Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: politicians, Vic Police, Cenitex) @ Victoria Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I am as an adoptee exempt from ‘complying’ with -any- adoption legislation made to try & stop legally binding rulings in jury lawsuits anywhere which is why Murdoch family & politicians et al led ‘trial by media’ of me in UK, publicly inciting what resulted in torture & attempted murder of me, to try & stop my existing High Court jury lawsuits in UK resulting in two historically significant legally binding agreements a) politicians & Murdoch family et al… knew when they retrospectively enacted Victorian Adoption legislation in 1984, based on me, they never intended to pay any/all legal, financial, medical & travel expenses for adult adoptees like me to indefinitely leave our own homes overseas (ie: in UK, New Zealand, or Breizh, France) & return to court of origin in Victoria, Australia, incl during global pandemic & recurrent cancer etc diagnoses to seek their ‘permission’ to ditch ‘adoption court order’ b) British judiciary legally obliged to have audio/audio visual recordings in British Magistrates Courts to avoid… foreseeable disputes about judicial corruption etc (12.09.2024)
FAO Registrar:
I make this witness statement/of truth/statutory declaration.
My own identity of Donna Bugat (formerly known by my adopted name of Babs Tucker) is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
**** It’s not legally complicated that there should have always been -equality- among all adoptees, which means officially recognising that of course some adoptees would want to ditch adoption court orders when we become adults, for our own personal reasons that are not and should never have to be anyone else’s business ****
I have previously provided any necessary documentation etc.
It was a British barrister/law firm (Doughty Chambers) who as I have previously shown, originally made a ‘case stated’ to the British High Court on an important point of law, that is very much in the public interest about what they first identified as judicial corruption in the British Magistrates Courts. That ‘case stated’ resulted in the British Judiciary closing ranks to repeatedly from then on illegally deny -me- legal representation, to illegally try and stop my having a historic High Court jury ruling in the UK including the British Magistrates `courts (which most British cases begin/go through) who can also imprison people, must make audio/audio visual recordings of proceedings in the British Magistrates Courts, to avoid foreseeable disputes.
The only reason, the not so landmark ‘Contempt of Court’ case about me in the High Court happened the following year and involving all the same members of the British Judiciary, was because people ‘sidestepped’ etc that original ‘case stated’ and subsequent inextricably linked jury lawsuits from Mothers Day 2006 (onwards) when the Murdoch family lawyer, Blair was grandstanding in Victoria, Australia.
Of course a British High Court jury would also have agreed that I am not legally obliged as an adult adoptee to return to the court or state of origin in Victoria, Australia, to (under duress) seek ‘permission’ to ditch an adoption court order made while I was a minor (where all state and federal politicians, political parties and government agencies et al, including Australian courts have also always illegally withheld a court certified copy/extract of adoption court order from me, I only first saw a photocopy of in July 2019 which was given to me by the Adoption Information Service who do not help adoptees obtain court certified copies/extracts).
The only identifiable purpose of the abuse of process that is the 1984 Adoption Act in Victoria, Australia is to illegally try and force adoptees to under duress, ‘agree’ to ‘waive’ any/all proceedings against anyone in relation to an ‘adoption court order’ if we want to ‘officially’ be released from the adoption court order.
I am aware that after I had High Court jury lawsuits in the UK, that would result in my bing able to ‘officially’ ditch the adoption court order without my needing to return to Victoria, or Australia, that Australian politicians illegally began further mislead adoptees with their political language of ‘forced adoptions, without politicians or the press publicly explaining that:
a) the political language of ’forced adoption’ is not a legal term recognised by any courts, because it obviously seeks to… minimise the widespread involvement of politicians and government agencies, including courts in child trafficking etc.
This is why politicians do not say/legislate who decides if any adoption is a ‘forced’ including at any time.
b) politicians et al are illegally hiding… they are… forcing all adoptees to stay adopted unless we go through the unreasonable obstacle course of their whole ‘permission’ racket like the 1984 Adoption Act in Victoria, Australia, where the only real purpose of that legislation is to try and force adoptees to under duress ‘waive’ any/all lawsuits against the politicians et al if we want to be ‘allowed’ by them, to ditch the adoption court order.
A Mr Foster who is a Labour politician in Western Australia has been spinning some political hyperbole about adoption through the ABC, currently run by another Murdoch family apologist.
(The man who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO in 1984 when the deceitful adoption legislation was enacted):
(I was quietly walking down the street the other day, when another resident came up to me and said a bridge was being blocked)
(I am currently resident in the Melbourne CBD, so I am like other residents quite use to there often being roadblocks of one kind or another in the CBD for all sorts of reasons)
It is a legal certainty I am as an adult adoptee exempt from ‘complying’ with any adoption legislation made to try & stop legally binding jury lawsuits anywhere which is why the Murdoch family & politicians spun the ‘trial by media’ of me in the UK, publicly inciting what led to the torture & attempted murder of me, to illegally try & stop my existing High Court jury lawsuits in UK resulting in historically legally binding agreements:
a) politicians & Murdoch family et al… knew when they retrospectively enacted Victorian Adoption legislation in 1984, based on me, they never intended to pay any/all legal, financial, medical & travel expenses for adult adoptees like me to indefinitely leave our own homes overseas (ie: in UK, New Zealand, or Breizh, France) & return to court of origin in Victoria, Australia, incl during global pandemic & recurrent cancer etc diagnoses to have their ‘permission’ to ditch an adoption court order
b) British judiciary legally obliged to have audio/audio visual recordings in British Magistrates Courts to avoid… foreseeable disputes about judicial corruption etc.
(Maybe rank and file police are having a demo at the Melbourne Convention Centre ?):
The Murdoch family et al have always known the ‘adoption court order’ made about me in the County Court in Melbourne, Australia, is ‘void ab initio’ as indeed is their supposed subsequent family trust in Nevada, in the United States.
(Nevada supposedly welcomes wealthy people shopping around to spin family trusts):
I personally only support a meaningful and genuine direct democracy which means more democracy because people have the opportunity to vote on all legislation, that can help reduce the worst legislative excesses, regardless of whether the government of any state or country claims to be a constitutional monarchy or republic.
A kinder world is possible.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 