Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: state & federal Labour & Liberal party & Vic Police) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I have obviously not committed any civil or criminal offence by officially… notifying any court/s I have ditched ‘adoption court order’ & adoption made while I was a minor (which I reasonably believe it would now be a ‘contempt of court’ for anyone to deny I had legally done) that had officially erased my Mediterranean identity (before I was officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer) that I was always legally entitled to do, incl through jury lawsuits & incl while living overseas & without needing to return to Victoria or Australia & I would use compensation to help fund a universal office in Jerusalem for former adoptees from any race, religion, politics or none (politicians & press knew… they are & were in ‘contempt of court’ on -for example- 19th July 2009 & 16th January 2012 in -for example- CO11393/2007 & my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order dated 16th April 2008 & HQ11X00563 etc in the UK while journalist & fmr British Tory MP, Mayor of London, FM & PM Johnson also illegally withheld CCTV of torture & attempted murder etc of me while other Murdoch family henchmen like Cameron, a fmr Tory British MP, PM & now FM & Lord paid tax payer funded $1.4 billion dollar ‘brown envelope’ to Rudd, a Labour fmr Australian MP, PM, FM & now Ambassador to United States, that was laundered through Ingeus etc) (16.11.2023)

My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.

The legal reality is, it is ‘agreed’ (as per ‘civil procedure’) that I have not committed any civil or criminal offence by notifying courts I have ditched the ‘adoption court order’ (and adoption). My personal view is it is a ‘contempt of court’ for anyone to now try and… deny I have properly … notified any court/s of my ditching the ‘adoption court order’ & adoption which I have taken all reasonable steps to do.
The fact remains I was always legally entitled to do that including through jury lawsuits, and including while living overseas and without needing to return to Victoria, Australia.
The reality is people involved in ‘adoption court orders’ about minors would reasonably know such ‘adoptees’ can notify any court as an adult of our ditching an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were a minor without our needing to pay money to or have the permission of anyone else including a court. If people don’t like that they can always… wait until someone is an adult and able to consent to an ‘adoption court order’ because being an adoptee should never be about becoming a ‘chattel’/ ‘property’ etc of someone else:



The reality is people involved in ‘adoption court orders’ about minors would reasonably know such ‘adoptees’ can notify any court as an adult of our ditching an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were a minor without our needing to pay money to or have the permission of anyone else including a court. If people don’t like that they can always… wait until someone is an adult and able to consent to an ‘adoption court order’ because being an ‘adoptee’ should never be about becoming a ‘chattel’/ ‘property’ etc of someone else:
I was unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned on -for example- Mothers Day 2006 in the UK, so the politicians and press et al could illegally publish their lies while I was illegally detained, because I could not get an injunction to stop them doing that while I was illegally detained:

What was actually agreed by New Scotland Yard et al who obviously did have my details, was that I had an unprecedented jury lawsuit.






The politicians and press knew from multiple court records and court filings that in April 2011, I ‘successfully’ argued in the British High Court that politicians were always trying to illegally ‘overtake’ any legal proceedings from Brian and I, which had certainly been the case since Mothers Day 2006 in the UK. I/we were (for example) still waiting in April 2011, for the audio recording ordered by the High Court in 2009 from HH Judge Rivlin at Southwark Crown Court in CO11393/2007… specifically relating to what was said and by whom when -I- was on the witness stand. A Murdoch family henchman called Cameron who was a former British MP, PM who is now FM and a Lord (to try & get free publicly funded legal representation) knew he was in Contempt of Court of CO/11393/2007 when he illegally publicly called on the Murdoch family’s Sky News in the UK for Brian and I to be ‘removed’ that led directly to the torture and attempted murder of me. The ‘both houses and black rod’ admission that was allegedly from 19th May 2006 was only disclosed in CO11393/2007 so it had previously been illegally withheld too.

