Re: 8 am meeting on 8th December 2006 at MPA in UK, Victorian IBAC, Commonwealth PID “Official Sensitive” & Universal Jurisdiction.

Hi, I hope this finds you well.

I am a very ordinary member of the public, but it really is impossible for me to feel I -belong- (which is something many people can enjoy) in Victoria, or Australia because of the ‘punishment’ (that politicians and public officials in Victoria and elsewhere are hiding) that is ‘not prescribed by law’ that causes me so many harms and losses on a daily basis, because it is corrupt.

I think it is logical and legally more correct for me to call this an addendum, rather than what your IBAC would like to call a ‘complaint’, with regard to my Commonwealth Statutory Declaration and Public Interest Disclosure. And particularly given my already very serious British High Court -jury- lawsuits in the UK, etc, that from records do already identifiably also involve Australian politicians, Victoria Police and under-covers, from before and after the hearing at the British High Court on –18th November 2008– in CO/11393/2007 that everyone was always trying to illegally overtake etc etc.

I don’t think politicians have put in place effective anti-corruption bodies, because many cases in this day and age, will involve politicians, political parties and public officials operating across multiple borders.

***It seems to me that since politicians, press and their under-covers do operate across different legal jurisdictions, that members of the public should not need to -duplicate- court cases from one country in another***

It seems pretty clear to me the Victorian Premier does have a case to answer over corruption in the here and now, because the regulatory regime for adoption does constitute ‘punishment’ that is ‘not prescribed by law’ on this Premier of Victoria’s watch too. The… adverse consequences of the regulatory regime of adoption in Victoria, do also extend far beyond the state of Victoria.

_________

In my own case, there is universal jurisdiction anyway.

__________

“Punishment” that is “not prescribed by law”.

I cannot see how the Victorian Premier can even begin to claim to be “democratically elected” when using such a corrupt ‘regulatory regime’ like adoption that in multiple respects, constitutes “punishment”… that is “not prescribed by law”. It is a legal… certainty that “punishment” that is “not prescribed by law” is corrupt.

It wasn’t that I have ever had a ‘political ideology’ that politicians could have a problem with. It is because their regulatory regime for adoption is incompatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law and… democracy.

It is clear the High Court hearing in the UK on November 18th 2008 (by which time it should also be remembered I had the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008) was pivotal including with regard to the unlawful use of under-covers, including from Victoria, Australia.

My addendum (that is incomplete because a) I am still ill at the moment, and b) illegally prevented from having legal representation I am still legally entitled to) includes the fmr Australian PM Rudd and fmr British PM Johnson being banned in perpetuity from the Melbourne CBD ‘unless they are attending court’, because that is where I currently live. The most recently diagnosed rare illness (that could have actually been triggered by the life threatening torture and attempted murder of me in the UK on their watch as Australian PM and British Mayor of London and boss of tops cops) that has no cure etc is a difficult medical situation that fluctuates, and requires ongoing medical treatment/s. So I now know I will need to continue visiting hospitals nearby from time to time to see various health professionals/specialists. Rudd and Johnson were central to the torture and attempted murder of me, so there needs to be some consequences for them, that actually helps me, that banning them from the Melbourne CBD unless they are attending court, does do.

It should also be remembered they both sought to permanently ban me from having the same freedom they had to stand for election in politics, anywhere. And it was Victoria Police who had an undeclared conflict of interest when they did illegally ban me from peacefully being in or going to -any- court in the Melbourne CBD on 21st December 2021, not least since I was legally entitled to go to -any- court in the Melbourne CBD for numerous reasons. It was then a Ms Corrie McKenzie who was Rudd’s former Deputy Chief of Staff, who while she was in the DOJ in Victoria, and I was seriously ill with cancer (the first time) contacted me on 7th September 2022, specifically because she didn’t want me to have… legal representation because of her own undeclared conflict of interest. Ms Corrie MacKenzie is a political appointee not a civil servant.

The questions about why I had, but don’t have legal representation, including despite it being witnessed etc that even judges in the UK were saying lawyers had no legal grounds to withdraw, yet did is by and large explained by a letter about a meeting at 8am on 8th December 2006 to a partner at Bindman’s Solicitors about a less than “Immaculate Concept”.

