Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: politicians, Vic Police) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I am asserting my right to… equality etc incl in federal politics by ditching legally unworkable ‘adoption court order’ from County Court in Victoria, Australia through my British (incl High Court jury) lawsuits (Murdoch family media barons compromised British Judiciary through outstanding legal issue of audio/audiovisual recordings in British Magistrates Courts); politicians adoption court order combined with adoption legislation from 1984 (when Barnett who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO working for Murdoch family in Australia) illegally bans me from freely standing for election in federal politics in Australia, because unlike Australian politicians/political parties it is claimed I need to first seek ‘permission’ of original County Court, in Victoria, Australia (from judges appointed by politicians/political parties) to ditch any/all part/s of politically imposed British Anglo-Saxon dual nationality from adoption court order, that I would not have to do if I did not have an adoption court order & was free to choose (like latest Murdoch family ‘reverse engineered’ Australian PM) to ditch any part of my own actual & overlapping Australian Mediterranean & Celtic dual nationality etc to stand in Australian federal politics (ie: S44 of Constitution) (20.09.2024)
FAO Registrar:
I make this witness statement/of truth/statutory declaration.
My own identity of Donna Bugat (formerly known by my adoptee name of Babs Tucker) is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
**** It cannot be legal for it to be down to an Australian judge whether or not I can ditch any part of a dual nationality (ie S44 of Australian Constitution) in order to be able to stand in federal politics in Australia ****
I have previously outlined there are too many problems with the Orwellian adoption legislation from 1984 in Victoria, Australia illegally imposing all sorts of legally unworkable ‘obligations’ on people who have never and no longer agree to be adoptees.
The legal reality is sometimes what passes itself off as ‘journalism’ is a crime. It is not the case that ‘journalism’ is never a crime.
I obviously never agreed with the Murdoch family who pose as media barons, illegally trafficking me as a small child in Australia to the intelligence services, before the same Murdoch family media barons then led the ‘trial by media’ of me in the UK, that incited and escalated to what resulted in the torture and attempted murder of me, to illegally try and stop my British High Court jury lawsuits.
**** My whole life has illegally been adversely affected by what passes itself off as ‘journalism’, and in more than one country ****
I personally only support a genuine direct democracy where the public can vote on all legislation regardless of whether or not a government claims to be a constitutional democracy or republic, to help avoid the worst legislative excesses.
This is an example below (that is now one of my massive jury lawsuits in the UK) of (the British government et al incl editing) my actually experiencing a flashback (while I was Steve Jago) in 2006 to the real 1984 when I was (with an American woman) in the Middle East and there was an attempt on our lives, which I now know must be the fault of the Murdoch family et al too:
The -pink folder- I am holding into (in CCTV the politicians et al illegally edited, while also illegally destroying independent video footage) contained legally privileged material the government illegally also went through in the days leading up to what also became another massive lawsuit against the British government et al.
(The Murdoch family et al also grandstanded at the British ‘Leveson Inquiry’ they staged – the subsequent Undercover police inquiry was also staged, because both ’sidestepped’ collective roles of politicians, police, prosecutors, intelligence services et al with for example the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ in the UK, that also included Australian undercovers. The press and courts persisted in trying to force me to agree to be linked/joined in far from legal proceedings to agent provocateurs in the UK, while the press were also perversely hiding the agent provocateurs were themselves hiding they had me unlawfully arrested.
To example, even just one video shows prior to a State Opening in the UK on 25th May 2010, a British (and an Australian agent provocateur who worked for Cenitex both before and afterwards) who (along with other agent provocateurs known as ‘Democracy Village’) stood around for over half an hour (when the video shows the tents of Brian and I were not being as publicly claimed by the press et al, searched by police) were the actual complainant/s from ‘Democracy Village’ in my unlawful arrest, but refused to appear in the High Court, while Johnson et al covered up. I have for many years properly complained the press (and Johnson was while Mayor of London, and also still a paid member of the press – the Telegraph- on 25th May 2010) illegally edited and widely published audio from 25th May 2010 specifically to hide the ‘complainant/s’ in my unlawful arrest on 25th May 2010 were actually from the phoney ‘Democracy Village’. And that was just one day in the whole phoney ‘Democracy Village’ imbroglio that ‘officially’ began on 1st May 2010 so actually spanned both Labour and Tory/Lib Dems administrations. The very serious harm caused to me just by that instance, which happened in the context of the wider cover up of the torture and attempted murder of me is obviously irreparable.
The self serving behaviour of the fmr Australian PM Rudd is unconscionable.
