Hi,

I hope this finds you well.

(N.B: I am pretty sure that I have taken all reasonable efforts -generally speaking- recently -and not just today- to serve my Commonwealth Statutory Declaration etc on the ‘civil servants’ Mr Rudd and Mr David Epstein)

This constitutes confirmation of service on Mr Kevin ‘Hush Money’ Rudd & Mr David Epstein of my Commonwealth Statutory Declaration & Public Interest Disclosure & addendum including Universal Jurisdiction over the repeated torture and then torture and attempted murder of me in the UK to illegally try and stop my British High Court jury lawsuits etc (refer: adoption court order 28 May 1963, Case 352, County Court, Victoria, Australia, CO11393/2007 incl Libel Claim 2008 & HQ12X01972, HQ12X02745, HQ12X03564, HQ13X0344 etc) & my standing for democratic election anywhere.

My own identity of Donna along with my Celtic Mediterranean heritage, that is all important to me, were illegally ‘officially’ erased and replaced with the adopted identity of Barbara that was imposed on me.

1. I reasonably believe it is legal for me to ditch an adoption court order using a Commonwealth Statutory Declaration without needing to go through the additional trauma of any court proceedings or the unrelenting political persecution, that only constitutes “punishment” that is “not prescribed by law” because I haven’t do anything -wrong-.
   
   It is politicians and ‘civil servants’ like Rudd et al who mislead the public, who have a legal duty to acknowledge I have legally ditched the adoption court order.

2. **** My position is, I am legally entitled to a portable Disability Support Pension without needing to share my personal and sensitive medical information (that I do share with medical professionals/specialists treating me) with any government, government agency, or private contractor, until such time as my British High Court jury lawsuits, that include a very serious -libel- claim, all of which I have long maintained I should not have to duplicate in Australia, including because it involves the same politicians, political parties, public officials and press etc in both countries, is peacefully settled -because- I have not and have never done anything… wrong ****

3. The British and Australian governments have never had any recognised defence in law to even put before any jury.

4. It would be libellous/defamatory (that would attract a civil -jury- trial) to suggest -I- have or could do anything “wrong” in refusing to share my personal and sensitive medical information, in any circumstances, including with regard to a portable Disability Support Pension.

I find it quite extraordinary that politicians, public officials and the press in Australia do spend a considerable amount of time suing -each other- over their reputations supposedly being harmed in some way, that does not come anywhere close to my own ‘lived experience’ as a law abiding member of the public, being repeatedly unlawfully arrested to really try and harm my reputation as a law abiding civilian, while -also- running a ‘trial by media’ against me, in the UK, to illegally try and side-step civil jury trials.

——————-

I do think it is unlawful for politicians to mislead the public, as to the legal rights all people made adoptees as minors have, to as adults, make our -own- choices and informed decisions. This includes our choice of legal avenues, should we wish for our own personal and private reasons, to ditch an adoption court order made while we were minors, that also means being -free- from a legally unworkable and oppressive ‘regulatory regime’ arbitrarily imposed by politicians. I would not personally, under any circumstances, as an adult, sign up to be ‘adopted’ and therefore also be subject to the political whims of any old accompanying ‘regulatory regime’ that could always change.

The “government official”/’Agent Orange’ and the “public servant”/ ‘Company manager’ who posed as my parents (and obviously falsified court records that I only first saw photocopies of in July 2019):

They did make a witnessed confession of sorts:

I was sent 12000 miles away to the UK as a teenager, because I refused to: a) go along with what I understood by then was an adoption racket -or- b) join the intelligence services, because I just wanted to move on with my own life. The man who posed as my father was trained by Anthony Blunt, before he recruited Barnett who posed as my godfather, and so on and so forth which was the same for my late adopted brother. Barnett was the Director General of ASIO at the time the Orwellian ‘regulatory regime’ of Adoption in Victoria was enacted in 1984 (when ASIO was still in Victoria) while they knew I was living in Mediterranean countries, without knowing my Mediterranean origins, because my own identity was illegally “officially” erased, so he did definitely know the ‘regulatory regime’ was “punishment” that is “not prescribed by law”.