This letter dated 1st December 2006, just beggars belief when you know they were -all- illegally withholding the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006, until they were eventually forced to disclose it, after 3rd March 2009 in CO/11393/2007:

There was no valid reason for a Mr Murphy who was a partner at Bindmans (and now yet another coroner) to not have actually filed High Court jury lawsuits that already existed for Brian and I from for example Mothers Day 26th March 2006. And I already had many other High Court jury lawsuits including over 23rd May 2006 too, because I was unlawfully arrested and not charged with anything while the government was still trying to pursue Brian in what became the “no case to answer” run by a Mr MacDonald, a two-faced owner of Garden Court Chambers in London who left hostages to the… governments fortunes) Mr Murphy was wasting our time with the IPCC and MPA, who Brian and I proved knew they were acting illegally, when we had to do CO/11393/2007 ourselves !! without any legal representation, that eventually resulted in the disclosure of the “both houses and black rod” admission after 3rd March 2009 following the hearing on 18th November 2008.

Mr Hardwick was the Head of the IPCC and his London sidekick was a Ms Glass. A Ms Glass from the IPCC in the UK, then re-invented herself as the Ombudsman in Victoria, Australia, to obviously cover up much, including the illegal use of under-covers from Australia, in for example multiple case/s from a State Opening on 25th May 2010, that resulted in me being illegally imprisoned without legal representation or trial through the British Magistrates Courts (because they have no recordings) in 2011 again. The governments had failed to imprison me through the British High Courts, because they have audio recordings.

My case does raise all sorts of very important legal questions about how politicians and public officials who act illegally can do so with impunity across multiple borders.

______________

The records prove that Brian publicly stated in writing on 11th April 2009 that we didn’t campaign with someone who was an agent provocateur (who was also trying to undermine CO11393/2007 etc). The police -and- the agent provocateur persisted in publicly claiming that we were linked to the agent provocateur, and in the case of the MET Police by putting forward perjured witness statements they knew to be untrue. So I was then forced to formally name the agent provocateur in legal proceedings over my unlawful arrest on 18th November 2009, on 13th January 2010. The agent provocateur, and police in perjured witness statements still persisted with the lie we campaigned with the agent provocateur who was involved in my unlawful arrest on November 18th 2009 (which was one year after the High Court hearing on November 18th 2008) On 25th May 2010 I was unlawfully arrested prior to another State opening because the case from November 18th 2009 was suddenly adjourned on 29th April 2010 etc. The phoney ‘Democracy Village’ the government then tried to join us to began on 1st May 2010 so it covered all the political administrations. There is a very real and serious legal problem with the fact an Australian undercover who was involved in my unlawful arrest on 25th May 2010, in the UK, (prior to the State Opening on that day) was unlawfully protected by the Australian politicians, High Commission and British police and the press who publicly… identified the person, who tellingly… did not have to appear in court. He just had to give the soundbite to the press, to give the false impression he wasn’t involved in my unlawful arrest, when he was directly involved in my unlawful arrest. I am also aware the British government illegally edited their video footage to try and hide when British police gave the person, who is and was a complete stranger to me, who was directly involved in my unlawful arrest, some of my personal property !! which would obviously be extremely difficult to explain to any jury. The only reason the British Police would have gone through and edited that part of the video footage was because they knew it showed them working together. It had briefly crossed my mind because of the unnatural way the person I later knew was an undercover spoke, that he was more like someone working out of the Australian High Commission etc. The government had thrown a ‘cordon sanitaire’ around the square, on the morning of 25th May 2010, precisely because they didn’t want members of the public to witness the unlawful actions of agent provocateurs/undercovers involved in what was the pre-planned unlawful arrest of Brian and I because for a whole half an hour before Brian and I were unlawfully arrested, no police officer had searched either of our tents and yet the professed purpose of police being there was a search (The searches by police officers were always a contrived affair, to try and find any way to unlawfully arrest us on any false pretext, because in fact the police do use police sniffer dogs routinely in Westminster because they obviously can’t physically search everyone who happens to be in Westminster. We were also under 24/7 surveillance, anyway, ourselves, because we were in Parliament Square. I had pointed out when I was unlawfully arrested on 18th November 2009 that the police actually unlawfully arrested me -because- I pointed out they were not searching people nearby who it turned out were undercovers posing as members of the public)

I legally began naming agent provocateurs from 25th May 2010 while I was on the witness stand in the British High Court on 21st June 2010 while politicians and press lied when they illegally sought to invent their own narrative, in the press. The Daily Mail admitted but only in their own press, they used undercovers against us, but didn’t front up to court to tell the truth there and be… cross-examined.

