Donna ‘Schrodinger’s Democrat’ Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: politicians, Vic Police, ‘Ambassador’ Rudd, Head of NACC) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar/s & FOI depts: I plan to use my… UK jury lawsuits about my ‘right of return’ to my own identity incl $3 billion dollars compensation for me, to have a ‘registered office’ in Jerusalem to try & help global diaspora of adoptees that could also help make it a universal city on Mediterranean, because Australian politicians who are… legally obliged to… prioritise &… guarantee Australian citizens freedom to stand for democratic election incl federal politics in Australia, did instead engage in a… criminal conspiracy that began with Murdoch family & Barnett who posed as my godfather & was Director General of ASIO etc, conspiring with Australian Labour Party to knowingly… subvert peace & harmony of rule of law & democracy in 1984 when they illegally used… state adoption !!!! legislation to illegally try & stop my having freedom to without political, religious or judicial interference have ‘right of return’ to my own identity, jury lawsuits & to stand for democratic election & have career incl… federal politics in Australia (simply because my case stood in way of Murdoch patriarch… buying American citizenship & building global media empire) before Murdoch family & Rudd et al continued the… criminal conspiracy in the UK, through illegally withholding a MET Police document dated 19th May 2006 from legal proceedings about me, that was not even disclosed until after 3rd March 2009 in CO/11393/2007 etc etc (there are obviously more documents) that also became part of HQ11X00563 etc etc (simply because my UK lawsuits then also stood in way of Murdoch family BSkyB deal etc) before Rudd was grandstanding in the Australian Senate !! in 2021 making…. excuses !!!! about & expressing faux outrage about the Murdoch family instead of… prioritising &… guaranteeing !!!! freedom for… Australian citizens to stand in federal politics in Australia (which he never did) that would… of itself, naturally end the long standing criminal conspiracy to subvert the peace and harmony of the rule of law by the Murdoch family whose patriarch is an American citizen, who has literally built their global media empire out of subverting the peace & harmony of the rule of law & democracy (28.11.2024)
I make this witness statement/ of truth/statutory declaration.
My own identity of Donna Bugat (formerly known by my adoptee name of Babs Tucker) is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The legal reality is my own rights and freedoms do trump the Murdoch family ‘news media’ subverting the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy.
There is no human kindness in Australian politics.
The secrets and lies of our adoption cases:
I think the… criminal conspiracy about subverting the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy, using adoption legislation, sadly probably does also raise constitutional issues, such as the legitimacy of a supposed parliament who have used adoption legislation in such a deceitful and undemocratic way.
The injustice of the 1984 adoption legislation is like the ‘Fournier Files’ the Vatican notoriously collected during the Inquisition against Cathars. It is very much treated as heresy if you want to as an adult adoptee, ditch an adoption court order, and if you have had a dual nationality imposed by the adoption court order, to also be able to stand for democratic election including in federal politics in Australia (and of course theses days the Murdoch family patriarch just bought himself a papal knighthood in his undemocratic crusade to stop me having the freedom to stand in federal politics in Australia):
**** My personal view is the judiciary in Australia should be elected by the public (or at the very least by a jury system comprising members of the public) because there is absolutely no… public… scrutiny of the… judiciary at all in Australia.
The long standing criminal conspiracy by the Murdoch family to continually subvert the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy in Australia solely exists because of a failure of politicians to both… prioritise and … guarantee the… freedom of other Australian citizens to stand for democratic election to federal politics in Australia because that will of itself, naturally end the criminal conspiracy that began in 1984 illegally using adoption !!!! legislation. There are politicians who have not only had a career in politics but have made their career, politics, including to continue on the gravy train as Ambassadors, and so on and so forth, and yet in all their years in their career in only politics, they have never, prioritised or guaranteed the… freedom for other Australian citizens to stand for democratic election including in federal politics in Australia.
**** Of course, it’s completely unacceptable for Australia politicians to say it is mandatory for the public to vote for them, when politicians do not prioritise or guarantee other Australian citizens being able to stand for democratic election, including to have a career in federal politics in Australia. There are politicians who may sometimes promise a constituent a breadcrumb, but only because they don’t want the constituent to stand for election themselves, but for any politician to actually use public office to subvert the rule of law and democracy by stopping an Australian citizen from having the freedom to stand for democratic election including in federal politics in Australia is actually… unlawful ****
I currently live in Australia, but I do not live in the same “Australia” most other Australian citizens can take for granted because despite being a born and bred Australian citizen, I am unlawfully excluded by an adoption court order and adoption legislation from having those freedoms, which adversely affects my life every single day in so many ways.
The legal reality is there is not a single Australian state or federal politician who could honestly say to even a civil jury they represent me, and of course if you cannot stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia then you are also excluded from foreign policy decision making even though you are often also affected by that.
The Australian officials in the Australian embassy in London in the UK, when I was in Parliament Square, Central London told me (I didn’t ask) they wrote reports for the Australian politicians (presumably to try and cover themselves) but said (and again I did not ask) “the politicians do not care”. Of course Rudd, who once he got the nod from/agreement with the Murdoch family for the ‘Kevin 07’ political theatre, was too busy laundering money through Ingeus in the UK from both Labour and Tory & Lib Dem administrations, when he went far beyond simply not caring to being actively involved in covering up the appalling state violence etc because of course he knew there was no risk of my standing for democratic election in federal politics in Australia because of some politicians actual involvement in the criminal conspiracy revolving around the adoption legislation in 1984 in Victoria, Australia, to illegally try and stop me doing that. Rudd is no ‘victim’. My personal view is his ego was just far too big for him to be a man and come to speak with me when I was in the… public space of Parliament Square, Central London in the UK. He just exploited my being an adoptee.
