Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie Rudd, Andrews & State & Federal Labour & Liberal political parties, Vic Police et al) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I have already officially ditched ‘adoption court order’… before I was officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer, because I know my civil jury lawsuits in UK showed County Court et al in Victoria, Australia knew they lacked… jurisdiction to ignore my own… decision & refuse to release me from ‘adoption court order’ until or unless I first ‘agree’ (under duress) to ‘waive’ civil jury lawsuits in UK & Australia over harms & losses (retrospective 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia cannot legally be used in that way) ie: Murdoch family (who trafficked me to ‘Fremantle’ intelligence services) backed Rudd ’07’ to be Australia PM because he could launder $1.4 billion etc from UK through Ingeus, to for example illegally cover up I also really ‘won’ HQ11X00563 in the UK in… January 2011… before window dressing of Johnson et al’s ‘satellite litigation’ from 2010 had actually been albeit illegally ‘remitted’ back to High Court, where I also made my own… decision in HQ11X00563 in October 2011 when I ordered Banksy’s art taken on 23rd May 2006 returned to the artist which Johnson & New Scotland Yard did do while still refusing to hand over CCTV of torture and attempted murder of me, to me… before my civil jury lawsuit HQ12X03564 over 16th January 2012 etc because Johnson, May & Barrow et al then lied about having an injunction (I should have had to stop lies being published while I was illegally detained) when HQ11X00563 had not been & could not legally be ‘stayed’ (05.10.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
*****
The irony is the only reason I ended up with civil jury lawsuits in the UK, is because it is now known politicians et al in Australia were never going to release me from the ‘adoption court order’ that originated in Victoria, Australia, until and unless I ‘agreed’ (under duress) to ‘waive’ my right to civil jury lawsuits in the UK and Australia, over any harms and losses. It is clearly also extremely unreasonable of politicians and their civil servants to expect me to now… physically go to any court to argue about my own… decision that is not going to change, to ditch the ‘adoption court order’ when I have been seriously ill for well over a year now, and don’t even know myself what I can… physically manage from day to day !! It is seriously illegal for politicians and civil servants to essentially take advantage of me being ill, which is what is going on. I am correct in commenting that I do not reasonably believe any court has ever had any… jurisdiction to either ignore or over-rule my own… decision to ditch the ‘adoption court order’. The only reason I was sent 12000 miles away from Australia as a teenager was because I understandably refused to go along with it all, because as it stands there is no due process in the adoption case.
If politicians really wanted to clean up what is at the moment only an adoption… industry and see more children in ‘out of home’ care adopted they would ensure there is due process, and along with the Murdoch family compensate adoptees for current and past harms and losses because there hasn’t been and still isn’t any due process. My personal view is compensation for adoptees who are arguably the most diverse group of people there are, who wish to opt out of ‘adoption court orders’ could provide a real and valuable opportunity to test a universal income including free healthcare.
****
The Murdoch family’s Blair was just another bought and paid for walking advertisement for numerous large multi-national companies.
The British government had no qualms about illegally leaking my adopted name on Mothers Day 2006, in the UK, to illegally try and hide my civil jury lawsuit. The political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in Parliament Square, Central London in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (based on Brian) would probably have been forced off the statute books much earlier through for example jury nullification if there had not been the outstanding ‘complication’ of my being a ‘foreign’ born ‘adoptee’ (and of course legislation based on me in 2011 in the UK like legislation in Victoria, Australia in 1984 that was based on me would not have happened) which meant politicians et al were doing everything they could illegally do, including the torture and attempted murder of me, to try and avoid… civil jury lawsuits. The one thing people would consistently say was how I was treated much worse than anyone else.
Once they had decided to invent a lie, they just lied about not having my details to hide that what was really agreed before I was released was I had a High Court civil jury lawsuit:
The politicians really went out of their way to try and criminalize us. They would shift from lie to lie, to try and just use what were only… excuses for police et al to bully and harass us and so on (moving from ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 to try s 5 Public Order, to the illegal searches, the alleged trespass on some part of the soil in Parliament Square, Central London etc) The politicians really don’t care about members of the public.
