Hi,

Re: Rudd et al made it so I was not -safe- going to court in the UK. 

I hope this finds you well.

I am obviously the one and only “decision-maker” about what I would like to do about the adoption court order from Victoria, Australia, made when I was a minor.

My easily accessible peaceful ‘notification’ process to as an adult ditch an adoption court order made while I was a minor, delivers a sensible and -safe- option for people like me who were made an adoptee as a minor, to as an adult ‘officially’ ditch an adoption court order without needing to pay money to, or have the permission of or go to any court etc etc.

The easily accessible notification process of ditching an adoption court order (along with the legally unworkable accompanying ‘regulatory regime’ of adoption) means that someone made an adoptee as a minor can ‘officially’ notify -any- politician or public official (I only mention the irresponsible Rudd in my own case because it is what he should have put in place) who must provide a free court certified copy of the notification that is then included on the originating court register, to the adoptee along with a free court certified copy of the adoption court order (for our records) all without someone made an adoptee as a minor, needing to go to any court.

The very important legal point is -guaranteeing- that someone made an adoptee as a minor does not need to pay money to or have the permission of or go to any court to as an adult ditch an adoption court order. It is obviously not the case that all adoptees must in and all circumstances return indefinitely to an originating court.

_____________

The facts of my own transnational adoption case (352) that include:

a) I was sent 12000 miles away from Australia as a teenager, because I didn’t go along with being labelled ‘adopted’ or joining the government ‘agencies’ of the ‘public officials’ who posed as my parents and godparents.

(There is obviously, despite the personal opinions of a Mr Higgins, actually a -legal obligation- on politicians and public officials to not only notify people made adoptees as minors of the existence of an adoption -court order- made about us, just as anyone is legally entitled to know about a court order about them, but to provide everyone made adoptees as minors with court certified copies of the adoption court orders when we are adults.

My own adoption court order illegally erased my Celtic and Mediterranean origins.

It was when the people who posed as my parents etc discovered I was living in Mediterranean countries in 1984, long before 2013, that the legally unworkable Victorian Adoption Act 1984 was made based on me (in the same way the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 was based on Brian who I campaigned with in the UK, along with Steve Jago)

… of course everyone made adoptees as minors is legally entitled to a court certified copy of adoption court orders, courts are illegally refusing to hand over (not because anyone cares about our health and welfare) but to illegally stop our going to a court of our own choosing etc

I only have a photocopy of a court order in case 352, that I only first saw in July 2019 because the government is also cherry picking what information they hand over to adoptees.

I eventually worked out by myself that in my own case the government had illegally withheld my own parents marriage certificate from adoption records, when my parents who had nothing wrong and had formally asked for me back were not… notified of the… court hearing

The Adoption (Dis) Information Service have always illegally refused to hand over to me, by email, one single record, by email, of what they claim to have with regard to my adoption records. They exist solely to serve the personal interests of and follow orders from politicians, rather than serve the public interest and adoptees by upholding the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy.

The politicians have always put themselves in charge of investigating themselves when it is about adoption.

b) before I was forced to sell my own home in the UK, and move to Breizh, France, because I was not -safe- going to court in the UK, over my British High Court jury lawsuits, because of my adoption

The unlawful ‘trial by media’ of me in the UK did try to irrevocably harm my reputation as a… law abiding member of the public.

(the problem was Rudd et al were apart from also being paid off to hide the political scandal about the unlawful political interference of “both houses and black rod” in the UK, in CO11393/2007 etc were also -hiding- politicians and public officials have illegally been refusing to hand over court certified copies of adoption court orders to all adoptees

Rudd is obviously not going to stand in any court, let alone before a jury and repeat the political language of ‘forced adoption’ that is not a recognised legal term in any court unlike ‘false imprisonment’ which is a recognised legal term that does reflect what adoption court orders can constitute.