Another fmr Australian PM Gillard’s ‘apology’ about adoption rings very hollow because she too, never prioritised or guaranteed Australian citizens having the… freedom to stand for democratic election including federal politics in Australia, and lied when she used the political language of ‘forced adoptions’ (which is not a recognised legal term) to try and say it is all in the past, when being excluded from having the freedom to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia because of the combination of an adoption court order and adoption legislation is happening very much in the here and now. The 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia is intended to discourage an adoptee with dual nationality from even trying to stand in federal politics in Australia. The list of politicians who do not really care about the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy is not short..
______________________________________
The Murdoch family-led ‘trial by media’ of me in the UK began on 26th March 2006 which was Mothers Day in the UK, and when the Murdoch family lawyer, Blair was grandstanding with politicians et al in Melbourne, in Victoria, Australia (the ‘modus operandi’ was to unlawfully arrest me so the press could publish whatever lies they liked, while I was illegally detained):
You couldn’t say the Murdoch family (or their lawyer Blair) were cheerleaders for democracy in Iraq.
… before Blair was grandstanding as the UN, EU, US & Russian ‘peace envoy’ to the Middle East in Gaza on 3rd March 2009 when the MET Police “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006 was finally disclosed in CO/11393/2007, before the Murdoch family on 19th July 2009 recklessly publicly incited on Sky News Live, what resulted in torture and attempted murder of me (as the unscrupulous fell all over each in efforts to collect from what I quote they called an ‘unlimited budget’ two years earlier on 19th July 2007)
What has happened to me is a direct result of Australian politicians not fulfilling their legal obligation to… prioritise and…. guarantee Australian citizens freedom to stand for democratic election including in federal politics in Australia. I might have lived most of my adult life in the UK, but no-one could ever say I was voluntarily in the UK. I was just… trapped by adoption.
I am a very ordinary person and member of the public who is excluded from living in the same “Australia” other people live in, solely because I am just illegally trapped in an ‘adoption’. That happened for no other reason than my case happened to stand in the way of the global ambitions of the patriarch of the Murdoch family who trafficked me to the intelligence services when I was a minor, before the Murdoch family patriarch was…. buying American citizenship, which is why the ‘backdoor’ deceit of adoption legislation in 1984 was used to try and stop my having jury lawsuits in Australia, or my standing in federal politics in Australia.
There can be many reasons an adoptee needs to extricate themselves from an adoption (just as people who are not adoptees sometimes need to extricate themselves from all sorts of abusive situations) and it is not necessary for any adoptee to have to explain that to or have the permission of any judge to do that. I have never had ‘Stockholm syndrome’ about adoption, which I have always wanted to be free from, and clearly wanted to do… before the unlawful interference of the criminal conspiracy surrounding the 1984 adoption legislation.
The Australian politicians, press and judges always knew the 1984 adoption legislation (which goes far beyond any possible realms of any… civil law) in Victoria, Australia would reasonably know, they could not legally stop jury lawsuits in other countries from an adoptee, especially if like me, you were born a dual national, or made a dual national adoptee by an adoption court order.
**** The true purpose of 1984 adoption !!!! legislation was about the Murdoch patriarch… buying American citizenship, so he obviously would not want me standing in federal politics in Australia because he knows he is not really even actually legally entitled to a visa to visit Australia.
On 23rd May 2006: I am not hearing a Chief Inspector Layzell (who it was claimed shortly thereafter decamped to a British off-shore tax haven) saying “both houses and black rod” from MET Police document dated 19th May 2006 in the multi billion dollar political scandal in the UK, involving Australian politicians:
My banner about “no free press” identifying the Murdoch patriarch was of course… stolen by the British government (a Lord Scarlett from MI6 joined the Murdoch family on the board of Directors of the Times of London etc):
The first time I was actually ever able to participate in democracy in any kind of meaningful way in my entire life, was with Brian in Parliament Square, Central London, and all the Murdoch family did was try to destroy that. The continuing and truly vile and disgusting threat his Lord Marlesford made in the British House of Lords in January 2012, was completely unacceptable. The British House of Lords who are a rotten bunch on the best of days, in some ways illustrate the problem of a country/constitutional monarchy calling itself a democracy, while actually having a whole house of legislators who stop members of the public being elected by other members of the public to that particular part of the Houses of Parliament called the House of Lords. The British Houses of Lords have no interest in or respect for democracy.
The fmr PM Brown typically knew he was lying (below) because he was also illegally withholding the MET Police “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006 on 3rd July 2007. :
The complete & utter… lie above written by Brown on 3rd July 2007 was actually published while Brian and I were at a hearing in the High Court on 25th October 2007 in CO/5019/2007 (the published record omits the hearing on 25th October 2007 took place, although they have recordings that it did that exist in what was yet another case where the “both houses and black rod” document was… illegally withheld) on the same day the latest monarch was grandstanding in Parliament Square with “both houses and black rod” to unveil their Lloyd George statue, before Brian was bashed in January 2008 (after the cover up of my being violently punched in the head on 17th August 2007 before the unveiling of the Mandela statue on 29th August 2007)
(I don’t personally understand how politicians can possibly claim a British King can also be the King of Australia, because there is such an obvious conflict of interest in a monarch supposedly taking ‘advice’ (which is doubtful anyway) from… two PM’s (with a British and an Australian PM, not forgetting the Australian Governor General and a plethora of state governors in Australia because of course, the British King is…. always going to first and foremost take ‘advice’ from a British PM including if/when there is conflict between ‘advice’ from an Australian PM and British PM, because the British Commonwealth/empire is built on and relies upon the English ‘aristocracy’)
It wasn’t like the now British King et al ever had to worry about me becoming PM in Australia, because of the criminal conspiracy from 1984, to stop me standing in federal politics in Australia.
