Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie Premier Andrews, Downer, Rudd, Vic Police & Johnson fmr Mayor of London etc who ditched his American citizenship to front Murdoch family et al big Brexit & while FM illegally used public office to stalk me, while I was living in my own home in Breizh France, to force me out of EU to cover up torture & attempted murder of me, so he could become PM & illegally claim/hide behind ‘police protection’ for life etc etc) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: FAO Registrar: I have already as a universal mum, free speech advocate & peace campaigner who does not identify with ‘adoptee’ label, taken the practical step of… officially renouncing criminally negligent ‘adoption court order’ in my witness statement that I do not need anyone else’s ‘approval’ to do & is only way I know to try & protect myself (before I was also… officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer after politicians et al also illegally hid my serious pre-existing jury lawsuits in UK along with hiding medical information from adoptees about use of banned cancer causing DES drug etc) that must… officially be formally included in my adoption & other court records like my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 & HQ11X00563 & HQ12X03564 etc in UK (it should be possible for fmr adoptees of any race, religion, politics or none to have free universal healthcare & residency in Jerusalem to help make peace & a genuinely universal city) (23.08.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I am a universal mum, free speech advocate & peace campaigner who does not identify with the ‘adoptee’ label. The label ‘adoptee’ just does not describe or define who I am, and is only illegally imposed on me by politicians et al.
The politicians don’t like members of the public, publicly campaigning in a public space at any time anyway, so they don’t do anything to help make that… inclusive for people with cancer etc, that’s for sure.
There is precisely zero chance a ‘National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse’ is going protect any children who are… adoptees because we already know politicians, police and courts prevent an adult adoptee from putting our own witness statement formally and officially on our adoption court record for… any reason:
I personally reasonably believe the ‘National Centre for Action on Child Sexual Abuse’ is just diverting more public money away from helping the many thousands of vulnerable children already in ‘out of home care’ now. There is no evidence any Royal Commission has ever changed the behaviour of any politicians or civil servants et al. There is certainly no safe way out for any adoptee raised by the intelligence services, where the way I look at it, from my own experience, is we were only supposed to be some sort of superhuman universal soldier. I felt old in many ways, by the time I was a teenager, because there was no childhood and so much was like an endurance test. I remember gradually realizing when I was growing up that what was called our ‘family’ was really not like most other families whether they were single or two parent families.
It was pretty obvious that my adopted brother who died of cancer in 2013, and I were not related so I faced endless questions, always reminding me of the ball and chain of ‘adoption’:
The idea that having been illegally sent 12000 miles away as a teenager on the basis of an ‘adoption court order’ I was not even afforded the courtesy of being given a photocopy of to take with me, could mean I would have needed to leave Parliament Square, Central London in the UK (or my own home in Breizh, France) and return to Melbourne, Australia to on the basis of retrospective sham legislation based on me from 1984 have the ‘approval’ of someone else to officially renounce is a legal… absurdity, and then some !!!! That legal absurdity has been playing out since July 2019. It is way beyond self evident the ‘adoption court order’ is disproportionate etc.
_______
The High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in the UK:
This is the actual picture including the Habeas Corpus paperwork that the prison governor illegally withheld from me !! until I was on my way out the door and she came to speak to me and said she would not release me if I did not give a waiver over what she had done which I refused to do, but was released (an oil and commodity trader Vitol paid out massive… bribes to numerous politicians and civil servants):
(Johnson only became Mayor of London by illegally covering up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court… Order from 16th April 2008)
It was a widely known as corrupt Tory and Vitol MP Duncan who did commit perjury, but it was Labour’s Livingstone who illegally used it to try and get himself off the legal hook, knowing that even the perjured witness statement about an alleged s5 Public Order was not imprisonable and I could not even be forced to attend court over, before… I ended up with the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order against everyone involved (there were rather a lot of unscrupulous people involved) The prison staff simply refused accept me into Holloway on the papers they were given so somebody must have falsified something along the way behind the scenes that was never produced and the prison staff certainly never saw either but were just eventually told by the prison governor to admit me. The prison staff were unhappy about the whole situation and said someone paid big money to put me there because it was just so illegal. The ‘blues brothers’ with dark suits and sunglasses came to visit me in Holloway prison and remarkably said, I did not ‘officially’ exist in the UK, which I clearly did.
