Donna ‘Schrodinger’s Democrat’ Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie politicians & Vic police et al) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrars et al: The politicians are legally obliged to hand over to me a court certified copy/extract of my adoption court order so I can file it along with my notification of having ditched it along with any accompanying dual nationality, without my needing to appear in any court, with the electoral commission so I am free to stand in federal politics; it is a legal certainty no politician, judge or anyone else is going to bring a s44 legal challenge in any court to my doing that & I plan to campaign for a referendum on enshrining primacy of peace & harmony of rule of law &… democracy (instead of either a monarchy or republic) & fixed term PM who is Australian citizen as head of state & also legally accountable to international courts like ICC & ICJ in Australian Constitution (17.10.2024)
I make this witness statement/of truth/statutory declaration.
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I have always advocated for the supremacy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy. A genuine… democracy, is more important than a monarchy or republic which can both be used to mean anything. I am pro-democracy, which can exist without a country calling itself a republic or ‘constitutional monarchy’.
The politicians have clearly subverted what is supposed to be civil law with regard to adoptions, with all sorts of unlawful political interference which is of course something I am unfortunately all too familiar with in the UK over the smoking gun of the “both houses and black rod” document about the British Parliament, no politicians in Britain or Australia, or the monarchy have ever wanted on any court record, let alone before a High Court jury in the UK.
**
The inextricably linked CO/11393/2007 & HQ11X00563
The cover up by the British Parliament, successive Mayors of London and the British monarch/y et al of the ‘smoking gun’ document dated 19th May 2006 about unlawful political interference by “both houses and black rod” (and then some) see below **
The politicians not wanting to have the “both houses and black rod” document in the UK on any court record so Brian and I could make our own decisions about what to do etc, is similar to Australian politicians not wanting to hand over a court certified copy/extract of my adoption court order to me, because they don’t want me to be able to make my own decision about that either.
My only ‘ideology’ is the supremacy of the peace and harmony of the rule of law and (genuine) democracy, which I confirmed in Parliament Square, Central London, in the UK before the ‘trial by media’ of me began on 26th March 2006 on Mothers Day while Blair who acted as the personal lawyer for the Murdoch family who had trafficked me to the intelligence services as a small child, was grandstanding with politicians in Victoria, Australia.
The BBC never dared repeat the lie in any court, the reason they said I was arrested, ie: New Scotland Yard claimed they did not know my details (Murdoch family reporters only admitted in the government controlled Lord Leveson ‘inquiry’ they were writing scripts in/with NSY who obviously never disclosed the revelatory “both houses and black rod” document in… Leveson, about the British Parliament including the Law Lords:
The British High Court don’t include in their published version of Case No: CO/5019/2007, (Haw & Anor v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2007] EWHC 2960 (Admin) (12 December 2007) that there was actually a court hearing on 25th October 2007 about the not so ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court case against Brian and I. A ‘journalist’ called Mr Andrew Gilligan had come down to the square the previous evening, on the pretext of speaking about the Mayoral election, but I didn’t speak to him for lots of known reasons. Gilligan most certainly was not going to write what should have been the headline the next day which should have been that the Mayor of London at that time Livingstone had resigned in disgrace over his cover up of a violent attack on me on 17th August 2007 where Livingstone had refused to identify the assailant, so I could make my own decision about what action -I- would like to take.
After I had made a formal witness statement, Livingstone had phoned me (which is when I first came across the very much ‘Acting’ Inspector Cole from the MET Police at Charing Cross, Belgravia and then Royal Parks Police, I have previously mentioned) and had when I had declined to agree his (Livingstone’s) ‘out of court settlement’ (what Livingstone wanted) had me unlawfully arrested !!!! (and then hours later Brian because Brian knew Livingstone had phoned me etc) which all fell apart for Livingstone specifically on… 25th October 2007, but he didn’t resign.