The British politicians et al actively and illegally do all they could to stop Brian standing in the London Mayoralty in 2008 because of course all three candidates, Livingstone, Johnson and Paddick were all involved in the criminal conspiracy surrounding illegally withholding the MET Police “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006. The London Mayor is essentially the boss of the top cop, who obviously most definitely did not want Brian as the London Mayor. The London Mayoralty is about only wealthy people being able to stand because people need a large sum of money which most ordinary people would not have, to just stand for election to the London Mayoralty. The Australian Senator James McGrath (along with of course Lyndon Crosby) was up to his ears in the corruption surrounding that Mayoral election that made him Johnson’s Chief of Staff while the MET Police “both houses and black rod” document was illegally being withheld in my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 during that London Mayoral election.
It is a legal certainty the patriarch of the Murdoch family was breaching the Foreign Interference Act in the United States, in the UK, particularly when you look at the skullduggery of the London Mayoral election in 2008 (when of course Johnson was still technically a dual national American citizen too, that he had the… freedom to ditch). A fmr Australian Liberal party FM Downer, had tried to wriggle out of what was going on in the UK, by dishonestly trying to say in 2006 that I was no longer an Australian citizen !!!! which he wasn’t willing to repeat before any jury in any court in any country, before he became the Australian ‘Ambassador’ to the UK to help Labour’s Rudd et al cover up what they had done.
My personal view is the… most anyone who knows they were made an adoptee as a minor could possibly have to do as an adult is notify a court by (for example) email of our own adult decision to ditch the adoption court order which a court is legally obliged to accept and properly record. I cannot see how a judge can claim to have any legal standing to give his ten cents worth about an adult adoptee ditching an adoption court order made while the adoptee was a minor. (Brian and I went through a long ‘legal standing/locus standii’ thing with government departments and Westminster Council in CO/11393/2007) A person who was made an adoptee as a minor does not need the ‘permission’ of a judge (that could easily be refused) to as an adult, ditch an adoption court order. An adoptee who all too often goes through far too much inequality and uncertainty is at the very least, legally entitled to the… certainty of having ditched an adoption court order.
There are questions about the Head of NACC in Australia, because how on earth can a judge (patronisingly, and then some) loftily claim an adoption is about focusing on the best interests of an adoptee, when there is adoption legislation that subverts the rule of law and democracy to stop an adoptee having the freedom to stand for democratic election in federal politics (and worse just so some rich guy could buy American citizenship etc, and of course not forgetting he bought a Papal ‘knighthood’ from the Vatican and is their chief propagandist (despite of course having always been such a brazen sleaze bag and misogynist who objectifies and commodifies women, which he openly broadcasts on page 3 of his UK Sun newspaper which he hands out free to the UK MET Police who display it on the desks of their police stations)
The fact politicians and courts in Victoria, Australia have routinely illegally withheld and not provided court certified copies of adoption court orders to all adoptees (which is further evidence the 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia really is not at all what it claims to be about, because not all adoptees are even told they are adopted) means there cannot be any obligation on adoptees to provide that information to any court, but there is STILL a legal obligation on a court to provide an adult adoptee a court certified copy of our having ditched an adoption court order. That is probably the only way that could bring about courts to then actually follow due process to make sure all adoptees have a court certified copy of the adoption court order, no adoptee should ever have to ask for. It is a legal document courts are legally required to make sure an adoptee has.
In the UK the continuation of the criminal conspiracy by the Murdoch family, revolves around who knew what and when about the MET Police “both houses an black rod document dated 19th May 2006 that was illegally withheld and only disclosed after 3rd March 2009 in CO/11393/2007:
I simply plan to have a ‘registered office’ in Jerusalem where adoptees of any race, religion, politics or none can register our ‘right of return’ to our own identity. that will also help make that a universal city on the Mediterranean.
(The police are legally obliged to be ‘operationally’ independent of politicians. When Winfield gave me the ubiquitous pay per page bundle and I found “both houses and black rod” she claimed the document that had been illegally withheld and was obviously related to numerous other documents that had not been disclosed, was the MET Police’s “get out of jail free card”) There were numerous people like a Ms Deborah Glass who covered up while at the IPCC in the UK what happened to continue to… profit by becoming the Victorian Ombudsman in Australia where she obviously ‘oversaw’ covering up her own very serious corruption)
The fmr Australian PM Rudd was laundering money through Ingeus in the UK after he got the nod from the Murdoch family in return for covering up “both houses and black rod” (it’s about who knew what and when about that central document) that followed on from the…. criminal conspiracy in 1984 in Victoria, Australia about adoption involving the Australian Labour Party too:
It’s not like Rudd had to worry about me returning to Australia and standing for election in federal politics in Australia because he knew the Labour Party were part of the criminal conspiracy to subvert the rule of law and democracy, with adoption legislation in 1984 in Victoria, Australia.
