Re: Your emails & phone calls last week about my witness statement & Court of Disputed Returns re: Jurisdiction etc (& what Australian ‘bully boy’ PM Albanese’s very own ‘AUKUS’ with revolving doors of fmr Australian PM/FM/PM & now US Ambassador Rudd & fmr Australian FM & now UK Ambassador Smith etc knew) 

Hi,

Re: Your emails & phone calls last week about my witness statement about jurisdiction & Australian (High) Court of Disputed Returns and the Australian bully boy PM. 

I hope this finds you well.

I had to prioritise going to hospital last week to catch up with getting some tests done.

(So I should be able to find out soon, whether or not I am in remission/partial remission/what the medical situation is now, with regard to the diagnosis of a rare illness with no cure that can be extremely debilitating. The objective of available medical treatment this year with regard to that illness has been to try and preserve organ function etc etc. There is apparently only one medical treatment in the world so far that is specifically for the illness, but that has only recently been approved overseas, so that is not available in Australia. It has been yet another challenging situation to try and come to terms with and then manage, because as you know, I was already going through dealing with a number of other medical issues following on from the various diagnoses before that, of transfusion dependent cancer (that haemorrhaged) and then recurrent cancer etc etc)

It is just so offensive and the rest, that politicians like the Australian  Labour party’s ‘bully boy’ PM  publicly pretend that it is and was okay to “officially” permanently ….erase !!!!!! my own multinational overlapping Celtic & Mediterranean identity. It is just so unnatural.

So to briefly catch up, and consider next steps with regard to my legal argument about… jurisdiction etc (& what the now Australian Ambassadors to the UK and United States knew, incl particularly when Steve Jago spoke to the Australian Foreign Office, way back on 7th October 2009)

________________________________

I think it would be helpful if you checked whether or not the Australian (High) Court of Disputed Returns ( my adoption case sure is about ‘disputed returns’ in all sorts of ways) concedes in writing they have no jurisdiction (which is also obviously another reason I would not have to pay $500) to:

a) stop me making my own decision to ditch the adoption court order and by extension any dual nationality if I want to stand in federal politics in for example Australia 

b) stop me ditching the adoption court order through my High Court jury lawsuits in the UK, including the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, or while in my own home in Breizh, France, or before that while I was in my own home the UK  I am saying no court in Australia, including the High Court of Australia or the Australian (High) Court of Disputed Returns has any jurisdiction.

***** because as far as I can see, what is really going on, is the Australian ‘bully boy’ PM is just using illegally stopping me standing in federal politics in Australia to illegally continue to refuse to settle my jury lawsuits in the UK, that only happened….because Australian politicians illegally failed in their duty to ensure my… access to legal representation/assistance in the UK (because Australian politicians had a multiplicity of undeclared conflicts of interest) *****

If the Court of Disputed Returns concedes, then I only have to try and settle my lawsuits in the UK (which I am not pretending is easy or will happen)

___________________

____________________

The politicians were never going to let any jury see even the illegally edited government version of CCTV below from 4th September 200…6 (where I walk through a door with Steve Jago before what happened where the government illegally destroyed independent video footage before dishonestly claiming there was no CCTV in the corridor we were invited into that became a massive jury …lawsuit. In the lawsuit, the politicians ridiculously then tried on all sorts like trying to claim “public interest immunity” as yet another buying time/time wasting/ stalling tactic. The politicians and press didn’t;t worry about illegally leaking my adopted identity without my permission along with a pack of lies.

Rudd et al have then covered up Steve Jago phoned the Australian Foreign Office, from the UK, three years later on 7th October 2009, (after the Rudd et al cover up of my High Court habeas Corpus Court Order from April 2008 which did not attract any public interest immunity claims) to say I was being illegally detained (because I kept insisting on having the CCTV of the attempt on my life on 4th September 200…9 (after CCTV and independent video footage of what happened on 4th September 2006 was illegally destroyed)

The government’s (illegally) edited version of CCTV from 4th September 200…6: (before the attempt on my life on 4th September 200…9 that Rudd gave the green light to)

I am really not okay with being physically assaulted and abused like this:

I understandably suspect politicians intended to attempt to cause me life threatening harm on 4th September 2006 because there is no doubt they did three years later on 4th September 2009, after the Murdoch Crime family who had me kidnapped from a court on 19th July 2007, to stop me giving evidence in a case where they didn’t want CCTV of their literally stalking me going on the court record, where I did also complain “the government put in place a sequence of events that put my life at risk” !!!! did then put out a hit on me, on Sky News Live in the UK on 19th July 2009 after Rudd had despicably given the green light to the attempt on my life. They also used (for example) the same dates of 26th March 2006 (Mothers Day) and then 26th March 2007 (the ‘landmark’ jurisdiction case begins) against me, so presumably someone had… a diary arranging and orchestrating it all.

I was legally entitled to… access to legal representation/assistance  in the UK, but instead Australian politicians who had a multiplicity of undeclared conflicts of interest outsourced the life threatening physical harm of me to the UK (that Australian agents did take part in, in the UK)

I didn’t know at the time, that there was definitely a conspiracy between British and Australian politicians and the Murdoch Crime family, from Mothers Day 26th March 2006 onwards, which is why the Australian ‘bully boy’ PM brought back a Victorian Premier Bracks (who is shown with Blair on 26th March 2006) when I was forced to return and the Australian federal Labour party said they were taking over the Victorian Labour Party:

It turns out a Mr Cain from the Cain political family who spun the legally unworkable Victorian Adoption legislation 1984 was advising the Victorian government until it all fell apart in the UK in HQ11X00563 etc:(on 17th March 2011, I manage to get the words the govt was illegally overtaking us (in for example CO/11393/2007) on the British High court record which is actually recorded, and the judge couldn’t disagree:

Meanwhile Rudd (and Smith who was the FM when Steve Jago phoned) are hiding away in embassies illegally trying to claim legal immunity by another means:

The CCTV of the attempt on my life in 2009 (that I never agreed was solely a civil matter) politicians have illegally withheld and will never hand over:

My case does highlight why trying to force an adoptee to return to Australia to ditch an adoption court order cannot be legal, and is legally unworkable because it ignores that those who in my own case, would wish me harm, can and were -also- operating in the UK. It’s not really legally possible, and certainly in this day and age, to say an adoptee has to return to an originating court in Australia, when all the…. politicians who have illegally sought to stop me ditching the adoption court order, have illegally used public office like Rudd, Smith and Albanese have done and are doing, to avoid appearing before any jury in a court of law, which is slightly different to saying any old lies in the press.

c) Of course it cannot be that Australian courts who say courts in other countries have no jurisdiction to interfere in the right of Australian citizens to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia, could then turn around and say that doesn’t apply to a dual national …adoptee in an Australian court. The thing is it is not even just the Australian (High) ‘Court of Disputed Returns’ who politicians are illegally using to stop an adoptee ditching an adoption court order and by extension, any choice about accompanying dual nationalities, it is courts like the… County Court doing it too.

The politicians who staged the 2017 dual nationality extravaganza in 2017 while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France could not reasonably say they did not know there were dual national adoptees already adversely affected, and remain so. Too many adoptees can have a lifetime of too many layers of ‘bureaucracy’ endlessly illegally interfering in our lives and personal decisions every single day.

No politician could really claim in front of any jury, they can make an old supposedly… civil adoption court order with any old accompanying legislation to stop an adoptee having the same freedoms people who are not adoptees have.

The very fact politicians falsely claim adult adoptees need the permission of a judge in a court to ditch an adoption court order made while we were minors that we never agreed to, creates the very space for… discrimination between not just adoptees and people who are not adopted, but…. among adoptees because politicians opened the door to the concept that they could act…. arbitrarily and “allow” some people to ditch an adoption court order while refusing to “allow” some people to ditch an adoption court order. The “because I can act 1984” (the Victorian Adoption Act 1984) has a lot to answer for.

It is sadly not possible to really say that there is any good adoption legislation anywhere in what is only a global adoption industry, because successive governments have lacked either the political will or political courage to admit adult adoptees can ditch an adoption court order made while a minor without needing the permission of anyone else. People who raised an adoptee and who really cared about an adoptee could not possibly want, let alone expect, an adult adoptee to ask their permission to ditch the adoption court order and nor would they expect an adoptee to need the permission of a court.

