Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie Premier Andrews, Adoption Information Service, Vic Police, DPP et al) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I have had no choice but to… publicly officially confirm I have lawfully made my own adult decision to ditch ‘adoption court order’ (so politicians et al cannot deny that & that it should have been recorded by County Court, before & without my needing to return to Victoria, Australia where I was officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer that I also make my own adult decisions about that are recorded in medical records, incl my ‘Advanced Care Directive’ because my objective is to try & improve my quality of life) that legally trumps all arrests, bureaucratic forms & opinions about me from any politicians, Adoption Information Service, police, DPP, courts, or Murdoch family who compounded harm by unusually.. retrospectively leveraging their own “8.18” legislation based on me in 1984 in Victoria, Australia & in the UK in 2011 to illegally try & force me under duress etc to also ‘waive’… jury lawsuits about compensation incl (for example) HQ11X00563 & HQ12X03564 in UK (13.09.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
‐‐—–
I have had no choice but to… publicly say I have officially renounced the ‘adoption court order’ because otherwise politicians et al could… deny I have.
The politicians, civil servants and Murdoch family are far to flippant about the very serious consequences for an adoptee of a… court order that is really only superficially about adoption, and more about political control. A court order is a very serious… state interference.
I have never ‘agreed’ to ‘waive’ my legal rights:
My rights have been so comprehensively violated.
The torture and attempted murder of me is just swept under the carpet because it is an inconvenient truth.
The Murdoch family know the legal reality is I have never ‘agreed’ to sign any ‘waiver’ about having a… jury lawsuit that the Murdoch family have retrospectively leveraged legislation in 1984 in Australia and in 2011 in the UK to try and force me to do, that is something… they include in 8.18 of their own… business deals (see below). I don’t work for or have any ‘business’ dealings with the Murdoch family:
The Murdoch family and their waiver of a jury trial they cannot force all adoptees to do:
I now know the only reason the Adoption Information Service in the DOJ have illegally refused to hand over to me -by email- (so there is no longer any… dispute they have created about what I have/ have had) one single complete set of records that they claim to have (it’s never even been clear what overlap there is between adoption hospital and court records) is to illegally try and delay… jury lawsuits. I do not and have never given or… delegated my authority over… my personal information to the AIS (that they are illegally trying to say they have to try and undermine me, to use and profit from at my personal expense). I don’t want people from the AIS who do not respect I am an adult who makes my own decisions, also doing whatever they like with my… personal information too. I do want a court order preventing the Adoption Information Service from holding… any personal information about me because I just don’t need the perpetual conflict they have also unnecessarily created when I should be free to be able to focus on my health. I just view the Adoption Information Service in the DOJ as people who just do whatever suits the likes of the Murdoch family.
The civil servants at the Adoption Information Service have not even bothered to read their own 1984 adoption legislation that says any prosecution of an adoptee would require the DPP (who could not possibly justify prosecuting in the ‘public interest’ any adult adoptee for making our own adult decision to ditch an ‘adoption court order’) The politicians themselves say they only have to at most make reasonable efforts to notify people when they ditch any additional citizenship because they want to stand in Federal politics.
The only actual purpose of 1984 ‘adoption’ legislation in Victoria, Australia was to illegally try and circumvent… jury lawsuits by inventing a phoney ‘permission’ obstacle course.
I think it is absolutely despicable to take advantage !! of me being diagnosed with recurrent cancer to keep trying to bully me about the ‘adoption court order’ in the knowledge that I have already made my decision that no bureaucratic form, opinion or court hearing to suit… anyone else, can legally change.
My priority has been to ditch the adoption court order, and compensation from jury lawsuits is secondary.
The legal reality is my adult decisions about ditching the ‘adoption court order’ trump the bureaucratic forms, opinions and any court hearings of politicians, the Adoption Information Service, police, DPP, and courts.
It’s just appalling to try and drag an adoptee into the criminal justice system, which is so disproportionate, and is about using stand over tactics/intimidation.
It’s not okay that the Murdoch family… retrospectively leveraged legislation over based on me in 1984 in Victoria, Australia and then in 2011 in the UK to illegally try and force me to under… duress, ‘agree’ to ‘waive’… jury lawsuits.
(It is ‘unclear’ why adoption court records from 1963 do not match publicly available electoral records from 1963)
The criminally negligent ‘adoption court order’ in my own case really was ‘void ab initio’ even when I was a minor.
The criminally negligent ‘adoption court order’ in my own case really was ‘void ab initio’ even when I was a minor.
*******
*******
It is unusual that I am.the same adoptee who the same Murdoch family leveraged retrospective legislation against in 1984 in Victoria, Australia and then in 2011 in the UK when they were ’embedded’ in New Scotland Yard and the British House of Lords, to try and force me under duress to ‘agree’ to ‘waive’ jury lawsuits.
