Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: Premier Andrews, Victoria Police, DPP et al) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I have… already firstly officially ditched ‘adoption court order’ (before serious diagnosis of recurrent cancer) that County Court registrar was legally obliged to inform me by email was officially recorded on court ‘Adoptions Register’ etc… before I am understandably secondly intending to sue for compensation because… politicians & their mates are to blame for… intentionally breaching basic & universal legal & human rights etc by never having provided any legal or political representation or any easily accessible & lawful… processes with identifiable checks & balances & safeguards for me to as an adult ‘adoptee’ permanently living in my own home… overseas, sensibly ditch the ‘adoption court order’ made in Victoria, Australia while retrospective 1984 legislation etc also improperly tries to illegally force adult adoptees to ‘agree’ to ‘waive’ any legal right to lawsuits incl choice of a jury… before being released from an ‘adoption court order’ (06.09.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I am a universal mum and peace campaigner, and I do not identify with the ‘adoptee’ label illegally imposed on me by politicians and civil servants through what is really only the political use of an ‘adoption court order’ by politicians and their mates.
_____
The politicians and their mates are to blame for the fact…. there has never been any political or legal representation for me as an adult ‘adoptee’ who permanently lived in my own home overseas, and the absence of any easily accessible and lawful… processes with identifiable checks and balances and safeguards for me to ditch an ‘adoption court order’ while living overseas.
It was quite surreal when I was illegally imprisoned… in the UK in April 2008 (on a non-imprisonable alleged s5 Public Order Act ‘offense’ a Tory Minister for Vitol called Duncan invented, I wasn’t even legally obliged to even attend court over, that was another political attempt to illegally try to cover up my jury lawsuit from Mothers Day 2006 because it would have resulted in a legally binding ruling releasing me from the ‘adoption court order’) and the men in dark suits and sunglasses paid me a visit in Holloway Prison and said I did not ‘officially exist’ in the UK, although I very clearly did and do. The Prison governor from Holloway then illegally withheld the Habeas Corpus paperwork from me until I was released, but not before she incredibly asked me to sign a ‘waiver’ over what she had done before she would release me (which I refused to do, but I had to be released) The Murdoch family who by their own admission were ’embedded’ in New Scotland Yard, were literally stalking me in Westminster because my Mothers Day 2006 lawsuit stood in the way of their BskyB deal (so they obviously had no qualms about later also using the Brexit referendum as revenge, while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France, because thy knew they could leverage the problems about adoption for their own political advantage in the EU.
A fmr British Tory MP for Vitol called Duncan who is and was notoriously corrupt (as indeed Vitol have long been known to be) committed perjury in April 2008 when he falsely accused me of committing a S5 Public Order ‘offense’:
Duncan was willing to make a lot of money by committing perjury that was… intended to distract from the problems with adoption.
The British Labour Lord Malloch Brown who (was previously at the UN) is another Vitol stooge, who obviously has no interest in… democracy, so the only reason he could possibly be on the board of a company called Smartmatic is because companies are told that is how they can can get government contracts etc. The… politicians clearly tell companies that if they want to ensure they get government contracts they have to give lucrative jobs to politicians, former politicians and politicians mates. Once most politicians have stepped on to the political gravy train, they rarely step off because even when they are no longer politicians, other politicians will also hand public money to them to front all sorts of phoney NGO’s and ‘policy’ groups and so on:
It was actually entirely foreseeable that an adult adoptee living overseas “could” end up with a jury lawsuit… over different legislation like ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that I helped force off the statute books in the UK, that would also lead to a binding legal ruling over adult adoptees having a genuine choice to be released from an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were minors, living in another country. As far as I am concerned, the ‘adoptee’ label is just something that has been illegally… imposed on me by politicians and their mates.
I am actually a universal mum and peace campaigner.
I was obviously unlawfully arrested on 21st December 2021 inside and outside the County Court in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia because everyone incl the Victorian DPP did reasonably know it could never be legal to arrest, charge, prosecute and convict an adult adoptee (who they also knew permanently lived in my own home… overseas) for officially ditching an ‘adoption court order’ made against me as a minor. I was unlawfully arrested because politicians and their mates are to blame for… intentionally not having provided any legal or political representation or easily accessible and lawful… processes with identifiable checks and balances and safeguards for an adult adoptee permanently living in my own home overseas to ditch the adoption court order. No-one could explain why adult ‘adoptees’ living overseas are like ‘adoptees’ who are never told they are adopted, in practice… excluded from any prospect of any due process. It could happen to anyone and it did happen to me.
