Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: Australian state & federal politicians, UK & Vic Police, Cenitex) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I make this witness statement/of truth/statutory declaration incl a) my ditching adoption court order from Victoria, Australia in my UK lawsuit/s by -video- without my needing to physically appear in any court/return to UK (& could incl via Australian embassy in London, UK/Paris, France etc) & b) to incl legally binding agreement in UK lawsuit/s that I could not be & was not lawfully arrested, prosecuted, convicted or imprisoned by British Magistrates, because it is unlawful for British Judiciary to be judges/adjudicators in their own case/s where they remain legally liable etc for refusing to make audio/audio visual recordings of my proceedings in British Magistrates Courts, to avoid completely foreseeable disputes about conduct of Judiciary first ‘case stated’ by a lawyer on 24th February 2006 that resulted in Judiciary illegally repeatedly denying me legal representation in -all- courts c) Murdoch family cease & desist with publishing adoption misinformation/propaganda globally & pay me financial compensation for ‘trial by media’ of me in UK where they incited what resulted in torture & (attempted) murder etc of me with CCTV illegally withheld (23.08.2024)
I make this witness statement/of truth/statutory declaration:
The Registrar can confirm directly with the Victorian Attorney General or anyone delegated that authority they do not oppose my ditching the adoption court order through UK lawsuits which is the optimal choice. That is where I have lived most of my life, or adult life, except for living in New Zealand and of course the autonomous region of Breizh, in France in my own home that serendipitously combines my Celtic and Mediterranean heritage. It also naturally completes the UK lawsuits by facilitating the necessary ‘landmark’ legally binding agreement about audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates Court to avoid completely foreseeable disputes about the conduct of judges.
(It’s fair to say I have something of an ‘exclusive’ about the British Judiciary in the British Magistrates Court, with the relevant documents etc, the anything but “investigative’ Murdoch family won’t be publishing any time soon. Of course I am not a journalist and have zero interest in ever having anything to do with that business model)
(It will obviously now be very difficult for me to even get travel insurance to try and visit my own home in Breizh, France, without considerable paperwork from oncologists and various other doctors, after being diagnosed with cancer twice, and having an emergency major life saving operation, and further life saving medical treatment when the cancer returned, which was all complicated by a rare medical anomaly that meant I have not been able to have the same medical treatment people without the rare complication are able to have. So, there are all sorts of medical issues, and of course it is not uncommon for cancer and such serious medical treatment, to lead to or worsen already existing PTSD. In my own case the trauma of my adoption is inextricably linked to the trauma of recurrent cancer, so that is a long road to recovery of that, which was improved by living in my own home in Breizh, France.
The problem was being forced to leave my own home in Breizh, France, and return to Australia to try and sort out the legal quagmire of the adoption, instead of just being able to get on with my own life. My case certainly proves beyond all reasonable doubt how unreasonable it always was to put an adoptee living overseas at such a disadvantage by saying we have to return to the specific court in the state of origin inAustralia to put ourselves through onerous legal proceedings that are totally not needed, and all while we are not living in our own homes. My personal view is the continuation of an adoption court order into adulthood has nothing to do with an adoptee or adopter because is instead just about governments wanting to make as much money as they can out of interfering in the private lives of members of the public. That is why I personally only support genuine direct democracy that is about having… more democracy with people getting to vote on every piece of legislation, which would help curtail some of the worst legislative excesses)
Re: Legal representation of my own choosing that has a right of audience in court etc.
**** I am clear the available evidence is that the Australian government who are always lawyered up at the taxpayers expense are and were jointly and severally liable as politicians and political parties to ensure I had/have independent legal representation of my own choosing in the UK, because they have always known I was illegally denied legal representation in the UK that cannot be explained away by my being an adoptee ****
Note: I am quite certain -I- should never have had to constantly traipse/be trafficked around the world so the misogynistic and messianic Murdoch family who are the global propagandists of what they call ‘adoption’ can avoid blushes. I have never personally come across anyone who thinks the Murdoch family “care” about vulnerable children, anywhere.
My own identity is Donna Bugat (formerly known by my adopted etc name of Babs Tucker) and has always been essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right to self determination.
