Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Australian PM Albanese & Victorian Premier Andrews & Murdoch family et al know that while I have been diagnosed with recurrent cancer, they spin s44 of Australian Constitution for… public consumption, claiming politicians (& Murdoch) made/make “reasonable efforts” to renounce dual nationality themselves, without needing to go to court, while they know it is actually illegal to impose discriminatory & politically motivated… ‘adoption court orders’ on Australian citizens that impose foreign nationalities that are then illegally used to bar Australian citizens like myself, labelled adopted, from Federal politics, including by illegally using other unreasonable & onerous conditions etc, that Federal politicians et al are not subject to from Orwellian 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria (& that phoney case about “possession” of Parliament Square, Central London was really about Rudd, Johnson & Starmer et al illegally stopping me having… possession of CCTV of torture & attempted murder of me because of unlawful conditions imposed on me by adoption court order & Orwellian 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, that was based on me) (15.06.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful from of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
_______________
There is a huge difference between health professionals who generally try and help me manage the numerous problems of being diagnosed with recurrent cancer, and politicians and civil servants who continue to intentionally harm me with the politically motivated adoption court order, using the draconian adoption legislation from 1984 based on me.
I was unlawfully arrested so politicians could illegally leak my adopted identity, with false information, without my being able to go to court to get an injunction to prevent that:
It has obviously been incredibly difficult for me to try and manage the diagnosis of recurrent cancer while not living in my own home in Breizh, France.
The Victorian government put in place a sequence of events with the politically motivated adoption court order and the Orwellian adoption legislation from 1984 in Victoria, Australia that was based on me (to illegally try and avoid lawsuits) that has always recklessly caused me prolonged life threatening harm.
The politically motivated malicious prosecution about possession of various parts of land in Parliament Square, Central London, was really about continuing to illegally stop me having lawful… possession of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me:
(The most Europe/ECHR could have done in our case/s, where politicians just replaced ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, legislation based on Brian with ss 141-150 etc PRSR Act 2011 legislation against me, is remit our cases/lawsuits to at the very least civil juries with our having legal representation too, because the ECHR could not replace our right to at the very least, a civil jury)
It has become legally arguable that politicians spin the dual national Federal political woo over s 44 of the Australian Constitution (that they do not really practise themselves) to… prolong the unlawful imposition of adoption court orders that impose foreign citizenships -often different from those of the adopted person- because someone in Victoria, Australia labelled adopted is illegally stopped by the Orwellian 1984 adoption legislation from simply taking “reasonable steps” incl without going to court, from renouncing the adoption court order or any foreign citizenships.
It is instructive that politicians and political parties spin/ only pay lip service to s 44 of the Australian Constitution for public consumption by claiming they make “reasonable efforts” to renounce dual nationality, while they know it is illegal to impose politically motivated… adoption court orders including foreign nationalities that can be used to bar someone from Federal politics while also imposing numerous other onerous and arbitrary conditions.
The British and Australian politicians illegally stopping me having lawful… possession. CCTV of tortur and attemptd murder of me:
(In reality the politicians spin the ‘reasonable steps’ to renounce dual nationality- in the knowledge any nationality that is renounced while in politics can be returned – like with Mr Cormann- to maintain their political status quo. In fact the former PM Rudd was beholden to a foreign government like the UK, without being a dual national when he was Australian PM, because the real reason he promoted the politically motivated “mutual obligations” while PM in Australia, was because he was a financial beneficiary of private contracts with the British government. The only way private companies are guaranteed profits is from a guaranteed client base through the weasel words of “mutual obligations”. Rudd knew they couldn’t have me on welfare in the UK, while I had outstanding lawsuits there involving him too, while the Murdoch family, Rudd really did work with because they were behind my being trafficked around the world, which meant I stood in way of Murdoch’s BSkyB deal, which is why the Murdoch henchman Lord Marlesford resorted to false reporting of live lawsuits in Hansard in the House of Lords, that they knew they could not repeat in a court before a jury. The House of Lords Hansard from July 2011 and January 2012 is clearly false and malicious because I won for example HQ11X00563. Its slightly more problematic for Rudd to explain how he collected $1.4 billion dollars he laundered through Ingeus, at that time.
