Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: FAO Victorian Director of Public Prosecutions: This is to notify your office, I have already legally & officially renounced politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ inside & outside County Court in Melbourne, before I was diagnosed with recurrent cancer because I am obviously legally entitled regardless of where I live, incl. in my own home in Breizh, France to the legal certainty of making my own decision as an adult, instead of being subjected to the unreasonable uncertainty of the political obstacle course of bullying and criminal harassment, invented by draconian adoption legislation from 1984 based on me, so I have also notified Vic Pol who unlawfully arrested me three times inside & outside County Court on 21st December 2021… because I officially renounced the ‘adoption court order’ that I am suing them, incl because I did not voluntarily leave my own home in Breizh, France, to go to the County Court in Melbourne, where I obviously nevertheless had a licence to be (23.06.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The politicians only persist with their political language of ‘forced adoptions’ for the purposes of damage limitation because politicians obviously would reasonably know they do not have any legal standing/locus standii to force ‘adoption court orders’ on anyone labelled adopted when we become adults.
I was sent 12000 miles away as a teenager (and probably would have been dumped in the UK when I was four years old if it had been possible) precisely because it was illegal to use the ‘adoption court order’ on me, before that abuse of process was then compounded by the unreasonable uncertainty of the obstacle course of the draconian adoption legislation from 1984 when I lived overseas. It is obviously unreasonable to for example legislate to force someone to then leave their own home overseas and return to the state in Australia as part of an uncertain obstacle course of questionable legal validity.
The idea that politicians are genuinely trying to redress anything is a complete and utter lie, because the political language of ‘forced adoption’ is a merely a political exercise in damage limitation, and buying time.
The true legal reality of the situation is that it can only really be remedied by anyone who is labelled adopted being able to renounce the adoption court order when we are adults, regardless of where we are living. I don’t personally care which government department is designated for that purpose.
The continuing political white-washing of divide and rule etc (that also ignores that in practise there is state and federal interference by politicians and government departments) is also being facilitated by a faceless ‘committee’ because of course there is a political cover up about much, including that I was unlawfully arrested inside and outside the County Court in Melbourne three times, because I have officially renounced the ‘adoption court order’.
This is obviously a complete and utter lie (below) because politicians ( I rang the phone number the Premiers constituency office gave me which was the Dept of the Premier, and found out politicians) are ‘sidestepping’ the fact it is politicians who are still trying to illegally use ‘adoption court orders’ on people labelled adopted, because politicians hide I was unlawfully arrested (it is obviously unreasonable for me to ‘comply’ with for example the 1984 legislation):
Its obviously quite ‘exceptional’ to force an any adopted person to leave my own home in another country and return to Australia, on the false pretext I needed to return to Australia to go to court, while in reality politicians make up excuse after excuse, after excuse, that doesn’t even make any sense.
The government never informs anyone, let alone anyone who was living overseas of anything:
The true legal reality is politicians would have had to publicly legislate to notify every single person who is adopted that we would be arrested, regardless of if we lived in Australia or overseas, if we officially renounced the adoption court order at any time as adults, which they obviously did not do. At most people who still lived in Australia could be summonsed for illegally officially renouncing the adoption court order as an adult, but even that would have been disproportionate.
And let’s remember the politicians are still not a) notifying everyone who is adopted that they are adopted and b) people like myself were sent overseas without an official court extract from the County Court register of the adoption hearing because otherwise I could have challenged it overseas too)
The politicians, police and courts had the opportunity to at most summons me to court if they wished to legally argue anything. I was never legally obliged to agree to however they wanted to abuse me, with an ‘adoption court order’. I would have been legally entitled to have any decision to prosecute me for officially renouncing the adoption court order reviewed, because it could not possibly have been legal, proportionate or in the public interest. At the very least what happened with my unlawful arrests inside and outside the County Court on 21st December 2021 was… entrapment !! too.