Instead, on 25th October 2007, while Gilligan wrote some nonsense that was not about the still belligerent Livingstone resigning while Johnson was as an MP (part of “both houses and black rod”) the latest monarch was -also- grandstanding in Parliament Square, unveiling a new statue, for a fmr PM Lloyd George while Brian and I were having our time wasted in the High Court because the British Judiciary are a little squeamish about having audio/audio visual recordings in British Magistrates Courts to avoid entirely foreseeable judicial corruption, and worse in courts which can and do illegally imprison members of the public without legal representation or trial, which is how I got a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order on 16th April 2008 after he retaliated when I was forced to make a lawful citizens arrest of him (Livingstone) to try and protect myself.
I was not arrested by anyone after I made the lawful citizens arrest of Livingstone to try and protect myself. (Those involved in illegally hiding the “both houses and black rod” document Brian and I did not yet know about, and did not know about until after 3rd March 2009 just helped Livingstone make his escape, which the government’s City of London lawyer couldn’t wriggle out of saying had actually happened)
I remember when I lawfully arrested Livingstone, he was straight on his bat-phone to the top cop (because although I was careful to not physically touch him, I had hold of his ‘man-bag’ and he wasn’t keen to leave that behind) so Palace of Westminster Police (also involved in the cover up of 17th August 2007) closed carriage gates and came running, and armed police from St Stephens entrance at the Palace of Westminster also came running along with others in vehicles (a camera man from ITV who I hadn’t noticed was there and was with Livingstone had indignantly piped up that I “couldn’t arrest Livingstone” to which I responded that I had, which was an actual fact)
There was not a single police officer (and there were a lot while Livingstone was trying to hide who he was from members of the public) who said to me I had done something unlawful. They were just instructed to extricate him and run…. without saying anything, because they knew it was filmed by some people.
I had no idea what I would face when I did make the lawful citizen’s arrest of Livingstone, but I did actually feel empowered because at least I did my best to…. stand up for myself and at the very least send the message that it was not okay for politicians to orchestrate and cover up a violent assault on me, including they covered up the identity of the assailant, so in a sense it was another part of the undercover story. It also became part of a wider High Court jury lawsuit, because Livingstone had unlawfully had me arrested, when he had phoned me up after I had made a formal witness statement. (The MET police under Livingstone had already been caught red-handed earlier in the year, illegally using what turned out to be an undercover police officer to assault me, who was caught by Brian and another campaigner)
My lawful citizen’s arrest of Livingstone which was obviously not remotely political, was nevertheless, a massive political scandal within Westminster, because politicians had simply never contemplated that a law abiding woman might make a lawful citizens arrest of a seriously corrupt politician to try and protect myself. It was obviously reasonable self-defence, because Livingstone was covering up a very serious and violent potentially life threatening assault on me, for his own personal financial advantage.
The male (whose identity Westminstr knew) could have been an Australian citizen, a former Australian politician, or someone who worked for MI6, or the latest monarch. Other members of the public not connected to us, who saw what happened tried to trip him up as he tried to escape. before he, literally while being pursued, ran into the arms of a Palace of Westminster police officer, while I was concussed. The male was certainly a big misogynist coward who is very dangerous to women, because what he didn’t try to do, which is telling, is he didn’t try to punch Steve or another campaigner, clearly because they are men, who are physically stronger than women. It just showed how Westminster is certainly completely misogynist when it comes to civilian women.
