Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: My ‘Concerns Notice’ for Premier Andrews et al: I know… I have not done anything wrong, so I reasonably believe only reason I am not already free from politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ which continues to illegally be used against me by politicians who insist my adopted name is officially… published in documents instead etc, even despite my now being diagnosed with recurrent cancer is because of ongoing easily identifiable injustice, that a) saw me sent overseas as a teenager without necessary official extracts from County Court register so I could easily challenge it in courts elsewhere too, before b) politicians et al have then illegally tried to retrospectively apply Orwellian 1984 adoption legislation from Victoria (based on me) to illegally try & avoid lawsuits, incl because it can also be used to illegally try & exclude Australian citizens from Federal politics too before c) British & Australian politicians further escalated ongoing injustice by having me repeatedly unlawfully arrested in Parliament Square, Central London solely so my adopted name could illegally be leaked to and published by the press with other false information, because I was obviously unable while illegally detained, to get a court injunction etc, to prevent publication (ie: Mothers Day 26th March 2006 etc) while they inevitably then illegally covered up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 & refused to hand over possession to me of CCTV of torture & attempted murder of me, so I could be free to make my own choices & decisions that apart from having ss 141-150 PRSR Act 2011 legislation in UK then based on me too !! also means likes of Labour’s Rudd is now Australian Ambassador to US, while Tories Johnson is also unfairly provided legal & other protections that mean he can return to public office etc too (16.06.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
‐‐—–
I reasonably believe it is completely unlawful for politicians to continue to officially insist on publishing my adopted name in official documents, in the knowledge I have taken all “reasonable steps” to be free from a clearly politically motivated adoption court order.
I haven’t done anything wrong so there are no legal grounds for me to not have already been immediately released from the what is undeniably the politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ maliciously used against me.
Premier Andrews is legally obliged to “put up” and provide evidence for a court before at the very least a civil jury of my having done something so wrong that means I have not been immediately released from the politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ or to “shut up” and peacefully facilitate my immediate release from the adoption court order along with compensation that includes universal unlimited free healthcare of my choosing and a contribution of $1.4 billion dollars financial compensation that I would use to help set up an office to help other people be free from ‘adoption court orders’ along with campaigning for an International Civil Court with the choice of juries to help try and stop the trafficking of vulnerable children.
My ‘Concerns Notice’ for Premier Andrews et al: I know I have not done anything wrong, so I reasonably believe only reason I am not already free from politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ despite now being diagnosed with recurrent cancer is because of ongoing easily identifiable injustice, that a) saw me sent overseas as a teenager without necessary official extracts from County Court register so I could easily challenge it in courts elsewhere too, before b) politicians et al have then illegally tried to retrospectively apply Orwellian 1984 adoption legislation from Victoria (based on me) to illegally try & avoid lawsuits, incl because it can also be used to illegally try & exclude Australian citizens from Federal politics too before c) British & Australian politicians further escalated ongoing injustice by having me repeatedly unlawfully arrested in Parliament Square, Central London solely so my adopted name could illegally be leaked to and published by the press with other false information, because I was obviously unable while illegally detained, to get a court injunction etc, to prevent publication (ie: Mothers Day 26th March 2006 etc) while they inevitably then illegally covered up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 & refused to hand over possession to me of CCTV of torture & attempted murder of me, so I could be free to make my own choices & decisions that apart from having ss 141-150 PRSR Act 2011 legislation in UK then based on me too !! also means likes of Labour’s Rudd is now Australian Ambassador to US, while Tories Johnson is also unfairly provided legal & other protections that mean he can return to public office etc too.
