Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: I had already for my peace of mind & certainty… officially renounced ‘adoption court order’ (regardless of any legislation etc) before then being… officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer, because torture & attempted murder of me happened in UK (along with illegal refusal to hand over CCTV of that to me) because politicians… knew I didn’t need to a) return to Victoria, Australia, to b) ‘apply’ to & have ‘permission’ of any court to as an adult… make my own decision !!!! to officially renounce ‘adoption court order’ made when I was a minor, so c) the political ‘adoption’ legislation must be corrupt etc, so I am joining myself to High Court case between Russian & Australian government over Canberra alleged ’lease’ made while I was in Parliament Square, Central London in the UK to a) confirm… official recognition of my renunciation & b) because I would agree to land being used for an office to help adopted people anywhere officially renounce ‘adoption court orders’ & c) as a ‘new Jerusalem’ of an International Civil Court with choice of juries (29.06.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The torture and attempted murder of me in the UK (and the cover up of CCTV) happened because politicians knew I didn’t need to a) return to Victoria, Australia & b) ‘apply’ to & have ‘permission’ of any court to make my own decision !!!! as an adult to officially ‘renounce’ ‘adoption court order’.
I have… already made my decision to… officially renounce the ‘adoption court order’ that politicians are legally obliged to… officially confirm.
This was… another example of politicians not only illegally trying to hide and minimize what happened, but to also stop me making my own… decisions !!!! about what I wanted to do about what happened (the person who sent the email had no legal standing to have possession of the CCTV and it is completely unclear how it ever came into his possession because I had… already asked for it, through the… criminal courts) :
I am therefore joining myself to the High Court case between the Russian and Australian governments over an alleged ‘lease’ made between them in Canberra (while I was in the even more contested space of Parliament Square, Central London in the UK and Johnson et al spun their phoney ‘Matryoshka’ called ’Democracy Village’ against Brian and I) so that a) my renunciation is… officially confirmed and b) I would agree to land being used as an office to help any adopted people anywhere who renounce ‘adoption court orders’ and c) a ’new Jerusalem’ of an International Civil Court with choice of juries.
This ‘possession’ argument fronted by Johnson and his Matryoshka called ‘Democracy Village’ was really about illegally stopping my having possession of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me to yet again try and stop me making my own… decisions about what I wanted to do:
The politicians also knew a civil jury would seriously question what was going on given there was… already CCTV from several years earlier, but on the same date (the date was a reference to several anniversaries that resulted in Murdoch getting US citizenship etc – after Murdoch family trafficked me to the intelligence services which you can be certain he didn’t include in whatever his ‘application’ for US citizenship was) where a… court had already grudgingly found (on 13th December 2007 which was the same day the fmr PM Brown was late signing Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty… because he had obviously already been advised he had to resign/ officially renounce his Premiership) the government had illegally edited audio and destroyed independent video footage.
It was very clear from the CCTV that they had to… previously hand over, that what is going on is without my… consent:
To be an interested party/to ‘join’:
When I was listed as an “interested party” in the UK, I just signed up to that when Brian asked me to and no-one disputed it (the case never progressed in a timely manner and was never concluded).
I remember when Brian asked me to join him in CO/11393/2007 (below) which became another important fact and legal point against the Johnson extravaganga in 2010 (CO1193/2007 involved when I had actually been unlawfully arrested on 23rd May 2006 to cover up I already had ‘the’… civil jury lawsuit from Mothers Day 26th March 2006) so politicians could publish their lies because I could not get an injunction while I was illegally detained (shows the government trying to re-run !! a ‘no case to answer from the Magistrates Courts about the same day in the High Court with a Hugo Keith KC and an ‘amicus curaie’ was a complete and utter political scam)
This case (that had not been concluded before or after Johnson’s extravaganza in 2010 including because a Southwark Crown Court was trying to avoid handing over a court transcript or recording to Brian and I) where I was an ‘interested party’ but entitled to a civil jury because I was unlawfully arrested, showed… an earlier case…
… by the government (below) based on the same day (fronted by a Hugo Keith KC & some supposed ‘amicus curiae’ called Mr C. ‘Sheldon’ who did not speak for or instead of us, and both had obviously illegally failed to disclose the most basic disclosure we were still then asking for in CO/11393/2007 above) was a complete and utter… political scam:
The two cases (above) were about the same day.
