Donna Bugat

Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: Rudd & Andrews from Victorian & Federal Australian Labour Party (?) Vic Police et al @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I know I have naturally created a universal legal precedent, because politicians et al in Australia, & UK (while in ECHR & EU) etc publicly & maliciously repeatedly lied about Mothers Day 26th March 2006 in UK etc (ie: as email 03.03.2006 & tape 09.03.2006 show) because they & judiciary lack any… jurisdiction to ‘sidestep’, ‘nullify’, ‘trump’ or refuse to record my decision to ditch ‘adoption court order’ (that never even had any pretence of any legal & political representation or insurance cover overseas) in… jury lawsuits… before & without my needing to return to Victoria, Australia who know they cannot variously try & ‘remit’ ‘re-litigate’ or ‘stay’ my pre-existing jury lawsuits in UK anywhere, with… retrospective 1984 ‘waiver’ legislation (like politicians et al also illegally tried to do in UK… after I had won HQ11X00563 in January 2011… before retrospective 2011 ‘waiver’ legislation against me in UK too) & incl after I was officially diagnosed with notifiable recurrent cancer in Australia (28.09.2023)

My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.

‐—–

I understand I have through my peacefully campaigning naturally created a universal legal precedent.

(The politicians in Australia, have illegally sought to hide that they, along with members of their judiciary, have no… jurisdiction to stop…. jury lawsuits overseas that can result in an adoptee ditching an ‘adoption court order’… before and without needing to return to Australia.

It was dishonest to publicly say I had refused to give my details (about now repealed legislation that was political ‘window dressing’ to try and hide a longstanding political agreement by successive governments to actually try and… ban any peaceful campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London) which politicians et al obviously did not want to try and explain to any civil jury:

Brian was unlawfully arrested because he is seen recording (tape recorder circled) what is being said, and that I am unlawfully arrested with a… copy of my SOCPA Notification on me.

‘These are ‘excerpts’ from my SOCPA ‘Notification’ from 3rd March 2006:

I had taken all ‘reasonable steps’ to technically ‘comply’ with the intentionally libelous ‘Serious Organized Crime & Police Act’ legislation in the UK, despite not agreeing with it, and while realizing there were no legal grounds for politicians et al to impose ‘conditions’.

There was a very long tape recording from… 9th March 2006 (90 mins etc) where I question where there is any due process about the SOCPA Notifications after a police officcr is recorded bullying and harassing me (while knowing my details because I have a copy of my SOCPA ‘notification on me) before admitting I haven’t done anything wrong, and saying anything is NFA:

(Brian was exempt from the retrospective ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation at the time I wrote my own SOCPA ‘notification’ -and the legal reality was he remained like that even if it was not always ‘officially’ acknowledged- but the government had cynically tried to distract from my being illegally arrested instead of being summonsed prior to Mothers Day 2006 by saying it was a ‘crime’ for me to campaign with Brian while he was exempt, cven though it was admitted he had asked me to campaign with him. The use of unlawful arrests etc was intended to… punish people without law, because at most if you were not what the government called an ‘organizer’ you could be… summonsed, but did not actually have to even appear in the Magistrates Court in the UK, who don’t even keep accurate and contemporaneous court records of court proceedings anyway, and could only… fine you which was supposed to be subject to appeal in a higher court of ‘record’)

(It’s quite ‘extraordinary’ that with so much supposedly ‘investigative journalism’ in Westminster, a Lord Tosh of Haringey’s admission was so easily ‘overlooked’:

because it was by no ‘co-incidence’ that 23rd May 2000 did ‘co-incide’ with 23rd May 2006:

(where of course I was unlawfully arrested etc so the politicians and press could publish whatever they liked. I don’t personally understand how it is possible to say any members of the British House of Lords have any respect for democracy because if they did, they simply wouldn’t be in the legally anomalous House of Lords. I always think it was quite remarkable that a small group of people including ordinary people like me who had no legal training whatsoever, nevertheless eventually forced the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 of the ‘Serious Crime and Police Act 2005’ off the statute books, including without the support of a single politician, police officer, prosecutor, judge or press baron)

In terms of adoption, it has really always been the case legally speaking that any adult adoptees can ditch ‘adoption court orders’ made while we were minors without our needing the ‘permission’ of anyone else. I genuinely believe, the acknowledgement of that legal reality can actually help clean up what is currently an adoption… industry that has illegally trapped far too many ‘adoptees’ for far too long. There is no reason I would personally want an ‘adoption court order’ that never offered me even any pretence of any political or legal representation or protection or any insurance cover… overseas. It was the illegal use of an ‘adoption court order’ that led to my being sent 12000 miles away overseas as a teenager, which does not mean I would voluntarily return to the same old political abuse about adoption, that hasn’t… changed.