I am not one of their business associates.
******
******
NB: Re: HQ11X00563 & HQ12X3564
There was some serious… intimidation of me by the Murdoch family when they were ’embedded’ in New Scotland Yard and the British House of Lords when by their own admission they sent along(for example) umm… 15 police vans of police at 7.30pm (because my jury lawsuits stood in the way of the Murdoch family BskyB deal !!!!) that they admit didn’t initially achieve what the Murdoch family wanted:
Their ‘plan’ didn’t work.
So, this is the perjury the Murdoch family then had the former British PM, TM spin… after I was eventually unlawfully arrested (at 3am) while she was busy perverting the course of justice while she was Home Secretary:
The a) press couldn’t publish their lies without the Home Secretary publishing her perjury, which she could only do… after c) I was unlawfully arrested.
The truth was… I was legally entitled to an injunction to stop politicians et al publishing their lies which they could only do by unlawfully arresting me, because I could not get an injunction to stop them publishing their lies, while I was being illegally detained.
I was just standing there at 3am chatting to someone when some police came back and just… grabbed me.
It was in the minds of the Murdoch family, all about my jury lawsuits standing in the way of their BskyB deal as far as they were concerned, before they used Brexit as their revenge when I was living in my own home in Breizh, France.
They were involved in the torture and attempted murder of me that I refused to just dismiss as a ‘civil matter’ while endlessly being pressured to cover up other people violently harming me:
It’s a mystery how the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me ever came to be in the hands of those involved.
The Adoption Information Services building in Melbourne, Australia is very similar to, and reminds me of the building they tried to trap me in, in the UK, which I really don’t need to be reminded of either. I went and lived in my own home in Breizh, France for many reasons that include it is completely unacceptable to keep bullying me about an adoption court order. I am a universal mum and peace campaigner and I do not in any way identify with being labelled adoptee by politicians et al.
They wonder why I wouldn’t want an ‘adoption court order’ ? that is really controlled by politicians ?? who primarily only want to appease the likes of the Murdoch family.
It is politically motivated:
I remember…. the British government had me unlawfully arrested at a State Opening on 18th November 2009 because they had to (for example) cover up (apart from Mothers Day 2006 etc) I specifically complained Brian and I were being illegally searched while some monarchists standing next to us were not being searched. I was tortured again too. I was… tortured because the government could not explain why they treated me differently to the monarchists.
There was no explanation as to why the government was supposedly searching Brian and I and not the monarchists beside us trying to distract from that simple fact.
The monarchists said and I quote from a monarchist called Ms Karen Lewis’ own witness statement she never wanted any jury to see “if she doesn’t like the Queen she should go back to wherever she came from” which apart from the fact the English outpost called Australia still has the inequality of the institution of the English monarchy, distracted from.treating people who are monarchists and people who are not monarchists, differently.
There is significant unfair bias and prejudice from an Australian bar association that fawns all over the ‘stability’ ???? of the institution of monarchy whose only premise is to promote… inequality for goodness sakes through the use of torture etc:
There’s nothing even remotely democratic about the Westminster ‘tradition’ of the vast British House of Lords that includes the Murdoch henchman Lord Marlesford in July 2011:
This was just one for the scrapbooks that ironically happened because of the torture of me on 18th November 2009 etc etc (I didn’t even actually know at that time, that the monarchy were trying to claim part of the public land in Parliament Square, that obviously the monarchy cannot legally just claim with any legislative sleight of hand):
Westminister originally tried to cover up the monarchy being involved in maliciously prosecuting Brian and I, that… I first mentioned on the witness stand in the High Court on 21st June 2010 (and the judg then closed the court to the press and public on 23rd Jun 2010) because of course it is absolutely unlawful for the monarchy to do that (along with trying to claim public land).
My personal view is the courts have only ever really existed so that richer people can exploit poorer people.
In January 2010, I had also legally named in legal proceedings in court, a person who poses as a campaigner as an ‘agent provocateur’ (it was legally irrelevant to me which department of the… same government they answered to) because the government was illegally trying to ‘join’ that person who had also turned up on 18th November 2009 at the same time as police, when Brian and I were illegally searched, with Brian and I. The government didn’t like it when I named one agent provocateur which brought others running with their phoney ‘Democracy Village’.
