Hi,

I hope this finds you well.

Re: phone call 2nd July 2025 etc from Australian federal government employee about a) my Commonwealth of Australia statutory declaration

My Universal… ‘Commonwealth of Australia Statutory Declaration’ about two inextricably linked transnational ‘abuses of processes’ involving both governments means a) I am officially… ‘notifying’ Australian Ambassadors & DFAT et al in France, UK etc, I have ditched adoption court order, they’re legally obliged to unconditionally accept, within six days without ‘abuse of process’ of court proceedings b) I proved in CO/11393/2007 etc in UK there is unprecedented inextricably linked transnational ‘abuse of process’ with ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005; politicians intended (ie 23 May 2000) to illegally ban peaceful freedom of expression in UK **before** 9/11, War on Terror, Iraq War, 19 May & 23 May 2006 etc, that was also politically embarrassing for Australian politicians that -all- led to politicians & police et al ‘improperly influence’ outcome of elections (London Mayoralty 2008 & 2012 & UK General election 2012) etc while illegally trying to stop me standing for democratic election… anywhere incl to continue my peace campaign for International Courts for Civil & Human Rights for… everyone, in Old City of Jerusalem on Mediterranean (21.10.2025)

At the heart of my case really, is my Mediterranean identity being illegally officially erased by the Australian government which became a real issue for me in the UK:

_______________________
_______________________

1. I think my Commonwealth of Australia Statutory Declaration (in my case, for Australian Ambassadors) is the easiest and most accessible format that, I can as an adult made an adoptee as a minor, ditch the adoption court order from the originating court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, without the ‘abuse of process’ of any court proceedings to do so. It is also a format that is legally valid in all Australian states and overseas, regardless of the various legislation in for example different states within Australia.

________________________

________________________

I only have a photocopy because the County Court illegally refuse to hand of a court certified copy so again that is something The Australian Ambassadors can check out themselves.

2. The political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the UK in ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 was also an inextricably linked abuse of process that deliberately also had no due process because a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression was of itself intended to be arbitrary and unlawful. There was no process whereby British police (and specifically the top cop) took me to court if they disagreed with anything, about my SOCPA 2005 Notification, before they arrested, charged and prosecuted me, for not having their permission. It should be remembered the British Cabinet Office did also know what was going on.

(I can’t finish including everything yet about the UK, because there is too much to include, but the important part is to do the adoptee part about using a Commonwealth of Australia Statutory Declaration to ditch the adoption court order)

3. I may need an appointment at your political offices I visited in January 2025, in Australia, if my Commonwealth of Australia Statutory Declaration notifying I have ditched the adoption court order, without needing to go through the abuse of process of court proceedings, needs additional details/addendums.

It would obviously be extraordinarily difficult for -any- ordinary member of the public to try and even begin doing a Commonwealth of Australia Statutory Declaration about not one, but two inextricably linked and overwhelming transnational abuses of process by British and Australian politicians et al, that were always about illegally trying to stop jury lawsuits etc.

There are quite a few politicians along with of course the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family who don’t want me to stand in politics, which is the true context of the burglary etc of my home in Breizh, France.

One of the very serious consequences of not being able to ditch the adoption court order while still in my own home was obviously the Watergate-esque burglary and squatting of my home in Breizh, France that… a French politician told me about.

The British and Australian politicians do benefit from my home being burgled etc because of course it is part of a continuing pattern of illegally ‘overtaking’ my lawsuits.

The Australian High Commission in London did know I was the only person, who happens to be an Australian citizen, caught up in two transnational abuses of process that I would not wish on anyone, where I have just always done the right thing.

ABUSE OF PROCESS/VOID AB INITIO/NO CASE TO ANSWER

I did ask a London supposed human rights barrister called Mr McDonald who owned Garden Court Chambers in London, a very many years ago, in 2006, why he wasn’t running an abuse of process argument in a case (where by design he created, what Brian correctly called out were ‘hostages to other people’s fortunes’) and he couldn’t explain what by and large eventually became CO/11393/2007 that Brian and I had to do… ourselves in the British High Court.

It is the who did what and when in CO/11393/2007 that reveals the two inextricably linked transnational abuses of process where at least one about ditching adoption can be done essay accessible way without court proceedings.

The British government did illegally stop our going directly to the ECHR about ss 132-138 SOCPA (to enforce our right to safe access to civil jury lawsuits) which we would have been legally able to do, regardless of the Human Rights Act the British government enacted. The British government only enacted a Human Rights Act to interpret their ‘margin of appreciation’ as being able to completely ignore the peace and harmony of the rule of law, for however long they could get away with it. The British delegation to PACE (the Parliamentary Assembly at the Council of Europe) who run the ECHR are a rogues gallery of those who covered up the legislative deceit of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005. The world needs a proper and actual International Court for Human Rights that would improve what is the very basic but still far too heavily politically influenced, ECHR.

The facts include the British fmr PM Blair (who has always essentially been the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family’s shonky lawyer in the sense of ‘advising’ how long he or they could hope to get away with anything) was grandstanding with politicians in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 while illegally… misleading members of the public… everywhere, while I was unlawfully arrested in Parliament Square, Central London in the UK so the top cop at New Scotland Yard who was another Blair, could illegally leak my adopted identity, along with (dis)information “both (Blairs &) houses & Black rod” knew, was untrue, as did the state broadcaster, the BBC, because what was actually going on, was two inextricably linked transnational abuses of process by politicians in both countries.

