Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I have… already… officially renounced ‘adoption court order’ regardless of legislation etc, before being diagnosed with recurrent cancer, because politicians who covered up torture & attempted murder of me in UK incl CCTV knew I did not need to go to any court or return to Australia to make my own lawful adult… decisions about what I want to do (fmr Australian Attorney General 2007-2011 & now Federal Court judge & ‘Family’ Law Council Chair, McLelland also illegally sought to claim Crimes ‘Amendment’ Act on Prohibition of Torture etc 2010 meant politicians could legislate their way out of legal trouble by saying people also need ‘permission’ of a… politician like an Attorney General regardless of their… complicity, to bring a prosecution) are… standing in way of genuine progress in International Law incl ‘new Jerusalem’ of International Civil Court with choice of civil juries (05.07.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The politicians tortured and attempted to murder me in UK with knowledge and complicity of Australian politicians because I have obviously always been legally entitled to as an adult, make my own decision to… officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ without needing to go to any court anywhere or return to Australia. I was essentially ‘born into’ an ‘adoption court order’ as a minor, so I can officially renounce an adoption court order, just like politicians or royals who are born with citizenships or monarchies they don’t want can renounce them without needing to go to any court etc etc.
The torture and attempted murder of me (and the covering up of the CCTV) was intended to illegally try and stop me making my own lawful adult decisions:
The politicians etc are actually standing in the way of genuine progress, because the adoption industry can instantly be cleaned up, because politicians are legally obliged to acknowledge people adopted as minors can simply… officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ whenever we like as adults, without needing to go to any court or returning to the state/country of origin.
It is seriously… creepy that there are politicians in 2023 like for example Labour’s Ms Gallagher or Liberals Mr Littleproud actually publicly claiming that they can as politicians legislate (the likes of the draconian 1984 legislation in Victoria based on me) to… force people to as adult adopted people, stay as their ‘family’ as though ‘adopted’ people are simply ‘props’ who can be used to promote politicians and their cult of celebrity. There are even more two faced politicians and political parties in Australia when it comes to their claiming they have officially renounced additional citizenships (at least while they are in public office)
This is a significant legislative diversion by politicians, and for politicians:
Of course, the Attorney General’s Department does also know that he cannot legally introduce and use the… political language of ‘forced adoption’ that also falsely claims it is something that happened in the past that can now be swept under the carpet, to try and minimise the ongoing human trafficking going on. The only way it is really possible to make what politicians call ‘adoption’ legal is by adopted people being able to officially renounce the adoption court order as adults without needing to go to court or return to the state/country of origin.
An Attorney General’s Department et al (like the ‘Family’ Law Council) should not be introducing or hiding behind … political language like ‘forced’ adoption to try and minimize human trafficking that is… ongoing – there are… undeclared conflicts of interest in the ‘Family Law Council’ (incl in their published reports) – over money changing hands over ‘forced adoptions’ ) :
It is unconscionable that supposedly ‘adult’ politicians would perpetuate the legal ‘anomaly’ that adopted people cannot as an… adult !! freely make our own decision to officially renounce an adoption court order without needing to go to any court or returning to a state or the country called Australia.
The fact most politicians do in practice put themselves first (there are increasing numbers of politicians like the latest Australian PM & Victorian Premier making a ‘career’ out of being politicians because that is how they get rich) means most people would support an International Civil Court with the choice of juries, so the peace and harmony of the rule of law can be practiced more consistently. The politicians cannot legally subvert the peace and harmony of the rule of law with legislative diversions about needing politicians ‘permission’ to bring prosecutions regardless of politicians complicity in criminal acts. The politicians would not let me on a witness stand in the UK anywhere near a civil jury about anything to do with the torture of me because they knew a civil jury would question why politicians had not let me make my own… decisions.
The politicians have illegally… pressured me to not make… my own lawful adult… decisions about the ‘adoption court order’ AND the torture and attempted murder of me because of that.
My own ‘lived experience’ of being labelled adopted, and being a peace campaigner has informed me that what is missing in ‘International Law’ is an International Civil Court with the choice of juries.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 