The politically motivated staged “possession” case:
Of course the true legal reality is people in Australia, should like elsewhere, really be able to choose whether or not they vote for someone who is a dual national. It is undeniable the former PM Rudd was beholden to a foreign government without being a dual national when he was Australian PM.
It is self evident politicians have no legal standing to legislate to continue to arbitrarily impose adoption court orders on people like myself labelled adopted as children, when we become adults. The only purpose of the politically motivated draconian adoption legislation from 1984 is for politicians et al to cynically try and illegally avoid lawsuits, including with civil juries, by falsely claiming people have to return to a state in Australia, and go through an onerous and uncertain obstacle course in a court that ‘might’ free someone from being forced to stay adopted.
The staged politically motivated distraction of a trial by media to hide Johnson et al were never entitled to stop my having… possession of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me:
The proper process is that people labelled adopted only need to make reasonable efforts to notify of a renunciation of an adoption court order, and any separate renunciation of any additional citizenships that people can choose to do or not do.
Its not possible to legally challenge the illegal aspects of legislation without being publicly identified, because as I proved, the government in the UK did and would with the knowledge of the Australian government, unlawfully arrest me… solely so politicians could maliciously illegally leak my identity, and publish whatever they liked without my first being able to get an injunction to stop them publishing their lies.
There are so many politicians, senior judges and the cult of celebrity who have actually acted in Contempt of Court over supposedly sealed court records about adoption, to publicly name people labelled adopted, while people labelled adopted are still minors, and which the adult strangers did solely for getting some free publicity for themselves. There are too many politicians, judges and those from the cult of celebrity who have used the fact people are minors to identify them as adopted, that shows they have no … respect for the… privacy of any adopted people.
It is possible the people who posed as my parents intended to dump me in the UK when I was four years old, because by then they knew I had a little sister from the same parents, in Australia, but in any event, I was sent away from Australia as a teenager, because it is a straightforward fact, if I had had the official court extract from the County Court Register of the adoption hearing, that even if I had still been forced to leave Australia as a teenager, I could have challenged it all in a court in another country, also without having to return to Victoria, or Australia. The British government endlessly destroyed my DNA when I was in Parliament Square, Central London, because it obviously does not match their official version of who I am.
The politicians having me unlawfully arrested (ie: 26th March 2006, 23rd May 2006, 25th May 2010, 16th January 2012 etc)… solely so politicians could illegally circumvent my having injunctions to prevent them maliciously publishing false information, was seriously illegal.
The politicians in the UK did with the knowledge of Australian politicians, repeatedly have me unlawfully arrested solely, so that while I was being illegally detained politicians and civil servants could maliciously publish false information about me, that was always… intended to harm me. It was clearly seriously illegal for politicians to arrest me, as a member of the public, solely so politicians could publish false information, they knew I was unable to legally challenge in a court… before it was published. I was always being illegally prevented from going to a court… before the false information was published.
Of course, in terms of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that I helped repeal, all the public records show the politicians, press and British monarchy somehow ‘forgot’ to mention the salient point that prior to what was really the political window dressing of that legislation, there was in existence an illegal agreement articulated in the House of Lords on 23rd May 2000 to ban peaceful freedom of expression in Parliament Square, London.