I may have voluntarily returned if my ditching the ‘adoption court order’ had been officially acknowledged… before and without my needing to return to Victoria, in Australia)

It is of course commonsense, that the interests of law abiding civilians, are often quite different from the focus of the political classes on votes and factions within their own political parties, or the press who are essentially in the business of getting and staying rich by making as much money as possible from advertising for other rich people. It certainly isn’t easy for any law abiding civilian to be heard among the interests of the often revolving doors between politicians and media barons. Quite how media barons come to be ‘accredited’ as ‘journalists’ and by whom, is one of life’s little mysteries. I do not personally accept that ‘journalists’ and ‘media barons’ can or should have ‘special rights’ in terms of ‘free speech’ over and above the peaceful freedom of expression of ordinary civilians. Of course politicians and press barons who may claim from time to time, they have retired or resigned and so on, do still collect substantial pensions and other financial perks of all sorts they remain accountable over.

(I do not personally understand how politicians ‘adoption’ judge from NSW who now fronts a national ‘NACC’ in Australia could think a judge could have.. jurisdiction to try and ‘sidestep’ etc jury lawsuits from overseas, about ‘adoption court orders’ that originated in Australia by using for example the 1984 ‘waiver’ legislation about adoption in Victoria, Australia, that is only about trying to illegally… force adoptees to agree under… duress, to waive any jury lawsuits if adoptees want to be released from an ‘adoption court order’. I haven’t personally ever seen a published ‘revocation’ case where the comments of a judge could be construed as anything other than legally irrelevant… personal opinions, because an adult adoptee has the absolute right to make our own decision about an ‘adoption court order’ that can and should be simply be recorded on the adoption court records, regardless of where we live. The situation at the moment remains legally inconsistent with other forms of ‘out of home care’ that people automatically ‘age out of’ at adulthood, or even adoptions of adults in countries like Germany which can only happen with the… consent of an adult being adopted which I personally view rightly or wrongly as a pretty weird concept anyway)

The only reason I was unlawfully arrested on Mothers Day 2006 in the UK was so politicians and the press could illegally publish whatever they liked because I am an ordinary law abiding civilian who could not get an injunction to stop them doing that because I was illegally detained. The email from 03.03.2006 shows that of course they knew what they maliciously published was untrue, but they published what they knew to be untrue, because they do not ever intend to back down, so the political lies have just kept getting bigger, causing increasing harm.

I was recently asked by a professional what caused my PTSD which I simply explained with one word… “violence”. My own experience of PTSD is entirely attributable to the often extreme violence connected to illegally imposing an ‘adoption court order’ on me. There have never been any legal grounds to lay a hand on me using the ‘adoption court order’.

(I do know that some politicians do… intentionally try and overwhelm civilians to cause PTSD because they can then illegally try and… exploit any ’emotional dysregulation’ to try and further punish and control their civilian victims. It may not necessarily be possible to fully recover from PTSD but it is possible to try and manage it, to try and stop politicians… exploiting it)

A Ms Glass who is now posing as a Victorian Ombudsman in Australia, could not convincingly say that while she was an IPCC Commissioner in the UK she did not know about the 03.03.2006 email. It is true that the Australian state and federal politicians and governments have treated me very differently to a Ms Glass, although we are both Australian… citizens.

The politicians et al knew they were illegally trying to cover up a… precedent setting jury lawsuit that naturally happened.

The politicians et al were still doing that when they covered up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008:

and refused to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me,

I don’t personally believe the likes of the Australian NACC would want me to have, let alone to pass along to them the… evidence of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, that obviously involves evidence of very serious political… corruption that in my experience anyone in government just wants to sweep under the carpet.

and lied at a State Opening in 2010 (when they forgot to mention the ‘complainants’ were the phoney protesters posing as ‘Democracy Village’:

(while Brian and I were being illegally searched it reminded me to get out and start reading out a bundle of perjured witness statements I had previously been given that lied about for example a State Opening on 18th November 2009 where I was unlawfully arrested to cover up I had complained about Brian and I being illegally searched when some ‘pompous’ royalists were not being searched, but were saying we should be !! Brian and I never actually obstructed any searches using… sniffer dogs, but the rest was just bullying and harassment to illegally try and find an unlawful ‘excuse’ to arrest us etc so politicians could publish whatever lies they wanted)

and then when they covered up I had… already really won HQ11X00563 in January 2011

(the ‘Barrow Boy’ a former Tory Leader from Westminster City Council was caught out while being interviewed by American TV having to… admit to me, that he had no evidence of me doing anything wrong to bring HQ11X00563:

before Johnson et al’s ‘satellite’ litigation, also from 2010 was actually (albeit illegally) ‘remitted’ back (to the same judge who had… already !! stopped me speaking and covered up even what I did manage to say) or new legislation was made against me in the UK 2011 before everyone tried to cover up HQ11X00563 had not been ‘stayed’ on 16th January 2012 when there could not have possibly been and there was no ‘injunction’ protecting the governments so called ‘protesters’ that inevitably led to my having another jury lawsuit in HQ12X03564 etc etc etc. I was the one who was unlawfully arrested yet again on 16th January 2012 so I could not get an injunction to stop the politicians and press publishing whatever they liked because I was illegally detained, yet again.

The… political use of the ‘adoption court order; behind the scenes, against me, really just endlessly disadvantaged me.

