps to settle the matter, in the UK, which was right for me, before I was forced to sell my home in the UK, and move to Breizh, France.

When I was forced to return to Victoria, Australia in July 2019 (during the Brexit panjandrum which was a complication too far to try to compute as a transnational adoptee who just wants to get on with my own life, which is all I have always quite reasonably wanted) to continue to try and sort out the legal mess of the adoption court order, the Murdoch crime family parachuted into the Liberal Party in Victoria, a male who claimed to be an adoptee called Matt Bach. Mr Bach claimed to have worked on the Tory campaign at the 2010 general election in the UK when I was in Parliament Square, Central London, after working for a former Australian Liberal party MP, Ms Woolridge. Ms Woolridge has told so many lies about adoption it is difficult to know where to begin (Ms Woolridge also stole !!!! hundreds of dollars I thought was safely held, on behalf of me, she somehow inexplicably got access to ?? that was my housing bond !! she was able to steal from me (when I was in the Port Phillip area) when I first had cancer, so there’s no-where too low that former politician won’t go. A Senator McGrath who is also from the Australian Liberal party was one of the people who was working with the former Mayor of London Johnson in April 2008 when I got my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order on 16th April 2008 because of all their lies, including during that electoral campaign. Another former Liberal Party MP from Victoria, Australia called Mr Tim Smith was working with the British Tory MP David Davis when they… also covered up the identity of a male who violently punched me in the head who politicians refused to identify. The British Tory MP David Davis had slithered up to me earlier in 2007 to say “if politicians cared (about the torture etc of me) they would have to shut up shop”. I could only wish they did shut up shop. The extreme male-led (I can’t call them men because they are cowards when it comes to admitting what they do) state violence towards me in Westminster was truly appalling. 

There is not an adoptee in the world who would as an adult willingly !! (they must be kidding) sign up to the having an adoption court order, that is ruled over by the systemic corruption that is the Victorian Adoption Act 1984 that has no due process. 

The only reason so many adoption court orders were rubber-stamped in the first place was because politicians threw due process out the window so our own family members were not invited to court, so records could inevitably be falsified etc etc. 

The other main party candidates in a general election alongside a Mr Bandt in the Melbourne electorate are the Labour Party with a government mouthpiece for the same old government adoption propaganda, and the Liberal Party with a lawyer from the Foreign Office posing as an Ambassador for the Liberal party politicians own cancer ‘charity’ who is very obviously part of politicians continuing to cover up the DES cancer causing drug scandal because politicians refused to inform all adoptees the drug was tested on.

None of them speak, for, instead of, or on behalf of me. 

I am my own package who is the real deal called Donna. 

My own Mediterranean and Celtic heritage that was illegally erased when I was a small child, includes Italian and Australian, including the Celtic regions of Cornwall in the UK, County Clare and Galway in Ireland, and the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region in Italy on the Mediterranean, while of course my own home is in the Celtic region of Breizh, in France, is also on the Mediterranean.

(I was ‘raised’ in Australia by the highest echelons of the British military and naval intelligence Fremantle family etc who are obviously pretty much the opposite of my own cultural heritage 

They wrote what are construed as witness statements of a sort, in 2011, that can be used in court, where they admitted they worked for the British and Australian intelligence services, as did the people like Barnett who was a Director General of ASIO, when they also posed as the godparents of me and my late adopted brother. I was sent 12000 miles overseas as a teenager as punishment because I refused to go along with being adopted because I just wanted to get on with my own life, which is why I always refused to join the intelligence services who just do the bidding of the Murdoch crime family who had trafficked me to them. It is the Murdoch crime family, not the intelligence services who won’t let me walk away from their corrupt adoption industry. The people who posed as my parents did eventually admit I made the right decision to not join the intelligence services, and of course I always say the Victorian Adoption Act 1984 that was made while I was living in Mediterranean countries without my being told about my Mediterranean heritage is what I call the real official secrets act. I would know that legislation was obviously a dodgy deal done when Barnett was DG of ASIO and the Murdoch patriarch didn’t want lawsuits standing in the way of his getting American citizenship -before- my lawsuits in the UK then stood in the way of his BSkyB deal in the UK. In 1984, the Australian PM Hawke and Victorian Premier Cain had just done as they were told) 

I proved when I successfully helped force repeal of an… unlawful political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in Parliament Square, Central London in the UK in the also seriously libellous ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, that although people like the Murdoch crime family could buy politicians and legislation what they could not do, was guarantee a few members of the public would not come along and force it’s repeal, and preferably very swiftly with a civil jury, which is what politicians fell all over themselves to illegally stop. 