A top cop Blair still did not disclose “both houses and black rod” on his way out the door to of course be promoted to the British House of Lords to help… continue covering up the MET Police document “both houses and black rod” that had included Johnson when he was an MP before becoming Mayor of London:
Sir Ken Jones was -also- illegally withholding “both houses and black rod”:
They had lost the satellite litigation of HQ11X00563 which I actually won in early 2011 (before I mentioned the EU Courts who could not stop me having jury lawsuits either) but the politicians et al still refused to settle (which they were covering up in another/different bizarre legal omni-shambles where Johnson claimed he could -also- while a Telegraph journalist also being funded by the Russian government, represent the British monarchy, but obviously didn’t show any delegated authority, incl that he would have had to shown he had actually informed the monarch about the MET Police “both houses and black rod” document he had illegally withheld to become Mayor of London (that Labour’s Livingstone, and the Lib Dems fmr MET Police Asst Commissioner, Lord Paddick had also done, along with a Baroness Jones from the Green Party in the UK who was on the MPA with Johnson et al):
I had obviously not wanted to return to the UK, from Germany after Brian died in a hospital in Bremen (not Berlin as the press falsely claimed) but I felt I had to.
The ‘Murdopolitan Polic’e and ‘News of the Yard’: when I asked a senior police officer who was standing nonchalantly chatting with a reporter from the Sun newspaper, on 16th January 2012, what the MET Police (far from legal) excuse was for what they were doing to me that day, he was recorded really unprofessionally saying sarcastically to me, to “ask the media department at New Scotland Yard” (while he was himself standing there schmoozing with a Sun reporter):
They really did not want to settle HQ11X00563 etc:
The Murdoch spin at the government controlled Leveson spin in the UK, obviously could not ‘overtake’ our lawsuits.
What was being hidden from… the public too, was the MET Police document about “both houses and black rod” dated 19th May 2006 (I was publicly speaking about it when I was unlawfully arrested on 11th April 2009 and 7th May 2009 before there was the torture and attempted murder of me after the Murdoch family recklessly publicly incited that on Sky News Live on 19th July 2009)
I properly asked for the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of (they also knew my DNA did not match their story about me) in Westminster Magistrates, in the UK (and someone had… leaked information about my adoption to… judges) so it is legally impossible to explain how the latest British PM Starmer who was the DPP (who were there in court) had passed on the CCTV to the bent City of London brief (below) obviously representing the Murdoch family et al who was never going to hand over the CCTV that actually… belongs to me (Starmer had a conflict of interest having -also- illegally withheld the MET Police “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006 from numerous court proceedings incl in CO/11393/2007 when he became DPP in 2008, during which he covered up for Johnson before they both became MP’s (in the case of Johnson again) in 2015, in the run up to their big Brexit panjandrum (which was pretty much run by the Murdoch family who profited from it) by which time I was living in my own home in Breizh, France, although I did suspect, because they were still refusing to settle lawsuits despite knowing they had “no recognised defence in law” it was more likely than not that Johnson and Starmer became MP’s to become… PM’s who would cover up for each other (because of course I do know about who knew what and when about the central MET Police “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006):
***** Rudd then laundered 1.4 billion dollars through Ingeus in the UK, instead of HQ11X00563 etc being settled with me which certainly breached the Australian Foreign Interference Act too because he seriously breached the public trust using his public position in any political role, as PM, FM, PM, to continue… helping the Murdoch family:
I sometimes say “god sent me into the wilderness (of my own beautiful home in Breizh, France) because he knows I like peace”.
In fact it was serendipitous that I was finally able to live in what was an autonomous region in a Mediterranean country (yay) in my own home in my very own nature lovers paradise of a small forest, with the most amazing symphony of birdsong.
(I called the visiting cat “the supervisor cat” because it always quietly watched over me in the garden, while there was also an owl who would often make his presence known during the night at the other end of my modest cottage)
I loved the magical Celtic mist on the pink granite coast (Cotes d’Armor) that I adore:
I do feel my own home in Breizh, France is the (Celtic) connection between both sides of my own actual family that I had obviously missed my whole life, and is very important to me. I had at least a small opportunity to privately live my own real identity in at some small ways.
It’s fair to say I did not miss the UK, and it was only the ball and chain of the criminal conspiracy about my… adoption that was still stopping me moving completely on with my own life, finally.
It is very shocking that I am a born and bred Australian citizen, and yet I am a ‘Schrodinger’s Democrat’ in Australia because of the criminal conspiracy involving adoption legislation taking away my freedom to stand for democratic election and have a career in federal politics in Australia.
It is very challenging what with the recurrent cancer etc diagnoses that mean I may also never be able to permanently live in my own home in Breizh, France, ever again, including because it’s obviously extremely difficult to even get travel insurance once you have a recurrent cancer etc diagnoses.
**** This is a big lie (below) by Rudd grandstanding in the Australian Senate !!!! in 2021 with lies he obviously would never dare repeat before a civil jury in a court (because of course he… profited with over 1.4 billion dollars laundered through Ingeus in the UK by covering up for and with the Murdoch family) and obviously knew that the Liberal party Senator, a James McGrath was also compromised as was fmr Victorian Liberal MP, a Mr Tim Smith:
The Murdoch family employees (I have had the misfortune to come across over the years) creepily treat their patriarch as some kind of king of their own cult. I find it difficult to believe they could actually believe everything he tells them to say.