(It is a matter of fact, the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family trafficked me as small child to the highest echelons of the British and Australian intelligence services. It is of course well known that it is relatively common in numerous countries, for adoptees to be handed over to government officials of one kind or another)

It is unlawful for politicians to continue to refuse to provide -all- adoptees with a court certified copy of adoption court orders so that each and every person who was made an adoptee as a minor, can make their own individual and informed decisions as an adult.

The politicians and public officials also still refuse to this day to inform all adoptees who were affected by the DES cancer causing scandal that is very distressing.

The term ‘adoptee’ covers what is a very wide range of what politicians call ‘adoptions’. The politicians cannot just continue to try and lump all adoptees together, because each and every person is an individual who has their own equally valid personal story, that should never actually continually be reduced to and defined as ‘adoptee’ that means different things to different ‘adoptees’ anyway.

My personal view is that being an adoptee is something people should only be able to choose to do when able to give informed consent as an adult, because a -court order- of indeed any kind, is such a very significant and serious matter, as is any accompanying ‘regulatory regime’. I would never have agreed to an adoption court order under any circumstances, because it is not as a starting point, the kind of thing, I would ever want, but I respect that other people have different views about what they want for themselves. The important legal point is that any adoptee needs to actually have a -genuine- choice.

There are no legal grounds for politicians including Attorney General Departments to introduce the political language of ‘forced adoption’ that is not a recognised legal term in courts, to try and distract from adoption court orders that can constitute false imprisonment that is a recognised legal term.

The former Australian PM’s Rudd & Gillard are not going to go to court to argue that ‘forced adoption’ is a legally recognised term, so they are disrespectful and tone-deaf, towards very serious legal issues involving adoptees.

In summary and in no particular order:

The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family (refer the unlawful political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime Act 2005 in the UK, that I helped repeal) supported an unremarkable Rudd as the Australian ‘Kevin 07’ PM, because he was a useful cog in the wheel of their BSkyB aspirations. That was because Rudd could launder ‘hush money’ from British government ‘contracts’ through Ingeus in the UK, without it raising suspicion, as long as they could illegally stop my British High Court jury lawsuits. The Murdoch patriarch similarly installed the unelected Lord Mandelson who he had summoned in the summer of 2008 (refer Yacht-gate) as a Business Minister because he didn’t have anything tiresome like a public constituency of voters.

I never really felt -safe- after the ‘trial by media’ of me began, on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 in the UK (while Blair was grandstanding with Australian politicians in Victoria:

The ‘trial by media’ of me in… the UK, was part of illegally trying to stop my jury lawsuits that a) not only unravel the political scandal of “both houses and black rod” but would highlight the regulatory regimes of adoption that are “punishment” that is “not prescribed by law” including because I do not have the same freedom politicians do to stand for democratic election in federal politics… in Australia (because of the whole ‘permission’ routine surrounding adoption and s44 of the not so Australian Constitution about dual nationals)

They were also trying to cover up I did act in good faith and notify as per ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, but there was just no due process, if the government was disputing a notification, before any arrest, charge or prosecution through the criminal justice system, so I was repeatedly unlawfully arrested while the government tried to deny the -existence- of my notification (and that it was agreed on 26th March 2006, that I had a jury lawsuit).

**** I have never ever felt -safe- again going into any government building ever again, after this ‘stranger danger’ in what became my HQ12X02475 from 4th September 2006****

I am entitled to not only feel safe, but be -safe- going into a government building.

It was repeated !! exactly four years later, on 4th September 2009. They have always illegally just withheld that CCTV because it was obviously impossible to explain the torture and attempted murder of me that they wanted to limit to a civil suit that I refused to do because I am not a doormat, and I need to not only feel, but -be- safe:

I do not have the luxury of just being able to wake up one day being able to say, it was all just a bad nightmare that gave me PTSD etc.

I haven’t done anything… wrong.

There was the increasing use from the Blair era onwards of unelected peers from the British House of Lords (that Blair ‘reformed’ to increase the ability of corruption to flourish) as Ministers despite their having no public constituency. A Baroness Amos was another one who was a Minister and British Ambassador to Australia (when both governments were illegally covering up the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK) before she joined Rudd at an International Institute of Peace which was as ridiculous as Blair being a Middle East Peace Envoy. The ‘International Institute of Peace’ looks like another organisation that recycles money from governments through the same old “jobs for mates” clubs when they are no longer elected.