It wasn’t like I could return to Australia and stand as a Federal politician, in opposition to him, because the politicians version of adoption legislation (that was based on me) claims I would without legal representation first have to go through the obstacle course of a County Court with regard to the dual nationality imposed by an adoption court order.
Meanwhile Rudd was being paid $1.4 by the British government he laundered through Ingeus of which he was a beneficiary, to avoid blushes all round.
I do believe Australian politicians were legally obliged to ensure I had… access to legal representation in the UK, which I did not have, including because of their own personal financial reasons. It’s very clear from the timeline that I was very much maliciously targeted in the UK.
My own experience in the UK taught me, the only way the illegal use of undercovers could have been avoided was by having audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates Courts, because that is where most cases begin, even if they are transferred (by various means by politicians et al) to other courts. It was what was covered up in the British Magistrates Courts because they have no audio/audio visual recordings to avoid foreseeable disputes about judicial corruption.
It is legally relevant and significant that when Brown became the British PM, he was publicly saying one thing on 3rd July 2007 about the legislation (I helped repeal but not while Brown was PM) in the UK 0n the same day, 3rd July 2007, a Nick Hardwick from the Police watchdog (see below) was ducking and diving, while they along with the Murdoch family, were doing something completely different behind the scenes.
In around one week, two CPS lawyers came forward as witnesses for me in Westminster Magistrates court on 9th July 2007, (which Brown et al knew was going to happen) that resulted in our walking into a very violent ambush outside the court, when I ‘won’ before a male who identified himself as working for the government came forward in Camberwell Magistrates court on 17th July 2007, to without prior notice say on the witness stand the government was illegally using Special Branch against me, before I was kidnapped from Lavender Hill Magistrates Court on 19th July 2007 during live proceedings in a courtroom, in another inextricably linked case involving the Murdoch family, to stop me giving evidence on the witness stand, while in the same week a partner in a law firm is questioning what the head of a police watchdog is doing.
The BBC report deliberately lacks context, because they knew Brian is referring to what became the not so landmark High Court ‘Contempt of Court case about me, because there are no recordings in British Magistrates Courts and Brian was also correct in saying the judge not the case is dismissed, in what became CO/11393/2007 in the High Court because so many judges et al ‘sidestepped’ legal realities like due process etc.
It was then on the 19th July 200... 9 that the Murdoch family publicly incited on Sky News Live in the UK, what resulted in the torture and attempted murder of me, where the British government (who are the perpetrators) have always refused to unconditionally hand over the CCTV to me.
The Murdoch family did compromise the British Judiciary through leveraging the very serious legal issue of audio/audio visual recording in British Magistrates Courts I have previously mentioned incl. the not so landmark ‘Contempt of Court’ case about me in the UK.
I have previously showed the British government maliciously tried to prosecute me with legislation (I helped repeal) through the Magistrates Courts in the UK to also illegally try and stop High Court jury lawsuits. That nevertheless immediately triggered a ‘case stated’ to the High Court via Doughty Chambers that then led to the British Judiciary closing ranks, with my being illegally denied legal representation, which is how the opportunist Starmer from Doughty Chambers then used that to became DPP and PM (to cover up) after and while also covering up for Johnson et al. It has always been very misogynist too, because the entire state apparatus knows but refuses to acknowledge I am entitled to assert my own ‘agency’ to make my own decisions.
The timeline/sequence was the lengthy and illegal delay in the original ‘case stated’ directly resulted in the manufactured subsequent ‘contempt of court’ case to try and cover up the British Judiciary were compromised through the Magistrates Courts. It’s not legally sustainable for the British Judiciary to have a default position that a member of the public is at fault when the British Judiciary refuse to have audio/audio visual recordings of proceedings to avoid foreseeable disputes about Judicial corruption, which the not so landmark Contempt of Court case about me shows is what is going on.
The only proper course of conduct of the Crown Court or High Court in the not so landmark Contempt of Court case about me in the UK, was for the British Judiciary to accept legal responsibility and agree to audio/audio visual proceedings in all British Magistrates Court who can and did illegally imprison me without legal representation and trial, specifically (in respect of the British Judiciary) to illegally try and avoid legally binding High Court ruling, including a jury if necessary, mandating audio-audio visual recordings in all British Magistrates.
The press and courts persisted in trying to force me to agree to be linked in far from legal proceedings to agent provocateurs while perversely hiding those agent provocateurs were hiding they had me unlawfully arrested.