It is important to note: **** No one has ever dared repeat the lies that were published on 26th March 2006 in any court and nor would anyone dare repeat them before a High Court civil jury.****
The documents relating to my comments are below the comments:
I have never so much as (see 1984 legislation below) ever been given a court certified copy/extract of the adoption court order in my case 352 in the County Court of Australia (the Adoption Information Service only ever gave me what… they purport to be a photocopy in July 2019 when they transferred to the DOJ where a Ms Corrie McKenzie who was a political appointment dishonestly posing as a civil servant/departmental secretary working with Victoria Police) at the same time I was forced to leave my own home in Breizh, France and return to Australia. The available evidence proves Ms Corrie McKenzie intended to cover up my situation because she did not declare her conflict of interest from she was for example a fmr Chief of Staff for the fmr PM Rudd and they were obviously involved in my lawsuits in the UK including the employment of a Sir Ken Jones from the UK in Victoria, Australia to illegally continue to use Australian undercovers in Parliament Square, Central London (in defiance of the Special Branch disclosure in court in the UK on 17th July 2007) The illegal continuation of an undercover operation involving Australia, in the UK, resulted in an Australian living in Melbourne, Australia called Mr Brett Bailey being involved in the unlawful arrest of me at a State Opening on 25th May 2010 when he posed as a protester with the undercover campaign called ‘Democracy Village’ used against Brian and I where he is quoted in the ‘trial by media’ of Brian and I in the UK. The male I now know to be an Australian called Mr Brett Bailey publicly claims to have worked for the Victorian government as a ‘systems analyst’ at Cenitex before and after his involvement in my unlawful arrest at the State Opening in Parliament Square. I am aware Mr Bailey used his position at Cenitex to steal, share, and sell personal information about my adoption and as a result he also illegally spied on a family member – there is no such thing as private information of you are an adoptee. That adoption information was obviously illegally shared with for example Sir Ken Jones who was only in Melbourne and promised Australian citizenship while I was illegally denied legal representation while Jones was involved in and still orchestrating the for example undercover police from Australia with for example a fmr police officer Mr Dean Ingledew who had transferred to Westminster Council because of his unlawful involvement in my unlawful arrest on 23rd May 2006 on behalf of “both houses and black rod” which was information only belatedly disclosed to Brian and I in CO/11393/2007 when we had no legal representation)
- The unlawful reason politicians maliciously enacted legislation to completely ban members of the public peacefully campaigning in Parliament Square specifically in ss 132-138 (now repealed) of the Serious Organized Police and Crime Act 2005 was to facilitate the unlawful use of state agencies and powers that would normally be used against ‘organized crime’ (if it doesn’t happen to involve the government) The legislation exempted unions including the Police Federation from that legislation and the relevant corresponding sections of the Public Order Act 1986.
- The British Parliament et al obviously knew they could only try and launder the politically motivated malicious prosecutions to try and ban people peacefully campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London, through the Magistrates Courts in Westminster:
a) because Magistrates Courts have no recordings and
b) because the legislation did not exist outside the Westminster courts area
3. It is really obvious what was going on because when the politician and paid journalist of the Telegraph Johnson maliciously brought a civil action against Brian and I in the High Court (to keep trying to cover up the torture and attempted murder of me where the CCTV was illegally being withheld) the first thing I immediately did when I was first up on the witness stand on 21st June 2010 was articulate what could only be construed as a counter-lawsuit against Johnson and anyone standing with him, like the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ protesters which saw the judge hastily vacate the court and lawyers suddenly scatter and my being illegally denied legal representation yet again, on 23rd June 2010 when the Australian PM began his musical chairs as though the clock had to start running again on the issue of legal representation with every change of PM. Rudd could not deny on any witness stand in front of a jury he was laundering very lucrative brown envelopes through Ingeus contracts from the British government that would never have happened if I had legal representation. Rudd is currently hiding away posing as an Ambassador to the United States, precisely because he gets free publicly funded legal representation he is not entitled to. The true purpose of most public inquiries (like the UK Spycops Inquiry that came after my jury lawsuits) is so politicians and their mates get free publicly funded legal representation for often all sorts of nefarious reasons. To example: politicians in the UK like a fmr London Livingstone et al who spied etc on Brian and I illegally claimed free legal representation in the UK Spy Cops Inquiry by claiming they were previously spied on, which does not justify their spying on Brian and I. The British Spy Cops Cops Inquiry is particularly political performative theatre, that sidesteps the inconvenient truths of the involvement of the press and intelligence services and private contractors etc, not to mention Sir Ken Jones and why he really went to Victoria, Australia and was employed by Victoria Police. The Australian Liberal and then Labour governments cut a deal with Putin at APEC in Australia in September 2007 to give Russia uranium (which seemed odd to most people given what the… UK publicly claimed the Russian government did in the UK in 2006 which other people said was to do with what the British were doing in Iraq which seems possible too) which along with the Russian government connection to Vitol Oil and sponsoring Johnson through the Telegraph, partly explains their involvement in the undercover omnishambles that was called ‘Democracy Village’)
4. My personal view is an agreement in my lawsuits in the UK about audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates will pretty much clean up much of the illegal use of undercovers against peaceful protesters
( I blew the whistle about undercovers in the Magistrates Court case on 13th January 2010, which was covered up/ illegally adjourned until August 2011 after Brian had died and once again I had no legal representation and was illegally imprisoned through the Magistrates Court without any trial by the same Judge from 22nd February 2006. I was illegally imprisoned in April 2008 without legal representation or trial in the Habeas Corpus Case, because the Judge had been compromised/there was a massive lawsuit also involving a court order he had illegally issued in Westminster Magistrates on 22nd May 2007 in defiance/ignorance of a Crown Court Order from 8th March 2007)
5. There are problems with accessing transcripts and audio in other courts in a timely manner, because such a large problem in the Magistrates Court which is also the originating court for the transfer of cases to Crown Courts has not had the necessary checks and balances/ safeguards of audio/audio visual recordings.