The Adoption Information Service in the DOJ are perpetuating the political fraud, because they cherry pick photocopies of whatever suits the politicians at any given time. The first time I ever saw any of what were only photocopies of any alleged court documents in my adoption case was at the AIS in July 2019 when I was forced to return to Australia. The AIS then lied claiming I had not gone to a third meeting with them, they never made and still did not explain why they had simply not sent whatever photocopies they claimed were outstanding by email to me so there was no dispute what was in my possession or not, which they never did do, so they did always act in bad faith, about quite a lot.
The politicians are obviously also intentionally causing a lot of emotional damage, with the government only funding organisations who are trying to victim blame the adopted person because no government funded organisation in Melbourne has ever been able to explain to me, let alone rationally why I should have had to… return to Melbourne and… go to the County Court and no organisation taking government funding ever offered to accompany me to the County Court because it is obviously so unreasonable to for example make someone living overseas return to Melbourne as part of a seriously unreasonable obstacle course that has not even handed over the most basic disclosure of an official court extract from the court register, which is quite different from cherry picked photocopies from the AIS. It is a matter of fact the people running the agencies who accept government funding in Australia based on the political language of ‘forced adoptions’ completely ignore the problems the 1984 legislation causes for someone like me who was living overseas. No one in the agencies getting government funding has considered how disproportionate it is that I was forced to return to the state of origin and be homeless, to try and sort out the mess caused by the unlawful ‘adoption court order’ to my life. The fact that I was then homeless during a global pandemic, when I was still stopped from living in my own home, didn’t bother any government agency.
I even went to the County Court in Melbourne one day, with the limited photocopies of what I had been given in July 2019 and asked for an immediate hearing for an injunction (which people are supposed to be able to do) to prevent the adoption court order being used against me and the court staff just made excuses. I explained the uncertainty and unreasonableness of the draconian adoption legislation from 1984 that I say was a political sleight of hand to avoid lawsuits is legally unworkable in practise because it sidesteps so much, like the real lives of people labelled adopted. The County Court staff also refused without lawful excuse to make an appointment with the person they say had access to the court register for adoptions because they were obviously persisting in obstructing the administration of justice over my having an official court extract from the court register, including to take to another court. The politicians are misleading adopted people that we have to go to the County Court in Melbourne and apply for whatever suits politicians, because the Supreme Court are supposed to be able to issue Habeas Corpus Court Orders for free. In my own case, I already have a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 in the UK, so I should have been able to use that when I was campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London. The other significant legal problem of course is the County Court in Melbourne are also illegally stopping an adopted person putting our own witness statement on the court record in our cases, despite the fact the adopted cases only exist because of the adopted person.
There was a whole ‘landmark’ case in the UK where I was maliciously prosecuted by a fmr MP, Mayor of London, FM and PM Johnson while he was also a paid journalist and dual citizen, to illegally stop my having possession of the CCTV of the torture and attempt murder of me, in the political cover up of the 1984 legislation in Australia.
Vic Pol unlawfully arrested me because the politicians and courts can’t legally explain what they were doing. I explained I wasn’t even voluntarily in the country or at the court (that I obviously had a licence to be in, because it is politicians who said I had to go to that court) and the unlawful arrest inside and outside was obviously entrapment etc. When I said I wanted a lawyer to witness my witness statement officially renouncing the adoption court order, the police de-arrested me, then tried arguing the toss that it would be a trespass to go to court which is obviously untrue because I have always been a) legally entitled to have the proper paperwork so I could also progress my case elsewhere b) and am not legally obliged to agree with the 1984 legislation in Victoria, that I was entitled to have on the court record in a witness statement and in a hearing.
It was seriously illegal for politicians and courts to have Vic Pol unlawfully… arrest me to illegally stop my official witness statement renouncing the adoption court order being for example on the court record and in a court hearing because I should clearly have always been able to renounce the adoption court order while still in my own home in Breizh, France and without needing to go through any court proceedings at all.