________________

I did not provide personal information to the government, to fulfil the requirements of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (now repealed) that was copied to the Cabinet Office, so that my adopted identity could then illegally be ‘leaked’ to the press for their ‘trial by media’.

(I think it is highly unlikely that anything Rudd has done could be called an independent ‘non-profit) There was the increasing use from the Blair era onwards of unelected peers from the British House of Lords (that Blair ‘reformed’ to increase the ability of corruption to flourish) as Ministers despite their having no public constituency. A Baroness Amos was another one who was a Minister and British Ambassador to Australia (when both governments were illegally covering up the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK) before she joined Rudd at an International Institute of Peace which was as ridiculous as Blair being a Middle East Peace Envoy. The ‘International Institute of Peace’ looks like another organisation that recycles money from governments through the same old “jobs for mates” clubs when they are no longer elected. A Baroness Scotland was another person who while in the unelected Lords, became a government Minister and Attorney General (before also becoming a Secretary General of the far from Commonwealth)

The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family supported the unremarkable Rudd as the Kevin o7 Australian PM, because as he knew, he was useful to them because whether it was a) the political scandal of “both houses and black rod” or b) about adoption, they did not want a civil -jury- anywhere near either, in the British High Court.

The only thing Rudd was focused on when he was the Australian PM/FM/PM was laundering money through Ingeus in the UK:

3rd March 2009 & 31st March 2009:

I think they probably hoped we would never notice/find the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006 that was illegally withheld until between 3rd & 3oth March 2009:

After I was on the witness stand in Johnson’s omni-shambles on 21st June 2010 where he was still trying to illegally ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007, while trying to deflect from what he had done to me and his own involvement, in “both houses” he was disclosing what Livingstone had also been doing behind our backs that Livingstone did not deny. They were -all- trying to illegally swerve around CO/11393/2007 because it didn’t;t matter if you had one banner for 100 days or one hundred banners for one day, it was all about unlawfully banning all peaceful freedom of expression:

In fact, my own research discovered that parliamentary hansard from the British House of Lords, on 23rd May 2000 showed there was a bipartisan political agreement by politicians acting in bad faith, to illegally ban peaceful freedom of expression, before 9/11, the War on Terror, Iraq War and 23rd May 2006:

I was forced to leave the UK when I filed the above on 8th April 2013 because it was simply no longer -safe- for me to go to court.

****The Australian Ambassador to the United States, and former Australian PM/FM/PM Rudd has always abused his various public offices to cover up the repeated torture, and then torture and attempted murder of me in the UK on his watch, when by no co-incidence, his partner just happened to suddenly become one of the wealthiest women in Australia, by laundering ‘hush money’ from government contracts in the UK through Ingeus****

______

I currently live in the Melbourne CBD, so what would really be great, from my point of view, is if the former British and Australian PM’s, Rudd & Johnson (the torture and attempted murder of me happened on their watch as Mayor of London etc and Australian PM) were permanently banned from entering this designated area “unless attending court” (I was illegally banned from attending any court in a designated area on 21st December 2021) that also includes our special ‘secret garden’, and some other lovely parks and gardens.

One of the really nice things about living in the central Melbourne area (although of course, for me, nothing beats the peace and harmony of the area my own cottage in Breizh, France is in) is that you can walk as far as you can manage and catch a tram, bus or train back, or vice-versa, depending on what is going on in the City of twinkling lights. That has really helped me in my own efforts to try and recover from everything connected to the recurrent cancer diagnosis, and to try and do my best with the more recent diagnosis of a rare and debilitating systemic illness (that can mimic and increase risks of cancer) that has no cure, and does not yet have any medical treatment that works for me, in this country. It is possible the rare illness was triggered by extreme violence.

One criticism of facilities in the City of Melbourne, is politicians who spent millions re-furbishing a rather lovely State Library were then extraordinarily disrespectful towards people with mobility issues. They failed to provide any direct access for people with mobility issues, to a very many thousands of books on a mezzanine level in the Redmond Barry Reading Room, that is inexcusable and spoils the experience.