(Of course the Murdoch family hired the fmr Liberal Party PM Abbott to spin the Murdoch family version of the global adoption industry, before it turned out he (and his Chief of Staff, a not so credible Ms Credlin who also poses as a Murdoch family Sky News ‘journalist’) had spun a story about a person Abbott claimed to have given up for adoption, who it turned out was not his own son)
I am only one individual in what is a global diaspora of adoptees, with too many adoptees having the experience of losing our own identities and families, making us a real ‘lost tribe’ forced in the here and now, to ‘wander’ in the not so modern world, which for so many individuals and families has so many adverse consequences that do continue through generations.
In my own case, I just naturally wanted my own identity to peacefully move on with me own life, while others just wanted me to join the intelligence services to sweep whatever suited them under the carpet, and so I was sent 12000 miles away as a teenager to the UK as punishment because I had refused to join the intelligence services.
Prahran:
I did not know that before I was sent away, I was fleetingly living so close to members of my own family, because members of my own family were living in Prahran, in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. One of the people who posed as my mother who worked for ASIO also lived nearby in South Yarra. What was inevitable was I would come across members of my own family who were so close, and indeed I remember someone asking me if I had sisters, and yet what I will never be able to reconcile is, given the enormity of so much life changing and life threatening trauma is, I was sent so far away from my own family.
There was a Labour MP at the relevant times in Prahran.
Israel & Italy
I did not know, and it is very distressing to me that I was not told about and did not know when I was living in Mediterranean countries in 1984 about my Mediterranean heritage when the intelligence services knew I did not want to return to the UK, and they knew they were subverting the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy with the 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia.
I have lived what appears to be quite an ‘international’ life, but it is not really of my own choosing.
**** It is clearly… criminal to buy or enact adoption !!!! legislation in any state in Australia that can be used to stop an adoptee having the freedom to bring jury lawsuits in Australia, and standing without political, religious or judicial interference for democratic election to have a career in federal politics in Australia.
**** The former NSW Supreme Court judge & Head of NACC is legally obliged (see number 7 in FOI) to publicly confirm that of course adoptees can have jury lawsuits about adoption in overseas countries, including without needing to return to Australia or the originating court in a state in Australia.
It is adoption legislation that is legally unworkable and unreasonable, lacking in even any basic… equality among adoptees in Australia.
I do not personally know anyone who was made an adoptee as a minor who would as an adult willingly agree that politicians can including retrospectively enact any old… adoption legislation they like, that also subverts the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy, in Australia.
The fact some adoptees may not want to assert their right of return to their own identity is not a reason to put a far from legal obstacle course in the way of adoptees who do want to assert the ‘right of return’ to our own identity.
It is commonsense, and common and civil law that all adoptees must have an actual personal… choice to say no to and ditch an adoption court order regardless of when and how their adoption court order came about.
I was sharing (with a government employed contractor among others) last week the perversity of the curse of adoption and the harm it has and is causing me, that is entirely the making of politicians et al is:
a) –if- I was not adopted it would not have been a problem for me to ditch any one of the dual nationalities, I was born with (I had also been married to a national of a third country before being divorced in the UK) including if I wanted to assert my freedom to (as per s44 of Australian Constitution) stand without political, religious or judicial interference for democratic election to have a career in federal politics in Australia.
(NB: The whole political narrative more generally of S44 of the Australian Constitution seems suspect in all sorts of ways, because it also seems to have completely bypassed that surely federal politicians would also have to ditch any foreign nationality they may have acquired, not just through birth, but as a result of their own marriage/s ????)
b) the fact I do have an adoption court order imposed on me as a minor that means politicians et al have dishonestly purported authority to enact any old legislation they like, including the retrospective 1984 adoption legislation even if it subverts the rule of law and democracy that means I do not have the same… freedom to stand for democratic election to have a career in federal politics for no other reason than being an… adoptee, which is a very serious injustice that draftsmen of the legislation obviously knew because they are paid to know.
Politicians knew about a) Section 44 of the Australian Constitution) and b) knew adoption court orders had been used to impose dual nationality of all sorts on adoptees yet arbitrarily imposed retrospective adoption legislation to treat a dual national adoptee differently from a dual national politician who is not an adoptee.
Of course there could be a federal politician who doesn’t know they are an adoptee so they were able to just ditch a dual nationality, which yet again raises the questions over claiming judges have some kind of ‘legal standing’ to stop adoptees ditching adoption court orders.
Clearly when politicians use adoption legislation to subvert the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy in politics (which politicians also did in the UK with ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that I helped to force the repeal of while I was in Parliament Square, Central London) there is something… else going on (as was indeed the case with the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in Parliament Square, Central London in the UK)
I pointed out again last week, my actual and only own home is overseas, so it is clearly legally unworkable and unreasonable to expect adoptees like myself who have been permanently living overseas, to return to the originating adopting court in Australia to be subjected to onerous and entirely unnecessary legal proceedings that are really a trap about something entirely different.
I cannot personally see any “legitimate aim that is convincingly established in civil law” forcing adoptees living overseas to return to an originating court in Australia to indefinitely argue over what ????. All I have heard are self serving…. excuses that amount to what suits politicians, civil servants, police, courts and the press, but not an… adoptee which also only reflects the longstanding global adoption… industry. I do not understand how any court can claim to have any ‘legal standing’ to… interfere in the personal decision of someone who was made an adoptee as a minor to ditch an adoption court order as an adult.