The British and Australian politicians did know about the two inextricably linked transnational abuses of process on 26th March 2006, when Blair was grandstanding in Australia, illegally misleading the public, while I was unlawfully arrested in the UK so the politicians and top cop could illegally leak my adopted identity and publish whatever lies they liked while I was illegally detained:

Blair illegally lied to the public about the legislative abuse of process in the UK.

He then re-invented himself as the Middle East Peace Envoy when he couldn’t even make peace with we peace campaigners in the UK !!

(I’d rather like to have been a… Mediterranean peace envoy, to help redress the historical wrong of my own Mediterranean identity being illegally officially erased. I like studying Mediterranean history which I find fascinating. I would like to add my own piece of Mediterranean history with International Civil and Human Rights Courts for… everyone, in the Old City of Jerusalem because there need to be proper International Courts for civilians everywhere, regardless of our race, religion, politics and none.

I believe the addition of International Courts that are actually accessible for civilians, instead of just government, can help stop a lot of politicians self interest taking precedence over the rights of civilians)

It wasn’t so much that Australian politicians stood by and let what happen, happen in the UK. The case CO/11393/2007 proves Australian politicians et al illegally took an active part in what happened.
_______________________

British and Australian politicians have illegally tried to stop me ever being able to stand for democratic election in national or federal politics… anywhere in their efforts to cover up two inextricably linked transnational abuses of process in Australia and the UK that have been used by politicians in both countries for their own political benefit.

I only support the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy that should be enshrined in and have primacy in any Constitution, instead of political and press flattery and fawning over the inequality of an institution of monarchy or a republic that can be made to be the same. My personal view is politicians and political parties only promote the cronyism of lucrative jobs for mates, for life, instead of the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy. I do not reasonably believe that politicians and a monarchy can legally claim ‘special privileges’ to be over and above the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy. I think that probably the only way to provide at least some, legal scrutiny of a judiciary is for all judges to have to be elected by the public.

2019 -2025:

The fact it is in abuse of process to try and force me as an adult adoptee to go through any kind of court proceedings to ditch an adoption court order means that “more likely than not” explains other connected abuses of process including i) politicians and courts refusing to hand over court certified copies of adoption court orders to all adoptees, that means that all adult adoptees do not have a genuine chance to bring jury lawsuits ii) I was forced to indefinitely leave my own home in Breizh, France in July 2019 (after I was sent 12000 miles away from Australia to the UK, as a teenager, because I refused to go along with adoption) and return to the originating court (July 2019) in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia including during a global pandemic (2020) when I was stopped from going home, and when I was then diagnosed with recurrent cancer (2022 & 2023) and then another rare illness (2024) that still also involves ongoing medical treatment, because politicians abuse of process that also includes refusing to notify all adoptees affected by the DES cancer causing drug identifies more than a simply negligent disregard for the physical and emotional health of adoptees. Another abuse of process iii) caused by illegally trying to force me as someone made an adoptee as a minor into court proceedings as an adult to ditch an adoption court order and by extension any dual nationalities arising from the adoption court order (compared to dual nationality that was originally illegally erased by the government through an adoption court order) is that I was not free, as an adoptee with a court order that also imposed dual nationality on me, to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia in 2025 without first going through court proceedings to ditch the adoption court order (that could be refused) and by extension any dual nationality. The Chief Justice of the Australian High Court of Disputed Returns who was previously a Rudd et al appointee as the federal Solicitor general in Australia in the inextricably linked CO/11393/2007 in the UK (and this ‘return’ to Australia is disputed in every respect) failed in his legal duty to publicly confirm it is an abuse of process to put someone who wants to stand for democratic election in federal politics through court proceedings over over dual nationality arising from an adoption court order and state legislation. The Victorian Adoption legislation is incompatible with s44 of the Australian Constitution that is also incorrectly interpreted so that people who are not dual nationals like Rudd could work for any government he liked while in federal politics in Australia. It was just another very serious example of the abuse of process that is caused by trying to force me as someone made an adoptee as a minor into court proceedings as a adult about an adoption court order I never agreed to. It would be illegal to a) demand I also pay money to the Australian High Court of Disputed Returns to b) have a hearing, in what just another serious example of the unlawful consequences of trying to force court proceedings that are neither necessary or proportionate.

Victoria Police illegally enforcing County Court adoption court orders, in Melbourne, Australia & UK.

The other abuse of process, iv) was on 21st December 2021 when I was unlawfully arrested without any legal grounds being given, while I was having a ‘silent protest’ –

(I think it was possibly my best protest yet !!)

– while sitting quietly in the County Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia that was open to the public where I wasn’t saying anything and did not have any banner or anything else that might attract the attention of police.

When I was unlawfully arrested without any legal grounds being identified, I immediately said I wanted a lawyer to witness my witness statement at which point, I was immediately de-arrested. Victoria Police had failed to disclose their very significant conflict of interest in the inextricably linked abuse of process that also includes CO/11393/2007 in the UK because Australian politicians illegally employed Sir Ken Jones who was Head of ACPO in the UK, as DAC in Victoria, Australia in the cover up over illegally withholding documents (ie 19 May 2006 until after 3 March 2009) and audio court recordings (from Southwark Crown Court on 17 October 2007 etc until after 17 March 2011 when the audio recording in the British High Court on 17 March 2011 shows I said the state was illegally ‘overtaking’ our CO/11393/2007.