There was no political comeback possible for Livingstone after I had the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, prior to the actual Mayoral election, but during the run up to that election because that is evidence he had done a very dirty and seriously illegal backroom deal with the Tory party (obviously with the knowledge of the Labour PM, Brown) to use an earlier malicious complaint/involving… perjury committed by a corrupt and now former Tory MP and oil trader Alan Duncan on 26th February 2007 in the ‘Vitol Switch’ (Vitol were up to all sorts in Iraq they didn’t want me speaking about before they moved on to Libya too) so Duncan was paid £160k by Vitol to let Labour’s Livingstone (Vitol also paid off the Labour Lord and fmr UN Malloch-Brown) to use Duncan’s Tory complaint as the pretext to illegally imprison me on a still non-imprisonable !!!! alleged s5 Public Order (it’s just not imprisonable) via the Magistrates Court without legal representation or trial. I guess it was the best distraction they could come up with, at the time, because they didn’t want me going to the High Court with the civil jury lawsuit that I had had since 25th October 2007 (incl because they knew they had not disclosed “both houses and black rod” and they were illegally covering up the identity of the male who punched me)
The chief of the Parliamentary press gallery had a hard time trying to launder a paid for by Vitol spin through a nasty little libellous ‘hit piece’ tucked away in the Daily Mail in August 2008 because I pointed out they had illegally hidden my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order (while nevertheless essentially admitting for the purposes of any of my civil jury lawsuits there was a ‘trial by media’ against me) before the male called Brogan decamped to the Telegraph to join the ‘alliance’ with Johnson posing as Mayor of London while being paid vast sums as a journalist by the Barclay Brothers who as a result illegally enjoyed free publicly funded legal representation (at a time the Russian government was also sponsoring Johnson as Mayor of London, via the Telegraph, and of course Vitol was also working with Moscow) Of course, I doubt the British aristocracy would ever sanction anyone who had stashed their cash in British off-shore tax havens, and seize that money because that would finish the British off-shore tax havens. My personal view is the British off-shore tax havens are one of the main reasons the British aristocracy have so many fair weather ‘friends’ who just want somewhere to stash their cash.
Anyway, it turned out in CO/11393/2007 (where I was as interested party because I had a, separate, High Court jury lawsuit because I had actually been unlawfully arrested in that case loosely relating to 23rd May 2006) Haw, R (on the application of) v Southwark Crown Court & Ors [2009] EWHC 379 (Admin) (03 March 2009) that everyone (including Livingstone) had been and then later really was covering up the “both houses and black rod” document from 19th May 2006. **** It is very legally significant**** because it was illegally withheld from so many cases before and after 3rd March 2009, which was the first time it came to light.
Of course Johnson and Duncan were at the relevant time both MP’s who were part of “both houses and black rod” so they had undeclared conflicts of interest and so on. The first time Brian and I ever saw that document was after 3rd March 2009 (exactly three years from my supposedly controversial ‘once in a lifetime’ ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 notification) so the timing is significant because a) a Sir Ken Jones decamped to Victoria Police in Australia without publicly disclosing his ‘conflict of interest’ and of course b) on 19th July 2009 the Murdoch family publicly incited what resulted in the torture and attempted murder of me (while the Murdoch patriarch and family members along with Lords were actually board members of the Times in the UK etc in the revolving doors between press and politics)
The British monarchy became overtly involved later mostly between 2010-2011 which there is no reasonable expectation the government controlled and limited ‘undercover inquiry’ into just ‘police spies’ in the UK is ever going to include looking at the monarchy. A common denominator was the revolving doors of politicians and press and the monarchy all used the same ‘core group’ of undercover’s who manifested themselves as ‘Democracy Village’ between 2010- 2012. I just dealt with all that as best I could through the courts. We muddled along as best as possible under the circumstances, which we were able to do, because we were legally in a public space.
One of the hardest things I have ever had to do was return to Parliament Square, Central London in the UK, after I was with Brian when he died in a hospital in Bremen in Germany, but I did return to Parliament Square, Central London because it was the right thing to do, not because I wanted to be there. Obviously neither Brian or I had wanted to be in Parliament Square.
My wide practical experience of politics informs me that the unlawful use of undercovers in the UK against Brian and I could never have happened if there were audio/audio visual recordings in British Magistrates Courts, and of course the reality of what happened in what our case was unlawful political interference is far removed from what the press say, and does directly involve… politicians and in our case the monarchy, because of the way the land was divided up by politicians that also led to the unlawful interference of the monarch/y too. It is just not true when monarchists say the monarchy do not interfere in day to day politics, that even the Murdoch family law reports in the Times in July 2010 (below) could only whitewash so far.