The Murdoch family who originally trafficked me to the intelligence services have obviously built their so called ‘news’ media ’empire’ by… exploiting adoptees, because it has been easier for politicians to keep paying off the Murdoch family, instead of cleaning up the adoption… industry, and where necessary compensating adoptees who have not had any genuine choices.

It was when I recently went to the Springvale Botanical Cemetary to peacefully pay my respects to my little sister who I was raised separately from, who had ‘suddenly’ died, now many years ago, although in many ways, it still seems like yesterday, that I think I fully comprehended the wider abuse of an ‘adoption court order’ that is not… safely resolved. The past year has been exceptionally difficult, which politicians have exploited.

I could not help while being confronted by the harsh reality of the situation, involving life and death, that the relentless political bureaucracy (that in my view is sometimes properly referred to as the ‘banality of evil’) actually still persists in ‘officially’ refusing to acknowledge I am the older sister of my little sister. (One of the biggest obstacles to my personally ‘coming to terms’ with the loss of my little sister is that ‘banality of evil’ of a political class, who refuse to ‘officially’ acknowledge I am the older sister of my little sister who ‘suddenly’ died, even when she has died !!) Of course, the only real reason the truth is still ‘officially’ denied, is because it is part of the… wider political ‘face saving’ and ‘victim blaming exercise’ that since being ‘officially’ labelled an ‘adoptee’ I must always be in the ‘wrong’. Clearly, the political idea that I have to ‘apply’ to have my little sister ‘officially’ recognised as my little sister (and that a court has ‘legal standing’/locus standii to refuse to ‘officially’ acknowledge that) is a legal absurdity that is legally ridiculous. It is just social engineering/eugenics.

I did nevertheless turn a page in my thinking in reaching an understanding that at least my little sister did have the family who did love her very much, which was important in… her life. She did… always thankfully know she was loved.

The political extremes of ‘adoption’ me politicians et al have never ‘officially’ recognized I am the older sister, of mu little sister who died, which is very sad and has many far reaching adverse consequences:

I have always tried to live the best life I can, regardless of how difficult that sometimes is. The reality is adoptees do face many quite specific ‘challenges’ that can also include having been illegally excluded from for example class actions about the banned cancer causing drug DES.

I think in all honesty, I might well have ditched my Australian citizenship if politicians had explicitly said it was necessary to do that to ditch the ‘adoption court order’ that has caused me so much prolonged and life threatening physical and emotional harm, I may never fully recover from. The ‘adoption court order’ was after all used to illegally send me 12000 miles away as a teenager, in the knowledge there wasn’t even any pretence of any legal or political representation or insurance cover overseas. There is an inherent very serious legal problem with ‘adoption court orders’ that are very serious and completely arbitrary political interferences. It is telling that the political ‘window dressing’ of the 1984 ‘adoption’ legislation in Victoria, Australia, is ‘silent’ about adoptees who live overseas, or those who are never told they are ‘adopted’. The legal anomalies of different legislation in different states even within Australia is never ever really legally explained either, because ‘adoptees’ are first and foremost Australian… citizens, not… citizens of… different states, within Australia, where there are only two ‘main’ political parties nationally anyway, that only serves to in practice further confuse, isolate or divide and rule ‘adoptees’. There is a quite incredible list of legal anomalies with regard to ‘adoption court orders’ that are legally speaking quite ‘unique’ when compared to other ‘court orders’ and how they operate.

I try and focus on the fact I am a universal mum and peace campaigner, and the label of ‘adoptee’ is not me, but instead something that is just illegally imposed on me by politicians et al.

It cannot be a surprise that some adoptees like me, are understandably mistrustful of a system of politicians, press and courts when nothing has really changed for the better for… all adoptees with for example the 1984 legislation in Victoria, Australia. It is just too cynical to try and claim the same political… parties and courts who originally rubber-stamped any old ‘adoption court order’ should then be given oversight of an ‘adoptee’ supposedly needing their ‘permission’ to be… released from such ‘adoption court orders’ !!!! Seriously ???? And of course the former Australian PM, FM and now Australian Ambassador to the United States Rudd has certainly never ‘apologized’ for corruptly pocketing $1.4 billion dollars in my own case, he received from the British government, and laundered through Ingeus of which he was a financial beneficiary. His colleague, Gillard running cover, with a cynical phoney ‘apology’ for ‘forced adoptions’ just used political language and posturing to continue to hide a far wider legal truth (and of course delay any compensation etc)

The politician et al’s blatant lies over Mothers Day 2006 in the UK that exponentially grew, and adversely affected me in so many ways, proved to me that politicians would just sweep any very real harm caused to me under the carpet, when it is politically expedient for them to do so, regardless of whatever I had actually said.

Therefore, I didn’t really ever have any genuine… choice but to publicly say my own decision is that I have officially renounced the ‘adoption court order’ because otherwise, politicians, police, and other civil service people including the County Court in Melbourne, can and will deny that is my own decision.

It is not legally possible for politicians to try and ‘waive’ jury lawsuits with retrospective legislation.

A kinder evolution is possible.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)