Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: Labour & Liberal state & Federal party & Vic Police) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I could not have to bring… additional legal proceedings in Victoria, Australia to my jury lawsuits in UK to ditch ‘adoption court order’ (after same transnational Murdoch family-led revolving doors of hereditary male robber media barons & politicians who erased my Mediterranean identity because they already knew they never had any ‘recognised defence in law’ to stop me ditching ‘adoption court order’ without needing permission of anyone else incl any court which is why they also knew like ‘absentee’ Lord ‘Vitol’ Malloch-Brown -from UN- who was installed by fmr British PM Brown et al they have repeatedly illegally tried to stop… jury lawsuits -after knowing medical information had already been illegally withheld from adoptees incl about for example DES cancer causing drug- while repeatedly committing perjury & being in ‘contempt of court’ on -for example 19th July 2007, 2009 & 2011 incl while Sir Ken Jones fmr ACPO in UK was DAC in Victoria Police in Australia despite having already been responsible for illegally using Special Branch etc against me in UK… while ‘welfare queen’ & fmr Australian PM & now Ambassador to United States Rudd laundered $1.4 billion dollars from UK through Ingeus in ‘contempt of court’ in for example HQ11X00563- when anything said about me while also hiding CCTV of torture & attempted murder of me, is/was obviously legally irrelevant) (07.12.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
It’s not a complicated concept.
_____________________
There is obviously no ‘balanced reporting’ about the ‘adoption’ industry by the Murdoch family-led revolving doors of male robber media barons and politicians because that would not be in their financial interests.
My adopted identity was illegally leaked on Mothers Day 2006 by the Murdoch family stooge Blair et al, in the UK along with false information about… me supposedly doing something so wrong it could be criminal (which no-one could or did dare repeat in any court, including before a jury) to illegally try and distract what was really agreed was I had a High Court… jury lawsuit:
The reality is no jury would ever conclude it was mere ‘co-incidence’ that:
a) I was kidnapped from inside a courtroom in Lavender Hill/Southwestern Magistrates Court during… live proceedings on 19th July 2007 in the UK in “another” not entirely disconnected case involving the… Murdoch family, to stop me giving evidence about the agreed fact the government had put in place a ’sequence of events that put my life at risk’…
(Lord Malloch-Brown was also directly involved in the torture etc of me)
… before the Westminster parliamentary press gallery singled me out when they publicly identified me again with false information in 2008 (they could not and would not ever repeat in a court including before a jury about the robber media barons making unknown complaints to police about me the Daily Mail refused to disclose to me) that was intended to distract from and stop and cover up a jury lawsuit from Mothers Day 2006
b) the Murdoch family published a threat on 19th July 2009 to ‘remove’ me (while not disclosing 19th July 2007) which led directly to the torture and attempted murder of me for no other reason than to stop me having a jury lawsuit that would ditch the ‘adoption court order’ because there is ‘no recognised defence in law’ to even put before a court or jury to stop me ditching an ‘adoption court order’ made while I was a minor (that in my own case has undeniably only been illegally used for political purposes)
The government et al knew they would not disclose information in the High Court Order from 3rd March 2009 in CO/13393/2007 (they were already also in ‘contempt of court’ over my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008)
I had since 11th April 2009 (several days before the press separately reported the arrests of ‘climate protesters’ in what became the separate press spun ‘spycops scandal)- which obviously onvolves more than just undercover police) publicly refused to be ‘joined’ with people the… government claimed were protesters because the people the government claimed were protesters had like Labour’s Livingstone repeatedly covered up violent attacks on me (ie 17th August 2007) that led to the Barclay Brothers Telegraph ‘journalist’ and Tory MP Johnson being able to switch from being an MP to Mayor of London and made it possible for him to become FM and PM etc etc etc.
The legal reality is whatever lies were said by Johnson et al while the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me is and was illegally being withheld is and was legally irrelevant because he/they could not have said anything they have said if the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me had been handed over to me.
A Lord ‘Vitol’ Malloch-Brown who like others was installed by former British PM Brown (like the latest British PM installed a former PM Cameron as a Lord) is an ‘absentee’ Lord to avoid legal scrutiny over his business interests, and just how they cam about (so the Smartmatic case in the United States is a distraction from what has already happened in the UK etc)
The revolving doors could hardly ‘investigate’… themselves:
I had complained -again in April 2010- about the Murdoch family’s Sun journalists paying off Metropolitan (& National Crime Agency) Police (which it was witnessed the Sun newspaper journalists -the ‘Crime editor’ and his photographer who took photographic evidence from me in Parliament Square, Central London- told me themselves !!!! they were doing, to which I said it’s not like… Murdoch was ever going to publish that admission) before the politically bipartisan phoney ‘Democracy Village’ that publicly began on 1st May 2010 before the general election that year etc etc before I ‘won’ for example HQ11X00563.
c) the Murdoch family knew they were committing perjury even while grandstanding before a political committee in the UK on 19th July 2011, instead of a jury in a court, when they knew I had already ‘won’ for example HQ11X00563.
