Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I am a ‘dissident’ adoptee who has lawfully… officially renounced unfair & unsafe ’adoption court order’ (before I was officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer) regardless of any legislation or constitutions because most likely reason torture & attempted murder of me happened in UK, along with then refusing to hand over CCTV to me, was because no-one would ever be able to legally explain WHY would I need to return to Australia because of legally unworkable retrospective adoption legislation from 1984 that was even worse, based on me !! to try & protect ‘reputations’ of Murdoch family who trafficked me to intelligence services, instead of my just being able to make my own lawful reasonable & responsible adult decisions, so my own ‘lived experience’ as adoptee & peace campaigner informs me (along with failed Nato-Russia Council @ Rome Summit 28th May 2002) that what is undeniably missing in ‘International Law’ is an International Civil Court with the choice of juries, for civilian populations (13.07.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self-determination.
______________________
It is not legally complicated that as a reasonable and responsible adult adoptee, I was always legally entitled to officially renounce the ‘adoption court order’ without needing to go to any court or returning to Australia.
The British government and Murdoch family knew who I was when I walked into Parliament Square, Central London in the UK. And Australian politicians knew exactly who I was when I walked into the ‘Adoption Information Service’ in the Department of (In) Justice in Victoria, in July 2019, because -everyone- did know the retrospective 1984 adoption legislation was after all, based on me, because the Murdoch family and the intelligence services they trafficked me to, wanted to protect their ‘reputations’ which didn’t really work with the Iraq War either. The ‘adoption court orders’ are illegal ‘sanctions’ too.
I do also think the adoption legislation from 1984 breaches ’non-refoulement’ because it does constitute political… persecution of a ’specific group’ of people because so much of the legislation is unreasonable and unnecessary, so it cannot possibly be lawful.
It really is not at all legally complicated to have an office that is a… registry that makes and keeps an accurate and contemporaneous record of adult adoptees who have officially renounced ‘adoption court orders’ made when we were children that we could not agree or disagree with, that there is no legal need for any adult ‘adoptee’ to go to any court to do and can be done regardless of where an ‘adoptee’ lives.
Of course it doesn’t really make legal sense to have an International Criminal Court that is really just by and for politicians, without… first having an International Civil Court with the choice of juries for civilian populations.
The ‘he said/she said’ of the revolving doors of the ‘old boys club’ of politicians and global news media barons simply is no… substitute for the international law of an International Civil Court with the choice of juries for civilian politicians. It’s not really fair when a company like Murdoch’s can essentially go jurisdiction shopping, because the company is based in Delaware, which I think is the same state the latest United States President was a Senator from.
This is up there with cowardly things self entitled politicians will resort to:
I was at that time, the only person in Parliament Square, who the government had tortured and attempted to murder, who the government were illegally refusing to hand over the CCTV of that, to me. I had already been through so much…. trauma from being trafficked.
I went through a shocking ordeal of being repeatedly (unlawfully) arrested in the UK just so that politicians and press could illegally publish whatever they liked without my being able to get an injunction to stop that because I was illegally detained. So many people commented on how differently (as in unfairly) I was treated compared to other campaigners, and how politicians were so hateful towards me. And then I had to put up with the deeply offensive corruption of a Murdoch family henchman Lord Marlesford going on in the British House of Lords about me being in Parliament Square, Central London, at the same time, the Murdoch family withdrew from their BSkyB deal and another top cop had to resign when excuse me !!!! they are illegally covering up the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, which is legally speaking… exceptionally serious. I mean fancy an unelected self entitled old politician having a tirade about the person, me, they were illegally refusing to hand over the CCTV to, of the torture and attempted murder of me. It’s the most extreme form of ‘victim blaming’ possible.
It’s not even like I… chose, as a vulnerable child to be trafficked by the Murdoch family to the intelligence services.
I would be personally willing to at least ‘oversee’ an office (I would even pay for from compensation due to me) to make and keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of official renunciations of ‘adoption court orders’ (even though I have to just try and deal with one day at a time now because of the cancer and so on, that means I never know how I will feel etc) that should help, support and… encourage every adoptee who wants to officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’.
There is nothing ‘wrong’ with and no ‘failure’ attached to making a reasonable and responsible adult… decision of not wanting to continue with an ‘adoption court order’ that is really no-one else’s business. It is and must be a personal… choice.
