Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: Premier Andrews et al) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: Re: Supreme Court Registrar: I obviously need written confirmation from the court it is clearly legally unsustainable & was -obviously- unlawful for the County Court to stop me having my own -witness statement- !!!! officially included in my adoption case 352, from 28th May 1963 confirming I have a) lawfully officially renounced the ‘adoption court order’ (before I was officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer in Australia) b) the torture & attempted murder of me in the UK was to illegally try and stop… jury lawsuits c) I am being illegally detained in Victoria, and Australia by politicians still illegally trying to use their clearly politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ !!!! for goodness sakes… solely because it is politically expedient… for politicians et al to illegally try & continue to live in a ‘state of denial’ (which further unraveled when I was in first in and out of hospital with cancer in 2022 & it could no longer be denied politicians had falsified state & federal records to falsely claim I owned property in Australia (so records had to be amended) because politicians are illegally trying to hide I am actually being illegally… detained in the country, while politicians had known since 2013 that my own home is officially in Breizh, France (03.08.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
__________
VICTORIA: ‘LIVING IN A STATE OF DENIAL’
It is undeniable the only reason politicians et al have illegally stopped my own witness statement !!!! from being officially placed on the court record in my adoption case 352 from 28th May 1963 that is supposed to be about me, is because it is… politically expedient for politicians et al to illegally continue to try and live in a ‘state of denial’.
I do not see why I would need to apply for any kind of court order from… another court to be able to have my own witness statement officially included in my own adoption case 352 from 28th May 1963, because… politicians are illegally trying to live in a ‘state of denial’.
I do very much like the State Library, although there is far too much vulgar historical revisionism to suit the political narratives and wallets of wealthy ‘benefactors’ that means in practice there is very little self awareness of how odd such continuing political allegiance to the institution of British monarchy can look, including with this politically delinquent display that I would known boasted about company fronts used by politicians and the intelligence services to launder adopted children’s identities:
I couldn’t honestly say the French government were that well behaved towards me in Breizh, France, but that’s most politicians and adoption, for you:
I loved living in my own home in Breizh, France for many reasons that had nothing whatsoever to do with politicians or civil servants in either Australia or France.
There’s one Premier (Andrews) covering up for another Premier (Cain) and of course the Murdoch family:
The reality was Barnett who literally posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO in 1984 when he used one spy scandal (Combe-Ivanov) to leverage legislation to illegally cover up another spy scandal (the Murdoch family trafficking me to the intelligence services) which had involved my being sent 12000 miles away as a teenager because it was about trying to avoid lawsuits that would be inconvenient to the Murdoch family et al. They obviously didn’t include their business interests in child trafficking in any application for citizenship in the United States. So of course they illegally interfered in my peacefully campaigning in the UK too, in Parliament Square, Central London where my having lawsuits there are and were a legal problem for their BSkyB deals for example.
One of the Murdoch family grifters from the UK called Frederic Michel who was a participant in the 2011 ‘scandals’ in the UK, is currently ensconced in the Elysee in France writing political scripts for the latest French President. On the plus side at least France was not involved in the Iraq War in 2003, and at least French Presidents can only serve two terms, although I don’t know how long Laurent Fabius can be the Head of their Constitutional Court. The guy who used to be head of their nuclear industry was a Bugat too (Alain Bugat). There is a historical pattern of Bugats in the always changing border regions of the Mediterranean, where the ever diminishing Catalonia must be one of the most contested spaces over centuries of wars, back and forth.
When is a Bugat, not a Bugat ?
I don’t personally know of any legal authorities or legislation that says an adult adoptee can legally be stopped from having our own witness statement… officially included in the adoption court record of our own case, that already exists and is not a new case. Clearly it should also be possible to do that without needing to return to Australia, because it is very straightforward that someone including a notary service in an embassy. While I was living in my own home in France, I had a notary in Germany, which I was visiting confirm an information request from the Australian government for a document that was dated 29th April 2015 that was sent by the Australian government to my home in France, although I did have to chase up a significant delay from the Australian government department.