I do after all know something about ‘false imprisonment’ because I also have a British High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 because I was illegally imprisoned during the London Mayoral –elections– based on a false and malicious and non imprisonable s5 Public Order allegation made by… a politician, a Sir Alan Duncan to distract and deflect from CO/11393/2007 when politicians including all the Mayoral candidates from the Labour (Livingstone) Tory (Johnson) and Liberal Democrat (Paddick) political parties, were illegally withholding documents from that case that only began to be disclosed after 3rd March 2009)

It is a matter of fact that if you know -who- did what, and when, in CO/11393/2007 (that any politician, political party or government et al has always had access to in the British High Court) then you know why and how people like Johnson and Starmer became Prime Ministers in the UK:

CO/11393/2007 became HQ12Xo1972 etc because I was actually unlawfully arrested etc:

I was just no longer -safe- going to court because we were being violently unlawfully ‘arrested’ etc whenever I went to court about my own jury lawsuits.

c) before being forced to indefinitely leave my own home overseas in Breizh, France, to return to the originating court, in Victoria, Australia, to try and peacefully resolve the legal quagmire that is entirely the making of politicians et al

d) including during what then became a global pandemic (when I was illegally stopped by the Australian government from going back to my home when they falsified state and federal records to falsely claim I also owned property in Australia) before I was then

e) diagnosed with recurrent cancer, needing a major emergency operation because the cancer was transfusion dependent, before needing further onerous medical treatment when the cancer returned

(it was only when I was diagnosed with recurrent cancer when it returned early in 2023 that state and federal records that falsely claimed I also owned property in Australia were amended because a public official wrote a statutory declaration for me when I was seriously ill

….politicians have also illegally been refusing to notify all adoptees who were affected by the use of the DES cancer causing drug)

(the failure to actually give a person made an adoptee as a minor, a court certified copy of an adoption court order breaches, not just human rights, but the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy that is supposed to have checks and balances and safeguards for all adoptees too)

I personally advocate for an International -Court- of Human Rights that would strengthen the ECHR and so on along with having International Civil Courts that are actually for civilians, because the UN is just for governments.

f) before more recently being diagnosed with a rare systemic illness that has no cure (and could have been triggered by the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK that was about illegally trying to stop me standing for democratic election anywhere) where after a year of medical treatment that has not worked, during which I was also illegally stopped from having the same freedom politicians do to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia (because of the corrupt ‘regulatory regime’ attached to adoption) the specialists have’ cross-referred me to another specialist to see if there are any other medical treatments available for me in Australia etc etc.

g) during which time I was as you know contacted in 2025 by a French politician who told me about the Watergate-esque burglary and squatting of my own home in Breizh, France, that could only happen because of the legally unworkable ‘regulatory regime’ about adoption.

Of course, I should have been able to ditch the adoption court order from the -safety- of my own home in Breizh, France.

(there is first and foremost a legal obligation to provide people made adoptees as minors, with court certified copies of our adoption court orders when we are adults, so that we can make our own decisions about whether or not as an adult we want to a) continue with an adoption court order and b) therefore remain subject to wholly arbitrary and legally unworkable ‘regulatory regime’ about adoption based whatever may happen to be the whims of the day of politicians et al that is all entirely -separate- from any relationship with family members or people who pose as family members)

There are unfortunately cynical political and media narratives that irresponsibly try and continue to use all sorts of emotional blackmail on people made adoptees as minors to try and stop our as adults pursuing -legal avenues- against… government about legally unworkable ‘regulatory regimes’ about adoption.

highlight politicians and public officials have consistently across all political administrations ignored the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy when it comes to people made adoptees as minors, because they have never and don’t care about the health and welfare of all adoptees.

_______________________
_______________________

I don’t personally care abut whether or not politicians care about any adoptee. I care about politicians and public officials ignoring the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy that means I was not -safe- going to court in the UK etc etc.

