Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: politicians & Vic Police, ref: ‘Mon Repos’ case of fmr King of Greece & Ors & ECHR 2000/02 etc re ‘possessions/chattels’) @ Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar a) who can confirm Vic AG (who was legally responsible to guarantee I had legal representation in UK) does not oppose my ditching ‘adoption court order’ (incl by video via London/Paris embassies so I do not need to physically appear in any court) in British lawsuits, involving Murdoch family, Australian politicians & Vic Police (ref phony UK Undercover ‘Inquiry’ giving free legal representation repeatedly illegally denied to me by British Judiciary & Australian politicians b) incl agreement British Judiciary must make audio/audio visual recordings in British Magistrates Courts because default position of disputes over Judicial conduct in courts cannot be that a member of public (who is also a defendant repeatedly refused legal representation by the British Judiciary & Australian politicians) is at fault; all government cases against me in Australia (Case 352 adoption) & UK ‘void ab initio’ c) Murdoch family who recklessly led ‘trial by media’ against me in UK that incited resulting torture & attempted murder etc of me to cover up they trafficked me to intelligence services etc, pay me financial compensation incl to cover all future legal & medical costs (30.08.2024)
I make this witness statement/of truth/statutory declaration.
My own identity of Donna Bugat (formerly known as Babs Tucker) is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination that all people can and do peacefully exercise in many ways, most of which are none of the business of any politicians, governments or monarch/y.
**** The politicians have illegally used the 1984 adoption legislation to achieve something they could not have achieved if they had gone as ordinary citizens to court etc. The politicians obviously cannot claim financial compensation for abusing adult adoptees as possessions/chattels ****
I compare the
a) obviously defective ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court case (below) about me in the UK that was cynically trying to illegally circumvent my having a legally binding High Court civil jury ruling/agreement on the legal need for i) audio/audio visual court recordings in British Magistrates Court and ii) legal representation, and
b) the two British-led Greek ‘Mon Repos’ court cases about the former British-led Greek monarch/y at the ECHR in 2000 & 2002 about “possessions” which are also relevant to Australian adoption legislation and malicious prosecutions against me in Parliament Square/Green in Central London in the UK.
The political policy of the British Parliament and monarch/y was to (illegally) ban peaceful campaigning by members of the public in Parliament Square, Central London (even before now repealed ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005) and while expecting the public to provide unlimited publicly funded… legal representation for the politicians, police, courts, and monarch/y but not the members of public !! over that:
It was obviously very serious that I was falsely accused by the British government of an alleged ‘Contempt of Court’ in the Magistrates Court in the UK that resulted in the defective landmark ‘Contempt of Court case in the UK (and the High Court Habeas Corpus Case in April 2008) because it showed that in the absence of audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates, the Judiciary could imprison someone without legal representation by for example making a false allegation like a Contempt of Court that is imprisonable in the British Magistrates too.
It was actually a lawyer who first accused a District Judge in a ‘case stated’ to the High Court of being corrupt (which immediately raised the legal issue of the need for audio/audio recordings in all cases in British Magistrates Courts)
It was obviously a legal impossibility for a District Judge to make out the necessary element of ‘criminal intent’ on my part in the agreement between Brian and I, to campaign together, which we didn’t need the approval of a court to make. I also note the prosecutor who was a Tory MP did not list his payment as prosecutor !! on his register of member interests including before he became the Attorney General in 2010, before he curiously threatened me, in 2012, specifically about court rcordings:
(My personal view based on my own experiences, is the ECHR case about the former Greek monarch/y which is relevant to what happened with the monarch/y claiming some of Parliament Square, Central London, is more likely than not what precipitated the Brexit omnishambles, with politicians acting on behalf of the monarch/y also threatening to leave the ECHR too)
There had always been the constant tensions specifically over the access to legal representation, including with the Cabinet Office (the Australian government also originally tried in 2006, to wriggle out of their legal responsibility to guarantee I had… access to legal representation by saying I was no longer an Australian citizen which is obviously untrue:
(The politicians did not know/plan for me to trump/checkmate etc them on 13th December 2007 (over their published case on 12/12/2007 above) when I used High Court etc ‘case law’ in Southwark Crown Court to prove (or rather state the obvious) I was not legally responsible (there was no ‘criminal intent’ on my part with regard to the intentional failures of politicians et al towards me)
It is politicians et al who have “no recognised defence in law”.
am not a possession/chattel of the Victorian/Australian governments, despite their misleading adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia from 1984, that illegally treats adoptees as though we are -solely- possessions and chattels of government/s with no rights of our own.