NB: The likes of Rudd had financial interests with Ingeus in the UK, while a Senator James McGrath was working with Johnson and Lynton Crosby in the London Mayoralty in the UK (so there was overlap between Rudd and McGrath n the UK) as did a former Victorian MP Tim Smith who was working for a British Tory MP, in the UK called David Davis., like a former Victorian Liberal MP who claimed to be adopted called Bach who the Murdoch crime family parachuted in to Victoria for a while, after he was working for the politicians in the UK) A Tory MP (and former Leader of the Tories) Ian Duncan Smith had married into the Fremantle family, and it was the Fremantle naval and intelligence services part of the clan who ‘raised’ me in Australia (after the Murdoch crime family trafficked me to them) so the last person that warmongering Smith wanted to see, was me in Parliament Square, Central London. And when a Charing Cross Police Station had to be disbanded (because of our lawsuits) the senior police officer hid out in Ian Duncan’s Smith constituency, while of course Ian Duncan Smith was living it up in the Fremantle pile, in a different constituency, and then Ian Duncan Smith was giving the poverty profiteering contracts to Ingeus, and Rudd was a financial beneficiary of Ingeus in the UK, and so on and so forth. 

It was Rudd and a Tory MP Sir Alan Duncan from Vitol Oil who illegally covered up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in 2008 and then the attempt on my life, before they were cheerleaders for arming their mercenaries ridiculously posing as protesters in Libya in 2011 who were only interested in artificially inflating the price of oil, not democracy. Not forgetting the meddling monarchy in the UK were also maliciously trying to prosecute me in the UK, along with the Murdoch crime family and their private members bill in the British House of Lords against me in 2011 (when I had actually ‘won’ HQ11X00563 which they were all desperate to also cover up) It’s very sad that the likes of lying Rudd were desperate for the war in Libya, to try and hide what he was illegally involved in, in Parliament Square, Central London, in the UK against me as an…. Australian citizen. And yet such people waffle on about how they as politicians should have the right to officially erase… my Mediterranean identity. No thanks. I was peacefully defending the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy in the UK, despite politicians labelling me as the “other”/”foreigner” (and long before they invented their Farage-a-drama to try and distract from umm… themselves.

I have never really been treated as an Australian citizen, which has just been so clear at this latest federal election.

I really am a Schrodinger’s Democrat because I currently live in (albeit not voluntarily) a country called Australia that says it is a democracy, but is in fact only a democracy for people who have the freedom to make their own choice to stand for democratic election in federal politics. The adoption court order has made me an “other”/”outsider”/”foreigner”, my whole life really, because I don’t accept or want to just go along with such an oppressive abuse of political power.

There is and was so much… political overlap in the real world, that no Australian court has any jurisdiction (for a number of/so many reasons) to say I could not ditch an adoption court order in… another country, including through jury lawsuits related to the adoption court order or dual nationality in another country, like the UK. The Victorian Adoption Act 1984 was only ever legally unworkable political window dressing, just like the phoney national apology in 2013. I was born in Australia, was married in New Zealand, and divorced in the UK (and had one son born in Australia and one som born in New Zealand) and yet politicians ridiculously claim I had to return to the originating court in Australia to go through whatever obstacle course they put in my way/to essentially sign a gag order to… possibly be “allowed” to ditch an adoption court order. The disproportionate nature of an adoption court order does constitute a false imprisonment when it is forced on me by politicians.

_____________________________________

Notes:

It is clear the Australian government are also legally liable for unlimited medical costs, so that I should have unlimited access to any medical treatment of my choosing because politicians knew that any medical professional who saw the CCTV of the attempt on my life in the UK would… immediately know what politicians intended. 

(My personal view and my own peace plan is the best place to actually have an office in a Magistrates civil court where a registrar has the legal authority to rubber stamp a court certified copy of adoptees of any race, religion, politics or none, exercising our right of return to our own identity (which is not necessarily the same as linking that to any actual place) by ditching our adoption court orders made while we were minors, would be Jerusalem because it is a contested space. 