I do get satisfaction from knowing the former British PM Blair (who acted as the Murdoch crime family lawyer) has to live with forever knowing a small group of people with no legal training whatsoever, successfully repealed the centrepiece of his wider political deceit that sought to ban peaceful freedom of expression by law abiding members of the public in Parliament Square, Central London, they intended to roll out across the country.  

The UN, EU, Russia and United States may have made Blair their Middle East Peace Envoy (which certainly didn’t age well)  but it was we peace campaigners who trumped him and the Murdoch crime family, in the highly contested public space of Parliament Square, Central London.

The British and Australian politicians also illegally used people in the UK I legally referred to in court, as agent provocateurs, to best describe their own illegal actions, and because I don’t care which government agency or in the case of one group called ‘Democracy Village’ 2010-2013 which robber news media press baron any also work for.  The Daily Mail doorstopped me when I was leaving the High Court on 21st June 2010 and I said words to the effect of they needed to go away, because they were involved in the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ which the journalist admitted was true, and the newspaper itself admitted, but only outside of a court, because they refused to front up in court and try to defend the indefensible of their illegally being involved in my unlawful arrest. 

It is never lawful to use agent provocateurs… to try and stop civil jury lawsuits, but British and Australian politicians (and the press) did illegally use British and Australian agent provocateurs in Parliament Square, Central London, which is how a Sir Ken Jones from ACPO in the UK was a busted flush as DAC in Victoria Police in 2011 because I managed to get on the High Court record in the UK in 2011 he too had illegally swerved around CO/11393/2007. A Mr Brett Bailey who was an Australian agent provocateur working in the UK, who claims to live in Victoria, Australia which may or may not be true, refused without lawful excuse to appear in court in the UK and try to defend his indefensible behaviour as a member of ‘Democracy Village’ at the State Opening on 25th May 2010 when he is shown on video illegally working with the British MET police to unlawfully arrest me, because I am holding another perjured witness statement from ‘DC’ from the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006, so the ‘DC’ is unlawfully arresting me on 25th May 2010 to continue to try and cover up, while he also needs to illegally grab the video footage or it will be a problem publishing the government version of what has happened. The synchronised video footage also shows the British government edited some of the video of Mr Brett Bailey (who was named in the British press but I only recognise by comparing photographs etc) to try and hide some of his more inexplicable interactions with British police that he would be unable to explain to any jury, that related to me.There were several Australian males who were part of the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ who were very obviously wired, with their little back up entourage. 

The British politicians have staged a very sanitised Undercover Inquiry in the UK that goes no-where near the actual… violent reality of the illegal use of under-covers from various state agencies, whose only purpose in my own case, was to illegally try and stop civil jury lawsuits. 

On 25th May 2010, the British government went to the trouble of actually closing off Parliament Square, Central London, during their undercover operation, specifically so that members of the public could not witness the illegal use of agent provocateurs.

The Murdoch crime family acted illegally along with other ‘news’ media barons to illegally try and… undermine my uncontested evidence in courts, about agent provocateurs, by trying to present that evidence, outside courts, as just some kind of gossip to put in their press releases, instead of being honest about what I had actually said while giving evidence… in a court. It was the agent provocateurs who grandstanded in the news media, saying what they could not and would not dare repeat on the witness stand in any court.

__________

***** I know it is also a legal certainty that Ambassador Rudd, Gillard and Mr Bandt, the federal Green Party MP for Melbourne, are never going to repeat…. political language using the expression ‘forced adoption’ (that is not a legal term and has no defined legal meaning) in any court, and particularly before a civil jury, because they have illegally been… misleading the public to hide my lawsuits in the UK that predated their adoption propaganda and are about being an… adoptee with our legal situations being different to that of our own families or the people who posed as our parents.

*** Our own family members are for example not stopped by an adoption court order from having the freedom to stand for election in federal politics without unlawful judicial interference.   ****

The same politicians like Rudd, the Murdoch crime family and Vitol Oil from when I got my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in 2008 did do a dodgy deal with Mr Bandt in 2010, that really hasn’t aged well when they were all on the same page in 2011 about Libya war and then adoption propaganda while I was in Parliament Square, Central London where they most certainly did not care about peaceful protesters, let alone the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy.  