What is simply completely unacceptable is for anyone, whether it is the ‘Adoption Information Service’ in the DOJ or any court to in any way … interrogate any adult adoptee about not wanting the ball and chain of an ‘adoption court order’ that politicians intentionally try and make far, far worse to try and get out of than any marriage.
I never wanted to get married and was quite relieved when I was divorced, not because I opposed the institution of marriage, per se, but because I didn’t want the government to use my marriage to interfere in my personal life too, because of so much trauma that was and has been and is still being caused to me by the ‘adoption court order’.
I don’t see why I should suffer the very serious interference of an ‘adoption court order’ that is completely legally unjustifiable, and has never caused me anything but huge grief. It’s been extraordinarily difficult while I have had cancer, because of course it’s simply not physically possible in my own case, to do everything I might have once done, while trying to progress all that. So of course politicians can take unfair advantage of an adoptee having cancer which is what they have been doing.
It’s revealing that the real… opposition to an adoptee officially renouncing an ‘adoption court order’ is not necessarily an ‘adoptive’ family but the politicians and the likes of the Murdoch family who are the biggest promoters of ‘adoption court orders’ that are clearly based on cut and paste legislation about slavery that… treats ‘adoptees’ like chattels. There are not three equal parts of what is called an adoption ‘triangle’ between an ‘adoptee’ and biological parents and people who pose as parents. There is a… victim called an ‘adoptee’. And we don’t all have ‘stock-holm syndrome’. It is a truism that when politicians are trying to sell you something that sounds too good to be true, like the ‘forever family’ of ‘adoption’ it probably is, because as it currently stands legislation about ‘adoptees’ is not about ‘adoptees’ ever having a… genuine and free choice.
The contrast between medical professionals who generally help, support and encourage me as much as they can which is not something I am really used to as an adoptee, and politicians who don’t help, support or encourage me in any way, could not be greater. I know my medical treatment so far, would have been much easier if I had not still had the burden of the unfair & unsafe ’adoption court order’.
Notes:
There is a reasonable suspicion the reason I was for example (unlawfully) arrested inside and outside a County Court in Victoria, Australia on 21st December 2021 (when I was just quietly sitting down, saying nothing, inside the court when I had like it or not… officially renounced the ‘adoption court order’) was because politicians knew they could not explain why on earth I would need to return to Victoria, Australia or go to any court, I did not voluntarily go to, to officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’.
I was amused/ bemused to see a picture of our tents in Parliament Square, Central London on an edition of a French/English dictionary bought while I was living in Breizh, France, because of course because I was there I knew which was my tent and when the photo must have been taken:
I said to the previous owners of my home in Breizh, France that the beautiful stone cottage built into the hillside, was like living in a luxury tent, but literally in my very own forest, which was very special.
It only became known when I was originally diagnosed in Australia with cancer in 2022 (which is a ‘notifiable’ illness) so people started asking all sorts of questions that both state and federal politicians had… falsified numerous records to try and make it appear that I owned property in Australia too which was clearly untrue, but was being used by politicians to try and absolve themselves of any kind of responsibility for my being in Australia. It was other people who had to correct those records for me, who also pointed out that the politicians were also responsible for stopping me from going home during the… global pandemic, which didn’t make any legal sense at all. Then a hospital made the medical call and said I was too ill from the cancer to travel anywhere, because I was blood transfusion dependent by that time. Sadly, for me, once I had a major operation and was trying to recover, and even begin to think about making a few plans which is a big thing to start to do, I was then diagnosed with the physical and emotional chaos of… recurrent cancer. Even then, such is the casual cruelty of politicians, they made no effort to officially recognise the legal reality I have officially renounced what is very clearly an unsafe ‘adoption court order’.
The unsafe ‘adoption court order’ is after all the only reason I am in Australia, where getting cancer and then getting cancer again shortly after was also most definitely not on my bucket list of things I must do.
The adoption legislation from 1984 is clearly legally unworkable, and even worse politicians knew was based on me, to protect the ‘reputations’ of for example the Murdoch family who trafficked me to the intelligence services. I did explain I was not voluntarily in the country and I only went to the court because the government said I had to, and I just wanted to leave the country and safely get on with… my own life. I was not legally obliged to agree and it was legally an impossibility for me to agree that the legislation from 1984 was legally workable because it was unreasonable to even say I had to return to Australia on the false pretext I would need to pay for and have the ‘permission’ of a judge so I ‘might’ be able to extricate myself from an ‘adoption court order’ but… only if I agreed to cover up what had happened to me.