On 25th May 2010, it was the BBC who illegally edited and published audio to hide the unlawful use of agent provocateurs, that led to my being illegally imprisoned without legal representation or trial in 2011. But the BBC did not act alone, because multiple other ‘news’ organisations, like the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family, Guardian, Independent, London Evening Standard and Daily Mail et al… all… repeated the BBC lies without bothering about verifying anything in what was just the continuing ‘trial by media’ of me that was part of a pattern of state abuse.

The government went to extreme lengths involving the use of life threatening state violence to ban peaceful freedom of expression in Parliament Square, Central London, regardless of if someone had one banner for one hundred days, or one hundred banners for one day etc.

** My big complaint with the British CPS in my libel claim against them in 2008 was, that I am not a public figure, and I did not by notifying on 3rd March 2006, according to ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation -also- give my permission for my adopted identity to then be illegally leaked in a ‘trial by media’ against me in the UK to try and distract from my British High Court jury lawsuits. A Mr Murphy from Bindmans Solicitors had in December 2006, tried to trick me into essentially going along with a ‘trial by news media’ which I had refused to do, that he did not like because of course he only wanted to publicly grandstand at my expense too . I had while acting in good faith by notifying according to ss132-138 SOCPA 2005, never sought out ‘publicity’. I… was forced to publicly defend myself, because of the ‘trial by media’ etc etc… against me

The British courts had no problem however lifting bail conditions for me to go to a… press event because that’s what they did when Brian said he wanted me to go with him to Channel Four for an award he won because it was a public vote. I was really ill after being tortured etc (and then there were a series of three sexual assaults within the space of a few months) but Brian said that was why I should go and so I did. It was really horrible except for Brian winning the award. It was incredibly offensive when the producer and a journalist from Channel Four who were sitting at our table unbelievably said they had thought it would have made great footage if I had been arrested !! at the TV studios if the courts had refused to lift the bail conditions. The ghoulish press really don’t care about civilians at all. A British PM called David Davis slithered up to me and said “if Parliament cared we’d have to shut down”. The politicians in Westminster who hid behind and got the MET police to do their dirty work, for them, never let anything get in the way of their own self-interest.

The CPS (who had previously had two CPS lawyers come forward as witnesses for me from 5th August 2006) joined the ‘trial by news media’ of me, publishing a false and malicious ‘hit-piece’ -after- Brian and I had filed CO/11393/2007 and they knew they too were still illegally involved in withholding the “both houses and black rod” document from 19th May 2006 that was not disclosed until -after- 3rd March 2009:

For reasons best known to Mr Simon Clements from the CPS ‘Special Crime Division’ he also posed as someone called Terrina Narbett:

The CPS did eventually remove the libellous article they illegally published about me, before a hearing in the satellite litigation of CO/11393/2007 on November 18th 2008, but they did not settle because they KNEW they were still all illegally withholding the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006 in CO/11393/2007 that they were slowly being forced to disclose although they have always refused to release other relevant disclosures:

The top cop turned politician Lord Blair and the former DPP Lord MacDonald were eventually forced out by the progression of our CO/11393/2007. So then the Mayor of London Johnson was doing everything he could to save himself because the fact the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006 was not disclosed during the London Mayoral election in 2008, when another former top cop turned politician Lord Paddick stood as the Lib Dem Candidate (and I got a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 because I was illegally imprisoned during the election, without legal representation or trial on a non imprisonable alleged s5 Public Order allegation made by a Tory MP who committed perjury) showed the British MET Police were -also- improperly influencing an election !!