**** The politicians cannot legally use/abuse their position as politicians to legislate whatever they like, any more than the former Greek monarch/y could.
The politicians have illegally used the 1984 adoption legislation to achieve something they could not have achieved if they had gone as ordinary citizens to court etc. The politicians obviously cannot claim financial compensation for abusing adult adoptees as possessions/chattels ****
The British monarch/y knew this ‘gift’ (below) from politicians (not the public) only came about because of ‘special laws’ etc members of the public do not enjoy (referred to in the British led fmr Greek monarch/y case) could be repealed etc which is why after I was in Parliament Square (and after 13th December 2007) it turned out the monarch/y then went and filed a controversial claim in the Land Registry (that was not actually disclosed by the government in High Court proceedings where I was the person, not lawyers who first mentioned it) but ultimately along with politicians failed in their defective proceedings because they could not publicly imprison me through the British High Court… without legal representation the Judiciary had themselves kept illegally denying me for their own reasons (and incl making and handing over audio/audio visual recordings incl certain CCTV, I have previously mentioned)
The political policy of the British Parliament and monarch/y was to (illegally) ban peaceful campaigning by members of the public in Parliament Square, Central London (even before now repealed ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005) (while expecting the public to publicly fund unlimited… legal representation for the politicians, police, courts, and monarch/y but not the members of public !! over that:
There was mayhem from the state when I a) produced a photocopy of the above controversial claim by the monarch/y on 21st June 2010, in the High Court (that had not been disclosed by any of the lawyers) among also mentioning b) the illegal use of undercovers (that is currently being covered up by a staged government Undercover Inquiry in the UK where the unlawful purpose is to give politicians free legal representation, I mostly did not have with the malicious prosecutions brought against me, I mostly won, or for my civil jury lawsuits.
The Australian politicians who had employed Sir Ken Jones et al in Australia were very much directly involved when I was yet again illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 (the state staged Leveson used the cult of celebrity to subsequently ‘sidestep/overlook’ the revolving doors of politicians and press and the monarch/y do legislate to spy on… everyone)
The undercover scandal has never legally finished because politicians won’t settle the lawsuits that existed -before- their staged inquiry, in the UK that also involves Australian politicians and Sir Ken Jones in the UK too.
It was a legal impossibility for the courts to meaningfully explain how Johnson could claim to represent, pretty much a substantial part of the world (like the far from Commonwealth) in his malicious prosecution of me:
The corrupt Johnson (only became Mayor of London by covering up my being violently punched in the head on 17th August 2007, possibly because the Murdoch family had the goods on him over he and a Darius Guppy, which all led to Johnson orchestrating the torture and attempted murder of me, that most benefited the Murdoch family because of the adoption case in Australia) before Johnson was trying to cover all that and much else up in the British High Court etc etc etc. Corruption is always wide-ranging to try and overwhelm the victim/s)
Johnson had further conflicts of interest while a) on the one hand claiming to be elected by the public, as a Mayor, but b) still collecting more from the Daily Telegraph, as a ‘journalist’ and c) also albeit belatedly claiming to act on behalf of the British monarch/y beyond being the official gardener (but not producing any delegated authority with regard to legal proceedings on behalf of the monarch/y who were knowingly involved) along with representing Australian politicians like fmr Australian PM Rudd and his welfare queen wife at Ingeus, and Sir Ken Jones who was working for Victoria Police, but still part of d) the undercover operation called ‘DV’/Democracy Village in the UK (who were overwhelmingly monarchist as all undercovers, like all the spooks who ‘raised’ me, are)
The British governments published case on 12/12/2007 inaccurately records the dates of court hearings because it omits there was a hearing in the High Court at the same time and on the same day the now latest British King was grandstanding in Parliament Square, with a statue of a lloyd-George on 25th October 2007.