6. My cases were moved out of Westminster because of the ongoing conduct of Judges etc – resulting in the ‘landmark’ Judicial ‘sidestep’ in the High Court ‘Contempt of Court’ case about me from March 2007 that arose after the barrister filed a ‘case stated’ on 12th March 2007 effectively calling the Judge from 22nd February 2006 corrupt, which led to the same judge maliciously targeting me again on 26th March 2007 by illegally issuing six summons on 23rd March 2007 for a hearing on 26th March 2006 when I was only at the court by happenstance and was illegally denied legal representation by the same Judge from 22nd February 2006 who refused to hand over a copy of the summons on 26th March 2007 (because he knew I would file them in another court as evidence of further wrongdoing by him) before I was then illegally denied legal representation over the ‘case stated’ involving that Judge, for a second time on 18th June 2007 by the same High Court Judge HH Collins who had previously illegally denied me legal representation.
7. An HH Justice Collins had previously illegally denied me legal representation on 25th May 2006 by illegally claiming he could indefinitely ‘stay’ my original appeal about a criminal prosecution, on 22nd February 2006 by illegally denying me legal representation, without similarly putting a stay on the arrest, prosecution, conviction, and imprisonment of me using the contested legislation. It is more than a little murky to me why the lawyers did not challenge that refusal of legal representation at the time, and let it slide for soooo long that caused me so much harm, before the partner in the law firm suddenly switched law firms which was the excuse used by the law firm for the lawyer which replaced him to not proceed with our lawsuits that I always thought they really should have done immediately following the beginning of the ‘trial by media’ against me over my unlawful arrest on 26th March 2006 which was a very straightforward case of unlawful arrest etc that the press lied about.
8. It is common-sense that all the available evidence about the conduct of the Judiciary, where the Judiciary were acting in bad faith and illegally was because they did not want an -ordinary member of the public- (and in their eyes, even worse a woman, an adoptee, and sufficiently foreign and too Mediterranean with absolutely no legal training whatsoever) to get a legally binding ruling in the British High Court (and particularly if it was by a jury) over recordings in the British Magistrates Courts. Regardless of however the information is presented that is what the true situation is with the British Judiciary in my own case.
***** All I have ever needed to argue is not really the detail of what any particular dispute about the conduct of a judge may be, but rather the fact the British Judiciary do not have any “recognised defence in law” to refuse to agree to audio/audio visual recordings in British Magistrates because that is what is very clearly an important point of law that is very much in the public interest to avoid foreseeable disputes about the conduct of the Judiciary. The reality is most people if they ever have anything to do with the legal system it will b with the Magistrates Courts who can imprison people who can imprison people too, so of course it is essential to have audio/audio visual recordings of proceedings in the British Magistrates. The British Judiciary know they cannot be judges in their own case about that, the European Courts also have no authority to stop a High Court jury lawsuit about ****
N.B The document show a Lord Thomas ‘sidestepped’/’crab-walked’ his way away from the rule of law in my inextricably linked ‘landmark’ a) Contempt of Court case, and the b) ‘case stated’ (both involving the same Judge/s) he forgot to invite me to, in 2007 to slyly switching my Judicial Review CO12316/2011 with the undercovers CO/12613/2011 while sidestepping/crabwalking away from the reality there was no ‘stay’ on HQ11X00563 on 16th January 2012 (I had really ‘won’ way back in January 2011) when I was unlawfully arrested in contempt of court of those proceedings on 17th January 2012 when the fmr PM and Home Secretary was nobbling High Court Judges (refer smoking email 17th January 2012) before Lord Thomas re-invented himself as an unelected politician in the House of Lords. There is no genuine separation of powers between unelected politicians in the House of Lords and the Judiciary.
