Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: state & federal Labour & Liberal party & Vic Police) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: The Murdoch-led all male global media barons who knew there is ‘no recognized defence in law’ to stop me ditching ‘adoption court order’ that no-one incl any court has/had any ‘jurisdiction’ to oppose/stop my doing, illegally published my ‘adopted’ identity on Mothers Day 2006, with false information they & politicians et al… knew they could not & did not ever repeat in any court incl before a civil jury, then repeatedly acted in… ‘Contempt of Court’ (ie: Sunday Times v UK 1979 & Haw & Anor -moi- v Westminster Magistrates UK 2007) when they publicly named me in UK press on 18.8.08 etc while making further false & malicious (& incl unknown) allegations they did not & could not repeat in any court incl before a civil jury (ie: my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 & CO11393/2007 & the High Court Order from 03.03.09 etc) before Murdoch family published threat to ‘remove’ me on 19th July 2009 Cameron et al knew politicians (19th May 2006 “both houses & black rod”) had no legal immunity to make (before refusal to hand over CCTV of torture & attempted murder of me & that I ‘won’ HQ11X00563 & no settlement had been ’stayed’ on 16th January 2012 etc) using revolving door of press & politicians (ie; Johnson who was still a journalist, while boss of top cops & London Mayor etc) before the effects of recurrent cancer & cancer treatment etc now mean I am unable to … permanently live in my own home in Breizh, France (30.11.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
**The legal reality is no court in Australia (or elsewhere) could make me subject to ‘adoption’ court proceedings in Australia (including to have ‘permission’ to ditch the ‘adoption court order’) if/because jury lawsuits in the UK were not settled or completed, because I clearly took all reasonable steps myself.**
It is obviously self evident the Murdoch led revolving doors of politicians and press would never accurately either record or report my ditching the ‘adoption court order’.
The politicians and press did not and could never repeat the lies they published on Mothers Day 2006 in the UK, before any court, including a civil jury:
The reality was my ‘adopted’ identity was illegally published in the UK on Mothers Day 2006 with false information that could not ever and was never repeated in any court, because the Murdoch-led revolving doors of press and politicians incl Blair & Johnson (who were both part of “both houses and black rod” on 19th May 2006) et al knew there was never any recognized defence to put before any court, including with a civil jury, to stop my ditching the ‘adoption court order’.
The facts are the ‘professional’ revolving door of Johnson has profited from being able to lie as a politician and as a journalist, by using each role to cover up what he does in the other role.
I asked Lord Rothermere’s legal department at the Daily Mail to put up and provide me with the list of false and malicious allegations they publicly claimed while identifying me on 18.8.08 (see below) had very seriously been made behind my back (by the Murdoch-led all male & mostly white) global media barons, to essentially the ahem… revolving doors of politicians and press like Johnson who was after being an MP and one of “both houses and black rod” -19th May 2006- while a paid journalist, remained a paid journalist while also the Mayor of London and boss of the top cops) so that I could put what was their ‘Contempt/s of Court’ before a court in already existing proceedings.
The Lords Hansard on 23rd May 2000 and then 23rd May 2006 were obviously not mere “co-incidence”.
The politicians and press were all aware of court proceedings and court filings in for example C011393/2007. In April 2011, I properly complained in the High Court that the government had still not complied with the High Court Order from 03.03.2009 in CO/11393/2007, let alone in a timely manner.
The Murdoch led all male robber media barons & government in the UK, unlawfully targeted anyone and any civilians they didn’t like peacefully saying anything against them (they weren’t trying to protect women and children):
The Daily Mail legal department were like rats down a drainpipe in August 2008 before a Benedict Brogan who publicly made the false and malicious allegations as a Chair of the Parliamentary Press Gallery in Westminster) at that time transferred across to the Barclay Brothers Telegraph who were still paying Johnson (before Brogan’s partner was then appointed Chair of Ofcom to cover up what he/they had done)
So, when the Murdoch-led press illegally published my name in the UK on 18.8.08 (see below) along with false and malicious allegations they claim the press had made (behind my back) they refused to repeat in any court, let alone before a civil jury,… they knew they were in ‘Contempt of Court’ relating to court cases and court filings they knew about.
The only reason I can see that there seems to only be the Murdoch led (mostly white) all male global media barons seems to be “male primogeniture”.
