Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: FAO ‘Human Ethics’ @ ANU: I am a ‘dissident’ adoptee & I have lawfully & officially renounced predatory & unsafe… coercive ‘adoption court order’ regardless of any legislation & constitutions (before I was officially diagnosed with ‘notifiable’ recurrent cancer) because there is reasonable suspicion torture & attempted murder of me happened in UK (along with refusal to hand over CCTV) because it is a legal impossibility to explain use of… coercive 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia, based on me, on any adult adoptee, that is only about protecting ‘reputations’ of politicians & Murdoch family who trafficked me to intelligence services, because all adult adoptees have an absolute legal right to make our own reasonable & responsible lawful decisions about what we want to do, without needing to leave our own families, friends & homes in other countries, to return to Australia to pay more money !! to & have the ‘permission’ of any judge in any court anywhere which is why I support having International Civil Courts with choice of juries (14.07.2023)
My own identity is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
FAO: ‘HUMAN ETHICS’ DEPT ANU
The legal reality is ‘adoption court orders’ and adoption legislation in Australia, as they stand, are… ‘coercive’ etc and unlawful.
I did not voluntarily return to Australia, and I am not voluntarily in Australia. The… only reason I am involuntarily in Australia is because of the predatory, unsafe and… coercive ‘adoption court order’ and adoption legislation.
It is after all a legal impossibility to explain WHY would I as an… adult adoptee, need to leave my own family, friends, or home in Breizh, France to return to the state of origin of what politicians call my adoption in Victoria, Australia to pay money to and ask the ‘permission’ of a judge in a County Court in Victoria “if” I can as a reasonable and responsible adult make… my own lawful decision to officially renounce a predatory and unsafe ‘adoption court order’.
The… political idea that I would need as an adult adoptee to return to pay money to and have the permission of a judge to make my own reasonable and responsible lawful decisions, is of course far more serious than any politician and academic publicly claiming “wind farms don’t work in the dark” without showing any “scientific” evidence.
It is simply not legally… sustainable for politicians et al to claim that all adult ‘adoptees’ cannot lawfully make our own reasonable and responsible decision to officially renounce an adoption court order made when we were minors that we could not agree or disagree with, without needing to leave our own home, or go to court or pay money to anyone else.
The unprofessional political language of ‘forced adoption’ that cynically seeks to minimize and sweep the criminal acts of child and human trafficking under the carpet, is not a legally recognized term or substitute for the correct identification of the criminal offence of child and human trafficking.
It is undeniable that any politician who publicly suggests that such practises… they call ’forced adoption’ are all in the “past” are knowingly being dishonest and misleading the public.
This is unscrupulous political woo (below) published by the ANU is obviously far worse than the controversy about wind-farms generated by the same… politician:
A ‘Human Ethics’ team at @ ANU would reasonably know, the only reason this obvious example of unscrupulous political dirty tricks posing as ‘academia’ (below) is funded by politicians illegally trying to spin the political language that what… they call ‘forced adoptions’ are all in the ‘past’ is to try and avoid… compensation for what is continuing and ongoing in… the here and now:
A civil jury would know the only reason the National Party backed the author of the political dirty tricks posing as academia to become a… politician is because it is a lot… cheaper than having to admit liability, and pay compensation to adult ‘adoptees’. There is obviously ‘no recognised defence’ in law for politicians offensively trying to suggest/legislate that adult ‘adoptees’ are not free to make our own reasonable and responsible lawful adult decisions. It is vulgar and opportunistic for a politician to exploit ‘adoptees’ for the personal financial gain of a politician.
This is just so cheap, vulgar and insensitive because ‘adoptees’ are not… chattels (adoption and surrogacy legislation are by and large cut and paste versions of slavery legislation) that people can have any old he/said/she said “opinion” about just like reckless global media barons:
The ‘human ethics’ team at the ANU might like to think very carefully about the use of the language about ‘withdrawal of consent’ because of course that is precisely what adult adoptees are illegally being stopped from freely doing:
It’s fair to say the author and politician has some oddly… political ‘opinions’ generally (of course it’s cynical of any politician to not encourage everyone to use clean renewable energy at home as much as possible because it can help give people greater independence from… politicians)
The money wasted on the vulgar and ghoulish… political opportunism of politicians… exploiting the situation of ‘adoptees’ for their own personal financial gain would have been better spent on making a constructive practical difference by funding an office to make and keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of renunciations by adult adoptees, who should be helped, supported and… encouraged.
I would use compensation owed to fund such an office.
The legal reality is there is no adoption ‘triangle’ because it is ‘adoptees’ who are the… victims of… politicians unlawful ‘adoption court orders’. A politician could not reasonably believe they have ‘legal standing’/locus standii’ to interfere in and undermine the reasonable and responsible decision making of an adult adoptee.