I was then kidnapped on 19th July 2007 from inside Lavender Hill Magistrates Court – which was outside the Westminster District during live proceedings, to stop me giving evidence in another case involving the Murdoch family. The available evidence is that a number of things happened on 17th July 2007, at Camberwell Magistrates which was also outside the Westminster district. It became clear that Westminster Magistrates had illegally issued a court order on 22nd May 2007 -in defiance- of a Crown Court Order from 8th March 2007 where it was agreed at Camberwell Magistrates that the defective Westminster Magistrates Court from 22nd May 2007 was under ‘appeal’/referred back to the Crown Court. What also happened on 17th July 2007 which was completely unexpected was a male on the witness stand said of his own volition that the government was using Special Branch against me and that it was illegal. It wasn’t so much surprising that it was going on, just surprising that a government employee had stated it on a witness stand. I think he was possibly emboldened, because a case in Westminster Magistrates on 9th July 2007 from 5th August 2006 (when I was first tortured) had been withdrawn because two witnesses from the CPS who were CPS lawyers (and resigned from the CPS) came forward as witnesses for me
which caused huge embarassment and shockingly led to a revenge attack by the MET police et al on me when I along with three others were unlawfully ‘arrested’ in crazy scenes that saw Horse-ferry Road closed and I was smashed into railings and then bundled into a van and driven around London etc for two hours before an Inspector Stacey tried to implode my knuckles etc. It was around that time that an officer from Palace of Westminster Police did say there was a paedophile ring in Westminster Magistrates. I had previously complained to a lawyer and shown her Westminster Magistrates staff publicly displaying pornography on their computer screen savers. in full view of the public. There was certainly unchecked misogyny and civilian women were particularly unsafe in Westminster Magistrates. That court just hated women. Their disrespect and hatred towards woman generally was irrational. In 2007 Westminster Magistrates said a woman was ‘mistaken’ about a sexual assault by a High Court Judge ‘Flasher’ Richards who was supposed to be the judge in our ‘contempt of court’ case. until I said there was zero chance I would dignify attending any court with him in it. There is a real problem with the safety of women in British courts. A Mr Weimar currently posing as a civil servant in the office of the Victorian Premier in Australia illegally dined with a Tory politician called Brian Coleman on the GLA in August 2011 (who publicly wanted peace campaigners illegally ‘removed’ for reasons of financial advancement) at the same time I was very violently assaulted by one of Weimar’s henchman at SERCO called Leroy who had previously beaten up Brian on 26th March 2007. In the incident where Leroy attacked me in August 2011 (because I could identify him from 26th March 2007) he had to be pulled off me by about four other people. It wasn’t a co-incidence the Judge from 22nd February 2006 and 26th March 2007 appeared and threatened me too etc etc. Weimar who along with a Murziline Parchment set up the chaos of the London Mayoralty/ GLA is just financially milking what happened in the UK, in Victoria, Australia. I think politicians illegally transferred part of Parliament Square, Central London to the monarchy (which Weimar was involved in) in the hope they could hide behind the coat-tails of the monarchy while trying to ban peaceful protest by the public which ignores the monarchy can be sued/counter sued too. It was difficult to legally sustain the concept that the fmr London Mayor Johnson who had free taxpayer funded legal representation could be elected by the public (by hiding what he and Australian politicians did to get him elected) and claim he was representing the public in his malicious prosecution of Brian and I, while also being paid £250k p.a by the Telegraph who benefited from his free publicly funded legal representation, while also claiming to represent the monarchy (when the records show, I, not a lawyer first raised the issue on 21st June 2010, of the monarchy in Parliament Square, Central London. Johnson could not honestly claim to represent, the public, the Telegraph and the monarchy. It was a legal nonsense and the outcome of his malicious prosecution proved to be legally meaningless because the High Court would have had to give me legal representation I was denied by them, to try and imprison me through any High Court injunction, which would have revealed my counterclaim etc. There were a lot of serious procedural irregularities arising/originating from the Magistrates Courts in Westminster.
I have never been given incl free of charge a certified copy/extract of my adoption court order as per the Adoption Act 1984 (the courts only disclose photocopies through the Adoption Information Service only presumably to adoptees physically in Australia because I hadn’t even seen a photocopy (from the AIS) until July 2019 which it is admitted is clearly valid in any courts that must include outside Australia (which politicians have not been complying with)
m
own case !!:
I think it was also unlawful for a Tory MP Grieve to pose as the prosecutor in the original malicious prosecution before he became the Attorney Gberal in 2010 which he used specifically to get a Mr Speybey, to write me a libellous missive, threaten me in August 2012 about court recordings without Grieve declaring his conflict of interest from 22nd February 2006:
I think that the Attorney General Grieve in September 2012 (who was bizarrely posing as a prosecutor on 22nd February 2006 which is more suggestive that the original malicious prosecution of me on 22nd February 2006 was actually a… private prosecution by a… politician) was more concerned about the original ‘case stated’ about recordings arising from 22nd February 2006:
(In reality, the Attorney General in 2012 knew he had a legal obligation to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me he had no authority to say anything about. Anything Grieve had to say about anything else was legally irrelevant. There was far too much taking us behind closed doors and violently attacking us, before refusing to hand over the CCTV. And to think, the Victorian government hired that goon, Sir Ken Jones, who reported directly to the Murdoch family lawyer Blair. The adoption legislation from 1984 is just ridiculous. It’s even worse that the Australian politicians hired Sir Ken Jones in Victoria Australia knowing what he had done in the UK, so it was really about him continuing to run an undercover operation in the UK that would just include Australian undercovers too.