The irony is I currently live in the Melbourne CBD:

The political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the UK in ss 132-138 of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 was an abuse of process that deliberately had no due process because a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression was of itself intended to be arbitrary and unlawful. There was no process whereby police took me to court if they disagreed with anything, about my SOCPA 2005 Notification, before they arrested, charged and prosecuted me, for not having their permission.

The British, and Australian governments both illegally used Australian undercovers against me in the UK, because it is illegal to use undercovers to try and cover up any -abuses of process- that in my own case happened to involve two inextricably linked abuses of process originating separately in Australia and the UK.

The County Court are along with other courts also illegally withholding court certified copies of adoption court order from all adoptees.

I did happen to have on me on 21st December 2021, a court certified copy of my property ownership in Breizh, France. I did not know at that time (and only discovered by happenstance on 23 May 2022, that since 2o October 2020 the state and then federal government had falsified state and federal government records to falsely claim I also owned property in Australia that whoever falsified the state and federal records and anyone reading them knew to be untrue were not amended when I complained, but were only amended when a local government employee wrote a Victorian statutory declaration for me when I was seriously ill with cancer for the second time in 2023. I was only told the Labour government in Preston, had originally falsified the state records. My little sister who had ‘suddenly’ died had lived in Preston when I first found her, before she ‘suddenly’ died exactly four years later.

I did as you know speak with the Supreme Court in Melbourne in January 2025 and was then given elsewhere the paperwork about jurisdiction (because of course there was a jurisdiction case about me in the UK because the British Magistrates Courts refuse to make or keep any audio/audio visual records of court proceedings to avoid the he/said she said. The original malicious prosecution of me in the UK was after all by a Tory MP called Grieve (see below) who posed as the prosecutor !! so it was all ‘highly irregular’ and I still do not know if Grieve was authorised by the CPS or he brought a private prosecution himself.)

The true purpose of the abuse of process of court proceedings to ditch an adoption court order, made while a minor, is in reality trying to force adoptees to sign a waiver over lawsuits if we want to be released from a not so civil court order that can constitute a false imprisonment. The facts and circumstances of my own case prove what is an abuse of process is only about politicians self interest, not the best interests of an adoptee or the public interest.

b) The British and Australian politicians and press, also both illegally covered up the legislative deceit of the abuse of process of the political ban on peaceful expression in the UK in ss 132 of the (now repealed) Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 because research showed it predated 9/11, the War on Terror, Iraq War because that was politically embarrassing not just for the British government, but the Australian government who as far as I can see, just did what the British government told them to do. My own research into a document dated 19 May 2006 that was illegally withheld until after 3rd March in CO11393/2007 about the unlawful interference of politicians on 23 May 2006, showed the origins of a bipartisan political agreement were actually articulated in parliamentary hansard on 23 May 2000 **before** the catch all reliance on ‘national security’ following 9/11, and the War on Terror and then Iraq War. The former British PM obviously illegally lied to the public about ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 but he wasn’t alone in doing so, and could only once agin lie with the help of the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family led press.

________________________________

For the sake of completeness:

The facts include the British fmr PM Blair (who I view as having always essentially been the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family’s shonky lawyer in the sense of ‘advising’ how long he or they could hope to get away with anything) was grandstanding with politicians in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 while illegally… misleading members of the public… everywhere, while I was unlawfully arrested in Parliament Square, Central London in the UK so the top cop at New Scotland Yard who was another Blair, could illegally leak my adopted identity, along with (dis)information “both (Blairs &) houses & Black rod” knew, was untrue, as did the state broadcaster, the BBC, because what was actually going on, was two inextricably linked transnational abuses of process by politicians in both countries.

The tape recording of two hours of me just saying I couldn’t see there was any due process to a police officer harassing me on (for example) on 9th March 2006 instead of dealing with the fact there was no due process (before the lies from 26th March 2006 when I was unlawfully arrested with !!!! my SOCPA Notification on me:.

I was unlawfully arrested on 26th March 2006 with my a copy of my SOCPA Notification on me… while Brian was unlawfully arrested because he was… recording the abuse of process:

… New Scotland Yard and the BBC illegally leaked my adopted identity, with other false information they knew was untrue (Charing Cross had agreed it was an unlawful arrest that was a High Court jury lawsuit. No-one could ‘overtake’/reverse my High Court jury lawsuit

NO DUE PROCESS & ABUSE OF PROCESS

There was no due process in the protest legislation in the UK over a -static- demo, regardless of if you were one peaceful person or one hundred peaceful people, or had one banner or one hundred banners or one tent or no tent, in a public space, and so on and so forth.

I ditched my SOCPA 2005 Notification in the middle of 2007 because I had well and truly proved the legislative deceit of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 was an abuse of process, so I really wasn’t interested in whatever lie any government department might be telling on any given day.

There was no process of any kind, including civil, for what were our static demos in the UK, before we were just arrested, charged or prosecuted, solely for not having ‘permission’:

In the UK, the criminal offence that ddi not even meet the threshold of civil law, was not having prior permission you could not get because there was no due process, because the intention was always a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression.