The politicians and monarch/y obviously prefer statues to real people:
The male who violently punched me in the head on 17th August 2008 (when I was not actually in Parliament Square) who politicians refused to identify, in any legal sense at least worked for the monarch/y however “directly” that was, of which there has long been a suspicion that he was employed by either the monarchy or MI6/Vitol Oil.
What is notable is that Johnson, the Daily Telegraph (which by that time included the Daily Mail’s Brogan who had publicly stated in 2008 that all of the robber media barons wanted me arrested) and the monarch/y all got free publicly funded legal representation from 2010 onwards, and I had none.
**** The British monarchy could not legally use a publicly elected official to get free publicly funded legal representation for themselves (and none for me) ****
The fmr MP, Mayor of London, FM and PM Johnson who proved (like the fmr Australian MP, PM, FM, PM and now Ambassador Rudd) he is and was the corrupt front guy for anyone, for a price (in the case of Rudd laundering $1.4 billion dollars through his welfare queen at Ingeus) wrote to the Department of Culture etc (who funded the ‘dark arts’ con-artist Wallinger’s ‘State Britain’ rip-off) about the ‘Royal Parks’.
The years between 2009 and 2013 were particularly traumatic for me, and of course particularly when Brian died.
The corrupt Johnson et al stashed our stolen property in the Museum of London, he… controlled. He only became British PM when I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019, to try and find a way through the legal quagmire created by politicians stopping me getting on with my own life in… my own home in Breizh, France, because of the rogue adoption court order.
I only personally support a genuine direct democracy that actually means more democracy because the public would then be able to participate in a more meaningful way, by being able to vote on all legislation that could possibly limit some of the worst legislative excesses of false prophets/profits.
Anyway, the timeline of the malicious prosecutions of me in the UK shows it only happened because the British Judiciary repeatedly illegally denied me legal representation in the UK (the Australian politicians covered up they were legally responsible to guarantee I had legal representation in the UK)
The British Judiciary… continued a sequence of events putting my life at risk:
The British Judiciary illegally indefinitely staying my legal representation without similarly staying use of now repealed offending legislation against me (ie: ‘poor laws’ not used against wealthy people) was clearly illegal and caused me very serious irrevocable harm.
We won’t be hearing the Murdoch family who are anything but ‘investigative journalists’ promoting the British Magistrates Courts having audio/audio visual recordings in their Magistrates Courts to prevent foreseeable disputes, anytime soon, because the Murdoch family have profited from some seriously unlawful legislative excesses too, like now repealed ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, the Murdoch family never opposed.
On Monday 26th March 2007 (the date of what became the ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court Case above) which was the anniversary of when the ‘trial by media’ against me in the UK began in 2006 (while the Murdoch family lawyer Blair) was grandstanding in Victoria, Australia, I was ambushed in COWMC (City of Westminster Magistrates Court) when I was in court for Steve Jago and the same District Judge (Nicholas Evans) from the indefinitely delayed original ‘case stated’ to the High Court from February 22nd 2006 illegally denied me an adjournment I asked for to get… legal representation over six summons, he had also illegally issued against me on Friday 23rd March 2006 for a hearing on 26th March 2006 that I had not received and he would not hand over to me. The District Judge (et al, because he did not act alone) knew I would file the illegal summons in another court as further evidence of his Judicial misconduct. The malicious allegation of an alleged contempt of court that was never cited, only happened because I was waiting around after the hearing asking for a copy of the summons which the court staff were also illegally refusing to give me, because they were illegally issued etc.