What can help the most people (undercovers or not undercovers) is audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates Courts (and Sir Ken Jones would never have been aemployed by Australian politicians(:
23rd May 2000 & 23rd May 2006:
The fact the ‘case stated’ was illegally ‘stayed’ (by illegally denying legal representation) led to more very serious instances of the government hiding what they did behind closed doors (like on 4th September 2006 where the government took me into a corridor they falsely claimed had no CCTV when they… also destroyed independent video footage)
I walk in to a government building with Steve Jago:
The government knew other members of the public witnessed something odd going on, when I ran to try and have long enough to phone Brian and alert him to our being violently attacked behind closed doors.
The same British High Court Judge illegally denying me legal representation in 2007 (after the entirely avoidable ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court case has then arisen on 26th March 2007 involving the same District Court Judge from 22nd February 2006, after the ‘advice’ written on 12th March 2007.
The Judiciary cannot be judges in their own cases or deny legal representation on that basis.
I think it is strange NOT to have Magistrates Courts with audio/audiovisual recordings of proceedings to avoid foreseeable disputes about the conduct of the Judiciary. It’s not acceptable for the default position of the Judiciary to blame a member of the public, because the Judiciary refuse to have audio/audio visual recordings in British Magistrates to avoid foreseeable disputes.
It’s not like there’s never been a drunk District Judge sitting in Wstminster Magistrates Court:
(I was raised by the highest echelons of the British and Australian ‘Fremantle’ intelligence services who posed as the parents and god parents of me and my late adopted brother)
The 1984 adoption legislation was not a good ‘strategy’ (to obviously try and avoid lawsuits)
There is a very beautiful library by the dock in Melbourne.
I obviously did not confer any rights on the corrupt Cole to do what he liked with my property.
The ‘landmark’ Contempt of Court judicial ‘sidestep’/’crabwalk’ from the British Judiciary knowing thy were legally obliged to have audio/audio recordings in Magistrates Courts that proves change would only really come through a legally binding agreement in a jury lawsuit:
It’s a legal impossibility to understand how the government had failed to disclose information in Magistrates Court procedings over 23rd May 2006, they only began to disclose in CO/11393/2007:
Brian was correct and ‘recurring’ District Judge Evans was wrong as CO/11393/2007 showed:
I
You just have to ask why ??? (with someone impersonating a police officer with the numbers 666 on 10th April 2013 in the City of London when Neil who was my boyfriend at that time was unlawfully arrested when we left the High Court about me lawsuits/ City of London police were already involved in a High Court jury lawsuit HQ12X03564 so it was intimidation/a contempt of court)
Some of the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order paperwork (that has two different numbers) from 10th April – 16th April 20o8
(of course another problem we discovered was a consequence of no audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates is that it provided Judges with the opportunity to… falsify records. It’s legally unacceptable to claim the default position of the Judiciary is that no judge will ever be corrupt (the irrevocable harm of false imprisonment has already been caused by the time there is any Habeas Corpus paperwork)
I was illegally imprisoned on the basis of a non imprisonable alleged S 5 Public Order (involving a perjured witness statement from a Tory politician paid £160k by Vitol Oil to help cover up what was going on. The staff at Holloway imprison me because they said they didn’t have the necessary paperwork to do that and later when I was accepted in it was the gossip of prison staff who said someone paid the prison governor big bucks. The prison governor then illegally withheld the Habeas Corpus paperwork from me until I was released, at which point shr had demanded I sign a waive about what she had done before sh would release me, which I refused to do, and sh was forced to release me.
The boys with “suits and sunglasses” came to make a “social call” when I was illegally imprisoned in Holloway in April 2008 during the London Mayoralty elections, and said I didn’t “officially” exist in the UK, which I obviously did. There was after all for example even relatively recently then, the published High Court Cases from -2007- about me.
‘
I had been slightly more direct and asked Mr Hardwick to provide the minutes of a meeting it was claimed he had with the MET Police and MET police Authority at 8am on 8th December 2006, to supposedly discuss our lawsuits.