The relentless overwhelming use of state violence that went far beyond misfeasance etc, and a breach of the public trust, because there was not even the pretence of any ‘due process’ is harrowing.

There was just an abuse of process heaped upon abuse of process from the original malicious prosecution of me on 22nd February 2006 by a… politician:

I was illegally denied legal representation over the original malicious prosecution of me, because the prosecutor was actually a Tory politician called Grieve, using the legislative deceit of the abuse of process for his own personal financial benefit:

The next abuse of process was the government ‘forgot’ to invite me to my own appeal over 22nd February 2006 when the prosecutor was a politician, called Grieve (who went on to be the Attorney General in 2010 to try and cover up his own corruption) and then in another abuse of process went ahead with it in my absence !!:

The terrorist Hall was sent to try and sweep the Tory MP’s Grieves abuse of process that was one of the last cases in the old Bow Street Magistrates Court, under the carpet:

It needs repeating that the original prosecutor of me was a Tory politician !! who as Attorney General very much had an undeclared conflict of interest over not wanting audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates Courts:

The Mr Grieve corruption when he was posing as a prosecutor (I never saw a copy of the CPS delegating authority to him to essentially be a prosecutor in his own case.

The Judge certainly changed what he really said, because what he actually said (that in our general experience would be from a script that was written for him an other judges) was I “should not be spending my money as a single (working) parent coming to London to protest” which I am 100% percent certain it is unlawful for a judge to say that I am also sure he would not be saying if I was a politician !!

This is the same Grieve with an undeclared conflict of interest in stopping audio and audio visual recordings in courts.

If I was a politician in the UK, there would be audio/audio visual recordings in all British Magistrates Courts who can and did imprison me without legal representation or trial on a non-imprisonable alleged offence made by… a politician !! (Sir Alan Vitol Oil Duncan because he wanted to get on the gravy train of illegally trying to overtake CO/11393/2007)

It is very shocking what else Palace of Westminster Police said was going on in the Westminster Courts (after I was tortured again on 9th July 2007) There was no denying, Westminster Courts did have a particular hatred of women that was really vicious, and went well beyond the political.

It’s fair comment that the only law in town in Westminster was we peace campaigners.

The tape recording of two hours of me saying there was no due process to a police officer harassing me on (for example) 9th March 2006 instead of dealing with the fact there was no due process.

The British police did not have to take you to a civil court/hearing six days before your –static– protest began in a public space that was not on a road and was not a march.

I personally preferred our generally small boutique style campaigning most, because it meant you could talk with and have all sorts of conversations with people all over the place from around the world, that was like having lots of political offices like political parties do. Parliament Square, Central London where the government tried to pin us down to, so they could destroy us, was our headquarters but we campaigned at Downing Street and elsewhere too, particularly after 23rd May 2006.

The former British PM Blair was legally obliged to resign on 26th March 2006, and then 23rd May 2006, and then 4th September 2006, and then on Friday 23rd March 2007 when Brian and I went to the Magistrates Courts to get summons against the two Blairs, that became CO/11393/2007 along with my High Court jury lawsuits HQ12X00 etc etc

PEACE, LOVE & JUSTICE FOR… EVERYONE

The top cop Blair should have resigned on 9th July 2006 (when I was also unlawfully arrested on 9th July 2006 below along with Steve Jago. That was after I was invited to a meeting at Charing Cross with top cops there on 7th July 2006 that Steve Jago also accompanied me to. At the meeting on 7th July 2006, I was improperly pressured to change my SOCPA Notification from 3rd March 2006, in some way or in any way, to -hide- the abuse of process !!!! When I declined, because it does not help to hide an abuse of process, Superintendent Terry and Chief Inspector Robinson who spoke to New Scotland Yard while we were there, said they would get back to me on Monday 10th July 2006. Instead they -all- had us both unlawfully arrested on 9th July 2006. A lawyer advised me not to answer any questions when detectives !! who interrogated me, produced a piece of paper that said “Superintendent Terry has asked for Barbara to answer these questions about ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 before she is released” that included a list of questions, because as the lawyer pointed out, I wasn’t unlawfully arrested under ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 on 9th July 2006 (although the MET Police themselves admitted that was -why- I was unlawfully arrested !! The police were so furious, they threatened the lawyer, saying they could have the lawyer arrested or made to leave, if the lawyer continued to “interfere” whatever that meant.

(On another day there was two hours !! of CCTV footage of Steve and I standing there and just chatting to people that the government was trying to make out in a… criminal court, was a… crime that we just went was political harassment, it was so ridiculous. It is the most ridiculous CCTV in a political case, I have ever seen)

Westminster is implacably opposed to peace, love and justice for everyone….

The politicians had dug their heels in and didn’t want to admit they had acted maliciously in bad faith, and vast numbers of MET Police (I was unlawfully arrested 48 times myself) the prosecutors, the judges and press just went along with and covered up… for politicians including Glass who re-invented herself as the Victorian Ombudsman to cover up the inextricably linked abuse of process in… the UK and Australia in… CO/11393/2007:

The records show a Ms Glass also illegally tried to ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007 in the UK, as indeed a Mr Jeroen Weimar from the GLA et al who decamped to Victoria for the same reasons of illegally ‘overtaking’ CO/11393/2007 in the UK.