I miss living in my own home in the autonomous region of Breizh, in France, where I did feel safe, and there were not many politicians.

________

The British Crown Prosecution Service compounded the very serious physical and emotional harm being caused to me, when in 2008, in the midst of very serious legal proceedings in CO/11393/2007, about the British government, where the CPS had without our knowledge at that time also illegally withheld documents about the unlawful political interference of “both houses and black rod” in our campaigning, openly jumped on the ‘trial by media’ bandwagon and published a quite an extraordinarily libellous ‘hit piece’ of their own that was seriously libellous, and an unconscionable thing for a prosecuting authority to do. The CPS were eventually forced to remove their libellous ‘hit-piece’ but without reaching a financial settlement because they were still one of numerous government agencies illegally withholding legal documents, some of which began to be disclosed after a hearing on 18th November 2009, after 3rd March 2009. The CPS had also illegally withheld from public knowledge the fact that the prosecutor in the original malicious prosecution of me over the legislative deceit I helped repeal in the UK, was actually a Tory MP, Mr Grieve which was what the latest British PM Starmer leveraged to become DPP etc (because his Doughty Chambers were counsel) that while still hidden from the public, enabled Grieve to also become Attorney General where he continued with an undeclared conflict of interest, to oppose British Magistrates Courts having audio/audio visual recordings.

The political scandal over the unlawful political interference of “both houses and black rod” was obviously far larger than the Leveson spin over royals and the cult of celebrity who totally rely on the news media:

The Australian Senator McGrath and Mr David Epstein were both Chief’s of Staff to politicians in the UK and Australia around the same time. In the case of McGrath he was Chief of Staff to Johnson when he was Mayor of London, a Telegraph journalist and boss of top cops, with numerous undeclared conflicts of interest, at the same time a Mr David Epstein was Chief of Staff to Rudd when I was also illegally imprisoned without legal representation or trial on a non-imprisonable S5 Public Order allegation made by a (Vitol) Tory MP, Sir Alan Duncan, during the London Mayoral election which is why I have a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from April 16th 2008 (part of HQ12X02745 etc)

A Mr Huhne was concerned how he could explain what was said when he sat next to me on 7th February 2007 at Channel Four.

A Mr Clements from the Special Crime Division of the CPS, in the UK, sometimes used the name Ms Narbett. It turned out the CPS had joined the MPA, IPCC and DPS illegally withholding the “both houses and black rod” documents that were only released after 3rd March 2009 in CO/11393/2007:

Another former (Labour) Mayor of London Livingstone was -recorded- lying to me, in 2007 in what became CO/11393/2007 (& HQ12X02475 etc) about what we later discovered was the unlawful political interference of “both houses and black rod” that he did know about.

The fmr Mayor of London, Livingstone illegally covered up this violent attack on me when I was punched in the head by a male, who politicians (and specifically Livingstone) refused to identify:

The “jobs for mates” posing as some kind of politics that is incompatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy always put themselves and their own self interest and political parties before law abiding civilians.

Rudd was always around in the UK when bad things were being done to me such as in April 2008 and in October 2009, when Steve Jago had to ring the Australian Foreign Affairs Department (DFAT) when I was illegally being held because I was demanding the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me:

DFAT contacted me while I was illegally detained (and I had already asked for a copy of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me to be given to the Australian High Commissioner before 7th October 2009) but DFAT illegally failed to ensure I had… access to legal representation, so yet again the British government would not hand over the CCTV, thanks to Rudd.

The British “both houses and black rod” Parliament:

Another widely disseminated part of the ‘trial by media’ of me unfolding above.

This became HQ12X03564 & then HQ13X0344 (because City of London Police in background in January 2012, were then also involved in April 2013) in the relentless very serious intimidation etc used to stop me safely going to court in my High Court jury lawsuits:

The British High Court descended into designed chaos, when I produced this as the transcript shows on 21st June 2010 (after it had been given to me on 18th June 2010 and not by the government in any disclosures as it should have been)

A Tory Leader of Westminster Council, the ‘barrow boy’ who was also recorded lying about me on American television in HQ11X00563 etc in the whole distressing ‘trial by media’ of me resigned in January 2012 at a time I had not agreed to a ‘stay’:

I can’t really relate to politicians, public officials and the press in Australia often suing each other for libel/defamation over whatever they claim their reputations is, to generate press headlines, because it is so different from my own lived experience as a law abiding civilian who never actively sought out any publicity, yet was subjected to a highly unusual ‘trial by media’ that led to torture and attempted murder of me to stop me ever standing for democratic election in politics… anywhere.