Livingstone was already up to his ears in legal troubles including because he hid the identity of a male who violently punched me in the head:
I had been violently punched in the head, not long after I was literally kidnapped from inside a court on 19th July 2007 during live proceedings to stop me giving evidence in another case involving the Murdoch family.
_____________
My case does yet again also highlight that politicians attempts to shoe-horn all adoptees into particular ‘groups’ politicians call national or inter-country does not in many instances come anywhere close to explaining the facts and circumstances of so many unique cases, or our real world relationships with our own partners, and children.
A few days before the other case involving the Murdoch family I had been unlawfully arrested because politicians who were going through their dirty tricks book tried it on illegally using ‘bail conditions’ to try and stop me peacefully campaigning, but the District Judge at Westminster said: “Did she have a banner ?” to then say when it was said that I did, that then he could not imprison me:
At that time, a Lord Myners, a City of London banker who was an adoptee too, and Chair of the Guardian newspaper, and Chair of Tate Britain who did not expect to be opening the con-artist Mark Wallinger’s State Britain rip off, with us…. still in Parliament Square, having also just won the major ‘SOCPA cases’ against us, were ‘professionally embarrassed’ in many ways, so I was a real target because it all led back to jury lawsuits over Mothers Day 2006 that would also highlight the problems with adoption court orders etc because how did I end up in the UK etc:
I have never known real freedom, like other people anyway, because of the ‘adoption court order’ and despite my trying my best to genuinely be free from it.
Two days after, the unlawful arrest on 29th January 2007 ( I had also been unlawfully arrested on 24th January 2007 too) I was unlawfully arrested in the case involving the Murdoch family where I was pushed from behind into a roadway (a family member in London was also knocked over in a hit and run) A lawyer had asked me in the court on 19th July 2007, after briefly showing me some edited CCTV in the case involving the Murdoch family if I knew where the line of press appeared from (along with the men with trench-coats and earpieces etc) I said I had no idea because they didn’t come from the direction I was going when I was trying to leave the square. it wasn’t that it was at all unusual for press to be doing their own thing in Parliament Square, or even for the men in trench-coats with earpieces to be wandering around, but in the manner and context it took place was suspicious, especially after it had emerged several days earlier, the Murdoch run New Scotland Yard had admitted they were working with Special Branch on the 24th January 2007, without being able to explain why. I think whatever the plot had been on 31st January 2007 in the case involving the Murdoch family that when I went to toddle off which would scupper whatever was going to happen, I was then suddenly pushed from behind into the roadway where I fell over too, in the hopes of causing me some harm/ to ‘suffragette’ me. There was certainly an odd array of government people who showed up and could not explain on the witness stand what they had been doing in Parliament Square, after another court had rung the court to say the case should be abandoned which was very odd too, before I was then just kidnapped during live proceedings to stop me giving evidence. It was all very murky, and then of course the torture and attempted murder of me happened after the Murdoch family published the hit piece on 19th July 2009 to ‘remove’ us without any caveats on how that was done.
There was nothing ‘civil’ about what happened, that’s for sure. I did the right things to secure the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, but I don’t think there was ever any realistic prospect it was actually going to be handed over to me because too many ‘senior’ politicians and the Murdoch family were involved.
There were a few queens involved:
I remember that Channel Four had the nerve (when a royal wedding was added to the busy schedule in Westminster where the monarchy had already controversially been outed as claiming they could sign off on legislation to hand over public land like some parts of Parliament Square to…. themselves !!) to unbelievably ask me if I would participate in an ‘alternative royal wedding program’ with a so called anthropologist who while part of Johnson’s phoney ‘Democracy Village’ had been involved in and… covered up my unlawful arrest at the State Opening on 25th May 2010, before he had to be separated from us in legal proceedings he had illegally tried to join himself to us through. I said it was unbelievably insulting of Channel Four to put me at further risk of serious harm by asking me to be in a program with someone who was a part of and covered up my unlawful arrest less than a year earlier and who we had been separated from in legal proceedings. I said they were just setting me up to be unlawfully arrested again !! with a government ‘pre-crime’ plan, which they were only a little sheepish over and turned out to be true. A Professor Knight had a bad reputation of covering up which I had also seen during student protests too. The police with their press entourage in tow did try to pounce on me in Parliament Square on the morning of the royal soap opera but I had briefly toddled off before I knew the area would be cordoned off so when I came back I was actually able to have quite a decent snooze during the royal performance, although there were ‘special minders’ lurking there to ridiculously follow me around.
