Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: politicians, Vic Police) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: Australian PM Albanese legally obliged to publicly acknowledge in writing to court, I was always legally entitled to ditch adoption court order without permission of any judge or court in Australia or overseas (which no federal Australian politician who is not an adoptee needs to have to stand in politics) because no adoption court order (of which politicians have illegally withheld court certified copies/extracts of) or legislation (made when Barnett who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO in 1984 working for Murdoch family while Australian PM was Hawke & Premier in Victoria was Cain) in Australia can be used as means to prevent my standing in federal politics to oppose him etc (that is all why Australian politicians -also- failed to declare their conflict of interest in UK, when they illegally failed to secure my… access to legal representation that led to torture & attempted murder of me in UK to illegally try & stop my British High Court -jury- lawsuits while Rudd, the fmr Australian PM, FM & now Ambassador to United States laundered $1.4 billion payoff through Ingeus in UK) (26.09.2024)
FAO Registrar:
I make this witness statement/of truth/statutory declaration.
My own identity of Donna Bugat (formerly known by my adoptee name of Babs Tucker) is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
It is my intention to ensure there is equality between all adoptees (so all adoptees who were made adoptees as minors have the legal right to ditch an adoption court order as adults without needing to seek and obtain the permission of anyone else) and with people who are not adoptees which the latest Australian PM does not support and has never supported. (dual national Federal politicians do not have to go through the far from legal obstacle course that an Australian born citizen and dual national adoptee does to stand in federal politics in Australia).
The latest Australian Prime Minister cannot legally use or hide behind public office or legislation to discriminate against me to try and stop me standing in Federal politics in Australia:
NB: It is important to note that no-one ever dared repeat in any witness statement or on any witness stand in any court, the lies published above, first circulated by the Murdoch family New Scotland Yard (refer Leveson etc) about the unlawful arrest of Brian and I, that began the ‘trial by media’ of me in the UK while the Murdoch family media barons lawyer Blair was grandstanding with politicians et al in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia on 26th March 2006:
**** The latest Australian PM Albanese is legally obliged to publicly acknowledge in writing to the court, I am legally entitled to ditch my adoption court order without the permission of any judge or court in Australia or overseas (which no federal Australian politician needs to have) because no adoption court order (of which politicians have illegally withheld court certified copies/extracts of) or legislation (made when Barnett who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO in 1984 working for Murdoch family while Australian PM was Hawke & Premier in Victoria was Cain) in Australia can be used as means to prevent my standing in federal politics to oppose him etc.
The politicians are ‘misleading’ the public and adoptees, because there is no court or agency that publicly takes responsibility for giving all adoptees court certified copies/extracts of our adoption court orders, so we can make our own decisions, including about what court we choose to go to (the Adoption Information Service in Victoria, only gave me a cherry picked and -photocopied- version of what they verbally claim to be court records in July 2019 and only then, because I was in Victoria, and Australia:
No Australian government agency has ever offered to give me a court certified copy/extract of my adoption court order in Case 352 from 28th May 1963 in the County Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. The County Court who had every opportunity to do so, failed to, including while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France and certified copies of other documents from Australian government agencies were sent to my home in Breizh, France in 2015.
The Victorian Adoption Information Service who moved into the DOJ when I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019 to try and sort out the legal quagmire created by politicians et al only then gave me… photocopies (see below) of some court documents (I had never been given, let alone court certified copies of while living overseas, because I would obviously have put them before a jury)
The Australian politicians only illegally ‘obstructed the administration of justice’ with regard to my High Court jury lawsuits in the UK.
I have previously made it clear an adoption court order and adoption legislation cannot legally be used as a means to stop me standing in Federal politics (by claiming I need the permission of a judge or court to ditch an adoption court order that imposed (a different to my own) dual nationality (when politicians do not need to ask the permission of any judge or court to ditch any part of a dual nationality to stand in Federal politics in Australia) to genuinely oppose the latest Australian PM.
The latest Australian PM could not genuinely claim on oath on the witness stand in any court, including before a jury, he does not know adoption legislation treats dual national adoptees differently from federal politicians who are dual nationals.
**** Any jury would know that politicians… intended when they made the retrospective adoption legislation in 1984 when Barnett who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO and working for the Murdoch family media barons, while the Australian PM was Hawke and the Victorian Premier was Cain after I was sent overseas as a teenager, that the legally unworkable legislation was specifically made for political, not legal reasons, to stop me standing in Federal politics and publicly ’embarrassing’ them ****
It does not appear to be uncommon for legislation to be based on a specific person, because I helped repeal legislation like that in the UK, before legislation was then made in the UK based on me in 2011. It is possibly unusual for one person to have legislation based on them, made in two countries, in my own case in 1984 in Australia, and in 2011 in the UK.
The revolving doors of politicians and press working for the robber media barons also ‘sidestepped’ the significant legal issue of the British Judiciary closing ranks to illegally try and stop me having a legally binding High Court ruling from a jury in the UK, that all British Magistrates Courts must have audio/audio visual recordings of proceedings in British Magistrates Courts to prevent foreseeable disputes about Judicial misconduct/corruption. The British Judiciary would never have been able to close ranks for the reasons they did, if Australian politicians had ensured I had… access to legal representation, which numerous records show was illegally withheld.
It is also clearly illegal for politicians to withhold court certified copies/extracts of adoption court orders from an adoptee. There is a legal obligation for all adoptees to be given a court certified copy/extract of our adoption court orders, free of charge and also while living in our own homes, including overseas.
**** The politicians knew the adoption legislation from 1984 is legally unworkable because politicians have not while unreasonably expecting me to leave my own home overseas, indefinitely, including during a global pandemic and after being diagnosed with recurrent cancer etc paid any/all of my travel, accommodation, medical or insurance costs, to return to Australia to try and sort through the legal quagmire, entirely of their own making.
An adoptee should have a reasonable expectation of being able to ditch an adoption court order made while we were minors, as an adult, and including while living in our own homes overseas, without needing to physically return to the original court, in a state in Australia, because being forced to return to the original court (and especially in cases where the court illegally issued an adoption court order) serves no legal or justifiable democratic purpose ****
The Murdoch family should fund an office in Jerusalem to help all adult adoptees of any race, religion, politics or none who have ditched adoption court orders made while we were minors.
A kinder evolution is possible.
Donna Bugat
Donna Bugat 