The two Blairs should have resigned on 4th September 2006.

The 4th & 5th September 2006 was very shocking:

This is what government corruption really looks like… (while attacking me)

It was so misogynist:

The British government illegally edited and destroyed video and CCTV that nevertheless could not hide something very serious happened in a corridor I was taken into, that Steve was invited by the British government to come into, before the government dishonestly claimed there was no CCTV in the corridor, while also illegally destroying Steve’s video footage.

The politicians only cared about their own self interest, not my best interests or the public interest because the fmr British PM Blair did not act alone (ie: the unlawful interference of “both houses and black rod” dated 19 May 2006.

Blair was illegally misleading the public in the UK on 5th September 2006, about what was the abuse of process of the legislative deceit:

I will never have back that time with family:

_______________

**I proved in CO/11393/2007 etc in the UK (with the who did what when and why) that what was going on was an inextricably linked transnational abuse of process with British and Australian politicians and police et al not only illegally trying to ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007, but in so doing also ‘improperly influencing’ the outcome of the ie: London Mayoralty (2008 & 2012) and UK General election (2010)**

The who did what when and why is revealed by the date 3rd March 200…9 (below) in **** CO/11393/2007****:

“Murdoch: No Free Press” (2007 etc before “zero intelligence” Scarlett joined the Times board when they brought a private members bill against me in 2011, after I survived Sky News Live inciting the torture and attempted murder of me because my lawsuits stood in the way of the BSkyB deal):

In fact, the revolving doors/shape-shifting, call it what you like, between politicians and press (that we actually saw copied by judges in our cases in the UK when they would sometimes change judge mid-hearing when cases involved more than one of us) was to illegally try and ‘side-step’ legal accountability over the inextricably linked transnational abuses of process:

Campbell is a very nasty piece of work himself.

The British Undercover Inquiry that only peers into some aspects involving police, is also an attempt to illegally ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007 because British and Australian under-covers who are not just the police were used, and do all also work with the press, who obviously include members of intelligence services. I just think of the British state broadcaster, the BBC, as really just an arm of and may as well be called MI5 because what’s the difference ? The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family are more ‘five eyes’ because they are obviously much bigger than the BBC in the United States which has a large market itself. It was difficult for the government to hide what they were doing in the UK, because we were in an open public space, whereas other groups usually meet in rooms and so on.

Other members of the public used to come along and say how shocked they were to be passing the Square and see the government violently attacking us.

The Murdoch Organised Crime Family illegally had their ‘Time(s)-Lord’ Lord Marles-ford actually try and spin a private members bill against me when they were on the Times Board, (and at the same time !! the staged Leveson was going on) because of course my cases always stood in the way of much, including their BSkyB deal:

The Murdoch Organised Family have always tried to avoid legal accountability, including by publicly portraying they are disbanding from the top down, which Charing Cross Police did in early 2008, and then the top cop Blair did on 2 October 2008, but really they just reinvent themselves and either carry on as before, or worse.

The ‘smoking gun’ about the unlawful interference of “both houses and black rod” was illegally withheld until after 3rd March 2009 in CO/11393/2007 and there are lots of questions why lawyers did not get all sorts of other basic disclosure I had to ask for in CO/11393/2007, like my custody record from 23 May 2006

It really was “both houses and black rod” and then Ingledew appeared again in HQ11X00563 (I ‘won’) when he was also working for/with Westminster Council. He was obviously very much illegally ‘overtaking’ CO11393/2007.

I had raised the issue it was all an abuse of process with the owner and partner of a Garden Court Chambers in the original malicious prosecution of Brian over 23 May 2006, when I was unlawfully arrested and released without charge etc etc because there was no actual police power of seizure of people or property. But the person Mr Ian McDonald QC wanted to spin what Brian later correctly identified was “hostages to other people’s fortunes”. The government ran from an earlier abuse of process argument brought in a malicious prosecution against me on 14th September 2006.

The undercover inquiry that doesn’t go anywhere near the truth about the involvement of intelligence services or news organisations or companies like the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family was also intended to illegally ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007 because British and Australian undercovers were illegally used:

It’s not legally permissible to use under-covers to try and cover up any abuse of process !! let alone two prolonged and harmful inextricably linked transnational abuses of process.

What is covered up is politicians using under-covers infiltrate groups to carry out unlawful violence that is hidden from being seen, as the… state violence it is.

In our own experience in the UK, the government do have the ability to illegally use under-covers just to make a political headline to push whatever a legislative agenda may happen to be. The British government did illegally try and join Brian and I with a whole phoney undercover operation called ‘Democracy Village’ in the UK, that did include, not for the first time, under-covers.

The police do slightly more than just spying in our experience.

The Australian press:

In the UK, on one occasion when I was violently assaulted in 2008, by what appeared to just be some random male, Brian actually caught the offender running away. What happened next is very educational. A whole gaggle of under-covers dressed in plain clothes then emerged from the shadows by the Treasury building next to Parliament Square, in Central London, hopping up and down, waving around police identification including one oddly claiming to be a ‘Special Constable’ (that was probably cover from another government department) One of them grabbed one of ours to get their own undercover officer back. It was really appalling behaviour by the government that conclusively proved the MET Police was actually sending undercover police to physically attack me !! and then try and escape legal accountability.