The ‘Peace News’ folk who behaved like zombie sometimes are what is known as… ‘government approved’… ‘activists’ or rather more often known as ‘agent provocateurs’ which we obviously saw because we were consistent in what we did.
The underlying problem always lurking in my own situation however was the ‘adoption court order’ being illegally used by politicians when I was in the UK too, that they knew a civil jury would stop. The Australian High Commission in London claimed in August 2011 when I asked exactly how many Australian citizens anywhere in the world were in the same situation, said I was the only one. That may be true in terms of the particular facts of the case, but it is certainly not more generally true in terms of adoptees because lots of adoptees have very significant legal issues arising from ‘adoption court orders’.
My very strong personal view is adoptions should not be allowed to go ahead unless an adoptee has a guarantee of unlimited legal representation of their own choosing for as long as there is an adoption court order, because otherwise the adoption court order is just a cut and paste job from slavery legislation, exploiting adopted people like chattels. A political party at most cares about factions and votes to make them money and that’s it, and they don’t care about any mess they leave behind in what is only a revolving door between two very similar political parties anyway. The current federal government are by and large the left overs from the Rudd administration.
There is only limited political representation for those adoptees who go along with whatever happens because no political party will choose any candidate who is not pro-adoption. The most political parties argue over with regard to adoption is that one group or another is ‘discriminated’ against if they cannot adopt. The adoption industry is a very dirty global multi-billion dollar racket where political abuse of adoptees has just been normalized, significantly beyond the often typical and patronizing ‘paternalistic’ type of attitude that permeates across most levels of government rgardless of whatever they happen to be trying to control. There’s never been a politician who isn’t trying to secure more control over others. The politicians are just reckless, and recklessly indifferent, to the harm they cause to adoptees.
I am mixed race and that was changed to a different dual nationality of British and Australian to ‘officially’… erase my Italian and Mediterranean heritage, before I was sent away as a teenager to punish me because I didn’t want to go along with the ‘adoption court order’ that was illegally being used… against me. The ball and chain of the ‘adoption court order’ hanging over me, has always repeatedly adversely affected my own ability to be with my… own family. I was married in New Zealand and divorced in the UK without needing to return to New Zealand and I would never ever get married ever again because of the endless political problems the illegal use of an ’adoption court order’… against me has caused. One of my sons was born in the UK and one of my sons was born in New Zealand and both also have Australian citizenship, but I would not actually encourage them to live in Australia, again because of the prolonged oppression caused by the ‘adoption court order’. There are horrific things that have happened in Australia, that have just been swept under the carpet. The Australian politicians also illegally tried to use the ‘adoption court order’ against me while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, to illegally try and claim I was not an Australian citizen !! When I later incredibly survived the torture and attempted murder of me (because Brian heard something happening and politicians knew they would not get away with murdering us both at the same time) Johnson the Mayor of London (& boss of top cops and also Telegraph journalist at that time) then ditched his American citizenship to front the Murdoch family et al’s big Brexit while I was then living in Breizh, France, when he illegally used public office to stalk me as FM to try and force me out of the EU so he could become PM and illegally claim ‘police protection’ for life, because he was the most… legally responsible for the torture and attempted murder of me. The British and Australian politicians would have used the ‘adoption court order’ to try and force me out of the EU, even if I had tried to ‘apply’ for French citizenship, while still having the complication of the ‘adoption court order’. I have essentially just been endlessly trafficked from jurisdiction to jurisdiction because of an illegal ‘adoption court order’. The Australian politicians obviously knew that was a problem before I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019 when Johnson became PM to illegally get ‘police protection’ for life. And these people spin adoption legislation !! The Murdoch family used the former British PM Blair spinning his father being an adoptee to secure adoption legislation favorable to the ‘historical activities’ of the Murdoch family history and then used the fmr Australian PM Abbott who claimed to have givn up his son that wasn’t his son, that they must have known, to try and secure continuing favorable adoption legislation for the Murdoch family who had historically trafficked me to the intelligence services.
It’s not really surprising I would want to have my officially renouncing the adoption court order etc formally officially recorded on my adoption court records and High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc because I am trying to… protect myself.