A contested space like Jerusalem is somewhere where it would actually be possible for the largest number of adoptees to have the opportunity to freely ditch adoption court orders without politician from anywhere actually being involved. My personal belief is that Jerusalem could host the first civil court for civilians, which is something that is really needed because there are only international courts for governments. 

The Israeli government could actually offer people who have ditched their adoption court order citizenship on the condition that adoptees did not have to publicly be any religion and could stand in Israeli politics, which would actually be good for Israeli politics because it would introduce a diversity that is not based on religion. There has never really been any… religious freedom around the Mediterranean, including the freedom to not publicly say what religion you are, or to choose to not be any religion. It is actually far more common than people talk about, that if you have a Mediterranean background, you can have, as in my own actual family background, people who are and have been Jewish, Catholic and Muslim. One of the main problems the Israeli government does have (which I saw when I was on the Yad Mordechai kibbutz near Gaza in 1984 when I was traveling in the Middle East with an American citizen) while Australian politicians were plotting adoption legislation, and you could be arrested in Israel if you identified yourself as adopted) is that politicians are essentially deciding who can and cannot live in a country based on religion.

I particularly find it extremely oppressive that because… politicians “officially” erased my Mediterranean identity, they have in reality also essentially illegally stopped me from being able to take part in contributing to peace in Mediterranean countries too or at least in a way I might like to choose. The government’s “official” version of me, is just not me, in any way, but particularly culturally. I felt much more at home when I was also living in Italy in 1984, than I have ever felt in Australia, and that was …before I even knew about my Italian heritage. The political lies and political betrayal over my own identity is not okay, and of course it is worse when politicians have used and abused public office.

**** 1. It is self evident, it is absolutely unlawful for any politicians to use a) state and b) adoption legislation to stop me having the same freedom other politicians have to ditch a dual nationality to have the freedom to stand for democratic election in..c) federal politics. 

2. The latest bully boy Australian Labour PM (who has made his very own little ‘AUKUS’ parachuting the former Australian PM/FM/PM Rudd into the Australian embassy in the United States while parachuting the former Australian FM Smith into the UK embassy as Ambassador, before handpicking his and the Murdoch crime family’s adoption propagandist from the government funded !! ‘PCA’ in Victoria, into my federal electorate of Melbourne, as an MP) really has had every opportunity to legally address at the federal level, the legal problems being created by unlawfully imposing an adoption court order on me.

The Australian ‘bully boy’ PM did after all have me dumped over the border from the McNamara electorate while I was very seriously ill with recurrent cancer !!!! 

There are a lot of similarities between the British Labour Party and the Australian Labour Party, in the sense that they are not really Labour Party’s. There is so little difference between political parties these days, because they are all occupying the same political space, that there is a actually a huge political space in both countries that has opened up for entirely new political… parties to represent what is an increasing majority of people who are now politically unrepresented, and especially so in the UK because of Brexit. I remember when I was living in Breizh, France and learning about politics in a republic, during the 2017 election in France. People would say they were left with no choice but to as they would say “hold their nose” to vote for the Macron government who had re-invented themselves as something new, which people knew wasn’t true, but was because people felt they could no longer vote for the main political parties there had been before. In the Presidential part of the election in France, which has two rounds, the actual largest vote turned out to be for neither Macron or Le Pen, but since only the vote for a person counted in the end, then Macron was elected the President. The politics in France were pretty dire at the time, except (in most circumstances) for the local Mairie (Mayor) which was a big improvement on the London Mayoralty in the UK which should just be abolished. I think I felt (and particularly after what happened in Catalonia, which I couldn’t really consider going to live in at that time, I was forced to leave the UK) that wherever I live, I really only believe in enshrining the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy in any Constitution instead of the inequality of the institution of a (an often meddling) monarchy or whatever a republic can also be made to mean. I do believe s genuine democracy has to put all legislation to a public vote, which could of course also help limit the worst excesses because logically members of the public are unlikely to consistently vote to give wealthy people the legislative exceptions, wealthy people often buy for themselves. It would also solve the problem of politicians saying one thing during a couple of weeks of electioneering before then going off and doing whatever they want. The latest Australian federal election reminded me of the French election in 2017, when members of the public just held their noses and voted for the political party they hoped would do the least harm.