**** I am an international citizen because I helped repeal the unlawful political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in Parliament Square, Central London… regardless of my race, religion, politics or none.

I only ‘swear allegiance’ to the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy, so I would always advocate a referendum enshrining the peace and harmony of the rule of law and a genuine direct democracy (where members of the public can vote on all legislation) in any Constitution, instead of the inequality of the institution of monarchy or whatever a republic cane be made to mean**** 

What the District Judge actually said to me at Bow Street Magistrates in what became CO/4002/2006 (which is not the version of any agreed case stated) where the prosecutor was a Tory MP !! called Grieve who became the Attorney General to try and cover up what was really and quite illogically said, that the District Judge tellingly refused to repeat for the ‘case stated’ in the High Court was I “SHOULD NOT AS A SINGLE (WORKING) PARENT BE SPENDING MY OWN MONEY COMING TO PARLIAMENT SQUARE, CENTRAL LONDON TO PROTEST AGAINST POLITICIANS“

The District Judge (Nicholas Evans) only dared to be so offensive when he said it (when I was on the witness stand I had to ask the District Judge if he was going to stop continually interrupting me as soon as I tried to speak, and let me speak or was he just going to keep trying to put words in my mouth) yet the District Judge was squeamish about repeating what he really said in the case stated which I propose to reform by setting a valuable precedent through settling my lawsuits.   

*****It was obviously unacceptable, the political message from an anything but independent judiciary, was my… taxes should only be used to pay politicians (like the Tory MP posing as the prosecutor) to go to the British Houses of Parliament and legislate whatever they and their wealthy mates like the Murdoch crime family wanted against members of the public*****

I could never have imagined that as the court records prove the original malicious prosecution against me could escalate so dramatically and in such an unexpected, but eye opening way (I was a ‘clean skin’ with no criminal record who didn’t just suddenly become a criminal and solely in Parliament Square, Central London) as the… Judiciary rounded the wagons to protect their own, so I was illegally refused legal representation for the second time in CO/4002/2006 (it was first illegally refused on 25th May 2006 when the government were illegally covering up the unlawful interference by “both houses and black rod” in what became CO/1193/2007) on 18th June 2007 after… a lawyer formally put in writing on 12th March 2007 that the District Judge (Nicholas Evans) was corrupt, which put me in huge danger because then the same District Judge (Nicholas Evans) went for me again on 26th March 2007 which resulted in the ‘landmark’ huge buck passing exercise between Crown Court and High Court Judges instead of them just acting responsibly and confirming judges had no ‘reasonable excuse’ to refuse making audiovisual recordings while at the same time using that as an excuse to falsely accuse members of the public.

***** In the landmark ‘Contempt of Court’ case about me in the UK, the High Court judges who usually love to wax lyrical about the minutest of detail, notably did not mention a single detail of how and why Brian Haw and I came to be in the Magistrates Court. Not a peep. 

Of course, the true legal reality is none of the judges had any jurisdiction to try anyone for an alleged Contempt of Court when the facts are disputed, because it is entirely the fault of courts, to refuse without reasonable excuse to make audiovisual recordings of court proceedings to avoid entirely foreseeable disputes. It is not the case that all judges can or should be trusted. Members of the public are legally entitled to a proper accurate and contemporaneous record of proceedings in all cases without needing to just place our trust in anyone else. No government can guarantee all judges can be trusted. A court is supposed to be some kind of a professional place. The Murdoch crime family certainly exploited the situation that eventually escalated to my being illegally imprisoned by the British Magistrates Courts, without legal representation or trial on a non imprisonable alleged offence !! that resulted in the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008.

I didn’t really care about how much the High Court might waffle on or pontificate from on high about anything, because what they could not get away with (or at least not very easily) was imprisoning me without legal representation or trial, because they do have recordings they do have to produce (and they don’t want people leapfrogging to the ECHR) We had to wait over four years for a recording in CO/11393/2007 from a Crown Court which was also unacceptable and was only produced when I complained about it… on the High Court record in 2011 in satellite litigation that no one thought I would mention, that then suddenly everyone feigned interest that it must be produced. If something was said on a High Court record it was only usually then it became problematic for the government)

It is notable that in all the years the battle over the repeal of the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation raged back and forth, the politicians, press and judiciary went all over the place with any and all sorts of…  excuses about banners and tents, that hid their real purpose was to stop… a group of people doing a 24/7 vigil so that people could share the responsibility. The government knew they could not legally stop a group of people doing a 24/7 vigil where the only difference with the one that had been outside South Africa House was ours was outside the British Houses of Parliament.

