Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I have already for my own peace of mind & certainty… officially renounced ‘adoption court order’ politicians et al always legally obliged to immediately… officially recognize my doing, incl before I was… officially diagnosed with recurrent cancer & without my needing to go through onerous uncertainty of any court & regardless of where I live, or any legislation, treaties, constitutions or monarchies (so politicians et al knew I was for example unlawfully arrested inside & outside County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 despite never being summonsed, charged or prosecuted, for renouncing ‘adoption court order’ politicians illegally control with their secrets & lies to try & stop lawsuits against them, while state & federal politicians also tried to hide I could not legally be obliged to leave my own home in Breizh, France & return to County Court in Melbourne, or Australia, by also falsely claiming I own property in Australia) so I am also ‘joining’ myself to High Court ‘proceedings’ over Australian ‘lease’ made with Russian government in Canberra (while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, in UK) because I would agree to land being used as ‘new Jerusalem’ of International Civil Court with choice of juries (28.06.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I was ‘born into’ adoption as a minor, so I have always had the absolute legal right to at any time, as an adult, officially renounce the ‘adoption court order’ that is controlled by politicians, for my own peace of mind and legal certainty, without needing to go to court, or return to Australia, just like politicians and royals can renounce citizenships or the monarchy they were ‘born into’ without needing to go to court etc etc.
It has always been a ‘legal absurdity’ for politicians et al to claim I have never been old enough to enjoy having the peace of mind and legal certainty of making my own decision to officially renounce an ‘adoption court order’ controlled by the government, yet I was old enough as a teenager for people to illegally try and force me to officially join the intelligence services who ‘raised’ me (to try and force me to officially sign an ‘Official Secrets Act’ so what goes on could be covered up) or be sent 12000 miles away as punishment etc etc. I would never have worked for or joined any intelligence services because my own very straightforward priority has always been to have my own identity officially recognised and to renounce the secrets and lies of the ‘adoption court order’ controlled by politicians.
The draconian adoption legislation from 1984 that was based on me and made after I was sent 12000 miles away as a teenager because I refused to… officially join the intelligence services who had ‘raised’ me sets out the secrets and lies of an unreasonable obstacle course of continuing uncertainty that falsely claimed I would need to return to Australia and go to court and have the permission of a court that would involve my agreeing to whatever politicians wanted, like my not bringing a lawsuit !!!! if I wanted to have any chance of extricating myself from an ‘adoption court order’ that is controlled by politicians through always changing legislation etc. The secrets and lies of politicians have never been able to explain how draconian adoption legislation that means I would have to leave my own home in another country and return to Australia and agree to not bring a lawsuit against politicians et al over the adoption court order to have any chance of being released from the adoption court order that is controlled by politicians, is lawful and proportionate.
Of course it was in fact, always entirely natural for me to as an adult want to enjoy having the peace of mind and legal certainty of making my own decision to renounce the secrets and lies of an adoption court order controlled by politicians.
The multiplicity of the secrets and lies of the adoption court order that is controlled by politicians, inevitably began to unravel when I was in Parliament Square, Central London and politicians repeatedly had me unlawfully arrested etc !! so they could publish whatever lies they liked through their ‘news’ media while I was illegally detained because I obviously could not get an injunction to prevent them publishing their lies through the ‘news’ media while I was illegally detained. The reality is sometimes what is called journalism can be a crime if it is used by politicians like ‘journalist’ Johnson to arrest and detain someone to illegally stop that person having an injunction to stop politicians publishing their lies which is what repeatedly happened in my own case (ie: Mothers Day 2006, 23rd May 2006, State Opening 2010, and 16th January 2012) which is obviously very serious.
This political spin about “possession” (below) was used to hide illegally continuing to refuse to hand over to my possession the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, so that I could make my own decision about what I wanted to do about that too:
(In the UK, the unscrupulous likes of Lynton Crosby wasn’t just covering up the ‘adoption court order’, or my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, or the government refusing to hand over to my possession the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me so I could make my own decision about what I wanted to do about that too, just for ‘journalist’ Johnson)
I think we know ‘journalist’ Johnson wrote this (below) for the Daily Mail when he was spinning the Matryoshka of his phoney ‘Democracy Village’ he illegally used against Brian and I, because they didn’t report what… I said in the British High Court on the witness stand, under oath on 23rd June 2010 which the Daily Mail then ‘doorstopped’ me in the lift about outside the court, when I was leaving the court, that no-one ever did deny in any court on the witness stand or under oath:
It’s a… legal impossibility to explain how ‘journalist’ Johnson avoided being put on the witness stand and cross examined.
The only way that ‘adoption court orders’ could possibly become legal is if anyone labelled adopted as a minor has a genuine choice as an adult to at any time, renounce the ‘adoption court order’ without needing to go to any court, because then politicians cannot use ‘adoption court orders’ made when someone was a minor that we could not agree to or disagree to, to continue to control us, as an adult by always changing legislation etc to suit themselves.
The politicians draconian adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia from 1984, was based on me, as was politicians ss 144-150 PRSR Act 2011 in London in the UK (after I helped force repeal of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 and had ‘won’ HQ11X00563 etc)
A ’new Jerusalem’ of an International Civil Court with the choice of juries, could be built on leased land in Canberra.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 