It’s not legally possible for politicians to legally legislate that rights don’t exist for some adoptees:
The Victorian DPP would not have any… legal authority to prosecute an adult ‘adoptee; in another state in Australia or another country overseas either. There is no… crime in an adult adoptee, just officially renouncing an ‘adoption court order’ made while a minor. It cannot be legal to… force an adult adoptee who permanently lives in their own home… overseas, to return to a state in Australia based on the political premise of possibly being given ‘permission’ to officially be released from an ‘adoption court order’.
The ‘Black Swan theory’ applies to adoptees… excluded by court order and legislation from any pretense of any due process as though… we do not exist and have no legal rights.
There is nothing in any a) adoption court orders or b) legislation that legally addresses the fact adult adoptees living overseas or people who are not told they are adoptees, are effectively… excluded from being released from any adoption court order, which highlights the true legal reality is… all adult adoptees are legally entitled to just notify of renouncing an ‘adoption court order’ that a court registrar must officially record on the ‘Adoption register’.
There are so many ‘official’ court extracts and court records adoptees are never given while politicians and their mates try and fob us off with… photocopies of whatever cherry-picked information happens to suit politicians.
This is just a… photocopy I was only given by the ‘Adoption Information Service’ in July 2019:
If I was old enough to send overseas when I was a teenager which could only be forced on me because of an ‘adoption court order’ then I was old enough to have an official court extract of that ‘adoption court order’ then. The first time I ever saw what are only… photocopies of some court records, like an ‘adoption court order’ was in July 2019. The ‘Adoption Information Service’ have consistently illegally refused to provide me with a… complete single set of any records they claim to have by email (so there can be no dispute about what exactly I do have from them) which has only served to further obstruct the administration of justice:
There is no legal explanation as to why the County Court registrar in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia has failed to confirm to me by email and in a timely manner that my officially ditching the ‘adoption court order’ has been officially recorded on the courts ‘adoption register’ which I am legally entitled to have confirmed. It would be self evident that I would be suing for compensation because that should have happened while I was still permanently living in… my own… home overseas. The politicians et al treat adult adoptees born in Australia who live overseas and want to be released from an ‘adoption court order’ as though we don’t exist and have rights that exist which is pretty much the same for adult adoptees who are never told they are adopted.
I personally reasonably believe that the only reason politicians have not cleaned up the multi-billion dollar ‘adoption’ industry (with the starting point being to officially recognise adult ‘adoptees’ make our own decisions about adoption court orders made while we were minors) is because the supposed ‘reputations’ of the likes of the Murdoch family (who trafficked me to the intelligence services etc) and their robbing innocent civilians is prioritized over the basic and universal rights of not just some, but all adult adoptees. The politicians didn’t have a problem recognizing in 1975 that adults who had actually agreed to get married could be divorced through a ‘no fault’ system because politicians wanted to continue to encourage people to get married, primarily because most politicians and their mates are always trying to maintain as much control as they can over other people’s lives. The politicians have therefore… known they have been acting illegally towards some adult adoptees who should be genuinely free to renounce an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were minors, without needing the ‘permission’ of anyone else.
The Murdoch family were not disinterested ‘observers’ (and of course the monarchy should never have been involved in legislating to give themselves whatever public land they feel like):
Another Murdoch family henchman Lord Marlesford:
The former British PM, TM resorted to lying (below) in legal proceedings while Home Secretary falsely claiming there was an injunction on 16th January 2012 (that did not actually exist at that time while the pre-existing ‘satellite litigation’ of HQX1100563 which I ‘won’ was still also ‘alive’) to protect the government’s phoney campaign because politicians could not legally explain/had no excuse for stealing just… my shelter, and not that of their ummm… own ‘protesters’:
The fmr British PM, TM was inevitably caught out committing… perjury above (on behalf of people she publicly claimed were genuine ‘protesters’ she used to stage a phoney ‘judicial review’) in what became my quite separate… jury lawsuit HQ12X003564 because I was… yet again, unlawfully arrested and falsely imprisoned (after… 10pm) solely so politicians and the robber media barons could publish their lies while I was illegally detained because… I could not get an injunction to stop them doing that.