In 2012, the British Parliament only collected yet another High Court jury lawsuit from me, in my ‘walk on the wild side’ when they tried to use new legislation (in the PRSR Act 2011) to then claim my human body was a ‘structure’ that was illegal because it could be used for ‘staying’ in a public space ‘for a time’. It obviously still didn’t change that what they were really doing was illegally trying to ban a group of people doing a 24/7 campaign like they had in CO/4002/2006. The London human rights lawyers churlishly never congratulated me for the repeal of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 they had falsely claimed complied with the rule of law despite their… knowing it didn’t even have any due process. It was publicly recorded in court records that I did, unlike the ‘learned’ human rights lawyers (who were really apologists for Blair and by extension the Murdoch crime family and the Iraq War) the judges compared me to, refused to concede the legislation was compatible, which I am glad I did do. 

The Murdoch crime family were disgracefully endlessly spinning their Private Members ‘Parliament Square Management Bill 2011’ (through their Time/s Lord Marlesford) because my lawsuits stood in the way of their BSkyB deal. 

All of Westminster was only pretending to be challenging the Murdoch crime family in 2011 and 2012, while staying completely silent about their Private Members ‘Parliament Square Management Bill 2011’. 

This was the same Murdoch crime family that took the opportunity that British Magistrates Court refuse without reasonable excuse to make audiovisual recordings of court proceedings who had me literally kidnapped during live proceedings at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court in London, on 19th July 2007 to stop me going on the witness stand giving evidence and putting CCTV of their stalking me on the court record.

Of course, the Murdoch patriarch would never dare repeat a single word his Time(s) Lord was spewed forth on Hansard, he would not dare repeat under oath on the witness stand before a civil jury. It is untrue that politicians can say what they like on Hansard because of course saying what they like on Hansard does not in any way excuse them from having to appear in courts. 

I am the only person who also happens to be an adoptee the Murdoch crime family who are the global propagandists about adoption with their cult of celebrity, has illegally sought to legislate against in both Australia with the Adoption Act 1984 in Victoria, and the Private Members Parliament Square Management Bill in the British House of Lords in the UK.

(It was irrelevant to me when the monarchy jumped on the bandwagon too in 2010 (which was against misreported by the Murdoch crime family, because again, it didn’t change the fact that whether it was politicians, the monarchy or the Murdoch crime family (which it was mostly in my case) or all of them, they could not… legally stop a group of people… taking it in turns doing a 24/7 vigil)

The Russian government jumped on the bandwagon with the British government in the UK against us, (with the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ the British government illegally tried to ‘join’ us in legally proceedings with) because of course they did also make Blair the Middle Peace Envoy, so of course I complained when the Russian government contacted me in 2017 following Brexit and an American election, because they were apologists for Blair when they, as the Russian government… promoted the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ illegally used to take me to court. 

I don’t believe a single word the con-artist Bill Browder who while stashing his cash in British off-shore tax havens (imagine if ordinary people also did that) also tries to undermine… adoptees basic right to make our… own decisions. The whole political spin around adoptees and meetings at Trump Tower in the United States and so on and so forth has a very unpleasant political whiff about it, because it is for adult adoptees to make our own decisions, regardless of any government.

I don’t think politicians could legally put ‘tariffs’ on adoptees !!!! But we are treated as commodities that can be traded.

Anyway, the refusal by British and Australian politicians to hand over the CCTV that belongs to me, including in a timely manner that meant I was illegally stopped from making… my own decisions on how I wanted to progress the legal issues, does mean the Murdoch crime family, and British and Australian politicians are now clearly jointly and severally legally liable for all my medical costs… of my own choosing along with insurance cover including for travel. 

They were never going to hand over the CCTV to me because they knew any competent medical professional would… immediately know they intended to cause life threatening permanent harm to major organs.

 __________

I am saying the adoption court order clearly constitutes a false imprisonment that is also illegally being used as a punitive punishment by politicians who are also using it to illegally stop me living in my own home in Breizh, France, and standing in national and federal politics in the UK, Australia and even France.

_____________________________________

I originally mentioned in early January 2025, I was briefly delaying beginning medical treatment for a rare illness that I am trying to work through has no actual cure so the purpose of the medical treatment is to try to induce remission to try and preserve organ function. It is a lot for me to try and work through after and along with everything else. I should not be subjected to what is such prolonged stress by the consequences of adoption court order. 