It is worthwhile just letting the words sink in, that the British Metropolitan Police ‘staked’ out Parliament Square, Central London for the purposes of conducting an illegal undercover operation to physically assault me, not forgetting the part about the undercover police officer then trying to run away !!

The nod for that kind of state corruption came not just from the top cop, but as we earlier discovered politicians like the Labour Mayor of London Livingstone too.

On 17th August 2007, a male violently punched me in the head (I only had time to turn my head slightly before the blow I saw coming, connected, so it didn’t break my nose but I was concussed etc) when I wasn’t actually in, but nearby to Parliament Square. The coward was then incredibly running away as fast as he could (avoiding independent members of the public who saw what happened and tried to trip him up) and several people like Steve Jago, before the male flew into the arms of Palace of Westminster Police who along with Charing Cross and the London Mayor Livingstone at that time who Brian called a quisling, who phoned me (that was the first time I came across an Acting Inspector Cole who brought a phone from the Mayor at that time Livingstone) when they -all- illegally hid the identity of the male, so he was in any respect a state ‘asset’ of some kind.

Several Australians including a Senator James McGrath who along with Lynton Crosby covered up for Johnson at the London Mayoralty, and a Tim Smith who worked for the British MP David Davis, are and have been politicians involved in British politics at that time so they were part of what happened:

The relentless intended state violence I have faced as a woman is unforgivable.

There was just so much male… aggression from males who just resented a woman who said no to them.

Sir Ken Jones was obviously illegally employed by politicians at Victoria Police to cover up/illegally ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007 in the UK:

The Age newspaper are not really impartial and unbiased in their reportage/trial by media, with regard to very serious legal issues that are not for the press to arbitrate etc:

I didn’t know the Age are a court.

On 21st June 2010, I was illegally ‘doorstepped’ in a lift in the High Court by the Daily Mail (after I had for example legally begun naming agent provocateurs the government were trying to join Brian and I to, while I was on the witness stand before the judge hastily exited stage left and the case was nevertheless later illegally remitted back) I told the Daily Mail (and not for the first time, because my adopted identity was illegally leaked to the press) to leave me alone because they were involved in my unlawful arrest at a State Opening on 25 May 2010 while posing as a ‘protester’ which the Daily Mail admitted to me on 21st June 2010, was true, and in the later article, but only outside a court but not inside the court (where they were never prosecuted !!!! as either Arthur Martin or the Daily Mail. So of course the Daily Mail are legally obliged to identify ‘Arthur Martin’):

I am legally entitled to know who ‘Arthur Martin’ is.

The legal reality beyond the typically cheap headline from the Daily Mail is they were illegally involved in my unlawful arrest (and not for the first time given the libellous hit piece I pulled their legal department up over, in 2008 when they were hiding the existence of my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008) while they were part of the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ at the State Opening on 25 May 2010.

It was always a very serious legal issue that the press took such a central role in spinning a ‘trial by media’ they preferred and… intended, to try and undermine actual very serious legal proceedings in courts.

It was very serious when I did legally name an agent provocateur…. in very serious legal proceedings when the government were illegally trying to ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007 etc.

I used the term agent provocateur, that best describes the unlawful actions of someone trying to cause life threatening harm to me. It is legally irrelevant to me -which- state organisation or company a person is illegally working for while knowingly trying to cover up an abuse of process.

I was always very careful to only say what I could conclusively prove not just to the civil standard of ‘on the balance of probabilities’ but to the criminal standard of ‘beyond all reasonable doubt’ in a court of law including with a jury.

I did conclusively prove a not so civil injunction the British and Australian government used their phoney ‘Democracy Village’ in the UK against Brian and I, to try and get, wasn’t the paper it was written on (I don’t remember actually ever seeing a court certified or any other copy of it anyway) when I literally cut through their ‘de-fence’ with the largest pair of bolt cutters I could find, because it was as I said on 17th March 2011, that the government was illegally ‘overtaking’ CO/11393/2007.

When the British monarch/y maliciously prosecuted Brian and I which is a weird one for the scrap book, Johnson was essentially their ‘Queen’s counsel’ of sorts while also wearing the hats of publicly elected Mayor of London and Telegraph journalist, all illegally trying to cover up a counterclaim etc, there will obviously be all sorts of skullduggery including under-covers going on:

I was illegally denied legal representation… yet again.

My position has always been that all of Parliament Square, Central London must remain in perpetuity in public hands, maybe through a Trust of some kind.

Rudd was illegally… misleading the public too:

A City of London lawyer trying to limit/downgrade the torture and attempted murder of me on 4th September 2009, over two inextricably linked transnational abuses of process is not a civil claim:

It’s a fact that -all- the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me that is not and will never be just a civil matter, has illegally been withheld from me with all sorts of weasel words.

I have the proof it wasn’t handed over to me, including in a timely manner.

(Mr Forshaw is also not a fan of audio/audio visual recordings of who said, what and when in British Magistrates Courts. I wonder why ? Because he would be out of a job)

The former Australian PM/FM/PM and now Australian Ambassador the US, Rudd was useful to the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family et al because he could launder money from government ‘contracts’ in the UK, through Ingeus (he didn’t need to be a dual national to work for a foreign government while in federal politics in Australia):

Rudd just had to portray like Livingstone in the UK, that he was opposed to the Iraq War, to get the votes he needed before he became one of the biggest cheerleaders for war in Syria and Libya to protect Vitol Oil mercenaries posing as protesters, obviously to distract from what was being done in the UK to we peace campaigners.