It seemed quite unusual to me that while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, an Australian born American citizen Murdoch, was running his media empire from ummm… inside New Scotland Yard !! in the UK (while of course controlling the political administrations in Number Ten) Of course the Murdoch family were not at all pleased to see me in Parliament Square, Central London, because that was a reminder I was trafficked by the Murdoch family to the intelligence services which is how the 1984 legislation in Victoria, that is based on me, came about.
The only way I can see to make adoptions legal and for adoptees to be able to in practice try and… protect ourselves (because we cannot rely on politicians, police or courts) is by adoptees being able to as adults officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were minors, in a witness statement formally and officially included in our adoption court records, without our needing the ‘approval’ of anyone else. There is no legal justification for anyone to stand in the way of an adult adoptee doing that which is not of itself a criticism of anyone else. The officially renouncing an adoption court order cannot be left to someone else to ‘approve’ because that makes an adult adoptee… illegally subject to whatever… suits anyone else.
It’s been a really difficult year, particularly not being able to campaign as I normally would after originally being diagnosed with cancer on 23rd August 2022. I remember I was sitting on the Number 16 tram at 6pm outside the State Library in the Melbourne CBD, when I got the phone call. It felt quite surreal to be told that during what was still pretty much peak hour in the middle of the city, with people all around me, but I had felt pretty ill, and several days earlier doctors at one hospital had wanted to transfer me from their A&E to another hospital, so I think they had probably known then. I had gone to an A & E over the previous weekend because I thought I must be having a really bad reaction to some new medicine but then it turned out it was actually cancer dramatically worsening. I think the reason I did not know I had cancer, when so many doctors in different hospitals said how could I not know I had cancer because it should have been obvious to me, in so many ways, is because I have been sooooo abused by governments. I am used to having to tough it out until I get better which obviously was not going to make the cancer go away. I said to one of the oncologists recently that when I go for a walk now to try and not only maintain, but improve some mobility regardless of pain, I then just fall asleep and they said that’s normal because my body is trying to recover from so much like challenging treatment, side effects and the recurrence of cancer. The recurrence such a short time after the major operation that was expedited because of the cancer haemorrhaging so I became blood transfusion dependant has been a lot to try and cope with, and move beyond. It was better from my point of view that the major operation was expedited rather than having to have another operation before that. I said I personally sort of try to now think that side effects from treatment for the recurrent cancer, that can sometimes be very difficult or challenging do not generally seem as bad to me when I remember the challenging experience of cancer haemorrhaging that was so immediately life threatening that I didn’t have any hope of doing anything about that myself. I look back and realise it took all my energy to actually speak on a phone to get help and that the voices speaking back to me sounded strange and drawn out and actually quite difficult for me to understand because by the time I knew I could not cope, I was finding it hard to stay conscious. I had only been released from hospital a few day earlier after a previous emergency hospital admission, so there were no real discussions about treatment etc because the repeated emergency hospital admissions meant that I was actually in the hospital for the third time before my first official… outpatient appointment was supposed to take place, that then happened while I was actually a patient in the hospital again. The cancer just took over and dictated events.
It is a strange situation whereby hospitals treat cancer as a serious illness but politicians and civil servants don’t generally really treat it as a serious illness unless of course they have it themselves. I have learned a lot in the past year about all sorts of medical things I had no idea about and of course everyone who has cancer has a different experience, because each case, like adoption, has a unique set of circumstances etc.
It does disgust me that politicians et al have taken…. advantage of such a serious illness or disability like recurrent cancer by illegally treating an adult adoptees right to officially renounce an adoption court order as a affront in the knowledge their idea an adult adoptee needs the ‘approval’ of someone else is a political… sham.
Anyway, the medical staff say I am doing really well in trying my best to manage the cancer part of the situation so it is the continuing illegal use of the adoption court order that is still having an unnecessarily adverse impact on my health that really is criminally negligent now. The criminally negligent use of an ‘adoption court order’ against me only continues to highlight why adult adoptees must be able to try and protect ourselves by having our witness statement officially renouncing an adoption court order etc formally officially included in our adoption court records and in my own case my lawsuits too. It’s kind of obvious the undeniable reality is I do not have an ‘adoption court order’ imposed on me because any politicians, police or courts have ever or do… ‘care’ !!!! in any way about my… health.