**** I do reasonably believe that the… most someone who was made an adoptee as a minor, could possibly have to do, is notify -any- court by for example email, of our own decision to ditch an adoption court order made while a minor, that no court can refuse to accept and is legally obliged to properly record****
**** The criminal conspiracy surrounding the 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia, put in place a sequence of events that has repeatedly put my life at risk ****
A kinder evolution is possible.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
FOI:
This is a FOI Request to:
1. The County Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,
a) for the signed and dated document that authorises the transferral of (the government version of) adoption records incl my own to the Public Records Office without my explicit consent.
b) for the signed and dated document naming an identifiable person/ judge who is responsible for providing me as an adult adoptee with a court certified copy of my adoption court order (to use in court proceedings of my choice) that has not been given to me by the court, including in a timely manner.
2. The PM’s Department:
a) for the signed and dated document identifying the person who illegally falsified state and federal government records from 20th October 2020 onwards, (that I first discovered in May 2022, (when I was originally seriously ill with cancer) that I have previously complained about that falsely claimed I owned property somewhere in Australia, that obviously no-one could ever identify when asked, until the falsified records were (as far as I know) all amended in January 2023 when a civil servant (I also wrote another statutory declaration for that was witnessed by a police officer) had to raise the issue after I was repeatedly ignored, including when I was repeatedly hospitalised in 2022 while getting emergency medical treatment for what became a recurrent cancer diagnosis after being stopped from returning to my own home in Breizh, France, during the global pandemic.
b) for the signed and dated document showing the politician who authorised someone to falsify state and federal records to falsely claim I owned property in Australia (which among much was used to illegally detain me and make me homeless in Australia…. during a global pandemic, when I also got cancer)
I’d quite like to own Gibraltar on the Mediterranean, but realistically that’s not going to happen 🙂
My own personal view is the only genuine/pure form of democracy, is one where the public can vote on all legislation which might help stop the worst legislative excesses that are more often than not, bought and paid for by the wealthiest people)
3. The Supreme Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia:
a) for the signed and dated document that authorises the transferral of (the government version of) adoption records from the Supreme Court to the Public Records Officer of Victoria without the consent of an adoptee.
b) for the signed and dated document in the Supreme Court in Victoria, Australia stating an identifiable person who is responsible for providing an adult adoptee with a court certified copy of their adoption court order (to use in court proceedings of their choice)
4. The Birth, Deaths and Marriages department:
a) for the signed and dated document that authorises the transferral of (the government version of) adoption records to the Public Records Office without the consent of an adoptee.
5. The Adoption Information Service in Victoria:
a) for the signed and dated document that authorises the transferral of (the government version of) adoption records to the Public Records Office of Victoria without the consent of an adoptee.
The adoption records of an adoptee, are endlessly just passed from… stranger to stranger with zero legal accountability.
b) for one complete set of adoption records (hospital, court, whatever) the AIS claim to have, but have refused to send to me by email
I already know the government version of my adoption records are false because they do not include my own parents marriage certificate (which is one of the main reasons I believe I have never been given a complete single set of what the AIS claim to have)
6. The Public Record Office of Victoria (& legally privileged material):
a) for the signed and dated document authorising the Public Record office in Victoria, Australia to receive and hold adoption records without the explicit permission of an adoptee
b) a copy of any adoption records about me the Public Record office of Victoria hold in Case 352 from the County Court in Melbourne, Victoria on 28th May 1963 and who provided any of those records to them, without my specific permission.
c) a signed and dated document from the PROV authorising the PROV to… publicly disclose however they choose (the government version of) adoption records (which are obviously often false etc) after a specified time.
d) a signed and dated document outlining the authority for having the information of adoptees who live overseas, and the provision for adoptees who live overseas, to have access to personal information held by the PROV.
(I should also be able to sue the PRV if they have any of my adoption court records that they are publicly claiming they can do whatever they like with, including controlling my own access to (which is very similar to Johnson stealing and stashing our campaign property in the Museum of London he controlled, in the UK, after they illegally went through Brian and my legally privileged material… during !!!! live legal proceedings in HQ11X00563 etc. They invented a non legal argument to try and hide their illegally going through legally privileged material. In the High Court on 7th October 2011 (in HQ11X00563) I just ordered the return of the Banksy’s to him because the government was using them (to essentially sell to the highest bidder) to cover up among much wrongdoing, illegally going through our legally privileged material. I had a bent barrister, well over six foot, (who worked for the government) towering over me in the courtyard outside the court in the High Court threatening me (while he was trying to stop people see what he was saying to me) until other people stepped in to stop him. I was physically assaulted outside a court room, in the High Court by a government lawyer in the High Court Habeas Corpus case. And then of course I was literally kidnapped from inside a court during live proceedings in Lavender Hill Magistrates Court in the UK on 19th July 2007, to stop me giving evidence in another case involving the Murdoch family (where the government did concede they put in place a sequence of events that put my life at risk) It was surreal to be kidnapped from inside a court during live proceedings when those involved just barged into the court en masse and did it. I never saw the judge who let that happen, again. I was entitled to legal accountability over what happened)
There are just so many strangers who have abuse their public positions to falsify or misuse my personal information, just because of the widespread corruption of the global industry the PROV isn’t interested in stopping.
Most adoptees have never had proper… control over our own personal information that has often been laundered through many government departments without our knowledge.
The person information of adoptees is treated much like the ‘Fournier Files’.
(Of course, it’s not really possible to say people with a Mediterranean heritage have ever had any freedom of religion)
7. The ABC:
a) for the signed and dated document that is the… employment contract between the Australian PM ??? and Mr K Williams as Head of the ABC who was formerly an employee of the Murdoch family at the relevant time of HQ11X00563 etc.