** I don’t personally consider the current Victorian Premier or Australian PM can possibly publicly claim they are “democratically elected” because the ‘regulatory regime’ of… adoption that has no logical connection to elections illegally stops me having the same freedom politicians do to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia.

In the UK, the legislation I helped repeal that was a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the UK in ss 132-134 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 was also illegal because peaceful freedom of expression obviously has no logical connection to serious organised crime. The legislative deceit of ss 132-238 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 showed how politicians really do not like law abiding members of the public.**

A Mr Clements & Starmer (and Huhne who was worried about being called to appear before a jury to explain exactly what he said to me on 7th February 2007 when Channel Four filmed him sitting next to me) are also trying to cover up for Murdoch et al etc around the time the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family illegally published what resulted in the torture and attempted murder of me:

Starmer was also meeting with the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family when their Time(s)-Lord for hire, Lord Marlesford, was using their Private Members Bill against me in 2011.

The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family obviously knew that Starmer was made the DPP because Doughty Chambers were covering up the prosecutor in the original malicious prosecution against me was a Tory MP, Grieve who became the Attorney General:

The connection between Starmer (from Doughty Chambers) and Grieve:

Starmer’s right hand man at the DPP was Mr Simon Clements (and they -all- knew the document dated 19th May 2006 about “both houses and black rod” was illegally withheld for years and so on and so forth):

It was obvious incredibly difficult to be -overwhelmed- by such widespread corruption from so many people like politicians, police, and prosecutors etc, breaching the public trust placed in them (that constituted more than misconduct or misfeasance) while falling all over each other to illegally try and stop our High Court jury lawsuits.

This was the High Court hearing on 18th November 2008 that caused significant legal problems for Rudd and Johnson:

So a Sir Ken Jones from ACPO in the UK, became DAC in Victoria, Australia to help try and run cover for politicians in both countries by expanding the unlawful use of under-covers against me in the UK.

I think the reason that Bindmans Solicitors had not begun by filing our High Court jury lawsuits in 2006 (that I eventually had to do myself, just like we had to do CO/11393/2007 ourselves) was because Bindmans Solicitors knew they were legally compromised/negligent (and then some) in not accompanying me on 4th September 2006 (especially since they knew I was tortured on 5th August 2006) so Steve Jago had then accompanied me. The negligence of Bindmans Solicitors on 4th September 2006, then led to the torture and attempted murder of me on 4th September 2009 when Brian was with me, and he then fired Bindmans Solicitors because a Mike Schwarz refused to get the CCTV, and instead just wrote a letter ‘securing it’ which was also in all the true circumstances negligent. When… Brian fired Bindmans Solicitors, Mr Schwarz told barristers they would not get any work from Bindmans Solicitors if they represented… me, which it was illegal for him to do, while also essentially blaming me for being a victim of very serious state crimes.

**** Mr Schwartz is not going to deny, let alone in front of any jury that what he did in saying to barristers they would not get business from Bindmans Solicitors if they represented… me, after… Brian fired Bindmans, was illegal ****

It is impossible to explain why DFAT did not ensure I had… access to legal representation when they phoned me on 7th October 2009, and only then because Steve Jago had phoned them.

The British government did also routinely refuse to notify the Australian High Commission when I was ‘arrested’ because the British politicians were working with Australian politicians.

(Quite a few people I campaigned with over the years, did complain about Bindmans Solicitors who were covering up very serious state violence against many campaigners. And people from cases against Pinochet in Chile also complained Bindmans Solicitors misled people)

In my own case, Bindmans Solicitors… covered up the torture and attempted murder of me, in the UK, and when Brian fired them, then they represented the under-covers of Democracy Village, the government illegally tried to join us to, because they really were trying to illegally undermine our cases. The press also illegally published comments by undercovers from the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ who were not going on the witness stand in the High Court under oath to be cross examined, while

The press also illegally published comments by undercovers from the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ who were not going on the witness stand in the High Court to repeat anything under oath to be cross examined (about denying they were agent provocateurs) after the press had hidden !! I did go on the witness stand and was under oath when what I said was never disputed on 21st June 2010.