The 23rd May 2006 was another… political example of politicians having me unlawfully arrested, so they could… publish their lies through Murdoch et al, while I was illegally detained (I wasn’t bailed, summonsed, charged or prosecuted for anything because they were trying to cover up my Mothers Day 26th March 2006 civil jury lawsuit that proved they knew they were acting unlawfully thereafter):
I’m pretty sure a Hugo Keith KC and C. Sheldon KC et al knew what a Lord Tish had said hiding behind Hansard a few years earlier on the same date:
On 23rd May 2000:
“Lord McIntosh of Haringey: My Lords, I must be very careful what I say… 23 May 2000 : Column 635… the policy of successive governments that there should not be demonstrations in Parliament Square must be maintained in the future…“
The government had… already lied about me in what they… published on Mothers Day 26th March 2006, which they knew they couldn’t get away with doing before a civil jury in a court, which is a bit different from a Lord Tosh being able to mouth off while hiding behind Hansard:
All the actual legal records prove what was actually agreed on Mothers Day 26th March 2006, while I was illegally detained and … before I was released, was that I had a civil jury lawsuit over my unlawful arrest etc on that day.
In the Johnson ‘extravagaza’ which was about illegally continuing to refuse to hand over CCTV to me, the court just allowed anyone to ‘join’ themselves as ‘Democracy Village’… against Brian and I (although the cases were obviously completely different and had to be separated not just because ‘Democracy Village’ very specifically publicly claimed to be… occupying land to exclude others which we were never doing) and in HQ11X00563 involving the same people, who had again ‘joined’ themselves to me, I ‘won’ when except for Brian who I did campaign with who had died, they all withdrew, but I didn’t. The government made other legislation against me in ss 141-150 PRSRS Act 2011 but illegally failed to make a single disclosure in HQ12X03564, and so on and so forth.
My case was completely ‘distinguished’ from that of Johnson’s phoney ‘Democracy Village’ because Johnson was using the malicious prosecution to hide he was illegally refusing to hand over into my possession the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, which wasn’t the case for anyone else who was part of what was really Johnson et al’s ‘Democracy Village’ etc. Once the government had illegally refused to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, to me, the politicians were obviously not really bothered about handing over anything else, because the priority is covering up what they had… already illegally done, and why.
I remember that Australian public officials in London who told me they actually wrote reports for Australian politicians that the politicians “don’t care” (although the politicians… did care about covering up the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, because that’s the only way the former Australian PM, FM and Ambassador to the US, Rudd was able to launder $1.4 billion dollars through Ingeus) while Rudd et al were of course also, like Johnson et al, such good friends with the Russian government too, at that time.
It is legally unsustainable for politicians to try and stop adopted people making our own decisions as adults to officially renounce an adoption court order made when we were minors, regardless of where we live, or any legislation, treaties, constitutions and monarchies.
I know from my own experience of being diagnosed with recurrent cancer that an array of medical professionals have continuously helped, supported and encouraged me as I have tried to work through so many overwhelming physical and emotional difficulties, to make my own… decisions, while going through onerous medical treatment/s that obviously have seriously debilitating side effects too, so I can try and “optimize my quality of life”. This has taught me there definitely needs to be an office that helps, supports and encourages adopted people every step of the way too, when for our own peace of mind and certainty we make our own adult… decision !! to officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ to “optimise our quality of life” too. In both instances, there are no two cases that will be the same, but what I now know is there can and should be help, support and encouragement for both.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 