The District Judge knew he could not and did not legally or otherwise actually cite me for an alleged Contempt of Court in the Magistrates Court which is imprisonable, because he could not legally imprison me without legal representation… I had (as instructed by lawyers I had phoned when I discovered the court had ambushed me) actually asked for (I got a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in April 2008 because I was illegally imprisoned without legal representation or trial etc by the same Magistrates Courts, as it all continued to spin increasingly out of control because of the same political and judicial failures etc)
**** The Victorian politicians have always illegally refused to provide all adoptees with a court certified extract/copy of our adoption court orders (incl free of charge) which they have obviously tried to cover up with their misleading/disingenuous adoption legislation in 1984 in Victoria, Australia when I was already living overseas.
The fault over all adoptees not having court certified copies/extracts of our adoption court orders, lies with politicians like the Victorian Attorney General, and not adoptees. The Adoption Information Service who cherry pick what they may hand over to adoptees that depends on if you live in Australia or overseas, only extends to photocopies, not court certified copies of the adoption court order, which they have never claimed they provide, if they even mentioned the existence of any, because they are selective about the photocopies they may disclose.
I was on a kibbutz (Yad Mordechai) in Israel near Gaza when the Orwellian Adoption Act in 1984 was passed (and living in my own home in Breizh, France, when amendments were made in March 2019)
The County Court in Victoria have always illegally denied me access to the adoption register too.
It’s not like politicians did not know adoptees lived overseas and like my case proves it is unreasonable to make us physically return to Victoria, Australia, which has also resulted in my being diagnosd twice with cancer, and all the additional medical complications that creates and adds to the situation. The politicians did not and have not paid my travel or accommodation costs etc in Victoria, Australia, and nor has the Murdoch family who are the global propagandists for the adoption industry.
The only possible way to make the adoption industry even begin to work for adoptees is by acknowledging any adoptees legal right to just ditch the adoption court orders when we are adults, at a time of our choosing, and without our needing to attend any court. A witness statement/of truth/statutory declaration should be sufficient, and particularly since no legal representation is on offer for all adoptees.
It’s cases like mine that show there is something seriously wrong with for example the 1984 adoption legislation that politicians simply cannot say they don’t know.
There are obviously no legal grounds which would make it lawful and reasonable for politicians to demand I would have to leave my own home overseas and return at my own financial cost (travel, accommodation and living costs, and regardless of my health, and including after being twice diagnosed with cancer after being stopped from ditching the adoption court order… from my own home in Breizh, France (or indeed, Reading in the UK) to embark on what are in all the true circumstances really, very onerous, and extremely unnecessary proceedings (that are an abuse of process) in the original court on the pretext that I would need to have ‘permission’ that could be refused, to as an adult ditch an adoption court order made when I was a child.
2020=2023
The politicians specifically illegally falsified state and federal government records on 20th October 2020 to (without my knowledge) falsely give an impression I owned property in Australia that was only eventually corrected (not when I was unlawfully arrested at the County Court on 21st December 2021, and I then showed Victoria Police the original title deeds to my property in Breizh, France) but only -after- I was in hospital in 2022 because of the first diagnosis of cancer and it was then clear the government had falsified those records too, just before I was diagnosed with recurrent cancer in early 2023. It is only possible to conclude that politicians have taken -advantage- of my being diagnosed with recurrent cancer because I am even more vulnerable than before. The only priority political parties appear to have is collecting enough votes to try and spend as much public money as they possibly can, however they like which seems more of a monarchist than democratic model, to me.
In any event it is actually very much an important matter of public and international law, that is very much in the public interest to a) ditch the adoption court order from Victoria, Australia, in my British lawsuits, along with b) an agreement on audio/audio visual recordings in Magistrates Courts which would have at least ameliorated the -deliberate- failure of Australian politicians to guarantee I had access to legal representation in the British Magistrates Courts who could and did unlawfully imprison me, by making up things like the Contempt of Court which was also… imprisonable and c) the Murdoch family who led the trial by media that incited torture and attempted murder of me pay me compensation.
A kinder evolution is possible.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 