A lawyer, Mr Foot from Birnberg Pierce wasn’t being honest in his email above (where he did nothing about the unlawful directions from a District Judge Snow he refers to himself, because the case Brian is referring to (that involved the same named undercover named on 13th January 2010) was suddenly adjourned in the Magistrates on 29th April 2010 to be ‘re-imagined’ as ‘Democracy Village’ on 1st May 2010 onwards with the same ‘organizers’ who (despite the media spin) Johnson never took legal action against, before I was illegally denied legal representation (Birnberg Pierce) on 21st June 2010. That could never have happend with audio/audio visual recordings in the Magistrates Courts, and Birnberg Pierce knew that and just wanted Brian to fire them too. We had never even met the brief Mr Harris from Hong Kong/Doughty. Doughty obviously could not say they didn’t know about the case stated by one of their own barristers on… 24th February 2006. Of course Starmer from Doughty was profiting by grandstanding as the DPP by then. The term ‘human rights’ lawyer is just a marketing slogan used by a few unscrupulous law firms in London, who are ‘New’ Labour party apologists for the ‘lawyer’ Blair who was the ummm… Murdoch family lawyer. I don’t think anyone would pretend Blair or the Murdoch family have ever had any time for human rights for any civilian population, anywhere.
The tittle tattle ‘Guidofawkes’ journalist machine (below) in Westminster somehow lacked the ‘investigative capabilities’/skills to know what really goes on under their collective noses in the Westminster Magistrates, and -why- that began long before Starmer (and could go a long way to explaining how Australia was populated with cheap Labour as a ‘convict colony’ :):
It’s a legal impossibility to explain why Brown did not resign on 13th December 2007 when albeit unexpectedly I ‘won’ a decisive legal victor at Southwark Crown Court. Brown was up to his ears in the undercover operation and the cover up of the torture and attempted murder of me:
This was all pre-planned:
No-one dared repeat anything that was published on 25th May 2010 in any… court proceedings:
This (below) was what I actually said when I was unlawfully arrested:
The BBC et al (and a person I now know to be an Australian called Mr Bailey, see below) covered up what I really said when I was unlawfully arrested (the government refused to identify their undercover ‘Democracy Village’ ‘witness’, provide a ‘witness statement’ from the person, or produce them in court, while the press covered up it was an undercover agent from ‘Democracy Village’ who was with Mr Bailey, who came forward as their witness/complainant against me:
It wasn’t really surprising that despite the repeated protestations of the press and the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ over the following several years, I consistently refused to be ‘joined’ in legal proceedings with the very people… harming me.
On 25th May 2010, the square was closed to members of the public when Brian and I were unlawfully arrested, so members of the public could not see what happened.
There wasn’t a soundbite published that wasn’t carefully curated from agreed government ‘sources’.
I had realised at some point, on 25th May 2010 the members of the rogue ‘Democracy Village’ must be wired because they behaved like zombies and did not move around or speak naturally. It was like they were being briefed what to say and where to stand, which during the course of a half an hour of no sniffer dog going anywhere near Brians tent or my tent, made it increasingly clear they were getting instructions from elsewhere. The videos show the person of colour who was their ‘witness’ wasn’t even standing close enough to me to hear anything I said to other people while I had my back to Cole and her, and she was standing with Mr Bailey.
It was so corrupt and contrived no-one including Mr Bailey (below) from the rogue ‘Democracy Village’ ever publicly admitted in any press release or any court that they were the ‘complainant’ (and collectively legally responsible really) in my unlawful arrest on 25th May 2010. It was the same when the Matryoshka of ‘Democracy Village was waffling on, on Russia today in August 2010 when they had Brian unlawfully arrested, shortly before he was hospitalized with cancer.
They was no legal doubt they were undercovers because they publicly lied about their objective which was only to help the government unlawfully arrest Brian and I, and so on and so forth.
An Australian living in Victoria, called Mr Bailey (mentioned in the British government’s curated press release at a State Opening on 25th May 2010) who publicly claims to have worked as a “systems analyst” for the Victorian government’s IT company called Cenitex in Australia, both before and after he was posing as a protester with the phoney Democracy Village in Parliament Square (where he was also directly involved in my unlawful arrest etc) illegally acquired and shared personal information about my adoption -and- spied on a family member:
A Mr Bailey claims to have worked for the Victorian government IT (Cenitex) as a ‘systems analyst’ both before and after he was centre stage at my unlawful arrest before the State Opening on 25th May 2010:
The Australian I now know as Mr Bailey (brown jumper) was no innocent bystander on 25th May 2010.