The Murdoch family henchman Lord Marlesford would never dare repeat what he said in July 2011 before any jury in any court either:
The Murdoch family have repeatedly perjured themselves and could not repeat any of their lies before a jury in a court of law:
The Murdoch family ‘McTaggart lecture’… after having first published the threat to ‘remove’ me on Sky News Live, on 19th July 2009, was all spin from the Murdoch family who had already made billions working with the BBC to monetize the male football industry called ‘Premier League’ etc)
(Some of the same people who were posing as protesters who were involved in the protest that the press used to spin into “spy cops” were visiting Parliament Square in Central London, at the time in April 2009, when I refused to be associated with people the government claimed were protesters covering up violent attacks on me)
This was the…. same revolving doors of politicians and press who had me unlawfully arrested in 2006 for doing nothing more than peacefully standing in a public space, with a pink-sequinned banner that simply said “Peace, Love & Justice For All” :
The fmr Australian PM Rudd who re-invented himself as the Ambassador to the United States, knew (like Glass)… Jones had… illegally also run undercovers in the UK, against… peace campaigners including myself as an adoptee so the… Murdoch family could profit) had an undeclared conflict of interest with Johnson et al making the Rudd family ‘welfare queens’ instead of settling for example HQ11X00563:
(The British government had admitted in open court in the UK on 16th & 17th July 2007 that they had (illegally) used for example Special Branch against specifically me, and of course it is an irony that undercovers can switch between names whenever they feel like it, while my own Mediterranean identity was illegally erased)
The people the government identified as number 9 & number 11 (above in HQ11X00563) had supported Livingstone -and- covered up the violent attack on me on (for example) 17th August 2007 which made it possible for Johnson to switch from being an MP to Mayor of London etc etc before they were directly involved in the unlawful arrest of me at a State Opening on 25th May 2010 etc etc:
What was not reported on 25th May 2010 was that it was actually the government’s own phoney ‘Democracy Village’ supposed ‘protesters’ who were the ‘complainants’ in my unlawful arrest (they didn’t and wouldn’t … publicly admit what they did) that included the Daily Mail (who Johnson didn’t prosecute either):
I said in the High Court on 21st June 2010 (before the judge illegally stopped me giving my defence, and closed the doors to the public on 23rd June 2010, along with the press -which wasn’t true because the press were part of ‘Democracy Village’-) that I was nothing to do with Johnson et al’s ‘Democracy Village’.
Lord Rothermere’s Daily Mail was… literally part of what they belatedly professed to complain about (while avoiding a jury trial)
The revolving doors of Murdoch led politicians and press were in reality in ‘contempt of court’ over much including for example my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, and the High Court Order from 3rd March 2009 in CO/11393/2007 that had not been heard in a ‘timely manner’.
The payment from the British government to the ‘welfare queen’ Rudd laundered through Ingeus was obviously done in ‘contempt of court’ of HQ11X00563 etc.
This is another ‘smoking email’ Rudd et al covered up too while taking the big brown envelope (Gillard’s subsequent alleged ‘apology’by the Labour party in Australia about ‘forced adoption’ was as insincere as it is possible to be, which is why the Murdoch family replaced Wooldridge with Matt Bach in the Liberal party in Victoria, Australia)
A not so ‘immaculate concept’ including December 8th… 2006 in the UK:
A Ms Wooldridge is (like Gillard was) just another cog in the Murdoch ‘wheel of fortune’:
The… Australian state and federal political parties had long been actually actively trying to undermine my jury lawsuits (incl HQ12X3564) in… the UK.
My personal view is the global ‘adoption’ industry has obviously always been about money, instead of the best interests of adoptees, because it was possible for the ‘adoption’ industry to be used by the Murdoch family who trafficked me to the intelligence services when I was a small child,
to help build their global career from…. exploiting adoptees.
It has obviously always been cheaper for the political classes (like the British ‘aristocracy’) to pay the Murdoch family off, instead of admitting there is ‘no recognised defence in law’ to stop adoptees ditching ‘adoption court orders’ made while we were minors, without our needing the ‘permission’ of anyone else including courts. The man called Barnett who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO and had like the Murdoch family an undeclared conflict of interest, as indeed did politicians when politicians spun the 1984 ‘adoption’ legislation in Victoria, Australia, while I was permanently living overseas.
The politicians et al still don’t… care about any vulnerable children in Victoria (and they have illegally used a politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ to stop me as an… adult living in my own home overseas):
The effects of recurrent cancer and multiple cancer treatments which has really used up so much of my energy, also means I am not able to… permanently live in my own home in Breizh, France.
There is no logical or legal reason why I would, after having already had jury lawsuits in the UK, need to go to any court in Victoria, Australia on the same matter of the ‘adoption court order’ involving the same revolving doors of Murdoch-led hereditary robber media barons and political classes there are in the UK and Australia.
(The politicians in Australia and the UK and Australia could never have ‘reasonably believed’ a court in Victoria, Australia could take supremacy etc over my jury lawsuits in the UK by way of an ‘adoption court order’ made while I was a minor in Victoria, Australia)
It is commonsense I would never have agreed… to be or… remain an ‘adoptee’ if it meant even the…. possibility of getting caught up in so many political problems created by politicians et al hiding behind such a politically motivated ‘adoption court order’.
_______________________________
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 