(I remember once when two groups, called Combat 18 and Al-Muhajiroun were doing a face-off for the cameras, across the road from Downing Street in the UK, I had also happened to go along to Downing Street with another person who had a six foot cross that asked “What would Jesus say about Iraq” but we were actually outside the gates at Downing Street, and not across the road (in what we called “the piggy pens”) Members of Combat 18 came and spoke to me because they could not understand why we were “allowed” to stand where we did in what is as far as I am concerned, a public place. I explained the actual situation was that I had like them, notified, but the government had covered up the legislative deceit had no due process, and so they had refused to “authorise” me so sometimes I was unlawfully arrested and sometimes I wasn’t, because I was treated… differently to them. Al-Muhajiroun didn’t approve of a woman publicly campaigning. The senior MET police there had the nerve to complain !! -I- was creating problems for them by campaigning by the gates. When the person I was there with and I later returned to our HQ in Parliament Square, then the armed police (who were sometimes real gossips) turned up (one was the person who was in the case from January 2007 involving Blair and Murdoch at Lavender Hill Magistrates on 19th July 2007) and -also- asked why -I- hadn’t been arrested. I said it could have been because they would have had to arrest and prosecute the person who was -with- me who had the six foot cross that said “What would Jesus say about Iraq?”

I think the actual reason I was not arrested while caught up between the Combat 18 and Al-Muhajiroun face-off (they had been given “permission” to do) was because it would have been too politically problematic to explain in any court why the –one and only woman– there was arrested, when I had -also- notified but that had been covered up etc etc

I remember when a former British FM & Justice Minister called Straw was grandstanding on the BBC with a person called Nick Griffin from a group called the BNP who are considered racists and fascists, people agreed with me when I said I just could not see the difference between Straw and Griffin. Once, when Straw tried to ambush me on my way back to Parliament Square, sidling up with a large entourage of suits and sunglasses in tow, he had the nerve to ask me how I was, to which I could only say “words to the effect of” I would feel safer if he was in prison, while I kept walking in the opposite direction from him. Another group called the EDL who general opinion seemed to think, were football hooligans hired by the government to pose as some kind of protesters, actually said they were offended !! when I said I couldn’t see the difference between them and the government because they -both- violently attacked me. The groups like ‘Redwatch’ and ‘Incels’ who also ‘profiled’ me as ‘left wing’ just because I opposed the Iraq War chose to conveniently overlook the fact people from all walks of life and politics opposed the Iraq War.

** I do reasonably believe it is illegal for a Mr Schwartz who was from Bindmans Solicitors, to be making large sums of money from the governments own Undercover Inquiry in the UK, that ‘sidesteps’ the illegal use of undercovers from Victoria Police, who Bindmans Solicitors did represent in 2010 when they were called ‘Democracy Village’ etc **

The only real purpose of the British Undercover Inquiry is to cover up the involvement of the British Parliament of “both houses and black rod”.

There is no way the British Undercover Inquiry could have ever had or was ever going to have the former top cop turned unelected politician Lord Blair ever appear before the undercover inquiry, because the whole purpose of the inquiry is to distract from the political scandal of “both houses and black rod”.

Bindmans Solicitors were supposed to accompany me (below) on 4th September 2006 but ‘inexplicably’ did not (while the government was illegally withholding “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006:

The legal reality is the facts of my transnational case attracts… Universal Jurisdiction

“A need to know” ?

I think the whole point of a public interest disclosure by a member of the public, is that it is information the public either do need to or have a -right to know- and on that legal point the government have acted illegally when it comes to the regulatory regime of adoption.

****I would very much like to stand for election, emphasising just how important it is for members of the public to be encouraged to and be able to make -public interest disclosures-. Politicians, public officials and the press do not generally want, let alone encourage… members of the public to make ‘public interest disclosures’ because they usually relate to members of the public being harmed by… politicians, public officials and the press ****

The politicians including the Attorney General’s Office have not only been illegally using political language of for example ‘forced adoption’ to distract from some adoption court orders constitute ‘false imprisonment’ which is a known legal term. They have also been trying to re-frame what constitutes corruption in Australia if it involves politicians, public officials or the press.

My personal view is the “jobs for mates” culture masquerading as some kind of politics in Australia is incompatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat (aka Nonna Donna)
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)