The politicians 1984 legislation illegally reverses due process, with a phoney ‘application’ process that makes no legal sense, for an adult adoptee, but also because there is already a… live adoption case, an adoptee is legally entitled to file/attach a witness statement too. It’s not a ‘new’ case, but is instead, because of the fault of politicians et al, an ongoing case. The politicians phoney ‘application’ process (that would in my own case involves illegal retrospective legislation from 1984 anyway) to ‘revoke’ an ‘adoption’ but only… if you can or do go along with whatever politicians want, is illegally treated like a…. completely ‘new case’ which it is not. The 1984 legislation only illegally tries to ‘gloss over’/’sidestep’/cover up there were never any legal grounds to with-hold… court records from an… adult adoptee in the first place. The 1984 legislation is very significant legislative ‘over-reach’.
I just said when I was unlawfully arrested on 21st December 2021, that okay, I am exercising my right to have a lawyer, and a lawyer can… witness my witness statement (that I have officially renounced the ‘adoption court order’) and so then they hastily de-arrested me, only to then re-arrest me !! when I said I was going across the road to the Supreme Court to complain about what had just happened, which was disgraceful. I wasn’t taken to a police station, but was instead dropped off outside the fire station across the road from the Catholic Cathedral, and illegally ‘banned’ from entering the CBD for a day.
Talk about politicians using intimidation to intentionally ‘re-traumatise’ an adoptee. It was offensive enough to legislate to try and send us back to the same court that did the dirty deed in the first place. I had no doubt then that politicians were illegally trying to cover up my being trafficked.
When I subsequently spoke to staff in the Supreme Court they said why didn’t they take you to the County Court you were… already in, if they or the court had a problem. Exactly !
I had even gone to the trouble of previously asking the County Court for a hearing to get a permanent… injunction preventing the use of the ’adoption court order’ and had patiently waited while court staff had wasted hours before coming back with excuses about why they could not do a court hearing that day, so they knew adoptees are not legally obliged to just go along with whatever subsequent legislation politicians produce.
I also reasonably believe the reason the County Court did not want a hearing about my having a permanent injunction against the ‘adoption court order’ was a) because of the fact the County Court knew people did not need to ‘apply’ to effectively have a ‘new’ case to instead have ‘permission’ to ’revoke’ but b) that the County Court would have to itself explain why I had never even been given a court extract of the ‘adoption court hearing’ etc (even since I had returned in July 2019 the County Court had always made excuses why no-one was available and they did not make an appointment for me to view the court’s adoption… register) before I was sent 12000 miles away as a teenager to protect the ‘reputations’ of the Murdoch family who trafficked me to the intelligence services (the intelligence services were more the ‘receivers’ of the stolen goods, being me, rather than the stealers) but most of all…
c) The County Court must have reasonably known there were… no legal grounds to refuse giving me a permanent injunction preventing the use of the ‘adoption court order’ because what legal purpose could it possibly serve when I am an adult adoptee who did not want the ball and chain of an ‘adoption court order’ that in my own case had never been anything but trouble, and made me unsafe.
One of the biggest problems politicians faced and could well have been behind the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK, was how could anyone legally justify my needing to… return to Australia to extricate myself from an ‘adoption court order’ because of even worse, legislation based on me in 1984 to protect the ‘reputations’ of the Murdoch family and the intelligence services they trafficked me to.
How was a County Court judge in an injunction hearing going to… oppose my having a permanent injunction preventing the use of the ‘adoption court order’ that serves no justifiable legal purpose of any kind ?
How was a County Court Judge going to explain why -I- would even need to return to that County Court ? let alone in Australia, to do that ??
It was always a…. legal absurdity that an adoptee would even need to … return to Victoria, Australia to go through the uncertainty of the political lottery and obstacle course of a ‘revocation’ if you get lucky.
The only logical legal way is and was to ultimately just officially renounce the adoption court order that I could never have had to go to any court to do, that could have been officially recognised when I was still living in my own home in Breizh, France, and long before I was officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer.
Most people know politicians do have a propensity to behave in a messianic manner as though they can do no wrong, and can write any legislation they like.
My personal view is that possibly what is considered to be ‘government’ should really be more accurately defined as the revolving doors of an ‘old boys club’ of politicians, and (oddly) all male global media barons which is presumably based historically on primogeniture. Most people know politicians have a propensity to behave in a messianic way to claim they can legislate whatever they like which is simply untrue, as we proved with the repeal of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005.
__________________
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 