To example one video shows prior to a State Opening in the UK on 25th May 2010, a British (and an Australian agent provocateur who worked for Cenitex both before and afterwards) who (along with other members of ‘Democracy Village’) stood around for over half an hour (when the video shows the tents of Brian and I were not being searched by police) were the actual complainant/s from ‘Democracy Village’ in my unlawful arrest, but refused to appear in the High Court, while Johnson et al covered up. I have for many years properly complained the press (and Johnson was while Mayor of London, also still a member of the press – the Telegraph- on 25th May 2010) illegally edited and widely published audio from 25th May 2010 to hide the ‘complainant/s’ in my unlawful arrest on 25th May 2010 were actually from the phoney ‘Democracy Village’. And that was just one day in the whole phoney Democracy Village that ‘officially’ began on 1st May 2010 so spanned both Labour and Tory administrations. The harm caused to me just by that instance, which happened in the context of the wider cover up of the torture and attempted murder of me is irreparable.
The difference in the political and press treatment of adoptees is significant, because the Murdoch family hired (for example) a now Lord Austin of Dudley in the UK (who claims to be an adoptee) as a henchman posing as a ‘media advisor’ and then politician with the fmr British PM Brown, in the revolving doors of politics and media in Westminster. There’s no real legal difference between a Lord Austin of Dudley (who claims to be an adoptee) and Johnson (who ennobled a Lord Austin of Dudley) and Brown (or indeed Lord Austin of Dudley & Corbyn and Livingstone) and the fmr Australian PM Rudd, because they were all politicians who covered up the torture and attempted murder of me, for the Murdoch family.
I was on a kibbutz called Yad Mordechai in Israel, near Gaza, in the real 1984 when the adoption legislation was made in Victoria, Australia. The Murdoch family should pay for an office to help adoptees in Jerusalem of any race, religion, politics or non who ditch adoption court orders that have erased our own identities etc. My personal view is that Israel should offer all adoptees citizenship because it is not right that any adoptee should -also- need to ask the permission of anyone else to be Jewish and live in the only Jewish state in the world. It should obviously have never been controversial to have one Jewish State on the Mediterranean (which is not contingent on Zionism) when there are so many Catholic or Muslim states around the Mediterranean. Of course, despite the fact the British aristocracy still claim Gibraltar as their own, it is still nevertheless, predominantly Catholic.
The adoption legislation from 1984 in Victoria, Australia, that was retrospectively based on me, after I had been sent 12000 miles away as a teenager to avoid blushes between politicians, the Murdoch family and intelligence services is and was very deceitful. It wasn’t like any were saying they would pay any/all of the travel, accommodation, medical and insurance costs for any adoptee to indefinitely leave our own home overseas to return to the original court to go through onerous and completely unnecessary legal proceedings to seek the ‘permission’ of that court to ditch an adoption court order.
The only true purpose of that 1984 adoption legislation (as I have previously explained) was to try and force any adoptee to under… duress agree to waive any lawsuits before possibly being released from the adoption court order. The illegal practise of being forced as an adult to live the lie of a what is a politically imposed adoption court order, affects every single part of my daily life.
The imposition of an adoption court order made while I was a child on me as an adult, against my free will does meet the threshold of a false imprisonment that adversely affects most aspects of my life because I don’t have agency over my own life that other people do have in their own lives, to make the adult decisions I am entitled to make.
I do not personally agree with adoptions, but if there are adoptions, then there has to be -equality– in the world of adoptions or there cannot legally be adoptions. This means there cannot be discrimination between different groups of adoptees (ie: people who ‘agree’ as adults to be adoptees and those adult adoptees like myself, who have not agreed to continue to be adoptees) and between people who are adopted and people who are not adopted.
The Australian Labour party (via Western Australia) are now also ridiculously trying to portray it is and has always been up to politicians to inform an adoptee of an adoption, which is not and has not ever been legally sustainable, and is often contradicted by much of their own legislation.
I can’t change corrupt politically motivated adoption legislation simply by standing in federal politics in Australia because the combination of the adoption court order and legally unworkable retrospective adoption legislation from 1984. illegally bans me from freely standing for election in federal politics in Australia, because unlike Australian politicians/political parties it is claimed I need to first seek ‘permission’ of the original County Court, in Victoria, Australia (who made the adoption court order) to ditch any/all part/s of the politically imposed British Anglo-Saxon dual nationality from the adoption court order, that I would not have to do if I did not have an adoption court order & was free to choose (like latest Murdoch family ‘reverse engineered’ Australian PM) to ditch any part of my own actual & Australian overlapping Mediterranean & Celtic dual nationality etc to stand in Australian federal politics (ie: according to S44 of Constitution).
A kinder evolution is possible.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 