**** The truth was the videos show police and their undercover operation including undercover police called ‘Democracy Village” stood around harassing Brian and I for thirty minutes during which neither of our tents were searched by any sniffer dogs ****
The government was also by that time after all covering up the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
London Evening Standard 25th May 2010
The carefully curated soundbites (below) by the revolving doors of politicians, police and journalists in Westminster, at a State Opening that no-one ever dared repeat on any witness stand in any court, including the top cop Sir Paul Stephenson who was illegally covering up the use of undercover police officers etc, along with the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me while Sir Ken Jones was grandstanding in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (and the politicians were going to give Sir Ken Jones Australian citizenship !!)
“The Queen was greeted by extraordinary scenes as she arrived at Westminster for the state opening of Parliament today.
Dozens of campaigners encamped outside the Commons jeered and waved banners as her coach drove past — but the only people to be arrested were veteran anti-war protester Brian Haw and his friend Barbara Tucker.
Mr Haw, 60, who has lived in a tent opposite Parliament for nine years, was dragged off for obstructing police sniffer dogs — on a day when Prime Minister David Cameron pledged a new era of civil liberties in the coalition government’s first Queen’s Speech, promising to let members of the public protest peacefully without being criminalised.
The police, who were carrying out a security sweep on Parliament Square, had no powers to remove dozens of “eco-protesters” who set up a ramshackle collection of tents four weeks ago.
In pictures: Police arrest protesters and search peace camp
MPs called on the Government to change the law to evict the “eyesore” camp, and former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind said: “I feel very angry about it because it’s becoming an international embarrassment to have this tent city.
“I have not the slightest problem with people having the right to demonstrate outside Parliament but I think it’s absolutely unacceptable to have a permanent camp, including Mr Haw, permanently living outside Parliament.”
Responsibility for managing the Square lies with Mayor Boris Johnson, who is now seeking court approval to evict the eco-campaigners.
Labour MP Tom Harris said: “Boris should certainly have done something sooner. It’s an eyesore. By all means protest but this doesn’t justify having a permanent shanty town in Parliament Square.
“I’m shocked that the authorities — Boris, the police, the courts — haven’t done something about this. Boris, and Ken before him, has been complacent but hopefully that will change now.”
Cities of London and Westminster MP Mark Field said: “I very much support the idea of peaceful protests and clearly Brian Haw’s position has been protected for some time. But the reality is it’s an appalling eyesore and these people are turning up in breach of the laws that exist. We need to enforce them.”
Questions were being asked about why Mr Johnson allowed the camp to remain for so long. Today he finally sought permission from the High Court to evict the group, and claimed the delay was to give lawyers the time to compose an effective legal argument.
The protesters have instructed solicitors at Birdmans, human rights specialists, in a bid to frustrate the Mayor — and have said they will appeal if he wins.
Mike Raddie, 39, an IT worker and one of the founders of the group, said: “They’re going to have to forcibly evict us if they want us to go, I don’t think anyone’s going to do so willingly.”
**** Met Police chief Sir Paul Stephenson said it was not the job of the police to evict the campaigners: “We need to make sure that the Met does our job and does not undertake other people’s responsibility. That land is owned by the Greater London Authority and it is for them and the Mayor to decide what they want to do with it.”*****
The legal reality was Sir Paul Stephenson was legal responsibly for illegally using undercover police including on 25th May 2010.
Westminster council chief Colin Barrow added: “We’re delighted that Boris is getting on with it and what’s necessary now is that we actually change the law. We have got to get to grips with this.”
The Barrow boy was forced to resign in January 2012 because he was recorded admitting to American TV, when I challenged him, that I hadn’t done anything wrong.
A Scotland Yard spokesman said two people were arrested in Parliament Square at 8am as sniffer dogs were used to search the tents. He said: “The search is a necessary security measure.”
They spent half an hour standing round without any sniffer dogs going near Brian and my tents. I don’t personally remember Acting Inspector Cole telling Brian and he (Cole) was being a “sniffer dog” too. I do remember Cole was compromised when (at the instigation of Livingstone who phoned me) he had covered up the identity of the undercover who violently punched me in the head on 17th August 2007.
Mr Haw, of Redditch, Worcestershire, who uses crutches to walk…
... complained that police were hurting his back. Mark Mabey, 43, a campaigner from Cambridge, said: “His arrest has raised the profile of his campaign, but it’s disgusting that he’s been arrested.” **** Brett Bailey, 28, a disability support worker from Australia, said: “The police could have held him to the side of the tent instead of handcuffing him and carrying him horizontally across the park.”****
Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights group Liberty, said: “We are very sad to see that on a day that is supposed to celebrate British democracy, peaceful dissent is also shut down. The new coalition government has promised to restore the right to non-violent protest — a sweep of Parliament Square is not the most promising start.”
Metropolitan Police Authority member Jenny Jones added: “What are the chances of anybody stashing a bomb or a rocket launcher in Brian Haw’s tent? This is the worst sort of policing.”