I was clearly unlawfully arrested in the County Court in Victoria on 21st December 2021 because I have lawfully officially renounced the predatory and unsafe adoption court order that I should never have had to return to Australia or go to any court to do.
I was not charged or prosecuted for any alleged offence and the police most definitely did not want to take a witness statement from me or bring me before any court. The situation of -why- I am in the country does not change depending on any court. The minute police had unlawfully arrested me and I had said okay I will have a lawyer thanks and the lawyer can witness my witness statement, they were de-arresting me, only to arrest me when I was open and honest and said I was going across the road to the Supreme Court to complain about what had just happened because I am not even voluntarily in the country and certainly did not even voluntarily go to the same County Court that did the dirty adoption deed. The police didn’t take me to a police station, but instead dumped me outside the fire station across the road from the Catholic Cathedral, writing I was ‘banned’ from the CBD for a day, without providing any relevant legal authority. The actions of the state would tend to bring the administration of justice with regard to what is called ‘adoption’ into very serious disrepute.
The politicians just cannot explain -why- I as an adult adoptee ever needed to return to or be in Australia because the problem is the ‘adoption court order’ and the legislation not me. The political idea an adult ‘adoptee’ needs to pay money to a court to extinguish an ‘adoption court order’ made while we were minors who could not agree or disagree, could easily be construed as… extortion.
The minute I walked into Parliament Square, Central London, the politicians, along with the Murdoch family who trafficked me to the intelligence services knew exactly who I was.
I did say Johnson was a wrong’un long before it became politically fashionable to say so.
I was the only person in Parliament Square, Central London, when the Murdoch family henchman and Times ‘executive’ and self entitled old goat, Lord Marlesford launched his political tirade, who the politicians had tortured and attempted to murder before being a little squeamish about handing over the CCTV to me.
I was legally sent this email (that is really all about the ‘adoption court order’)
It really wasn’t on my bucket list of things I really wanted to do, to a) return to Australia to b) face continuing… political persecution because of a predatory, unsafe and… coercive ‘adoption court order’ and to c) be diagnosed with cancer and then d) recurrent cancer !!
The minute I walked into the ‘Adoption Information Service’ at the DOJ in Victoria in July 2019, the Australia politicians knew exactly who I was too, because… the 1984 adoption legislation that was… based on me was intended to protect the ‘reputations’ of the Murdoch family who trafficked me to the intelligence services (the man called Barnett who posed as my godfather was Director General of ASIO at the time)
The Australian civil servants in London told me while I was in Parliament Square, Central London that they wrote reports for politicians and said “but the politicians don’t care”. I would have been astonished if politicians had said they “cared” because I was after all sent/trafficked 12000 miles away from Australia as a teenager to protect the ‘reputations’ of the Murdoch family etc that resulted in the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK. The former Australian PM Rudd who did not tell the truth about his resignation on 23rd June 2010, only cared about the big brown envelope he later got from the British government containing $1.4 billion dollars he laundered through a company called Ingeus, which is the only reason he is the Australian Ambassador to the United States.
The politicians who most people know have a propensity for messianic zealotry when saying they can legislate whatever they and their political parties and mates like in Australia, know they are being so two-faced because politicians can officially renounce any citizenship they like, just like royals can renounce a monarchy, that are all things people can be born into as minors too, and all without them needing to return to any country or go to any court anywhere to do.
There is nothing ‘wrong’ with and no ‘failure’ attached to making a reasonable and responsible adult… decision of not wanting to continue with an ‘adoption court order’ that is really no-one else’s business. It is and must be a personal… choice.
People who get divorced often remain friends, and sometimes like me, just didn’t want to be married in the first place. It wasn’t that I was opposed to the institution of marriage per se, but with all the huge ongoing grief and trauma caused by the ‘adoption court order’ meant that as an adult ‘adoptee’ I didn’t want something else like marriage, that politicians could use to interfere in my personal life.
It is in fact and law, politicians who are the ones standing in the way of genuine progress with regard to adoption, because it is very straightforward that politicians are legally obliged to officially acknowledge adult ‘adoptees’ can make our own reasonable and responsible adult decision to officially renounce an adoption court order without needing to leave our own family, friends or own homes or go to any court.
******
There has been such a profound contrast between so many medical professionals in hospitals who have helped, supported and encouraged me to optimize my quality of life, after being diagnosed with cancer and then recurrent cancer (I also have an ‘advanced care directive’ where I point out about adoption and my real identity) and the casual cruelty of self serving politicians still illegally trying to use a predatory, unsafe and co-ercive ‘adoption court order’ without my consent.
******
The ‘human ethics’ team at the ANU would be sensible to not take ‘sides’ with politicians… against adult ‘adoptees’ who are all legally entitled to withdraw consent to the use of an ‘adoption court order’ at any time without needing to… justify that to anyone.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 