I am legally entitled to have a portable Disability Support Pension without needing to share my personal and sensitive medical information (that I do share with medical health professionals treating me) with any politicians, government departments or their contractors, until my jury lawsuits from the UK that I do not need to duplicate in Australia, are peacefully settled. It would be libellous to suggest I have done anything wrong.

I was not -safe- when politicians and public officials illegally leaked my personal information I did not (by notifying according to politicians ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation) give them permission to do in the UK in what they used to begin the highly unusual ‘trial by media’ of me there to try and irrevocably harm my reputation as a law abiding member of the public.

The Australian politicians, public officials and press, who routinely sue each other for libel/defamation have never faced the very serious irreparable physical and emotional harm caused to me in the UK by the highly unusual ‘trial by media’ of me that really was trying to harm my reputation as a law abiding member of the public. It was a highly unusual ‘media strategy’ to use a ‘trial by media’ of me in the UK to repeatedly unlawfully arrest me (including to intimidate me etc) so that politicians and the press could publish whatever they liked while I was illegally detained.

The refusal of politicians, public officials and courts to hand over to everyone who was made an adoptee as a minor, in Australia, a court certified copy of our adoption court orders so that we can make our own adult decisions about that has created an anomalous legal situation/put in place a sequence of events, that in my own case resulted in my not being -safe- to go to the British High Court in the UK over my unprecedented jury lawsuits there.

I was peacefully opposing one legislative deceit in the UK (I helped repeal) while essentially having my hands tied behind my back (sometimes literally) by different deceitful legislation about adoption in Victoria, Australia.

I was very definitely not -safe- with the corrupt politician called Livingstone (below) when he was a Mayor of London plotting his lying part in a “media strategy” behind our backs (that Johnson had illegally withheld in CO/11393/2007 that he only disclosed in how own omni-shambles in 2010 that illegally sought to ‘overtake’ us when he posed as a ‘Queen’s counsel/Mackenzie friend’ because they could not produce their latest Attorney General because he was hiding he was the prosecutor in the original malicious prosecution against me)

or when a Leader of Westminster Council, Barrow was plotting his “media strategy” in February 2011 in HQ11X00563 (that was also part of CO/11393/2007 they were illegally trying to overtake when people working in Westminster Council told me in March 2012, the entire budget in their -legal department- was being spent on trying to illegally ‘sidestep’ a financial settlement)

The lying Leader of Westminster Council Barrow admitted to me, in front of American TV (above) he had no legal grounds to take me to court, so they could never produce him in court in what was a continuation of a ‘trial by media’ of me in the UK.

I wasn’t -safe- going to the -public space- of a court in the UK:

I proved with my SOCPA Notification on 3rd March 2006, that it didn’t matter if you notified or didn’t notify or had one banner for one hundred days or one hundred banners for one day or were in Parliament Square, or outside Downing Street, with or without a tent, etc etc which is why I then withdrew my SOCPA Notification in 2007 because I was violently attacked more, because the government had illegally -hidden- my SOCPA Notification in the UK:

The trial by media of me in the UK, began on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 when Blair was grandstanding with politicians in Victoria, Australia while trying to -hide- my SOCPA Notification in the UK:

The revolving doors of ‘jobs for mates’ posing as some kind of politics that is incompatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy, saw the British public continue to pay for Blair to grandstand as the Middle East Peace Envoy in the same way the revolving doors of ‘jobs for mates’ saw the next British PM Brown appoint a Lord Malloch Brown as a peer (and unelected Lord for hire) as a government… minister who had no members of the public in any constituency of his either:

The UN have never been friends of people made ‘adoptees’ as minors, with all their vulgar grandstanding promoting the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family’s ‘cult of celebrity’ who treat adoptees as the latest ‘must have’ accessory to get free publicity.