The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family publicly solicited/incited the torture and attempted murder of me on Sky News Live in the UK in 2009, and when that failed actually had the nerve to get their Lord for hire from the Times Newspaper when the Murdoch patriarch was a Director along with zero intelligence Scarlett to illegally bring a private members bill against me in the unelected British House of Lords in 2011, all during CO/11393/2007 etc:

The former British PM Blair was essentially the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family’s shonky ‘reputational’ lawyer, as are indeed the rest of a clique of phoney ‘human rights’ lawyers like Starmer et al in London who are apologists for and actually hide behind the former PM Blair who used to hide behind the former top cop Blair.

The former Australian PM/FM/PM Rudd has illegally misled the Australian public, he was part of illegally trying to stop my British High Court -jury- lawsuits going ahead.

It was truly horrific and very badly re-traumatised me, when I had to go on the witness stand on 21st June 2010 in the British High Court -because- of what Rudd was hiding so he could keep on collecting his ‘hush money’ being laundered through Ingeus in the UK.

Brian and I were illegally ‘remitted’ back to the High Court in 2010-2011 as politicians continued to illegally try and overtake our different CO/11393/2007 etc including by also illegally using an undercover operation including Australians (A Sir Ken Jones had been sent to Victoria Police in Australia -after- the High Court hearing in the UK on 18th November 2008, so he could continue to co-ordinate undercovers in the UK, that included people who identified themselves as Australians, as the cover up over “both houses and black rod” etc continued.

The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family et al, repeated the BBC who illegally edited and published audio to hide the unlawful use of agent provocateurs/’influencers’ (including Australian) to arrest me which was intended to pervert the course of justice:

Brian and I were illegally held for thirty hours, so the Mayor of London Johnson could go running to the High Court to invent something against us -before- we were released and were able put the actual footage from 25th May 2010 in our… CO/11393/2007.

I was illegally imprisoned twice in Holloway Prison, through the Magistrates Courts without legal representation and trial because they have no recordings so no-one knows what happened (the first time in April 2008 which is when I got the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 and then in August 2011 after Brian died in Germany and the British government were covering up the illegal use of agent provocateurs including Australians after they couldn’t find a way to imprison me through the High Court because it does have audio recordings

It was inevitable that the refusal of politicians to have audio recordings in the British Magistrates Courts would lead to a District Judge making a false and malicious allegation of Brian and I committing a contempt of court on Monday 26th March 2007 so one year after Mothers Day 2006 that became a ‘landmark’ sidestep in a Contempt of Court case about us in CO/5019/2007 in the High Court over what happened.

On 26th March 2007 Westminster Magistrates Court had refused to hand over copies of summons to me that had illegally been issued on Friday 23rd March 2007, for a hearing on the Monday 26th March 2007 -after- Brian and I had attended the same court to ask for summons against the two Blair’s (the PM and top cop) The court had eventually agreed to issue a summons against the top cop “first” that then became CO/11393/2007 in the High Court, when the actual case was really against… both Blairs because the PM had also misled the public about ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 etc etc)

The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family’s Times newspaper inevitably does not give an accurate account of what happened on 21st June 2010 (where no-one had mentioned the involvement of the monarch/y until I did)

Grieve couldn’t show his face ‘on behalf’ of the monarch/y because the government and Starmer were hiding that the prosecutor in the original malicious prosecution of me was actually the Tory MP Grieve:

(The British monarchy did not actually even show any interest in any part of Parliament Square, Central London, until February 2008)

Grieve was the prosecutor in the original malicious prosecution of me (that obviously Starmer knew while at the DPP in their double act:

The Attorney General had an undeclared conflict of interest (there is no real separation of powers)

Doughty Chambers essentially accused a Judge of being corrupt while ‘side-stepping’ what Grieve had done:

Starmer’s Doughty Chambers was horse-trading with my… life !!