There is a long succession of the most senior British politicians like Labour’s PM Blair & Mayor of London Livingstone, followed by the Labour PM Brown and Tory Mayor of London Johnson (because Mayors of London are also bosses of top cops) and & then PM Cameron (on the Murdoch family ‘Sky News Live’ on 19th July 2009) who like the latest PM Starmer who was the DPP, and a Sir Ken Jones who was DAC in Victoria, Australia (between 2009-2011) who all illegally failed (like the monarch/y in 2010-2011) to publicly disclose the document about the British Parliament and “both houses and black rod” dated 19th May 2006 (see below) along with their own accompanying undeclared “conflicts of interest” (and the fact they had “no recognised defence in law”):
My personal view is a genuine democracy is one where the public can peacefully participate in a meaningful way by having the opportunity to vote on all legislation, that also means everyone can make a direct contribution to civil society. A genuine democracy where the public have the opportunity to vote on all legislation, could also help prevent the worst legislative excesses whereby wealthy people do simply buy legislation, and the monarchy abuse their position to also agree/extract favourable financial advantages for themselves (the public do not enjoy and have never voted for the monarchy to have) to give their ‘assent’ to legislation (which their unelected state governors and federal governor general in Australia also do). It is legally perverse that the UK ‘could’ simply legislate to abolish the British monarchy (although the monarchy may not give their ‘royal assent’ to legislation unless they had secured more favourable terms than the ECHR cases in 2000 & 2002 involving the related “former” Greek monarchy that some Australian monarchists would like to see restored in Greece ) while having a foreign monarchy as head of state in Australia, is said to be baked into the only Australian Constitution which was curiously not addressed by the Australia Act 1986 which politicians falsely claimed made Australia ‘independent’ of the UK or at least the British Parliament which ‘sidesteps’ the reality of State Openings in the UK are officiated/overseen by the same monarchy.
This is a perjured witness statement in Australia by a Sir Ken Jones, because he knows he has illegally omitted “both houses and black rod”:
When I was literally kidnapped by the British government on 19th July 2007 from inside a court… during live proceedings in Lavender Hill Magistrates Court, in London in the UK, to stop me giving evidence in another case involving the Murdoch family (after two CPS lawyers were witnesses for me at Westminster Magistrates on 9th July 2007, and on 17th July 2007 a male who worked for the government unexpectedly blew the whistle on the witness stand at Camberwell Magistrates Court saying Special Branch was illegally being used against me, while the ‘police watchdog’ was also ducking and diving, below. The government said/boasted and I quote, they had an “unlimited budget” to illegally use against us. I don’t think most members of the public think politicians care how much public money they use, generally speaking, on themselves.
I don’t personally think the partner at Bindmans Solicitors (below) was telling Brian and I, the truth, when he had said Brian and I needed to go through the obstacle course of the ‘police watchdog’ to show we had given the MET Police and police watch-dog an opportunity to look into the cases, before getting legal aid for what with that ‘strategy’ then became an increasing number of High Court jury lawsuits that resulted from that failed ‘strategy’ (where the partner just switched law firms) The failure by Bindman’s to immediately file a High Court jury lawsuit over (Mothers Day) 26th March 2006 did cause me soooooo much escalating physical harm (the idea a small group of London lawyers marketed themselves as human rights lawyers just hid they were like Starmer at Doughty apologists for Blair et al and by extension the Murdoch family:
The British ‘police watchdog’ most certainly did not ever disclose the “both houses and black rod” document either (things were clearly going awry for the government in July 2007 because some people would not lie for them) before another Australian citizen, Ms Glass who was at the ‘police watchdog leveraged that to become an ombudsman in Victoria, where she was able to continue to hide what really happened in the UK. Of course, a Jeroen Weimar, now posing as a civil servant with the Victorian government after working with Livingston and Johnson in the UK also illegally failed to disclose the “both houses and black rod” document. I remember when Steve Jago and I popped along to the Metropolitan Police Authority office in Westminster one day, so I could ask for a copy of a meeting they had claimed they had with the DPS and Hardwick who was head of the IPCC ‘police watchdog’ at 8am on 8th December 2006 (which they claimed there was no written record of, which did not preclude them all writing witness statements of their recollections of the meeting) when Stephenson who became the top cop sent along armed police (they said Stephenson sent them) to try and interfere in and earwig in on our conversation, presumably to try and intimidate us, before they were asked to leave. It was not a good look, and the MPA said they had never told them we were there so the question is how did… Stephenson know ?? and why would he want to know ??