I understandably refused to campaign with people who publicly posed as campaigners who in covering up the life threatening violent attacks on me during the Livingstone era, put Johnson into the London Mayoralty and helped him do the same, while then becoming his phoney ‘Democracy Village’ etc who Johnson et al illegally tried to “join” Brian and I to:
The legal reality is the oil trader and former MP etc Duncan had known he was trying to cover up he was in ‘Contempt of Court’ in CO11393/2007 as a member of ‘both houses and black rod” (19th May 2006) before he compounded the harm by accepting $160,000 to make a further false and malicious allegation against me to also keep trying to hide my… Mediterranean identity:
The legal reality is Cameron… knew he was part of “both houses and black rod” (19th May 2006) and in ‘Contempt of Court’ in for example C011393/2007 when the Murdoch family published the threat 0n 19th July 2009 to ‘remove’ me (that was then repeated by the BBC et al) so he had no legal immunity as PM or now as a member of the British House of Lords & FM:
A subsequent press extravaganza claiming Duncan was the subject of an Israeli govt sting was obviously invented to cover up his ‘contempt of court’ etc over Mothers Day 2006 and…. my Mediterranean identity illegally being ‘officially’ hidden by the ‘adoption court order’:
The politicians, press and phoney ‘Democracy Village’… errr… ‘forgot’ to mention that when I was unlawfully arrested on 25th May 2010 so the government could publish their lies while I was illegally detained (so I could not get an injunction to stop the lies being published) that the actual ‘complainants’ were… ‘Democracy Village’ the government illegally tried to join us too, that included the… Daily Mail (who Johnson did not prosecute):
The politicians and press also knew from court filings that there was no injunction on 16th January 2012 putting a stay on or stopping the settlement of HQ11X00563 etc that I had ‘won’ early in 2011… before Johnson was unable to use an injunction against me in April 2011 in his satellite litigation:
I did literally “cut to the chase” in… April 2011 because Johnson et al could not use an injunction against me (which Murdoch sent a Times journalist along to confirm to me they would not try and do) because I had… already won ‘satellite litigation’ in for example HQ11X00563 and thy would need to provide me with legal representation in any High Court or Court of Appeal in the UK if thy wished to try and challenge that.
The Victoria Police unbelievably… employed !!!! Sir Ken Jones from ACPO in the UK at the behest of the Murdoch family et al.
It was a legal impossibility on 16th January 2012 for there to be a stay on/or injunction against, the… settlement of (for example) HQ11X00563 that… I had really ‘won’ in early 2011:
The Home Secretary and former PM TM, knew her ‘smoking email’ written on 17th January 2012 at the behest of the Murdoch family on 17th January 2012 was untrue and that sh could not and did not repeat the lies, in my own High Court civil jury lawsuit HQ12x3564)
The ‘barrow boy’ knew he could not and did not ever dare repeat any of the lies he said while speaking to the press, in any court including before a civil jury, about HQ11X00563 etc.
I was not (and had repeatedly pointed that out) linked to others named in HQ11X00563 (ie: number 9 and number 11) who had unlike Brian, covered up life threatening violent attacks on me, going back to 17th August 2007:
The Murdoch family henchman Lord Marlesford in the British House of Lords would never dare repeat what he said in the British House of Lords in July 2011, before any civil jury in a court of law:
I think Blair’s supposed ‘reform’ of the British House of Lords arguably made the corruption there even worse.
The Johnson & Rudd wives knew they were also profiting from covering up the torture and attempted murder of me:
The ‘contempt of court’ by the City of London ‘in April 2013 after I left the High Court happened because the evidence shows the City of London (ie: far left red cap below) had also been involved in Westminster on 16th January 2012 too, that they knew they had ‘no recognized defence in law’ to either in HQ12X00563 & HQ12X3564 so they were using intimidation etc to stop me going to court:
The… intimidation to stop me going to court in my own lawsuits has always been relentless. My PTSD was really bad in April 2013, so I completely missed the person trying to intimidate me was wearing the clearly fake numbers 666… until Neil pointed it out to me.
The Murdoch family and Vitol Duncan (Iraq sanctions busting etc) were linked by Marc Rich from Glencore (which was how Murdoch got Fox)
The man called Barnett who posed as my godfather (who was recruited by the man who posed as my father) was Director General of ASIO in 1984 etc.
It was never been legal to try and stop me ditching the ‘adoption court order’ or to use the ‘adoption court order’ to withhold medical information from me and to try and stop me having or being a part of civil jury lawsuits over the harm caused by that. The Murdoch family knew that adoptees were excluded from class actions about for example the cancer causing drug DES, before they bought the Times/Sunday Times.
I think the only way that it would have been possible to stop the politically motivated repeated ‘Contempt/s of Court’ by the Murdoch-led revolving doors of politicians and press in the UK (and Australia, ie Rudd & his $1.4 billion dollar rip-off laundered through Ingeus while Johnson had one of his wives Wheeler, who knew he had tortured and attempted to murder me, publicly running cover for him… while he was having an affair with his latest wife) and certainly before it escalated would have been by having signed for video recordings of court proceedings (just like in the UK you have to sign that audio recordings of police interrogations are accurate because the government had a record of falsifying evidence etc) because then it would be clear who said what, when & why, regardless of what the revolving doors of press and politicians publish.
The Murdoch family led, politicians and press knew they could not and did not ever repeat in any court, including before a civil jury the lies they published on Mothers Day 2006 (that just grew from then on to cover that up)
The all male line-up… continues:
The Murdoch family could obviously never deny they knew my true identity (which the British and Australian politicians were obviously always aware of too):
The former Australian PM’s Rudd and Turnbull obviously did not ever… genuinely oppose the Murdoch family, and the Smartmatic lawsuit in the United States is just another red herring, because a Lord Malloch Brown, also a former Deputy UN Secretary General (and another Vitol employee) who obviously does not support democracy was recruited by Smart-matic to get them government contracts (that is the way the British House of Lords works) so he never opposed the Murdoch family either.
The effects of recurrent cancer and cancer treatment mean I am unable to… permanently live in my own home in Breizh, France.
I am obviously still entitled to have my own Mediterranean identity officially acknowledged, without my needing the ‘permission’ of any court.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 