(I do not know if either declared the conflict of interest over for example HQ11X00563 with Newscorp etc)
b) for the signed and dated document that authorises the Head of the ABC to ignore equality, and subvert the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy in any part of Australia whenever it happens to suit him.
c) for a complete list of all references by the ABC to adoption in news articles or programmes on the ABC in Australia (that somehow while supposed to be an impartial source of information, managed to completely bypass the criminal conspiracy of the 1984 adoption legislation, for whatever reason including editing, which is about as biased and unjust as it can get)
8. NACC:
a) **** the signed and dated written document from the Head of NACC (and former NSW Supreme Court Judge) confirming that Australian adoption legislation could not and cannot stop Australian adoptees being legally entitled to bring jury lawsuits overseas to contest adoption ****
b) for the signed and dated document acknowledging that it is illegal for… adoption legislation to be used to stop someone having the freedom to stand for democratic election and have a career in federal politics in Australia
**** This is a big reason why my personal view is the judiciary should be elected by the public (or at the very least by a jury system comprising members of the public) because there is absolutely no public scrutiny of the … judiciary in Australia, and yet members of the judiciary are no different from other people, nor are members of the judiciary deserving of less public scrutiny by the public.
There has to be a very serious financial penalty for stopping someone having the freedom every other born and bred Australian citizen who is not an adoptee has, to stand for democratic election to have a career in federal politics in Australia. The criminal conspiracy by the Murdoch family threw away my democratic rights, just so the Murdoch patriarch could buy American citizenship etc.
My -rights- trump the criminal conspiracy to subvert the rule of law and democracy by the Murdoch family.
(I do also find it quite peculiar that the EU claim an ‘Ambassador’ status in Australia, because an EU Ambassador has absolutely nothing to with representing EU citizens in any kind of traditional embassy:
I don’t see why… a trade mission should have the status of an Ambassador.
(The irony to me, is the Australian government who are fine about trafficking a human being who is an adoptee across the world, using any old fake Anglo-Saxon identity, will have a dispute with the EU about the name of a bottle of wine, that was originally grown in the Friulia-Venezia-Giulia region in Northern Italy where most Bugats in Australia are originally from):
It would be more productive for adoptees for the EU to also… acknowledge adoptees ‘right of return’ to our own identities.
It is inconsistent that politicians and civil servants do all behave as though Australian adoptees (including those like myself who have permanently lived overseas for many years) cannot bring jury lawsuits contesting our adoption in… overseas courts, and yet both the Murdoch family and Rudd for example operate/d overseas. The more you look at the 1984 adoption legislation the worse it looks. And of course for adoptees it can often be too painful to have to even read what is at the very least such patronising legislation.
It just perpetuates a perception that courts do only really exist to serve wealthy people.
It is way beyond… patronising for any member of the Judiciary to even presume they have any ‘legal standing’/’locus standii’ with regard to the decision making of someone made an adoptee as a minor, to as an adult, ditch an adoption court order, and particularly when the 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia intentionally subverts the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy in so many ways:
There are members of the… Australian judiciary who have simply been… pandering to a wealthy… American citizen who is the Murdoch family patriarch who spins the white saviour, sugar coated, fairytale version of the global adoption industry to hide the criminal conspiracy surrounding him… buying American citizenship etc.
The Murdoch family… adoption ensemble with the Australian cult of adoption celebrity in Hollywood, including the quite British, Jordanian monarch/y who have a Palestinian adoptee too:
(It makes me remember it was not long after:
a) a Sun crime editor and photographer darkened our doorstep in Parliament Square, Central London, in April 2010, to see if I had a photograph of a male seconded from Thames Valley Police to the National Crime agency who the MET Police had – falsely- claimed they had arrested for impersonating a police officer- when what they really did, more likely than not, given 2007, was the Murdoch family news was in tow, when the MET Police had to suddenly appear out of the darkness from no-where, once they realised…. I had taken a photograph of the male threatening me etc, that I did hand over a copy of to, the Murdoch family employees at the Sun so they could all reflect on the fact they -knew- I could identify the male, I also saw in in Breizh, France, shortly after I moved there in 2013)
b) that two males in dark suits and sunglasses approached me introducing themselves as being from Jordanian security services (which was not so odd as you might think, when you were in Parliament Square, Central London, because there were always ‘dignitaries’ passing through Westminster and ‘dignitaries’ often have large entourages of all sorts) who asked me if I knew -why- ???? the British government was staging what they (also) said was obviously the fake undercover ‘Democracy Village’ (that began on 1st May 2010) being used against Brian and I, before they scuttled off, presumably as instructed by their earpieces)
There was certainly lots of gossip more generally about what was going on at that time, particularly when Johnson introduced the entanglement of the monarchy (which couldn’t really change the deceit of the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006):
The Murdoch family led press, et al hated our “Peace Camp/Police Camp” banner to distinguish us from their phoney (and quite creepy) ‘Democracy Village’ so volumes of lies could be published while Brian and I were illegally detained long before a monarch slithered past on another state opening in 2010:
This tall tale from the Murdoch family ‘Times of London’ ahem… ‘Law report’ bears no relationship whatsoever to anything approaching an accurate and contemporaneous record of court proceedings on 21st June or 23rd June 2010:
The whole revolting omni-shambes involving the soap opera of monarch/y just felt actually quite juvenile to me, because it did not treat the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy with the respect it deserves.