Police also searched 42 tents from the “democracy camp” — a separate village set up this month in protest against the war in Afghanistan…. A spokesman for Mr Johnson said: “The Mayor respects the right to demonstrate, however the scale and impact of the protest is now doing considerable damage to Parliament Square and preventing its peaceful use by other Londoners including those who may wish to have an authorised protest.””
m
The government didn’t disclose this (below) before I produced it on 21st June 2010 (the monarchy’s… private lawyers had previously spoken to Brian and I earlier in the year (and sometime after 18th November 2009) saying they would take us to court, without specifying why which was quite odd and would obviously be seriously illegal. The monarchy couldn’t hide behind Johnson and vice-versa and get free tax payer funded legal representation, including by also calling themselves ‘Democracy Village’. The monarchy had not actually sought to formally make any kind of claim about land until 19th February 2008:
Mr Bailey (in a brown jumper) did not tell the truth:
Last time I looked Acting Inspector Cole is not a sniffer dog and does not have a sniffer dog on him:
Mr Bailey left out the part where after I was unlawfully arrested he actually spoke with the police you can see are police and Johnson’s heritage wardens (and they are all sen heading towards my tent:
Then at 7.44 am the British Metropolitan police (“curiously”) edit their own footage (they did not know our video was still recording or what it recorded) to try and cover up that very oddly the British Metropolitan Police gave some of my personal property !!!! to Mr Bailey who I had just spent the past half an hour being filmed explaining was part of ‘Democracy Village’ I was not campaigning with:
At 7.44 am the police are seen in a huddle at my tent, helping themselves to some of the personal property of mine from my pale green tent, circled in red (while the sniffer dog still not doing any sniffing stands looking on) that they gave to a Mr Brett Bailey who was a complete stranger to me, when he asks them for some of my personal property. I reasonably believe that Mr Bailey did not say what he was really doing there.
I am telling the press to get out of my face) the Daily Mail subsequently admitted (outside any court proceedings they had an undercover journalist in Democracy Village so they were part of my unlawful arrest, as was Russia Today’s Mike Raddie:
My personal view is the journalists in Westminster who started the trial by media against me on 26th March 2006 when thy lied, would have served a much better purpose supporting the public, to have audio/audio visual recordings in the British Magistrates Courts that really is very much an important point of law in the public interest:
I had to appeal to the Court of Appeal (the revolving doors of Lord Neuberger who also sits in the Hong Kong Court where protesters do have lawyers, like Mr Harris) before the government would admit Brian and I were not in any way ‘connected’ to Democracy Village (so the case was illegally remitted back to the High Court which didn’t end up mattering much, because I ‘won’ the satellite litigation HQ11X00563 then including Westminster Council who also dishonestly tried to ‘re-imagine’ Democracy Village as ‘connected’ to Brian and I)
I am illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 while Rudd (now hiding away as the Australian ambassador to the United States, spins musical chairs to protect his brown envelope laundered through Ingeus ( which relies on avoiding my lawsuits):
The smoking email from 17th January 2012 (the fmt Home Secrtary and PM TM nobbling High Court judges) with all the rcipients aware there is a) no ‘stay’ on HQ11X00563, Lord Thomas (the same guy from the inextricably linked cases in 2007) switched) !! my CO/12316/2011 with the governments undercover operation CO/12613/2011:
The Horizon receipts:
m
mSir Ken Jones (who was employed in Victoria, Australia on the basis of this disclosure (below) he could not deny he knew about was working with Mr Ingledrew named in the document when Sir Ken Jones was in Australia and Mr Ingledrew had “transferred” across to Westminster Council (so also became involved in HQ11X00563, I “won’ but was not settled) following this ‘both house and black rod”/ie: Parliament disclosure in CO/11594/2007 from 23rd May 2006. It’s obviously very murky that the Metropolitan Police did not disclose this (their reliance on a get out of jail from Parliament) when Brian and I had lawyers (it wasn’t mentioned in the 2oth July 2007 letter from Mr Hardwick et al including Ms Glass sent to lawyers:
I aI asked a police lawyer (Winfield) what they were playing at only disclosing the above ‘smoking email’/document in a bundle in CO/11393/2007 and not the earlier cases in the Magistrates Courts !!!! and she did literally say it was their ‘get out of jail’ free card they must have demanded at some time from the British Parliament, to try and avoid being personally sued. They didn’t mention the link between the House of Lords statement on 23rd May 2000 about banning peaceful protest in Parliament Square, and 23rd May 2006.
lI obviously no longer feel safe walking into any government building, because I know people have… already repeatedly covered up and illegally withheld CCTV of what took place literally “behind closed doors”.
Donna Bugat 