(A Lord Malloch-Brown was another ‘Lord for hire’ also on the payroll of Vitol when they were all part of the political scandal about the unlawful political interference of “both houses and black rod” in CO/11393/2007 that saw another Lord for hire, Lord Marlesford from the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family illegally bring the Private Members Bill against me in the British House of Lords because CO/11393/2007 etc also stood in the way of their BSkyB deal)

I didn’t personally notice any difference in the UK between Lord Malloch-Brown and the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family ?:

I am not the only person who can think of many reasons why the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family might prefer to be talking about ‘stolen elections’ in the United States, rather than in for example the UK or Australia:

To be honest, I would not personally want to share my personal information with any private company/contractor running election machines for -any- government.

My personal view is the ‘disinformation’ campaign against me in the UK was to be honest, far worse, because it sought to irrevocably harm my reputation as…. a law abiding member of the public.

It is a matter of fact, the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family’s very own ‘racketeering’ Rudd now posing as the Australian Ambassador to the United States falsely claimed in 2020, that he also opposed Murdoch, in that case to specifically distract from my jury lawsuits in the UK that also involve Murdoch:

The same revolving doors of ‘jobs for mates’ posing as some kind of politics that is incompatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy, has seen the ‘racketeering’ Rudd appointed as the Australian Ambassador to the United States so he is not answerable to any -elected- constituency of members of the public.

_________________________
_________________________

I am legally entitled to, and it is a priority for me, to not only feel but actually be safe because I was not safe going to the British High Court over my jury lawsuits, because the now Australian Ambassador Rudd was while the Australian PM/FM/PM laundering his ‘hush money’ through Ingeus in the UK (in particular in 2013 while politicians in Australia were grandstanding with the political language of ‘forced adoption’ that Rudd has always known in not a recognised leal term he could use in any court, including before a jury. 

__________________________
__________________________

An adoption is a very serious legal matter that politicians, and public officials have been acting very disrespectfully about with their political language like ‘forced adoptions’ that in not being a recognised legal term in any court, is only trying to deflect from, downplay and minimise the continuing very serious legal issues of adoption court orders that do constitute ‘false imprisonment’ that is by contrast a recognised legal term in courts.   

Notes:

I just did the right thing when as an ordinary adult member of the public, I peacefully campaigned against a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the UK in ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005. 

I helped repeal ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 because the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the UK, obviously had no logical connection to serious organised crime.

The evidence is I acted in good faith when I notified according to the deceitful legislation in the UK, and in so doing, proved there was no due process, that then resulted in my accumulating an extraordinary number of unprecedented British High Court jury lawsuits, that are inextricably linked to my transnational adoption case. 

The Australian politicians et al had put in place “a sequence of events” whereby what is called my adoption put my life at risk. This is because politicians, public officials and courts, are illegally withholding court certified copies of adoption court orders from all adoptees, to stop people like myself, who were made adoptees as minors making our own informed choices and decisions as adults, to ditch an adoption court order, including through if/where necessary jury lawsuits.  

The politicians, public officials and courts have always been legally obliged to provide all adoptees with court certified copies of our adoption court orders.

The British politicians et al did act with serious malice when they illegally leaked my adopted identity in a highly unusual ‘trial by media’ of me in the UK, to illegally try and hide !! I had notified (as per ss 132-138 of SOCPA 2005) as they sought to deflect from what became my British High Court jury lawsuits that included my Libel Claim. 

The torture and attempted murder of me that happened in UK was intended to illegally try and stop my standing for democratic election in politics… anywhere.

The British Crown Prosecution Service also jumped on board with what became a Libel Claim from me in CO/11393/2007 that became HQ12X02745 etc, because they were among much trying to cover up two CPS lawyers had of their own volition come forward as witnesses for me etc etc when I was originally tortured in August 2006 and then tortured again when I left court on 9th July 2007 after they appeared for me. 

My transnational adoption case proves people made adoptees are legally entitled to not only feel, but be safe, that means not having to go to any court to ditch an adoption court order.

A kinder evolution is possible.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat

(Formerly known as Babs Tucker)