The British House of Lords Hansard from 23rd May 2000 and the 23rd May 2006 in Parliament Square, Central London was not mere co-incidence, but instead evidence that politicians really… intended to illegally use ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 to… ban all peaceful campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London:
The politicians would never let us anywhere near the ECHR even over ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 because they all along with the Law Lords (who subsequently claimed from 2009 that Parliament Square was the address of their Supreme Court) were completely compromised by the attempted land grab, of… public land.
The judiciary (there is no actual separation of powers in the UK) were trying to adjudicate in cases in Parliament Square, Central London, where they and the monarchy had personal conflicts of interest.
The prisoner governor at Holloway Prison in 2008 had illegally withheld the High Court Habeas Corpus paperwork from me, that she only handed over to me when I was leaving prison and she tried to force me to sign a ‘waiver’ (under duress) over what she had done, saying she would not release me unless I signed a ‘waiver’ which I refused to do, but she still had to release me. The attempt to try and force me to sign a ‘waiver’ could not really be construed as anything other than an admission of guilt. The prison staff had all said someone paid big money to put me in prison (what happened was the source of much gossip in the prison) because it is simply not legally possible to imprison someone over an alleged S5 Public Order Act that I wasn’t even legally obliged to attend any hearing in court over because at most I could only be fined. I was really maliciously targeted, because the lie over Mothers Day 2006 just grew bigger and bigger. It was really awful because nothing that happened to me could be passed off as a ‘mistake’.
Rudd et al illegally hid -I- already have a High Court Habeas Corpus Court order from 16th April 2008 because I was illegally imprisoned on a non imprisonable alleged S5 Public Order invented by Vitol politicians (Alan Duncan in the House of Commons and then Lord Malloch-Brown in the House of Lords) trying to hide what was going on.
The only reason I was…. repeatedly unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned etc in the UK was so that the revolving doors of politicians and press in Westminster could illegally publish whatever they liked while I was detained because I could not get an injunction to stop them doing that, while I was detained. It’s very horrible and a particularly cynical… abuse to be unlawfully arrested etc just so that the politicians and press could publish whatever they liked because I could not get an injunction to stop them doing that while I was illegally detained. I have to live with the fact of what really happened that really had nothing to do with any factual or legitimate ‘news’.
The only reason the ‘landmark’ alleged Contempt of Court case in the UK against Brian and I happened was because… politicians… illegally refuse to make, keep and publish including for free, any including accurate and contemporaneous records of proceedings in the Magistrates Courts in the UK.
I refused to dignify sitting in the High Court with the original judge, Lord Justice ‘Flasher’ Richards in our Contempt of Court case, because he had a conflict of interest because he was on trial himself at the same time in Westminster Magistrates Court before the at that time, senior District Judge Timothy Workman. Workman found the complainant against Lord Justice ‘Flasher’ Richards must have been ‘mistaken’ about his ‘identity’ so there was a reasonable suspicion that at that time there was a deal done between the politicians and courts to cover up all sorts of ‘professional’ embarrassment.
There was another judge in one of Brian’s other cases called Judge Roger Davis who had to resign (in one of the very many rent boy scandals in Westminster where very serious sexual assaults were commonplace, because they are always swept under the carpet:
I don’t personally believe it could possibly be legal for the government to accuse someone in the Magistrates Courts in the UK of an alleged… contempt of court when there is a dispute about… what is said in the court, because it is outside the control of a member of the public to guarantee an audio recording of proceedings is made, kept, or published for free by the Magistrates Courts. It was libelous etc of the government to falsely accuse Brian and I of saying something wrong when it was outside our control to keep an audio recording of proceedings which the courts refused to do. And yet politicians manage to find significant capacity when it suits them to subject members of the public to all sorts of surveillance. Brian and I obviously lived the real ‘big brother’ experience in Parliament Square, Central London because it was one of the most openly surveilled locations in the fortress that is Westminster.
I had to complain quite a few times about sexual assaults on me in Westminster, and Brian had actually complained about a sexual assault he witnessed happen to me, that was just covered up too. What was also covered up was that Westminster had transferred their use of torture in Northern Ireland across to mainland UK when it was repeatedly used against we peace campaigners in Westminster.
Blair et al were not really keen on either democracy or the rule of law in the UK, that’s for sure.