There could never have been any dispute if the British Magistrates Court had audio/audio visual recordings.

My personal view is all state and federal top cops and all state and federal judges need to be elected by members of the public so they have some actual public constituency and are not just political appointees.

I guess it’s possible the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’Family may actually have hired the shonky lawyer and former British PM Blair (who was made the Middle East Peace Envoy when he could not even make peace with we peace campaigners) to push forward with the Lisbon Treaty (that Brown was then late signing on 13th December 2007 that is the same day Steve Jago and I won a decisive legal victory in the UK, that became HQ12X02745) so they could use it to try and leverage the BSkyB deal, that my jury lawsuits then also stood in the way of.

I had astonishingly or shockingly been kidnapped from inside a court -during- live proceedings at Lavender Hill Magistrates Court in south London, on 19th July 2007, to stop me giving evidence in another case involving the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family and armed police curiously attached to the former British PM Blair, from an incident when I was minding my own business, in January 2007, because no-one wanted the very odd CCTV, I only saw that day entered on the court record.

The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family then incited on Sky News Live, on 19th July 2009, (so exactly two years after I was kidnapped fro a court during court proceedings) the torture and attempted murder of me that anyone who knew about CO/11393/2007 which was the whole of Westminster would know what was going on (that the BBC… repeated !!) etc etc.

Of course, it is unlikely the British monarch/y would have wanted me to go to the ECHR either:

(In my case however, it was always someone from the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family who seemed to be stalking me/hanging around whenever I turned around. They had disgustingly sent down a Times journalist one night around midnight in 2007, to ask Brian if they could write his obituary !!)

The politicians et al are being polite about Rudd, because he is, like Blair, more like one of the Murdoch patriarch’s bitches.

The same old media cycle because of course Mr Rudd was the PM of Australia -twice- when he certainly did not want even an Inquiry in Australia, and certainly did not want my High Court jury lawsuits in the UK:

Then after I was forced to return in July 2019 to try and progress resolving the problems with adoption so I could get on with my own life in Breizh, France, I was stopped from leaving Australia and going home during the global pandemic

I then later discovered state and federal government departments in Australia, had illegally falsified state and federal records to falsely claim I owned property in Australia, that were only amended when a public official wrote a statutory declaration for me when I was seriously ill with cancer the second time/the recurrent cancer diagnosis in early 2023. I don’t feel safe when people can also just falsify my records and it is never investigated how that happened, despite the serious harms and losses it caused me. I was released by one hospital because I now know they thought I owned a home here, only for me to nearly die when the cancer haemorrhaged, and became transfusion dependent, so I had to have an emergency major operation etc etc. I have never had the time and space to try and process that trauma. It was a health professional who identified the trauma of my adoption (that does not make me -safe-) is inextricably linked to the trauma of the recurrent cancer diagnosis etc etc.

The Australian government are intentionally trying to make it impossible for me to recover from the trauma.

Then when I was quite rightly complaining that I do not have the same freedom politicians do to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia, because of a ‘regulatory regime’ about adoption (that has no logical connection to elections) that constitutes “punishment” that is “not prescribed by law” I was then contacted by a French politician about the Watergate-esque burglary and squatting of my home in Breizh, France. I explained to the French politician it was only able to happen because I have illegally been stopped from ditching the adoption court order while living in what was the safety of my own home in Breizh, France. My case does prove, it is legally unworkable to say adoptees must indefinitely leave our own home, to return to the originating court (why ?? I got married as an adult in New Zealand, and was then divorced in the UK without needing to return to New Zealand) to go through a legally pointless obstacle course that is only really designed to try and force adoptees to under duress, agree to -waive- any lawsuits, in any and all circumstances, that I already have.

The Watergate-esque burglary and squatting of my home in Breizh, France happened while I have been going through medical treatment for most of the past year for a rare systemic illness that has no cure, where the medical treatments have not worked, so specialists have cross-referred me to another specialist to see if there are any other treatments in this country, that might work for me. Of course Rudd, Johnson and the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family do all, in particular benefit, from trying to destroy my legally privileged information and stopping me living -safely- in my own home.

This statement is true.

A kinder evolution is possible.

Donna Bugat

(formerly known as Babs Tucker)

______________

:

.