The politicians are unlawfully creating unnecessary legal problems for adult adoptees by illegally… withholding a court certified copy of adoption court records so we could deal with it more simply in a court in another country, and indeed the firs time I saw what are only… photocopies that are not admissible in any court I know, were from the shifty political department called the ‘Adoption Information Service’ who are a department within the DOJ. It’s all legally very unprofessional and when I queried what was going on in July 2019 and asked to speak to their legal department in the DOJ they refused to identify a legal department in the DOJ which is just a nonsense. The politicians and civil servants are… recklessly blasé about an adult adoptee needing to return to Australia, because of court I was diagnosed with recurrent cancer while comfortably smug politicians and civil servants have ben living in their state of denial about the administrative omni-shambles that is their tick-box adoption racket, where politics very clearly comes before any semblance of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
There wouldn’t be too many adults voluntarily signing up to any politically motivated -court order- that stopped you from having your own witness statement officially included in the case records for goodness sakes.
This political posturing for votes !! sure is… deliberately… misleading… advertising about ‘equality’:
The Murdoch family vultures, who often say one thing in one country and the complete opposite in another country, depending on what is best for their bank balance, are no better paying off the cult of celebrity to keep parading adoptees as the latest must have accessory.
The sociopathic adoption ‘bureaucracy’ are unbelievably rude and offensive because all they care about is clocking in and clocking out each day, following orders from politicians, to collect their cash.
It is my… intention (although I would personally prefer to see the practice of ‘adoptions’ banned) to make adoptions safer, fairer and actually… legal for anyone, because adoptions obviously can’t be legal until and unless adult adoptees can actually in practice enjoy the basic right to officially renounce an adoption court order made while we were minors, without our needing to physically go/return to, pay money to or have the -approval- of the originating/any court which is just a cynical political ploy to try and sidestep jury lawsuits. The County Court administrative staff did literally treat me like a criminal, which does tend to bring ‘the administration of justice into very serious disrepute’ (and frankly is becoming more than a little tiresome after the disgraceful behaviour of their fellow politicians et al in the UK over for example the repealed ss132-138 SOCPA 2005 too) because it cannot possibly be illegal to have my own witness statement officially included in my own case 352. It’s soooooo obviously people just illegally ‘following orders’ from politicians and their mates who would obviously prefer to live in their… ‘state of denial’.
It is of course sadly not that unusual for the mostly self-aggrandizing political classes and their mates to recklessly and unlawfully try to legislate to make law abiding civilians run around and jump through the artifice of all sorts of politically constructed and legally meaningless bureaucratic obstacle courses. The retrospective 1984 legislation in Victoria, Australia based on me, and the 2011 legislation in the UK also based on me where the Murdoch family are the common denominator, are two examples.
The Murdoch family are of course very shy about remembering that while they were literally having me kidnapped from inside a court during… live proceedings, on 19th July 2007 (you can see why they might not like the public recording or filming such shocking… corruption in courts) to stop me giving evidence in… another case involving them (because they had originally trafficked me to the intelligence services etc) I helped force the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the libelous etc ss 132-138 of the Serious Organized Crime and Police Act 2005 off the statute books in the UK.
The Registrar in the Supreme Court should be able to remind the County Court of it’s legal obligations to… officially include my witness statement on my court record in my adoption case 352 from the 28th May 1963 and that I will also need a court certified copy of the original adoption order (instead of the photocopy from the ‘Adoption Information Service’) to file with my… jury lawsuit in the Supreme Court.
The situation has of course become much more serious and complicated since I was diagnosed with recurrent cancer.
A good thing about the relative simplicity of a witness statement officially on the court record officially renouncing the adoption court order, without needing to pay money to or have the ‘approval’ of anyone else, is that it puts all the rude and deeply offensive behaviour of too many politicians, civil servants and their mates like the Murdoch family, firmly in the past.
_____________
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 