I didn’t know at the time I was being assaulted by Vic Pol, that I had cancer, and I explained the situation and showed them my home was overseas and how unreasonable everything was, and despite their having every opportunity to calmly take a witness statement from me, they didn’t. In fact they compounded the harm being caused by their threats, intimidation and assault by arresting me again, when I said I was going across the road to the Supreme Court to make a complaint about what had just happened. I was then bundled into a police wagon and left outside the fire station opposite the Catholic Cathedral and told (it was written too) that I wasn’t “allowed” in the CBD for twenty four hours. My personal view is that what happened even just on that day, is seriously corrupt and no politician has ever apologised. The political interference became obvious when a Ms Corrie McKenzie who was a former Chief of Staff to the former PM Rudd when I was in Parliament Square, tried covering up my being assaulted by Vic Pol at Southern Cross Station in July 2022 when I was still trying to leave the country, when I now know I was by then very seriously ill with cancer. (I had an emergency operation for cancer in September 2022 – there were a series of medical complications – before the cancer returned earlier this year, which forced the specialists hands in terms of my needing to have further onerous medical treatment despite the medical complication/s which it was hoped could be avoided)
There was a political cover up about my being stopped from living in my own home during the global pandemic because when I discovered in May 2022, the state government had lied and said I owned property in Australia, to try and cover up what was going on, when I was then in hospital and had a major operation and all the various government agencies were trying to pass the buck, it emerged the federal government had also been lying about my owning property in Australia too, so that all had to be amended and I was given social housing to try and recover from cancer, because I am as the true legal situation stands unable to live in my own home etc.
In my own case I already knew the reality politicians did not care about my health because they had already illegally refused to give me possession of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, in the UK, and of course a Sir Ken Jones from ACPO in the UK was installed by politicians in Vic Pol and offered Australian citizenship while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, to help try and cover up my lawsuits in the UK, in Australia too because they are linked because they all relate back to the real life consequences for me of the unlawful ’adoption court order’ (I suspect from what has been said to me at various times, it’s entirely possible there was an exchange in other police officers between the UK and Victoria, so that there were Vic Pol police officers working with Westminster Council when I was in Parliament Square, Central London and won for example HQ11X00563. The British government claimed all sorts about where they said people involved in court cases had moved to) I found it extremely offensive that when I was forced to return to Australia in July 2019, that Sir Ken Jones then slithered back into the country to continue committing perjury. I mean he knew about the corruption between politicians and the most senior police… in the UK !! when I was in Parliament Square, Central London, which he was trying to hide… before he was in Victoria, Australia.
It was fairly ‘unconventional’ for politicians to have me unlawfully arrested in the UK, so they could… publish whatever they liked through the same global (oddly all male) ’news’ media there is in the UK -that is essentially the same in Australia- without my being able to get an… injunction to stop the publication of false and malicious lies, because I was obviously detained – which is a very a real example of the ‘class system’ in practise which is by definition corrupt because it only promotes… inequality. One of the Murdoch family hires in the British House of Lords, called Lord Marlesford was trying to introduce a private members bill !! against me in the House of Lords at the same time the Murdoch family withdrew from the BskyB deal, after I had also really won HQ11X00563 by then, when the Murdoch family illegally used House of Lords Hansard as another way to lie to the public about court proceedings)
I am obviously claiming substantial additional damages for the continuing unlawful use of an adoption court order against me after I was diagnosed with recurrent cancer and having to undergo further onerous medical treatment. A reasonable and rational responsible adult, would know, that what is only politically motivated persecution obviously adversely affects my health.
It would clearly be unjust to say I would need to go to any court… again to officially renounce the adoption court order, so I think the Director of Public Prosecutions in Victoria, can provide a valuable public service by confirming that I cannot be arrested or prosecuted for an adoption court order, I have… already officially renounced, that politicians, police and courts have no choice but to accept.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 