Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: Premier Andrews) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: re: My lawfully officially renouncing ‘adoption court order’ that I do not need to pay money to !! or have the ’approval’ of anyone else incl. a court to do, that Premier Andrews is legally obliged to officially acknowledge & accept that should have been properly recorded by my witness statement being put on court record on 21st December 2021 in County Court Case 352 from 28th May 1963 because it is simply not legally sustainable to… exclude what is… intended to make adoptions safer, fairer &… legal for everyone (before I was officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer) instead of my being unlawfully arrested because of… Premier Andrews… political cover up that fmr… Premier Cain (who was also a friend of Murdoch family who trafficked me to intelligence services) had illegally based 1984 legislation in Victoria, Australia on me to illegally try & stop jury… lawsuits, (that led to my being kidnapped on 19th July 2007 from inside a Magistrates Court in the UK… during live proceedings, to stop me giving evidence in another case, also involving Murdoch family, before I was then illegally stopped while trying to give evidence in British High Court on 21st June 2010 etc in yet… another case involving Murdoch family using their queen Johnson who was illegally refusing to hand over CCTV of torture & attempted murder of me, after Murdoch family had published call on Sky ‘News’ on 19th July 2009 for me to be ‘removed’ without any caveats, before court was illegally closed to… public on 23rd June 2010 etc & Murdoch family henchman Lord Marlesford illegally used public office in House of Lords in July 2011 to demand more legislation against me… in UK, to illegally stop me going to Europe, which I did do, living in my own home in Breizh, France, that is a Mediterranean country I should obviously never have needed to leave to return to Victoria, Australia, in July 2019 to contest the ‘adoption court order’ only for Premier Andrews to make his … political appointment of Cain Jr as a County Court Judge, State Coroner & member of Victorian Judicial Commission) (01.08.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression, and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I am through my officially renouncing the ‘adoption court order’ that does not need the ‘approval’ of anyone else incl. a court,… intending to make adoptions, safer, fairer and… legal for everyone that adoptions cannot possibly be without the basic right of adult adoptees being able to safely officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ without needing to pay money to or have the approval of anyone else, incl a court.
It is simply not legally sustainable for politicians et al to continue to claim adult adoptees need the ‘approval’ of someone else, to officially renounce ‘adoption court orders’ made while we were minors.
The County Court was only legally obliged to include the ‘inconvenient’ facts in my witness statement (and has no legal authority to exclude) of a) my official renunciation of the adoption court order in my own Case 352 from 28th May 1963 and b) the fact of the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK and the political cover-up of that.
The County Court in Victoria, Australia did not have any legal authority to at any time, refuse to put my witness statement on the court record in Case 352 from 28th May 1963 that is, after all, about me, or to exclude anything ‘inconvenient’.
The only undeniable purpose of the 1984 ‘adoption’ legislation that was based on me, and was done at the expense of the basic right of… any adult adoptee to just officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ without needing to pay or have the ‘approval’ of anyone else, including a court was to illegally try and avoid lawsuits. The politicians knew adoptees like myself lived overseas (I was sent 12,000 miles away as a teenager to stop me giving evidence in any court) so thy knew the draconian adoption legislation from 1984 was in all the circumstances unreasonable. There was no actual legal impediment to stop me lawfully officially renouncing an ‘adoption’ court order while living in my own home in Reading, in the UK or in Breizh, France.
It was always entirely legal for an adult adoptee to at the most just have a witness statement filed on the court record in the adoption cases, which would have meant it would never have been possible to send me 12,00 miles away when I was a teenager. If I was old enough to send 12,000 miles away, I was old enough to put a witness statement on the court record in the adoption case 352, from 28th May 1963.
In practice the global multi-billion dollar adoption industry is, as it stands, completely unregulated, in any true legal sense, and subject to the political whims of any political administration, who still do not make it mandatory for courts to inform people they are adopted.
The only way it is possible to even begin to regulate and make adoptions of minors legal, is by acknowledging and accepting adult adoptees official renunciations of adoption court orders that we do not need to pay money to or have the ‘approval’ of anyone else, including a court to do.
I repeat that I would use compensation to have an office that makes and keeps an accurate and contemporaneous record for adult adoptees who want that of official renunciations of adoption court orders, and helps, supports and encourages adult adoptees who do that, because it is widely known that courts do not make or keep accurate and contemporaneous court records of adoptions.
It was obviously far from legal for politicians to legislate that adult adoptees would need to ‘apply’ to and physically appear in the same court that… rubber-stamped the original ‘adoption court order’ to have that court’s ‘approval’ ?? to stop an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were minors from a court that had never so much as followed any due process like giving an adult adoptee any… official court copy of the ‘adoption court order’. The most we get is a… photocopy (which is not considered legal tender in a court as an official record) of any court records that are filtered by political whims before being laundered through an obstructive and unhelpful ‘Adoption Information Service’ within the Department of Justice where politicians overtly made political appointments of people like a Ms Corrie McKenzie who was a political chief of Staff for ‘bunga-bunga’ Rudd (who by no-coincidence laundered a $1.4 billion brown envelope from Johnson et al in the UK, through Ingeus in 2011) now posing ‘off-shore’ as an Australian Ambassador to the United States.
The overt corruption in the global multi-billion adoption industry has only continued and flourished because politicians found it easier to allow themselves to be bought and paid for by the Murdoch family than show the slightest respect for the basic right of any and all adult adoptees of any race, religion, politics or none, to officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ without ridiculously needing the ‘approval’ of anyone else incl. a court who were only legally obliged to record any adult adoptees… decision.
The Murdoch family (who tell the Victorian Premier what to do, ie: they say jump and he says how high) have most profited at the expense of adoptees.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 