The Australian government (below) collecting brown envelopes in the ‘Palace of Westminster’ (House of Commons & Lords) after the torture and attempted murder of me when politicians refused to hand over the CCTV to me:
It was often difficult to keep track of which government department in Westminster was taking us to court over goodness knows what, but what is certain is the Australian politicians were entirely… complicit.
The Australian politicians were completely complicit in covering up the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
It’s one of life’s ‘mysteries’ how the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me ended up in the hands of those responsible for the torture and attempted murder of me who were only then still trying to force me to ‘agree’ to their continuing demands to cover up what happened.
I have had no… choice but to publicly confirm I have officially ditched the ‘adoption court order’ because it is obviously absolutely unlawful for anyone incl politicians et al to refuse to release me from the ‘adoption court order’ until and unless I ‘agree’ (under duress) to ‘waive’ civil jury lawsuits in the UK and Australia over any harms or losses.
I also made my own… decision in the UK in the High Court in October 2011 that was accepted, when I ordered the Banksy’s that were taken on 23rd May 2006 (when I was also unlawfully arrested so politicians could publish whatever they liked because I could not get an injunction to stop them doing that) be returned to the artist (so he could do whatever he wanted with them) which Johnson and New Scotland Yard did do because they were actually involved in HQ11X00563 too.
(A recent reporting of Banksy hoopla is odd because of 2007 and the con-artist Wallinger’s ‘State Britain’, that included copies of Banksy’s, before in HQ11X00563, I ordered the return of two actual Banksy’s taken by the government in 2006, to the artist in 2011):
The Murdoch family (who trafficked me to the ’Fremantle’ intelligence services) backed Rudd ’07’ to be Australia PM because Rudd could launder $1.4 billion etc from UK through Ingeus, to for example illegally cover up I also really ‘won’ HQ11X00563 in… January 2011… before the window dressing of Johnson et al’s ‘satellite litigation’ from 2010 had actually been albeit illegally ‘remitted’ back to High Court, before my civil jury lawsuit HQ12X03564 over 16th January 2012 etc because Johnson, May & Barrow et al then lied about having an injunction (I should have had to stop lies being published while I was illegally detained than too) when HQ11X00563 had not been & could not legally be ‘stayed’ etc etc etc etc.
Most politicians sign up to a… political party who like corporate sponsors, they serve before any ‘constituents’.
I obviously wasn’t remotely interested in getting dragged into arguing over two Banksy’s (that were taken on 23rd May 2006) with the same politicians et al who were at the same time illegally refusing to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, to me.
Brian and I had to go to Hendon Police Academy in late 2007 (below) when the latest delaying tactic was police were ordered to provide an inventory of what they had stolen and were refusing to return (after Labour’s Lord Myners who was an adoptee too, was Chair of Tate Britain and the Guardian newspaper at the time when he paid off the con-artist Mark Wallinger to spin the State Britain rip-off before more of our real campaign property was stolen and then stashed by Johnson et al in the Museum of London)
It was just one lie after another like the nonsense about the previous British Queen belatedly laying claim (in February 2008) to some of the land in Parliament Square, Central London too.
The BBC illegally edited and published audio on 25th May 2010 to hide that a member of Johnson et al’s phoney ‘Democracy Village’ came forward as the complainant in my unlawful arrest because once again the ‘news’ reports could not be published unless I was unlawfully arrested because I was standing there with a bundle of… perjured witness statements from the government
This was just a distraction because by then I stood in the way of the…. Murdoch family BskyB deal:
Griffith Williams J was himself caught out on 21st June 2010 because he was also mentioned in the perjured witness statements of others I was holding on to, on 25th May 2010, so no-one wanted me to be able to say anything on the witness stand:
The smoking email (below) from January 2012 was a complete lie, when former PM’s Johnson and May were trying to cover up there could not possibly have been an injunction on 16th January 2012.