A senior politician did illegally use public office in the UK to torture and attempt to murder me, and then when that failed ditched his American citizenship to front the Murdoch family et al big Brexit to become FM and stalk me to force me out of the EU so he could become PM and illegally claim ‘police protection’ for life. The fact politicians did not care and did not do anything to protect me by freeing me from the ‘adoption court order’ is just another reason they cannot legally legislate the whole need for ‘approval’… sham that is essentially asking for ‘approval’ to be free from an abuser for goodness sakes !!!!
My adopted identity was only illegally leaked on Mothers Day 2006 in the UK so politicians et al could illegally publish whatever they liked, because I could not get an injunction to stop them doing that while I was illegally detained.
I have never voluntarily identified myself as an adoptee, but once my adopted identity was illegally leaked, I was really left with no alternative other than publicly saying I am opposed to the ‘adoption court order’. One of the other reasons my adopted identity was illegally leaked was because politicians wanted to be able to say I am a ‘public figure’ which I always said in the UK, was never true, because my adopted identity was illegally leaked by the press.
I speak for myself, just like other adoptees speak for themselves and no other adoptee speaks for or instead of me or in any way represents me. The facts are the Australian Attorney General’s Office was discussing adoption behind the backs of most adoptees when they knew there was a serious legal problem while I was in Parliament Square, Central London.
It’s not possible to say Australian politicians made any effort to ‘consult’ with any adoptee living overseas, because they were doing the exact… opposite which I now know was being hidden by the Commonwealth Attorney General’s office in Australia:
The appointment of a Sir Ken Jones from ACPO in the UK as DAC in Victoria, by Victoria Police, who offered him Australian citizenship too… most tellingly while politicians were illegally using an ‘adoption court order’ to try and deny I am an Australian citizen, all of which did not happen in a political vacuum devoid of knowledge of what was being done to me, beggars belief. There is for example the significant legal issues of the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc, and the covering up of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
I nevertheless learned by forcing the sham ss 131-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation off the statute books in the UK (that generated so many jury lawsuits related to my also being labelled an adoptee) that it is actually possible for a small group of peaceful campaigners to be successful.
A Dr Bickerdike (who has a financial conflict of interest) must have a very odd worldview to manipulatively and opportunistically ignore -in return for government funding- the starting point of any ‘counseling’ of adoptees by his ‘Relationships Australia’ must be legally obliged to officially recognize an adult adoptee does not need the… ‘approval‘ of anyone else to officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’:
McClelland obviously knows adoption legislation has not been fit for purpose for years, because it was way back in the seventies they acknowledged no fault divorces.
I do think the adoption legislation not just in Victoria or Australia, would have been changed years ago but for the fact the Murdoch family who are no strangers to divorce, do not want to back down on the double dealing behind the 1984 legislation.
I don’t personally approve of the… government funded ‘counselling’ about adoption that is in every way controlled by politicians (that is essentially just as ghoulish and damaging as public inquiries) because it is all just being used by politicians to try and ’sidestep’ the real and continuing harm being caused by ridiculously trying to say that just because someone is labelled an ‘adoptee’ as a minor we need the ‘approval’ of someone else to renounce that court order as an adult. I don’t personally understand how opportunistic government funded ‘counsellors’ square the starting premise of such an offensive proposition that is not only deeply offensive psychobabble and what I call quack-ology but is designed to continue and prolong already very serious harm to an adoptee because there is such a… cognitive dissonance with other adult decisions we do make. The academic arena who take government funding to spin an official narrative about adoption too, similarly have unanswered questions on that central legal point. I have always had… my own life to get on with as an adult, that does not include being labeled an ‘adoptee’ because of an ‘adoption court order’ that suits someone else.
It will never suit politicians or be the right time for them as far as they are concerned, to right the historical wrong of adoptions that could be made legal.
The fact governments deliberately failed to inform adoptees about the use of the banned cancer causing drug (DES) obviously does along with routinely withholding or destroying other medical information from an adoptee make the government legally liable for universal free healthcare of our own choosing. I find it so upsetting that it was just something else politicians swept under the carpet when it came to adoptees.
I find it completely unconscionable that politicians to this day refuse to make it mandatory to even inform people they are officially labeled an ‘adoptee’. There has to be someone that has to be responsible for properly informing people because every adoptee has the right to make a number of fully informed decisions (which is hard to do even if you do know you have officially been labelled as an ‘adoptee’ because there are so many secrets and lies the state tell about adoption.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 