I don’t believe that voting should be compulsory, like it is in Australia, because forcing people to vote does not make politics any better but it does allow politicians to inflate the support they claim to have they may well not have if voting was not compulsory. I think the sheer nastiness of Australian politics where so many politicians are just so rude and dismissive of so many members of the public, highlights how much better it would be to put all legislation to a public vote so people really are able to vote for policies, rather than a media curated image of any politician.

(As you know, I already have the ‘highly unusual’ …jurisdiction case about me in the High Court in the UK, and did as you know, on the same day I first visited your offices in January 2025, go to a court and law library in Melbourne, to a) get any further information and b) confirm what I am saying. It’s commonsense the High Court… jurisdiction case about me in the UK I referred to in my witness statement, relied on my never having a High Court… jury lawsuit that would be recorded) 

3. I reasonably believe that I realistically took more than all reasonable steps I should have needed to take, to be able to stand for democratic election in federal politics… before the latest general election in Australia. I could not possibly have needed to do anything else myself, other than go to any politicians office or any government department office in Australia, to ask and get help to have the freedom to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia.

4. It seems to me, from my ‘highly unusual’ experience in the UK and Australia (and to some extent, also in France because I did raise the problems with my adoption there too) that is way off anything that could possibly be considered as normal for any member of the public, that politicians et al do not care at all about any… consequences for me of their unlawful imposition of an adoption court order made while I was a minor, on me as an adult (that include my illegally being stopped from having the freedom to make my own decision to stand in federal politics in Australia because of the additional dual nationality imposed by an adoption court order) 

Jurisdiction, jurisdiction, jurisdiction and then jurisdiction

5. I think it is logical that the only possible reason for the way I have been treated in the UK and Australia, is that politicians just do not want to publicly admit politicians and judges have no… jurisdiction to continue to impose an adoption court order made while I was a minor, on me as an adult without my agreement. 

———————

The two reasons I ended up having the original ‘landmark’  jurisdiction case about me in the UK (which politicians and judges knew was merely political window dressing that would not stand up to any legal scrutiny by any civil jury in… my High Court jury lawsuits in the UK) was:

a) politicians were trying to duck and dive all over the place to illegally hide what they were illegally trying to launder through the British Magistrates Courts that they never thought would get found out, because they refuse to make or keep any audio/audiovisual recordings of proceedings in the British Magistrates courts. 

After all, the overt part of the very serious political persecution of me in the UK did as court records show, begin with a sitting British Tory MP called Grieve illegally essentially maliciously bringing a private prosecution !! against me in the UK, with him literally as the prosecutor !!!! because he thought, that because he did it in the Magistrates Courts, he would never be found out !! And perhaps he would never have been found out, if I had not constantly campaigned to successfully force the repeal of the political ban (in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 now repealed) on peaceful freedom of expression in the UK. Even the Murdoch Crime family sough to bring their private members bill against me in the British House of Lords in 2011 in the UK too, which was also all about illegally trying to stop jury lawsuits. 

The British UK Attorney General in October 2012 & the Australian Attorney General in February 2013  

It is obviously highly unusual for a sitting MP to be the prosecutor. And when Grieve became the UK Attorney General he is seen continuing to try and cover up what he (and others) had done and were doing, when he illegally used his position to try and threaten me in October 2012, when he knew I had High Court civil jury lawsuits (ie: HQ12X03564) where he did reasonably know questions would be asked about what he had been doing. 

It is obviously not a co-incidence that in early 2013, the Australian Attorney General as I recently pointed out was also publishing false statements about adoption in Australia with politicians phoney apology spinning the political language of “forced adoptions” (the most senior political law officer in the country would be expected to know is not a legal term) to illegally hide it clearly constitutes a… false imprisonment (which is a known legal term) to impose an adoption court order on me as an adult without my agreement.