Rudd swerved left stage (to keep collecting the cash he was laundering through Ingeus in the UK) on same day I was illegally denied legal representation… again in the UK on 23rd June 2010 (because I was trying to tell the truth on the witness stand on 21st June 2010 (when a QC Luba was not representing Brian and I, who had quite a different legal position to the government’s undercover operation called ‘Democracy Village’ and it was me, not Luba who produced the title deeds to part of Parliament Square on 21st June 2010 too):
The phoney ‘Democracy Village’ that Brian and I were not a part of, is an example of how the government controlled ‘undercover inquiry’ in the UK is actually only trying to totally minimise the very serious harms caused by undercover who are obviously not just police (you only have to listen to what I said on the witness stand in the High Court on 21st June 2010 to know the British government do not want ordinary members of the public actually giving evidence on the witness stand in lawsuits about undercovers in the British High Court (that is not as simple as their undercover inquiry makes out (because of course intelligence services work across all walks of life, including in newspapers):
The British High Court most certainly did not want me giving evidence about undercovers on 21st June 2010 when I was on the witness stand in the British High Court in the UK so the news media led spin is untrue.
I know the Murdoch family led the ‘trial by media’ against me in the UK, so anything in the government controlled undercover inquiry is completely sanitised, because I was repeatedly also being unlawfully… arrested so the press could publish whatever lies they liked while I was illegally detained. There was a whole ‘Democracy Village’ of undercovers involved in the State Opening on 25th May 2010, when they closed off the square so members of the public could not see what was going on.
(It’s an interesting example of which PM was the British monarch supposedly really taking ‘advice’ from in terms of the British or Australian PM (because they had both illegally withheld the MET Police “both houses and black rod” document etc etc, and it was left to me to produce this (which was followed by the court descending into chaos) while I was legally entitled to be clear about -who- I was counter-suing (the monarch certainly hadn’t been satisfied with the GLA Act 1999 which was probably in response to the ECHR ‘Mon Repos’ etc rulings about the … former Greek monarchy in 2000 & 2002 that involved the British rule on Corfu too):
Of course Brian and I were not occupying anything, which was completely different from the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ who deliberately spun the ‘hostage to fortune’ of publicly stating they were occupying Parliament Square (to try and exclude others) before they spun out to become some of the founders of ‘Occupy London’ at St Paul’s etc etc when I got another High Court jury lawsuit with HQ12X03564 over Parliament Square, Central London:
This earlier Murdoch family ‘law report’ that is also from ‘the Times’ about Brian and I, is trying to ‘swerve’ around the legal responsibility of British Magistrates Courts to make and keep audio/audio visual recordings of court proceedings to avoid entirely foreseeable disputes that people like Rudd have also seriously profited from:
How are Australian politicians protecting Australian citizens who are brought before the British Magistrates Courts in political cases ? because Australian politicians know that despite the British Magistrates Court being able to imprison people, they have no audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates Court.
I think the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation (I helped repeal in the UK) would have lasted about 5 minutes if they had not been able to use the British Magistrates Court. We just didn’t go to the British Magistrates Court when they then brought in the political window dressing of legislation against me in 2012, that saw Neil who was my boyfriend at the time (before he died in October 2020 after he was forced to claim political asylum in the Netherlands which he had not wanted to do) politely tell a District Judge Snow(job) that he had no authority to be a judge in his own case (which was true) before quietly leaving while District Judge Snow(job) was still in full flow (but did hastily withdraw the case against Neil, because they didn’t want it going to another court) District Judge Snow(job) had also threatened to imprison without legal representation or trial… anyone who recorded an accurate and contemporaneous record of the proceedings in his ‘court’ which was certainly not properly constituted. .
The all too often ghoulish cult of celebrity in Hollywood grandstanding in Westminster too, to sell the global adoption industry (in return for free publicity) with precisely zero… privacy, for adoptees who are treated like the latest must have accessory:
(I presume a fmr NSW Supreme Court Judge, a Mr Brererton is in effect defending the judiciary in his now civilian role as Head of NACC, but I do not reasonably believe he has or had the necessary legal standing as either a Supreme Court Judge or Head of NACC to interfere in democratic politics, including through an adoption court order.)
I do not reasonably believe the limits of civil law extend to the judiciary interfering in the decision making of an adult adoptee to ditch an adoption court order made while a minor that can have all sorts of adverse impacts on an adoptee.
An adoptee is legally entitled to be able to make a fully informed decision about ditching an adoption court order as an adult, which simply doesn’t happen because there are so many serious procedural irregularities with adoption relating to adoptees being told of the existence of the adoption and being provided with a court certified copy of the adoption court order that could be used in legal proceedings of our own choice etc.
There is no known -legal basis- for an adoption court order continuing when an adoptee is an adult, without the explicit consent of an adult adoptee (after all an adult who was not an adoptee as a minor, cannot be forced to become an adoptee as an adult)
9. The Australian Human Rights Commission:
a) for the signed and dated document that authorises the AHRC to ignore the basic right of a born and bred Australian citizen who is an adult adoptee to have the freedom from political, religious and… judicial interference to stand for democratic election in federal politics in Australia.
(I don’t understand why there is not a publicly elected Human Rights Commission because otherwise there is just the whiff of jobs for mates/ for those from within in what should be an organisation at the forefront of upholding the peace and democracy of the rule of law and democracy)
Donna Bugat 