The Murdoch family parachuted in a male called Mr Bach as an MP in Victoria, Australia to be their ‘poster boy’ for adoption, to help try and cover up what happened to me in the UK. Bach who claims to be adopted which may or may not be true, also bizarrely claimed he helped the Tories ‘win’ the 2010 general election in the UK that was actually a ‘hung parliament’ (because the Lib Dems lied to get the student vote) so politicians could arrange the outcome of the election among themselves.
Bach who was living in the UK and… supporting Johnson et al when the torture and attempted murder of me happened, could not deny to any jury he has illegally been helping the Murdoch family et al cover up the torture and attempted murder of me, just like a Ms Glass did in the UK too.
I would obviously never have… voluntarily returned to Victoria, Australia.
A Victorian Ombudsman Ms Glass is another Murdoch family apparatchik who is completely compromised after covering up the Murdoch family ’embedded’ in New Scotland Yard in the UK, for goodness sakes while she was posing as an IPCC ‘Commissioner’ in London:
I don’t see how a Ms Glass could ever convince any jury she ever had any interest in ‘human rights’:
I never ‘agreed’ the torture and attempted murder of me was merely a ‘civil matter’ and it is one of life’s little mysteries how the CCTV ever came to be in the hands of people who could only be construed as protecting the… business interests of the Murdoch family:
I would not personally (regardless of any ‘circumstances’) as an adult ‘adoptee’ want something as serious as an ‘adoption court order’ (which is a very serious state interference) to continue in my own case. There is nothing wrong or illegal with me as an adult ‘adoptee’ simply not wanting a very serious legal matter of a… court order (under the pretext of adoption) which is not a frivolous matter but has real life consequences, imposed on me as an adult (that is actually… controlled by politicians and their mates).
If politicians want to kow-tow to the likes of the Murdoch family that is their business, but it is certainly not an… excuse to bypass the basic and universal legal and human rights of some adult ‘adoptees’.
The National Anti-corruption Commission would… already reasonably know there are serious legal issues involved in trying to… explain why an adult ‘adoptee’ who has permanently lived overseas in my own home, would ‘need’ to return to Victoria in Australia on the premise of… ‘possibly’ !!!! being released from an ‘adoption court order’ (and in particular when it was already known, I… already have so many lawsuits in the UK that along with the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 there too, should have released me from the ‘adoption court order’)
There aren’t really any legal grounds to subject any… adult ‘adoptee’ to what I do perceive to be essentially the… personal and legally irrelevant… opinions of a judge. The judiciary as a whole have never apologized to adopted people over what politicians call ‘forced adoptions’ that is not actually a recognized ‘legal term’.
The retrospective 1984 adoption legislation in… Victoria, only intentionally also seeks to improperly and illegally try and force an adult adoptee to ‘agree’ to ‘waive’ any lawsuits incl with the choice of a jury… before being released from the ‘adoption court order’:
It’s self evident that my legal right as an adult ‘adoptee’ to officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ and have that officially recorded, cannot be left to the whim of whenever that might happen to suit… any politicians or civil servants and their government departments, because I am… already legally entitled to be able to take back control of my own life to also try and improve my health.
It’s also self evident that if politicians and their mates were serious about trying to clean up the currently lawless multi-billion dollar ‘adoption’ industry, they would have as a starting point, had the common courtesy and respect to officially acknowledge that any adult adoptee can officially ditch an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were minors without needing to ‘apply’, pay money to or have the ‘permission’ of anyone else. (The legislation ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that I helped force off the statute books in the UK also had a phoney ‘permission’ regime to try and force people to ‘waive’ civil lawsuits incl with juries) The politicians and their mates are actually standing in the way of all adoptions becoming legal so more vulnerable children could be adopted knowing that as adults they will have the peace of mind of a genuine choice to make themselves about if they wish an ‘adoption court order’ to continue. The fact an adult ‘adoptee’ does not want an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were minors to continue, does not of itself, necessarily have to lead to the severance of friendly relationships with people involved in raising adoptees that can then arguably be on a more equal and respectful footing. The severance of relationships with people who raise adoptees can actually happen because of the continuing… imposition of an ‘adoption court order’ being… forced on an adult ‘adoptee’. No-one seriously suggests it’s a good thing to… force adults to get or stay married against their will, so it is incomprehensible that adult adoptees can be… forced to stay adopted.