(I knew when I was a small child, the whole adoption story was just endless lies, so because I sensibly never believed a single word of what I was being told, when I was growing up, all I really thought about, was trying to work out how I could… escape and find my own way home and move on with… my own life. That hasn’t really substantially changed, although there is obviously the sadness that I spoke about because I ‘suddenly’ lost my little sister I was raised separately from, exactly four years to the day, after I found her which was obviously something that did not suit the Murdoch crime family who don’t want me to have or be with my own family members. The last thing the Murdoch crime family wanted was the two sisters with the same parents, re-united.

People did say it was eerie how two sisters raised separately in completely different worlds could have the same mannerisms and expressions that were unique to us, as though it was our own private language. All I can say is my little sister always knew about the existence of me. It is inevitable that our paths would have crossed as teenagers, because she lived in Prahran and then I was living in Prahran, before I was then sent 12000 miles away as a teenager)
The brief delay in beginning medical treatment, was in the genuine hope on my part, that my truly transnational adoption case (that staff in the Australian High Commission in London said in 2011 was the only case of it’s kind when they told me, I hadn’t asked, they wrote reports for politicians, presumably to cover themselves) could be peacefully settled so I could focus on medical treatment and then as I also mentioned becoming a Nonna Donna, and if I chose to stand for election (but to at least guarantee that basic right for others)

Unfortunately you did not get back to me before I felt I had to begin the medical treatment without my adoption case being settled. I felt I could no longer delay the medical treatment. I guess the fact my body has physically been through so much (along with so much prolonged and entirely unnecessary stress, about the transnational adoption case) is more likely than not, part of the reason it has taken me so long to try and recover from the original diagnosis of transfusion dependent cancer (I mentioned I had nearly died around the corner from one of your offices) so a major operation that had not yet been planned had to suddenly be ‘expedited’ despite the complication of an anatomical anomaly etc etc, before I was then diagnosed with recurrent cancer before I had recovered from cancer, the first time around. The recent medical treatment as I was warned, it would, did make me feel really ill, because of course my body has not really had any time to properly recover from anything. The medical treatment also added to the problems by compromising my immune system and so of course because I am not living in my own home in Breizh, France and driving my own car, it has been really challenging to manage to try and protect myself, while living in the CBD, while of course being distressed every single day by being reminded the adoption court order really does constitute a false imprisonment and punitive punishment by politicians. There is no known offence I commit, in ditching the adoption court order, that politicians and courts have no legal standing or jurisdiction to refuse to officially acknowledge. 

The latest illness really remind me of how physically difficult it can be for me living in the Melbourne CBD if and when my immune system is going to be compromised. It is of course particularly problematic when I have to go to state agencies, who just want to harass me so they can tick a box, because unlike hospital visits etc where do actually try and help you, state agencies don’t give a toss about someone with a compromised immune system. It is very difficult.

In fact, the highly qualified and quite exceptional medical professionals at one of the cancer hospitals (that gave me part of the treatment for cancer) observed when there was a particular crisis situation they were trying to help me through, the trauma of my cancer and my adoption are so inextricably linked, I cannot expect to recover from the lifelong … trauma of the adoption overnight. And that was at a time I was dealing with a crisis about cancer !! 

They are correct, as other people have observed, it is very difficult because I have to relive the unresolved ongoing trauma of adoption every single day, as I have to repeatedly each and every single day, in so many human interactions, try to just advocate for and try and ensure I am at least referred to as me, Donna. It is simple for any government to just try and wear an adoptee down to make us give in to whatever they want which has nothing to do with what is best for an adoptee.

So, for the avoidance of doubt I am saying that I have legally ditched the adoption court order (it is not true that it is something I am “considering”)  that it is the responsibility of… politicians to officially acknowledge with a court certified copy of… acknowledgement. I am stating the obvious that I do not need the permission of politicians or courts to ditch the adoption court order from Victoria, Australia, that I was legally entitled to have acknowledged through my British civil jury lawsuits.  

I have considerable life experience, so I am sure that even the fact I currently feel so ill, and physical pain can in particular be very debilitating, and I am very much physically limited in what I could do at the moment, I could still only do a better job than politicians, primarily by peacefully settling all my civil jury lawsuits through the central focus on my British High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order dated 16th April 2008 from a Justice Owen so that I can make and guarantee valuable… precedents.