Donna Bugat -v- Murdoch family & Ors (ie: Premier Andrews) @ Supreme Court, Victoria, Australia: My lawfully as a responsible adult, officially renouncing (a clearly disproportionate) ‘adoption court order’ in 2021 (before I was officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer) that politicians anywhere are legally obliged to officially recognize without my needing to go to or having the… ‘approval’ of any court, will help clean up & make global adoption industry safer & fairer etc (because Premier Andrews et al… know Murdoch family bought & paid for legislative window-dressing based on me in Australia in 1984 & UK in 2011 to illegally try & stop lawsuits, that also highlights politicians state & federal ‘anti-corruption commissions’ like IBAC & NACC in Australia don’t pass sniff test in modern world where state & federal political parties & governments also do multi-billion dollar business deals with multi-national corporations like fmr Australian PM, FM & now Australian Ambassador to United States Rudd who laundered $1.4 billion from British government through Ingeus in 2011 in illegal efforts to stop lawsuits) that should be properly regulated by international law, with civilian-led International Civil Courts with choice of juries for compensation (28.07.2023)

My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.

It is a legal certainty that no-one has any legal standing to oppose an adult adoptee officially renouncing an ‘adoption court order’ made while a minor, that politicians are legally obliged to officially recognize without our needing to go to or having the… ‘approval’ of any court.
The Federal Australian politicians do not after all need to as adults, go to any court to officially renounce other citiznships they may have acquired through all sorts of means, to meet what it is somewhat doubtfully claimed s44 of a long out-of date constitution requires, which of course does not prohibit politicians re-acquiring citizenships after federal politics.
The long-standing global free for all in the multi-billion dollar adoption racket highlights a genuine need for civilian-led International Civil Courts with the choice of juries for compensation, because the likes of the Murdoch family who trafficked me to the intelligence services, and so arguably became the largest megaphone for the free for all of the adoption industry have literally built a global media empire at the… expense of adult adoptees having a genuine free choice to officially renounce an adoption court order made while a minor, without needing to go to or have the approval of a court anywhere.
The true legal reality is, all adult adoptees are legally entitled to have the free choice to officially renounce an adoption court order made while a minor, without needing to go to or have the approval of any court. The fact the 1984 legislation in Victoria, Australia is clearly disproportionate is self evident because politicians knew adoptees were sent and lived overseas, so should not need to return to officially renounce an adoption court order which means the legislation was not about the best interests of an adopted person as a child or adult. It was about government agencies and multi-national corporations illegally trying to avoid lawsuits.
Of course an adult adoptee can legally officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ made while a minor that is not contingent on suing for compensation too.
There should however be compensation available and it is right and proper that the Murdoch family and their companies who have profited most from adult adoptees not having a genuine free choice to officially renounce an adoption court order without needing to go to or have the approval of any court, should be legally liable for compensation.
In my own case, the Murdoch family specifically targeted me in… more than one country over the adoption court order, with the same intention of illegally avoiding civil jury lawsuits.
I would use compensation to have an official office to make and keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of adult adoptees officially renouncing adoption court orders, that are not for every adopted person, that adult adoptees should be helped, supported and encouraged to do.
The truth is the official recognition of adult adoptees officially renouncing adoption court orders made while minors, without needing to go to or have the approval of any court, will go a long way to cleaning up and making the global adoption industry safer and fairer.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)