Johnson’s little ‘Democracy Village’ helpers cheering him on while they kept trying to dig themselves out of HQ11X00563:
Rudd was covering up I was illegally denied legal representation because… he was busy collecting brown envelopes he could launder through Ingeus (which is the reason the Labour party had one of Rudd’s former Chief’s of Staff, a Ms McKenzie contact me in 2022 while posing as a civil servant at the DOJ in Victoria, Australia at that time when she failed to declare her obvious conflict of interest)
The Labour party including Ms McKenzie were illegally refusing to release me from the criminally negligent ‘adoption court order’ until and unless I ‘agree’ (under duress) to waive jury lawsuits in the UK and Australia. A police officer had said to me in July 2022, when I was at Southern Cross train station because I was waiting to get a passport in my own identity, to leave the country) that I should have access to legal representation and that police were able to ask for me to have (I gave my details for that purpose and said I’ll believe that I could get legal representation when it happens, after what happened on 21st December 2021) that… Ms McKenzie opposed my having.
Rudd et al were hardly ‘innocents’:
It’s not exactly what you could call a level playing field.This (below) was unbelievably corrupt (there is obviously no difference between the Australian Labour party and the British Tory Brexit party):
It was… after Barrow, the Tory Leader of Westminster was caught out having to admit in front of American TV, in early 2011, that I hadn’t done anything wrong or illegal:
There is a place for juries which obviously do include professional people from all walks of life who can provide an important check and balance to often oppressive legislative excesses and so on of politicians who are often nothing more than mouthpieces for corporate sponsors:
The reason that the right to (civil) juries (who obviously include people who are ‘professionals’) should be protected is because as the patchwork of legislation involving private interests in Parliament Square, Central London showed, where there was no separation of powers, there is an important role for members of the public on juries. The role of juries is much maligned because it is quite common and the justice system is based on people supposedly being able to appeal ‘decisions’ of judges. There is clearly ‘capricious’ judicial decision making going on within the legal system towards adult adoptees ditching ‘adoption court orders’.
There is a real problem with politicians like Blair furiously legislating for their mates to make money, which makes having juries even more important, to try and curb such political excesses:
It was very unusual that we managed as a small group of people who had no legal training of any kind, to force ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 off the statute books. The politicians would never have dared enact ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 if it was tried before a jury in a court that had audio recordings.
Of course there was never any pretence that adoptees from Victoria, Australia, who like myself did permanently live overseas (for whatever reason) had any political or legal representation or insurance cover with regard to adoption. I have never seen any due process with regard to my being labelled ‘adopted’. I was obviously legally entitled to ditch the ‘adoption court order’… before and… without needing to return to Victoria or Australia, including through a civil jury lawsuit.
The Murdoch family built their empire by exploiting adoptees, because it was easy for them to simply persuade politicians it was better to pay them than compensate adoptees for having our basic rights abused. Rudd became useful to the Murdoch family when I was in Parliament Square, Central London because Rudd could launder money through Ingeus, of which he was a financial beneficiary.
The Murdoch family henchman Lord Marlesford did know in July 2011 that he was intentionally covering up, I had really already won HQ11X00563 in January 2011:
Johnson was completely compromised by the time he fronted Brexit for th Murdoch family who just used Brexit as their revenge over BskyB.
The Murdoch family had also been involved in a case in 2007 where I was literally kidnapped from inside a courtroom in South Western Magistrates Court, on 19th July 2007, during live procedings, to stop me giving evidence on the witness stand. This was before the Murdoch family then published on 19th July 2009, on Sky News Live, (when Johnson was… already the Mayor of London and boss of top cops whil still posing as a journalist for the Brclay Brothers) a call for us to be ‘removed’ without any caveats on how that was done, that led directly to the torture and attempted murder of me.
I do not reasonably believe because of my ‘lived experience’ the courts have ever had any… jurisdiction to interfere in my own… decision to ditch the ‘adoption court order’ which the County Court in Victoria, Australia was obviously legally obliged to properly record on court records on 21st December 2021. The retrospective 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia could not legally be used by politicians and the legal system to refuse to release me from an ‘adoption court order’ until and unless I ‘agree’ (under duress) to ‘waive’ civil jury lawsuits in UK and Australia over harms and losses.
The’adoption court order’ that is clearly of no use to me, and only serves politicians interests is soooooo… political.
My own decision to ditch the ‘adoption court order’ would never change, regardless of my being taken to any court, and of course I should never have had to go to any court to do that. There is no legal point in politicians and courts denying I have legally officially ditched the ‘adoption court order’.