The timing of Australian politicians obviously illegally offering Sir Ken Jones from the UK, the DAC job in Victoria Police in 2009 was clearly so he could illegally try and ‘swerve’ (wriggle his way out of) CO/11393/2007 etc in the UK:
A Sir Ken Jones was obviously legally obliged to publicly disclose he was illegally trying to ‘swerve’ CO/11393/2007 in the UK.
The ‘delay’ in disclosing the ‘strategy’ of unlawful political interference/following orders from the British Parliament “both houses and black rod” until after 3rd March 2009 (which was three years on from my notorious ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 notification regarding legislation I helped repeal that was intended to be extended throughout the UK) was no ‘mistake’: (and must have also included the nobbling of a High Court judge who had illegally indefinitely denied me legal representation on 25th May 2006)
I’m quite certain Ch Insp Layzell (seen below) who had long ago decamped to a British offshore tax haven, to avoid taking to the witness stand. never mentioned “both houses and black rod” and nor had a Commander Allison or a Hugo Keith et al who ridiculously appealed a no case to answer in the Magistrates Court to the High Court (which Mr Hugo Keith said paid for his holiday to a British tax haven)
The ‘smoking gun’ of “both houses and black rod” (which Winfield described to me as the top cops et al “get out of jail free card” because politicians who had no recognised defence in law, would stop top cops being put on the witness stand before a High Court jury) had been illegally withheld in legal proceedings… prior to 3rd March 2009, and then afterwards as I pointed out on 17th March 2011 to a judge in the British High Court by Johnson et al as they illegally continually tried to ‘overtake’ us, with their by contrast publicly funded entourage of lawyers.
No top cop could ever explain why Livingstone, Johnson, and then Starmer as the DPP, and the top cops had not disclosed “both houses and black rod” prior to 3rd March 2009, and then, along with the British Parliament of “both houses and black rod” fell over each other to stop me putting it on any court record.
The British Parliament of “both houses and black rod” had clearly nobbled a High Court judge (below) to illegally indefinitely deny me legal aid in (any) criminal proceedings in courts (as the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order also shows)
It is very legally significant that the top cops and politicians -knew- they were illegally withholding the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006 on (for example) 25th May 2006 when I was by… no co-incidence, illegally denied legal representation while politicians also spun their ‘trial by media’. I could not have been denied legal representation if that document had been properly disclosed in a timely manner.
** Mr Hugo Keith was never going to dare put me on the witness stand in the High Court, while he was also illegally withholding the document about…. “both houses and black rod” which he did not disclose/produce in August 2007 (shortly before I was violently punched in the head on 17th August 2007 **
The dodgy summons placed ‘sine die’ to illegally avoid any legal scrutiny of the summons being used to falsely accuse Brian and I of a Contempt of Court below (the British Magistrates Court are legally obliged to have audio/audio visual recordings of courts to avoid foreseeable disputes about judicial corruption that cannot resort to a default position of falsely accusing members of the public of wrongdoing instead) also illegally failed to disclose the “both houses and black rod” document that was also undeniably linked to the illegally issued summons:
When you understand how many cases “both houses and black rod” had illegally been withheld from, you start to get the picture why a Sir Ken Jones decamped to Victoria, Australia, when he did.
In the High Court on 17th March 2011, the Judge had to agree Johnson et al had illegally tried to ‘overtake’ Brian and I with his own legal woo (because of the still outstanding CO/11393/2007) Yet in the satellite litigation of HQ11X00563 the British government still illegally refused to settle knowing I had ‘won’ that was obviously inextricably linked to CO/11393/2007
The BBC knew when I mentioned in the High Court on 17th March 2011 that Johnson et al illegally tried to overtake Brian and I CO11393/2007 the BBC et al were also caught out to (they had not accurately reported (below) what after winding it’s way through Southwark Crown Court became for example Co/11393/2007.