This was a ‘contempt of court’ by Cameron as an MP (ie: “both houses and black rod”) that was made on behalf of and first published by the Murdoch family ‘Sky News’ in the UK as the Tories first ‘political policy’ for the 2010 ‘general election’ that led directly to the torture and attempted murder of me when Johnson was also a Daily Telegraph journalist, Tory Mayor of London and boss of top cops:



(The Murdoch family had Cameron repeat the Israeli ‘political policy’ to ‘remove’ Yasser Arafat in 2003, knowing my… Mediterranean heritage was erased. It is possible that the ”both houses and black rod” was invented much later than 19th May 2006 because it simply was not disclosed in legal proceedings in courts prior to our CO/11393/2007, including those involving Hugo Keith KC et al. Ingledew went to work for Westminster Council before HQ11X00563 so he had an undeclared conflict of interest too, as indeed did many others)

Cameron et al did obviously know he was still in ‘Contempt of Court’ in September 2010 before he was then also in Contempt of Court in 2011 in HQ11X00563 too (the Murdoch family ‘Law reports’ in the ‘Times’ are obviously not entirely accurate summations:






The former Australian PM etc called Rudd obviously knows multiple records exist from when I was kidnapped off the street because I had previously properly sought the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me:

In addition the politicians and press were obviously in ‘Contempt of Court’ on 16th January 2012 because they knew (the court filings in HQ11X00563 were public) there was no stay in HQ11X00563 and that the people they falsely claimed had an injunction in ‘satellite litigation’ preventing the use of new legislation made against me being used on them were a) either directly involved in the use of state violence against me by people the government refused to identify:

or b) had covered up the use of state violence against me including the torture and attempted murder of me, incl c) when a member of their ‘Democracy Village’ etc – (that by the admission of the Daily Mail included them, yet Johnson who was employed at the Daily Telegraph before now being employed by the Daily Mail) didn’t prosecute the Daily Mail (who were also involved in the unlawful arrest and false imprisonment of Brian and I at a state opening so they could publish whatever they liked then too):


– punched me in the face and attempted to smash a wine bottle over my head on 3rd June 2011,

to also try and stop me traveling to Brian who was in hospital in Bremen, in Germany.
(It was after I was mugged and robbed at knife-point on April 11th 2009, I had then refused to let politicians and the press keep on trying to claim I was ‘associated’ with or could be legally ‘joined’ with people who were repeatedly involved in or covered up violent attacks… on me !!!! – who the government then falsely claimed had an injunction on 16th January 2012 in terms of new legislation being used against them, when there was no stay in HQ11X00563 that I had really ‘won’ in early 2011. One intention in 2012 was to cover up that I had no shelter, while those working for the press and politicians did have shelter. The politicians and press did use hired thugs they would pretend were ‘protesters’ who were really used to attack us)

The government had obviously not sought to delay any trial between for example 11th January and 4th April 2012 in HQ11X00563:

The ‘smoking email’ (below) in my jury lawsuit in HQ12X03564 was from another British former Home Secretary & PM May et al who falsely claimed on 17th January 2012 there was an injunction that could not have existed because there was no ‘stay‘ on 16th January 2012 in the pre-existing HQ11X00563 that came before what was a separate Judicial Review by others below of new legislation made against me, that did not involve me, but illegally named me in 2013… after I had filed a jury lawsuit in HQ12X03564 because it was illegally used on me on 16th January 2012:

The reality was once again that I was unlawfully arrested on 16th January 2012 (just like on Mothers Day 2006 and the State Opening on 25th May 2010) so that the rvolving doors of the politicians and press could publish their lies while I was illegally detained because I could not get an injunction to prevent that happening while I was illegally detained:

Johnson was also being paid by the Daily Telegraph while he was also being paid as Mayor of London:





The Murdoch family would prefer… the public to pay for any legal representation etc for just another warmonger etc called Cameron:

(There are obviously quite a few things that happened around the 2010 general election in the UK where unfortunately for me, the torture and attempted murder of me turned out to be the first and central ‘political policy’ that Cameron announced on 19th July 2009 on behalf of the Murdoch family on Sky News in the UK, where Johnson did the dirty deed and Rudd covered up – they knew that on 19th July 2007 I was kidnapped from inside a court room during live proceedings at Lavender Hill/Southwestern Magistrates Court in the UK to stop me giving evidence in… another case involving the Murdoch family who were directly linked to my supposed ‘adoption’ in Victoria, Australia. Murdoch backed Labour’s Rudd because they could launder money from the UK, through Ingeus. It is obviously a legal absurdity to suggest Ingeus would have been paid $1.4 billion dollars by Cameron et al, on behalf of the Murdoch family, if the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, had been handed over to me)
I would use compensation to help fund a universal office in Jerusalem for former ‘adoptees’ of any race, religion, politics or none. (I wouldn’t personally be asking anyone else for ‘permission’ to be any religion)

A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)