There couldn’t possibly be any reasonable expectation that I could get a fair hearing in the County Court in Victoria, Australia or that they would ever release me from the adoption court order, because they unlawfully had me arrested !!!! inside and outside the County Court on December 21st 2021 specifically because they… intended to ignore my own… decision regardless of my own witness statement or any court form. I wasn’t doing anything wrong sitting quietly in the court, when I was just grabbed.
The police de-arrested me on 21st December 2021 (although it wasn’t really clear why the police had arrested me in the first place anyway other than to assault me, presumably in the hope they could get me to react to that in some way, to try and falsely accuse me of something else ) when I said I would like a lawyer so a…. lawyer could witness my witness statement ditching the ‘adoption court order’. I also showed the police my legal doccuments showing I owned my own home in Breizh, France, explaining that I wasn’t even voluntarily in the country, let alone the County Court. I was trying to -safely- ditch the ‘adoption court order’ so I could leave the country and get on with my own life. The police then re-arrested me when I said I was going across the road to the Supreme Court to complain about what had just happened in the County Court. They unlawfully arrested me and did not then appear with me in a court in the County Court where we already were !!!! and nor did they take me to any other court either.
I was just dumped outside the Fire Station on the corner of Gisborne and Albert Street in Melbourne, when all I was trying to do was -safely- ditch the adoption court order so I could leave the country and go back to my own home in Breizh, France and get on with my own life. It was hardly suprising that I was trying to -safely- ditch the ‘adoption court order’ because the ‘adoption court order’ has only resulted in my being trafficked all around the world to suit… other people.
The fact courts do not as a matter of course provide adult adoptees with a certified court copy of our ‘adoption court orders’ (like adults have certified court copies of our marriage and divorce – I was married in New Zealand and divorced in the UK, because I did not want pieces of paper controlled by politicians because of how the ‘adoption court order’ has been used) was not coducive to building any kind of positive and constructive open and honest relationship with people who pose as ‘parents’ etc. An adult adoptee who is not given a court certified copy of the ‘adoption court order’ relied upon by others is being relegated to the status of a… commodity.
I did not as someone labelled adopted by politicians et al commit any known criminal offence by making my own… decision to ditch the ‘adoption court order’ which in my doing, at least created a certainty, that refusing to release me as an adoptee from an adoption court order until and unless I ‘agree’ (under duress) to waive jury lawsuits in the UK and Australia, does not.
I also showed the police my legal doccuments showing I owned my own home in Breizh, France.
I did not even voluntarily go to the County Court in the first place and was not even voluntarily in the country for goodness sakes. The politicians bogus adoption legislation from 1984 is ‘silent’ about any ‘process’ for adult adoptees who live overseas or adult adoptees who are not told they are ‘adopted’ along with the absence of proper record keeping from the courts in the first place when adoption court orders were made. The only reason the Adoption Information Service in the DOJ in Victoria, has refused to hand over to me by email, one complete single set of what are only photocopies anyway of records they claim to have, is because they are trying to stop jury lawsuits too. My personal view is the Adoption Information Service only work to further the financial interests of the Murdoch family. It is the government who is at fault for adoptees not being included in for example class actions over the use of the now banned cancer causing DES drug. It was always criminally negligent and wrong for the… government to use public office to withhold all sorts of medical information from adoptees.
I would never personally put my own trust in any politician after what has happened.
In the UK there was a well defined ‘pattern’ of illegally stopping me ever going on any witness stand in any court to say anything, while politicians fell over each other to illegally stop my civil jury lawsuits. The British High Court had commented that if our campaign jury lawsuits went ahead they would essentially constitute a ‘class action’ that would bring the British High Court to a standstill. I didn’t really view myself as a ‘foreigner’ when I was defending peaceful freedom of expression in Parliament Square, Central London, maybe because I had been sent 12000 miles away from Australia to the UK, on my own as a teenager.
It is unlawful to refuse to release me from the ‘adoption court order’ until and unless I ‘agree’ (under duress, which is what is going on) to ‘waive’ jury lawsuits in th UK and Australia over harms and losses that were ironically caused by refusing to release me from the adoption court order before it was illegally used to send me 12000 miles away as a teenager.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 