7th October 2009:

The records show The Australian High Commission in London knew about the torture and attempted murder of me on 4th September 2009 on 4th September 2009, before I was kidnapped off the street on 7 October 2009 because I kept asking for the CCTV that I have always been legally entitled to. Steve Jago then rang The Australian Foreign Affairs DFAT on 7th October 2009 who contacted me but illegally failed to get me… access to a lawyer !! because both governments were involved. The Australian PM at the time, Rudd was legally liable because it wasn’t that the Australian government just stood by and let it happen. They were involved !!

(N.B: There are actually two sets of CCTV that were illegally withheld, because the first set of CCTV from 4th September 2009 shows a male who claimed to be an Australian soldier who a witness the government did not want to take a witness statement from, said he heard the male screaming at me that I was a “Muslim loving whore” before I go flying through the air, when I was punched to the ground from behind (because I didn’t see the assault coming) There were later people with the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ who said they were Australian soldiers)

It was also the anniversary of 4th September 2006.

It was all about politicians self interest, with no public interest etc:

Rudd was always a cheerleader for Vitol Duncan and covered up the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008.

A legislative abuse of process is all about facilitating political corruption (the perjured witness statement from Duncan in February 2008, ALSO trying to illegally ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007

I don’t personally believe a single word of this story from 2017 falsely portraying Duncan as a victim of a political sting by an Israeli from the embassy, because the hyperbole covers up I have a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, because of the corruption of Duncan:

The Ambassador was someone called Regev who was Australian.

It is a very odd story that actually goes to the heart of everything really, because there was the Australian born Regev apologising to a corrupt British MP, who was also involved in covering up my… Mediterranean background has illegally been officially erased by the British government.

**** I view Israel, Libya, Syria and Palestine as… Mediterranean countries****

The Israeli called Masot in the article in 2017 does look like a male Brian and I busted trying to attack me in the run up to the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ in 2010. While Brian distracted him, I did go through his ‘man-bag’ and he did have ID from the IDF (which is obviously not at all unusual in London) and also ID for a private security firm that later worked in Parliament Square, Central London. He did the whole Schwarzenegger thing of “I’ll be back” before ‘Democracy Village’ were described as “they will rise up like Israel and crush you like Palestinians” It was unbelievably offensive to say to me as someone who has officially had my Mediterranean identity illegally erased. I don’t think it is a big deal to have one Jewish State on the Mediterranean because Jewish people have always lived all around the Mediterranean, just like Catholic and Muslim people. What is a problem is that there has never been any actual religious -freedom- around the Mediterranean. The Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family only speak well of people of any religion, if they have loads of money.

(On 4th September 2007 of course, there was a drunken male called Nigel Cutteridge (the original Farage-a-drama) from the the time of the EDL ‘genre’ roaming around draped in a St George’s flag wearing red lipstick waving a cricket bat around demanding to know where I was (that became a prosecution against Brian) who was linked to some person called Zia Trench, from the ‘dark arts’ of the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ Family et al, where she did some stage ‘theatre’ about Brian with some American actor Michael Byrne)

The British High Court audio recording from when I was on the witness stand on 21st June 2010, says something quite different that was all covered up by the politicians and press:

It is obviously illegally to ‘remit’ an abuse of process back to be… repeated !!

The British monarch/y (who rely completely on the flattery of and fawning over of them by the press who always protect the public image of whoever is the monarch) had not been best pleased with this outcome at the ECHR in the ‘Mon Repos’ case between 2000 -2002 for the Greek monarchy who lived in the UK with them:

The British monarch/y illegally withheld basic disclosure, including about their lawyer from a private law firm coming to speak to Brian and I.

The legal reality was no-one even mentioned the involvement of the monarch/y in 2010 -2011, until I also did that on 21st June 2010 ( when I showed a photocopy because that is all I had because they had illegally failed to make any proper disclosure in that case) of their claim to an unclear part of Parliament Square, Central London, in 2008, so also not long after Brian and I did for example CO/11383/2007:

Brian said when I pulled out the little gem above etc etc I was then top of the table for the fastest time a judge had exited court stage left to take further instructions from politicians etc:

The British monarchy had an interest in the former Greek monarchy case that was all around the time of the phoney ‘republican’ opposition of Turnbull (who later became another Australian PM) who argued a referendum on the monarchy in Australia, that was clearly designed to fail because politicians were only looking to give themselves the same powers of a monarchy.

The “political witch-hunt” by all the politicians was really against Brian and I that helped Johnson become PM (although I do have and did have a bigger problem because of the two inextricably linked transnational abuses of process):

In 2011, I did liberate myself from so many political lies, by just cutting through the government’s ‘de-fence’ unequivocally proving that Johnson et al had illegally sought to ‘overtake’ CO/11393/2007.

It is telling that it was a journalist from the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family’s Times News paper, not any lawyers from the monarch/y who came and told me that… Johnson wasn’t going to try and take me back to the High Court over his own shocking corruption that had not only covered up the torture and attempted murder of me, but had involved ‘improperly influencing’ election outcomes. It was creepy that whenever I turned around in any case, News-corp were always lurking.