It was similar to the British and Australian governments trying to continue to force me as an adult to stay adopted (ie: ‘joined’ to whoever the government label ‘family’)
(The original malicious prosecution against me in the UK using ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation that was made against Brian that I forced off the statute books tried to distract from my originally being unlawfully arrested, instead of just being summonsed. The judge did that by ridiculously claiming I first needed the permission of a court to campaign with anyone else. The true reality was I could only be summonsed and not arrested, because I wasn’t even legally obliged to actually attend the court and in particular a Magistrates court because… politicians refuse to have Magistrates Courts make or keep an accurate or contemporaneous record of any court hearing in a Magistrates Court)
I was literally holding the perjured witness statements the government needed to hide to be able to publish their own lies at a State Opening on 25th May 2010:
So at the next State Opening in Westminster on 25th May 2010 I was yet again unlawfully arrested so the government could… publish whatever they liked without my being able to get an Injunction to stop that, when I was also holding up and quoting from perjured witness statements from the previous November. It was just political lie after political lie from Mothers Day 2006 onwards. So then on 16th January 2012 the government unlawfully arrested me so they could publish their lies then too, because the former British PM, TM was lying when she claimed in an email written while I was illegally detained that there was an injunction protecting a person she falsely portrayed as a protester, when there were… already live proceedings in a High Court lawsuit in HQ11X00563 that had not been stayed that no one had to have an injunction over. It was only after I went to the High Court to get a copy of the supppsed injunction that the High Court told me there wasn’t one, so the government and the supppsed protester had all publicly lied. So when they were all found out then the government and their protester insisted the existing High Court case HQ11X00563 was illegally stayed (because I had really ‘won’ it way back in January 2011) so they could supposedly carry on with their Judicial Review of new legislation when I already had a jury lawsuit by comparison because I was unlawfully arrested on 16th January 2012 so the Home Secretary and her protester could claim their was an injunction. I had correctly named the Home Secretary’s so called ‘protester’ as an agent provocateur in legal proceedings in courts since January 2010 because it was seriously illegal what was covered up. It was inconceivable that a genuine protester would a) publicly lie in the first place about having an injunction to protect themselves before b) when discovered lying (again) then sought to stay a pre-existing lawsuit HQ11X00563 that had been going on for over a year, in favour of a narrow Judicial Review on not so new legislation that was essentially the same, or repeating the pre-existing lawsuit in HQ11X00563. It was just so corrupt that linked the same people from two State Openings in 2009, 2010 and then HQ11X00563 & HQ12X003564 all while the Murdoch family were embedded in New Scotland Yard & the British House of Lords. The legal reality is HQ12X03564 came to include HQ11X00563 because everyone lied about the injunction and when HQ11X00563 was stayed, so of course when Neil was kidnapped by the City of London police, when we left the High Court in April 2013 that was because the City of Police were involved in my unlawful arrest over 16th January 2012. The fact the Murdoch family mention 15 police vans at 7.30 pm, actually meant I was subjected to quite incredible intimidation for many hours. It didn’t work so some came back around 3am.the following morning and just grabbed me while I was backing away from.them, because they just couldn’t publish any of their lies unless they could stop me being able to get an injunction to stop that.
The City of London police tried to hide they were involved on 16th January… 2012:
I obviously never heard from the City of London police’s lawyers because it’s not like they could ever explain away even 666 to any jury:
I will never fully physically recover from the fact the British government used so much extreme violence on me, the Australian governments were wholly complicit in, that happened just so they could… publish whatever they wanted, without my being able to get an injunction to stop that, that was ultimately about trying to stop… jury lawsuits.
The Murdoch family have had an easy time using and exploiting adoptees over the years, because it was always easy for them to get politicians to pay them off, instead of firstly acknowledging adult adoptees legal right to a genuine free choice, and where adoptees choose, to take legal action for compensation. The adoptees like myself who have actually permanently lived overseas for whatever reason (which politicians refuse to officially acknowledge in my own case because an adoptee should be able to ditch an adoption court order… before or without returning to Australia ) or adoptees who have never been told they are adopted which courts should have done, are obviously excluded from any compensation politicians might make at some future date for any adoptees who may still be willing to jump through whatever other obstacle course politicians and their civil servants et al invent.
I have had no choice but to… publicly say that my own decision is that I have officially renounced the ‘adoption court order’ because otherwise the politicians et al will continue to try and… deny that is my decision.
The politicians and civil servants are standing in the way of making adoptions legal which can only happen by acknowledging the genuine right of adult adoptees to make our own decisions. It was another adoptee in New Zealand who said to me they told their own children there is no ‘father xmas’ because it is wrong to lie to children which is what has happened to us as adoptees, by trying to… force the fairy tale of a ‘forever family’ as though an adoptee is a chattel with no legal rights of our own.
This adoptee has more than enough to deal with, without the bullying and worse of a criminally negligent ‘adoption court order’.
A kinder world is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 