(the male Brian is referring to I then knew was called Leroy who Brian was complaining about assaulting him, then when Brian died then viciously assaulted me in August 2011 (the same judge was also involved again) because the male I knew as Leroy, knew I could -also- identify him as the person who assaulted Brian):
The top cop had not disclosed “both houses and” in the hearing above either (the BBC certainly knew their report in 2007 that lacked context about what became CO/11393/2007 was untrue on 17th March 2011) and of course that they (the BBC had also) lied over my unlawful arrest on Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 ** and then at a State Opening on 25th May 2010 etc etc.
I guess the government used a calendar to plan etc.
I do along with the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy, also personally support a free market, in the sense of ordinary people having equality of opportunity, that is traditionally opposed because some wealthy people do not want ordinary people to assert our rights including access to fair competition. A monarchy including a Constitutional monarchy does not genuinely represent the rule of law and democracy, and having a republic does not necessarily guarantee having a rule of law and democracy either.
The political interference of adoption legislation from 1984 that has always been illegally used to stop me freely choosing to stand in federal politics in Australia is obviously a very serious legislative excess. All the politicians and judges always knew… adoption court orders had imposed dual nationality on some adoptees, and that the 1984 adoption legislation in the state of Victoria when Barnett who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO and working for the Murdoch family who trafficked me to intelligence services could not be used by judges to interfere in politics to stop dual national adoptees from standing in federal politics by refusing to allow us to as adults ditch an adoption court order. It’s not legally possible for the politicians to alter what is & was supposed to be… civil law with adoptions, and turn the cases into something quite different. It is usual for courts to encourage civil cases to be settled outside court (of course and adult adoptee should not have to physically appear in the original court to ask permission from a judge to ditch the adoption court order, because a judge is not a party to my civil case. At most a judge could just rubber stamp what I an adult adoptee… decide to do about an adoption court order made while I was a minor. The politicians can’t use a judge to oppose my as an adult ditching the adoption court order, made while I was a minor, because the judge does not speak for me, and certainly not as an adult in what is supposed to be a…. civil case, where I am obviously legally entitled to make my own decision. The 1984 adoption act involves a very odd ‘interpretation’ of civil law, that I have some albeit also very odd experience of in the UK.
The politicians really did hide a coward who very violently punched me in the head, and just because I am a woman !!!! (he didn’t try to punch the men with me) but I was able to eventually do my best to hold politicians at least partially accountable over that, when I made the lawful citizens arrest of Livingstone, although my High Court jury lawsuit over it was never settled because of the wider “both houses and black rod” document that implicated so many people (ie: the British Parliament) and escalated still further:
No-one could seriously believe I would want an adoption court order that has caused me so much actual physical harm while hiding the… identities of others.
It is seriously perverse that some violent misogynist thug can punch me in the head and his identity is hidden by a government (and it’s not like Australian politicians cared because Rudd was too busy laundering $1.4 billion through Ingeus in the UK) yet politicians want to argue the toss about -how- I ditch an adoption court order, to use my own identity, and stand in federal politics.
It’s not a good look that an Australian PM (Rudd) had his snout well and truly in the public trough in the UK, laundering $1.4 billion from the British Parliament ummm… (“both houses and black rod”)
There is a well founded reasonable suspicion that Rudd knew about the “both houses and black rod” document dated 19th May 2006, before he became Australian PM (and before I did) which is obviously why the Murdoch family backed ‘Kevin 07’ and then Jones was able to decamp to Victoria Police.
I do have considerable practical experience of politics, so I do reasonably believe the politicians are legally obliged to hand over to me, a court certified copy/extract of my adoption court order so I can file it along with my notification of having ditched it along with any accompanying dual nationality, without my needing to appear in any court, with the electoral commission (the courts know I have properly notified them of my ditching the adoption court order which it is up to them to show how they have recorded… my lawful decision) so I am free to stand in federal politics. It is a legal certainty no politician, judge or anyone else is going to bring a s44 legal challenge in any court to my doing that & I plan to campaign for a referendum on enshrining primacy of peace & harmony of rule of law &… democracy (instead of either a monarchy or republic) & fixed term PM who is Australian citizen as head of state & also legally accountable to international courts like ICC & ICJ in Australian Constitution
A kinder evolution is possible.
Donna Bugat
Donna Bugat 