One of the nastier people when Brian died was a really vile con-artist called Mark Wallinger who had done the State Britain rip-off in 2007 at the Tate Britain.

The Guardian newspaper and Wallinger didn’t waste any time when Brian died (after a major operation in a hospital in Bremen, Germany, not Berlin as is publicly claimed by the press) by putting out a puzzling story they would never dare repeat in any court. I realised because of the lies that Wallinger told, that he and a Lord Myner had while he (Myner) was Chair of the Guardian Media Group, Tate Britain and a Director at the Bank of England been paid to do the State Britain rip-off to illegally try and cover up the abuse of process, including that the document dated 19 May had been illegally withheld until after 3rd March 2009 in CO/11393/2007.

What Wallinger says about any 19 May was untrue, because he never came and spoke with Brian and I, until after the illegal seizure:

I realised Wallinger was illegally trying to cover up this document (below) from Friday 19 May 2006 because I knew he never came to speak with Brian or I until -after- the illegal seizure so that was who and what he got his payday (100,00k) for and from:

I think Wallinger’s a little ‘confused’ about what he did on 19 May 2006 which was probably to ink his dirty deal with the to cop.

The con-artists Wallinger (who was definitely a trouble-maker trying to create numerous problem) obviously doesn’t want he was really doing ever coming out because its really not a good look for a supposed ‘artist’.

I was in Parliament Square on 19 May 2006.

I remember that Uri Geller did come and speak with us one evening before the illegal seizure, because he wanted to buy the two Banksy’s for 1,000 pounds.

(In the British High Court on 7th October 2011 I ordered the two Banksy’s be returned to Banksy to take them off the table in terms of the government who had stolen them, using them as leverage to get people to betray what Brian and I did, with others, that was much, much more than any banners)

Brian had apologised profusely to me over the original malicious prosecution against me, but he wasn’t to blame for what the government did. The actual arresting police officer who didn’t appear in court, I think because the police could not be seen with a politician as a prosecutor !! had said to me the government was going to make “an example” of me and were intentionally trying to… intimidate me.

(The first thing a lawyer ever said to me after the first time I was unlawfully arrested was “the first rule is police lie” which did turn out to be very true. The top cops Blair and Jones brought the British police into very serious disrepute)

The government had illegally stolen property again in September 2011 after Brian died and they did the whole routine of they could behave as though they were entitled to run our campaign, and so they decided who ‘owned’ what !! They illegally went through legally privileged information (and not for the first time) in live legal proceedings and then stashed the property in the City of London Museum of London so no-one could be accused of having stolen anything, although it was stolen by the government because neither Brian or I ever gave them permission to have anything. I would like everything returned from the Museum of London who are just telling the same old story which is basically some ‘eccentric’ guy did a protest. Another state actor called Sir Mark Rylance popped up and claimed he was a good friend of Brian’s to spin a statue outside the War Museum. We’d never seen the guy in all the years there. There were three Mark’s because the original Mark was the comedian Mark Thomas who Brian did know. The Metropolitan Police loved Thomas because he provided the top Cop Blair with the excuse to provide an -undated- delegated authority saying he could basically pass the buck to other police (while he was illegally withholding the 19 May 2006 document until after 3rd March 2009)

I also had to deal with the additionally complicating fact the people who posed as my parent and god parents (and those of my late adopted brother) were from the highest echelons of the British and Australian (Fremantle) intelligence services who the Murdoch ‘Organised Crime’ family had trafficked me to as a small child. My lived experience meant I already knew that on the one hand, the people who posed as my parents and godparents were accomplished liars who could swear what they said was black in the morning was white by the afternoon, such was the calculated ‘ambiguity’ of much of what they said and did, while on the other hand what happened in the UK, just confirmed I was correct to want nothing to do with them:

Someone said to me “It must be difficult (for me) to come to terms with what has happened”. I think it is unlikely to ever be possible to ‘come to terms’ with what has happened, but it is possible to move on and make new memories.

Then there was the ‘smoking email’ from 17th January 2012 because the press needed the politicians to write some lie to try and cover their usual routine of unlawfully arresting me so they could publish whatever the lie of the day happened to be:

The British and Australian politicians were never going to let me have legal representation.

The extraordinary abuse of process is undeniable, but I have so much that is beautiful in my life that helps me.

The British and Australian governments knew I was living in Mediterranean countries way back in 1984 without knowing my Mediterranean and Celtic identity, when Barnett who posed as my godfather was conveniently Director of General of ASIO after I had been sent 12000 miles away as a teenager because I refused to be used by or join the intelligence services because I just wanted to move on with my own life.

(When I was a small child, what I understood the word ‘adopted’ to mean was, I was living with strangers who were nothing like me, because somehow my own family had got lost somewhere in the big wide world, and so I would have to find them. It turned out my sisters had always known I existed, so I was never a secret. My own research proved the reason the government never wanted to ‘officially’ hand me back was because of the secrets on the government side. It creates endless problems for an adoptee when the government cling to the notion that they can ‘officially’ continue to erase our own identity even when we know our own identity and our own siblings who are not ‘officially’ considered next of kin)

A kinder evolution is possible.

This Commonwealth of Australia Statutory Declaration is true.

Donna