Jurisdiction:
I was also dragged into another highly irregular ‘landmark’ case in the UK that was supposedly about ‘jurisdiction’ over an alleged ‘Contempt of Court ‘ that was really about… politicians illegally refusing to have courts !! make and keep accurate and contemporaneous records of court hearings etc (which is also a problem with adoptions):
The judges did actually… change what long standing legislation says, which is… ‘highly unusual’ (they made a grand show of getting dusty legal tomes off the shelves in the High court in London to consider under what circumstances they can change what legislation says) It was all (as Brian said) simply ‘political theatre’ because… politicians did not want a legally binding ruling in the High Court confirming that… courts must obviously be legally obliged to make and keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of court hearings etc. The legal reality was ‘Parliament’ could not legally have intended to stop courts !! from making and keeping accurate and contemporaneous records of court hearings/proceedings, and no judge could possibly have any… ‘jurisdiction’ to refuse to make or keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of a court hearing. It was seriously illegal to try and… force Brian and I to ‘agree’ to a false account of a hearing that the politicians and courts had every opportunity to make and keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of. I therefore also reasonably believe that judges do NOT have any… jurisdiction to refuse to properly record an adult adoptee notifying a court of officially renouncing an ‘adoption court order’.
The whole political and legislative language about a ‘revocation’ being as though an adoption never happened is also very… misleading because of course an… ‘adoption… court order’ which is a very serious state interference, does happen and may cause very serious harm, because of the manner in which it is imposed etc etc.
The politicians and their mates, including the robber media barons, are way too flippant about an… adoption… court order that is actually a very serious…. state interference.
My personal view is that it is only when all adult adoptees have a genuine choice about ‘adoption court orders’ that the adoptee ‘environment’ can become much healthier, because it will be harder to… ‘coerce’ adoptees in so many different ways, which does not encourage positive social relationships related to adoption.
Of course, anyone who politicians say is old enough to vote without needing to apply, pay money to, or have anyone else’s permission to do so, is obviously also old enough to make our own decision to ditch an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were minors without our needing to ‘apply’, pay money to or have the ‘permission’ of anyone else.
The Victorian Premier was unlikely to have been remotely bothered about handing over $380 million dollars to improve his own… electoral chances at the last state election, in just the same way, the Commonwealth bureaucracy was not at all bothered about taking the money:
The endless over-use of political ‘inquiries’ in Australia as a… substitute for court hearings including before a jury, is of itself a money grabbing exercise in ‘political theatre’ by the usual suspects.
There is obviously no quick medical fix for the very serious diagnosis of recurrent cancer. It really is difficult enough for me to try and manage that a rare medical complication (so there isn’t much medical research about it) has meant that I have been unable to have the same medical treatment anyone else with the same type of cancer would usually be able to have, without having to also put up with the… socially constructed distressing ‘bureaucracy’ of a wholly unnecessary ‘adoption court order’ too:
There have been… too many time wasting ‘inquiries’ about adoption too, that only provide politicians with another opportunity to just ignore any problems ‘adoptees’ point out, that politicians and their mates like the Murdoch family (who when you stop and think about it, have ‘extraordinary’ access to… all politicians for no other reason than they are wealthy and ridiculously wear a label calling themselves ‘journalists’ which somehow makes them ‘accredited’ by an unknown… ‘process’ -who decides- ?? to be part of what can inevitably only then be a narrow echo chamber between politicians and wealthy robber barons where no-one is intended to genuinely… challenge what is said) could not so easily do before a civil jury in a court of law. The adoption ‘process’ is way too… adversarial towards an adoptee who just wants to be released from an ‘adoption court order’.
I recently properly notified the ‘relevant authorities’ of my latest medical certificate relating to the very serious diagnosis of cancer and recurrent cancer, and the next day I got a phone call, confirming the most recent medical certificate was sufficient for the next year, before that was then confirmed in writing too. I shouldn’t have to be dealing with the whole ‘adoption’ imbroglio too. It’s just not right and adversely affects my health that I am doing my best to try and improve.
It is similarly legally adequate that I officially… notified of my renouncing the ‘adoption court order’… in my own way, that in being in the format of my own witness statement/statement of truth, was also easily verifiable, and more than sufficient.
It is obviously entirely legal for my notification of officially renouncing the adoption court order to be recorded by a ‘prescribed officer’ and ‘registrar’ in the County Court (a revocation wouldn’t have worked in my case because it’s for example illegal to force an adult ‘adoptee’ who has permanently lived overseas to return to Australia and ‘agree’ to ‘waive’ any lawsuit incl the choice of a jury… before being released from an ‘adoption court order’):
__________
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 