It should go without saying that the Victorian Adoption Act 1984 is clearly legally unworkable (it was very unreasonable to for example force me to indefinitely leave my own home overseas in Breizh, France to return to the “originating” court in Victoria, Australia to go through what is only a political obstacle course, based on the false premise that I need to pay for and have “permission” from a County Court judge.

The Victorian Labour Premier Appoints a County Court Judge with an undeclared conflict of interest.

It is not by ‘happenstance’ that when I was forced to return, a former Labour Premier (Andrews) illegally appointed as a County Court Judge (& State Coroner) a Mr Cain from:

a) the Cain political family who illegally enacted the legally unworkable Adoption legislation in 1984 who

b) also just happened to be the Government Solicitor to the Victorian govt when I was in Parliament Square, Central London and the Victoria government 

c) illegally employed a Sir Ken Jones from ACPO etc in the UK as DAC in Vic Police (where Jones illegally failed to disclose the “both houses and black rod document etc) while it turns out (and this is just so illegal) politicians had Jones organising Australian undercovers/agents (I call agent provocateurs because that best describes in legal terms what they do) like someone they call a Mr Brett Bailey at for example a State Opening on 25th May 2010 in the UK who is subject to my UK jury lawsuits too (and was spying on a family member in Australia which means he illegally accessed adoption information… from someone, that the now Judge Cain is also legally liable over)

(Of course, a Ms Glass from the IPCC in the UK had re-invented herself as a Victorian Ombudsman, while a Mr Weimar from the GLA in London, had me illegally detained during hotel quarantine to cover up his role at the GLA with Johnson and Lynton Crosby, in what became my jury lawsuits in the UK. The Australian Labour Party was pretty close to the British…. Tory party too and indeed so much so they could be interchangeable. It just beggars belief that the the coward who is the fmr London Mayor and British PM Johnson who orchestrated the attempt of my life with Rudd, in the UK, was going to visit Melbourne at the end of last year. I remember a guy who had a contract with the GLAin 2012 once told me he had to go to a meeting with Johnson and he said all Johnson did was go on and on and on about me, behind my back of course. And then of course around the same tie, Johnson had one of his now ex wives who portrayed herself as a human rights lawyer defending him… in the press, against me, as if he didn’t have enough freebie legal representation. And so I all I could say in reply to the press, was words to the effect that Ms Wheeler obviously would not say her husband could go around unlawfully “arresting” defenceless women !! which is why and how I came to have High Court jury lawsuits, if she really was a human rights lawyer. ‘Astonishingly’ the fact the Murdoch Crime family had -also- tried on the Private members Bill against me in the British House of Lords had entirely escaped her along with the rest of the press while they were spinning their own Leveson.)

***** b) the Australian government… illegally failed to provide me with… access to legal representation/assistance… in the UK, because Australian politicians (like Rudd with Ingeus in the UK and Senator James McGrath with Johnson at the London Mayoralty in the UK) had a multiplicity of undeclared conflicts of interest, that meant they were essentially…. outsourcing the life threatening physical harm being caused to me in the UK.

The British and Australian politicians two priorities are and were to never let a) my British High Court jury lawsuits go ahead b) me stand in politics in Australia or the UK.

The politicians involved, obviously thought they would get away with what they were illegally doing because they could hide all sorts laundered through the widely discredited Metropolitan Police, the prosecutors, where the original prosecutor was also a serving MP and so on, through the British Magistrates Courts. It was a barrister from Doughty Chambers who accused the original District Judge of being corrupt that only led to umm… me being illegally denied… access to legal representation, and was not the whole story, because of course the MP should never have been allowed to be a prosecutor, including in a court that did not make or keep audio/audio visual recordings of proceedings.

I always knew it was easily arguable before a High Court civil jury in the UK, that judges in the UK cannot have any jurisdiction to… dispute what is said in a court, in proceedings in the Magistrates Courts when it is judges and politicians who illegally refused to make and keep audio/audio visual recordings in courts I didn’t voluntarily go to.

It is seriously illegal that Australian politicians illegally failed in their legal duty to ensure I had…. access to legal representation/assistance in the UK, because the politicians… themselves had such a multiplicity of undeclared conflicts of interest. 