(It is a matter of fact, that contrary to the supposed Australia Act 1986, the British monarchy do illegally interfere in politics because they signed legislation -the GLA Act 1999- purporting they could legislate to transfer public ownership of public spaces to themselves, so I do not reasonably believe they acted in good faith either with the 1999 referendum on the monarchy in Australia while the Blair government was legislating all sorts in the UK)
The staged political proceedings over “possession” of Parliament Square, Central London, was really about continuing to illegally stop me having… possession of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
The politicians and press were obviously very selective in what they published, because they covered up that I have a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, along with the refusal of the British government to later hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
It is self evident a counsel called Paul Harris SC imposed on me in June 2010 who I had never met or instructed in a “high profile case” illegally failed to disclose on the court record, the reason he withdrew from representing me on 23rd June 2010 was because he really acted for the British Labour so called Leader of the Opposition Starmer at Doughty Chambers, who was at that time DPP, because it is a legal impossibility to explain how CCTV that belongs to me ever came to be in the… possession of Johnson et al who have illegally refused to hand it over in what was really a double act between Johnson and Starmer. The only reason Johnson avoided being called to give evidence and cross examined in the High Court at that time, was because of the contrived “dithering” of Starmer’s SC Paul Harris from Doughty Chambers. The fact Paul Harris SC illegally failed to declare his conflict of interest on the court record, did not provide the legal grounds for me to be denied legal representation. The politicians and press did inevitably ‘misreport’ what later took place in proceedings in courts because of course Lord Neuberger et al did not have any legal right to interfere with or prevent Brian and I having legal representation, which was supposed to be a matter for the Legal Services Commission. No-one was ever able to say that Brian or I were in any way at fault for Blair et al’s so called human rights lawyers withdrawing either during or on the day before court cases. The lawyer Jan Luba who I also never met or instructed did not speak for or represent me either, because he represented the phoney ‘Democracy Village’ who were being used to illegally stop my having possession of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
(Of course politicians in the UK are directly responsible for illegally refusing to have official recordings of proceedings in Magistrates Courts in the UK, so there can be no dispute over who said, what, when and why)
I have when asked, since I was forced to return to Australia signed several statutory declarations, that are not disputed, including one that was signed and witnessed by a police officer. I did properly report that on 31st December 2019 an unknown male who was very angry, made an unsolicited phone call threatening me, that my ‘adoption case’ would never go to/return to court etc etc. The politicians and civil servants do not stop people who do not want to be forced to stay adopted from being endlessly threatened etc.
I reasonably believe that I only need to make “reasonable efforts” to … notify (and that I have already properly notified the Supreme Court in Victoria too) of my renouncing the adoption court order, which is not dependant on wherever I live, because of course there are no legal grounds to say I would need to go to a specific court like the County Court in Victoria which would in all the circumstances be unreasonable anyway. It’s unreasonable to claim someone adopted in Victoria, Australia, would need to return to Victoria, Australia to go through an uncertain process that might not result in the end of the adoption court order.
The Victorian Premier made a member of the Cain political family who are also responsible for the 1984 legislation a County Court judge and state coroner after I returned in July 2019, before they rebranded a tennis arena too.
It was the… County Court who illegally failed to give me an official court extract from the court register of the adoption hearing etc… the 1984 legislation, (which it is arguable could not be retrospectively applied to me) because politicians knew an official extract from the ctual County Court register, could be used in other courts, including in other countries. The AIS in the DOJ in Victoria, lied when they said I did not attend another meeting in 2019 to get further information, they knew they could send me by… email. I am obviously not known for voluntarily going into government buildings generally given a pre-existing refusal of politicians to hand over CCTV of what goes on behind closed doors. A jury would not think it was a mere co-incidence the AIS lied about a meeting, while Rudd’s former Chief of Staff, the political appointee a Ms Corri McKenzie who is not a civil servant, was at the DOJ, with an undeclared conflict of interest because it was straight out of the political playbook in the UK, because the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me could also have been sent to me by email.
I am legally entitled to $1.4 billion dollars compensation that should also act as a deterrent so that politicians are discouraged from doing do what they do to me, to anyone else. I would personally use compensation to help establish a universal office to help other adopted people streamline the process of notifying of renouncing an adoption court order, so what is the global multi-billion dollar industry of trafficking vulnerable children, much of which is labelled ‘adoption’ for political reasons, can no longer continue as the political free for all.
______________________________
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 