It is only politicians who are insisting on the politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ being used against me:
The Premier is unlawfully suggesting by repeatedly having me unlawfully arrested at the County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 (which is a… continuation of what happened in the UK that also included Premier Andrews and Rudd’s appointment at the DOJ of a Ms Corrie Mckenzie who was previously Rudd’s chief of staff so she had an undeclared conflict of interest) a) that I did something… wrong by going to the County Court so I could immediately be released from the politically motivated adoption court order (the AIS in the DOJ doesn’t have any of the necessary… official extracts from the court… register about the adoption court order that it is only possible to get directly from the court who always refused to even give me access to that register with endless excuses that the right person was never there, because the court is instructed by… politicians to instead retrospectively spin the political woo of the Orwellian adoption legislation from 1984 in Victoria) and have a new passport to leave the country and return to my own home in Breizh, France, while there was also a global pandemic. I was not even voluntarily in the country and certainly didn’t voluntarily go to the County Court who did the dirty deed of the politically motivated ‘adoption court order’. I knew I was unwell at that time, but I did not yet know I had cancer, which was not officially diagnosed until August 2022, which was before I was more recently diagnosed with recurrent cancer.
** The continuing… official use of an adoption court order against me, that in being forced on me, against my will, suggests that I have done something wrong, which is not true, is defamatory etc etc etc ** (I had while sitting in the County Court… previously asked for an immediate court hearing, that anyone is entitled to do, for an… injunction to in my case, stop the adoption court order being used)
I don’t personally reasonably believe that there is anything anyone who is labelled adopted by an ‘adoption court order’ could do that can give any legal grounds for not being released from an ‘adoption court order’.
It is seriously illegal for politicians to pass draconian adoption legislation in Victoria, that can also be illegally used to exclude Australian citizens from Federal politics by imposing dual nationality through ‘adoption court orders’ because politicians dishonestly claim adopted people cannot simply take “reasonable steps” to renounce either an adoption court order and, or any dual citizenship without seriously onerous court proceedings, unlike Federal politicians who only need to claim they have taken “reasonable steps” to while in politics renounce for public consumption dual citizenships they can like a former politician called Cormann reclaim when they leave Australian politics, when he went to OECD. There are so many politicians like Labour’s Senator Gallagher, or the former WA Premier, who have, or have had very serious undeclared conflicts of interest over politically motivated ‘adoption court orders’.
The politicians have quite deliberately been seriously misleading… the public generally by pretending politicians have legal standing they do not have and could not possibly have with regard to adoption court orders when people labelled adopted become adults. It’s seriously unscrupulous to use the fact someone is a vulnerable minor to impose something so onerous as an adoption court order that politicians claim can automatically continue into adulthood without the agreement of the person labelled adopted by the Adoption court order. The politicians just use the fact a vulnerable child obviously cannot object to what really is a politically motivated adoption court order, to illegally try to continue to impose that court order on someone as an adult, forever. The politically motivated ‘adoption court order’ does not encourage critical thinking, equality or independence, because people who want to stay adopted are not discriminated against and expected to give reasons for wanting to stay adopted.
It was clearly… seriously illegal for politicians to have someone arrested !! and all that involves, solely so politicians et al can leak false information that is published by the press because obviously someone cannot get an injunction etc from a court to stop the information being published, while being illegally detained by a government. There is the same so called ‘Westminster political system’ and by and large the same news media in Australia that there was in the UK.
The only reason Johnson did not find himself on the witness stand in the High Court being cross examined on 21st June 2010 was because I was illegally denied legal representation because a Paul Harris SC was really working for Starmer who had horsetraded his way through Doughty Chambers to become DPP so in practise Johnson and Starmer were a double act protecting each other, by illegally preventing my having possession of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me. Johnson was well and truly legally and politically… compromised long before Brexit, and Australian politicians have helped protect him.
This ‘landmark case’ (below) was really all about refusing to hand over… possession to me, of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, because politicians are illegally trying to stop me being released from what is clearly a politically motivated ‘adoption court order’:
The deliberate refusal to hand over possession to me of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me has undeniably illegally prevented me from making my own choices and decisions, resulting in… ongoing profoundly adverse consequences for me.
….
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 