It is really, really serious that Rudd et al covered up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from Justice Owen on 16th April 2008 that only happened because I was illegally denied… access to legal representation.

*********************

*********It was Steve Jago who rang and spoke to the Australian Foreign Office on 7th October 2009, to say I was being illegally detained in the UK (because I was insisting on having the CCTV of the attempt on my life on 4th September 2009 -which was after Steve Jago was with me on 4th September 2006- when the government had illegally edited CCTV and illegally destroyed independent video which is all as massive High Court jury lawsuit in the UK (ie: HQ12X03564 etc) The Australian Foreign Office did speak to me, but what they did not do is ensure I had… access to legal representation/assistance, so I could be immediately released because of the multiplicity of undeclared conflicts of interests of politicians ************

I have seen the common denominator between the official records on both 4th September 2006 and 4th September 2009 is that there are two (albeit incomplete) copies of the supposed same records from each day, because when the government failed in their plans they had to further falsify what were already falsified records.

One of the things the British and Australian politicians were trying to do on 7th October 2009 was cover up that no doctor was called to check out the injuries I already had on 4th September 2009, before the government made a further attempt on my life.

The government never intended to hand over to me the CCTV of the attempt on my life, because they knew any medical professional would immediately know they intended to murder me.

When a consultant from St Thomas’ hospital asked to speak with me on 7th October 2009 he said with regard to one injury that I would have to go to hospital and have an operation etc.  However I wasn’t able to for a number of reasons, including because the government kept torturing me where they knew, I was already injured, on for example a State Opening shortly after, on 18th November 2009. I remember when Neil who was my boyfriend at the time, when he was going through video footage in France that he said he was very shocked by some video footage he came across from the State Opening on 18th November 2009, that he said shows me being tortured. He asked me why I hadn’t mentioned it. I said I didn’t actually know that video footage of my being tortured on 18th November 2009, where I was already injured, existed.

The British government claimed in a different case when I was tortured that a police officer called Mr Corcoran could not appear in court in the UK, because he had emigrated to Australia. When I had asked the police officer (in front of CCTV that had audio) why he had tortured me, he replied (in front of CCTV that had audio) that he was promised a job with armed police, if he tortured me. In light of what I now know about a male who calls himself Mr Brett Bailey, who is subject to my jury lawsuits in the UK, it seems more likely than not to me that if Corcoran emigrated in 2009 then that was the same time Jone became DAC in Vic Police.

Th government agents of all sorts were emboldened because they had in their own words been given what they considered to be a get out of jail free card with the document I previously mentioned in my witness statement about “both houses and black rod” which now looks more like not just in the UK, but Australia too. There was no way the document about “both houses and black rod” illegally…. interfering in and giving their “full support to (any) police actions” was going to fly before a civil jury.

***************************

It was seriously illegal for politicians to force me to go on a witness stand in the British High Court… without a jury on 21st June 2010, that meant I was illegally denied legal representation… yet again, because of course quickly became obvious, the government/s were illegal trying to overtake the jury lawsuits of Brian and I. All the government could do by illegally truing to bring lawsuits in the High Court Court against Brian and I without any jury, to try and overtake our jury lawsuits was invite… counterclaims from us, against them. The politicians never had any ‘recognised defence in law’.

The British PM’s Mr Stamer’s Doughty Chambers professionally embarrassed themselves because they had an undeclared conflict of interest while Starmer was the DPP covering up for Greive et al. 

I am thankful that at least after Starmer is the British PM who I would know bought his way into Number Ten through covering up that prosecutor in the original malicious prosecution against me in the UK on 22nd February 2006 was a sitting Tory MP, Grieve and what that led to, and why, before the press lied about my unlawful arrest on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 to illegally try and hide that was actually agreed it was a High Court jury lawsuit (which is why the government could never produce an Inspector Lyons) that I won’t know who the politicians are and the dirty deeds they did to become PM’s et al.

My own adoption case proves the importance of my as an adoptee being able to ditch an adoption court order made while I was a minor, without needing the permission of anyone else because my case does prove how my political rights have been trampled all over by the political ambition… of others.

A kinder evolution is possible