Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: The “peak toxicity” of onerous medical treatment for recurrent cancer is remarkably similar in many ways to the “peak toxicity” of the hypocrisy of political parties with Australian Federal politicians, towards my having my renunciation of adoption court order properly registered without my needing to return to Australia or go through court proceedings, while present & former Labour & Coalition MP’s like Gallagher and Cormann could have their renunciation of foreign citizenships registered (& sometimes returned when they finished politics) without needing to return to other countries or go through onerous court proceedings in other countries, while I have always been legally entitled to have my… renunciation of County Court adoption court order from Victoria, Australia, immediately registered with for example my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 in the UK and or with a Victorian Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in Australia too, without my needing to physically attend a court in person, or go through any legal proceedings and regardless of where I live (or the refusal of the County Court in Melbourne to provide to me, in a timely manner with…. official extracts of the court… register of hearings etc for use in another court incl overseas, that I have only had since July 2019 some photocopies of, from unhelpful AIS in Victorian DOJ of alleged County Court adoption documents) – instead of being forced to go through the onerous, unfair, and unreasonable, uncertainty of ‘applying’ to a County Court in Victoria, Australia that was only ever really about politicians et al trying to avoid lawsuits & includes being forced to return to the state of Victoria & country of Australia) while Australian born Murdoch who traded his Australian citizenship for money should have his American citizenship reviewed, or I should have a green card as compensation too, because I doubt Murdoch declared his family interest in child trafficking (09.06.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The “peak toxicity” from onerous medical treatment for the diagnosis of recurrent cancer does have some remarkably similar features to the “peak toxicity” of the hypocrisy of politicians towards people like myself, also being forced against my will, by politicians, to stay labelled adopted. The “peak toxicity” of politicians and onerous medical treatment for recurrent cancer can literally make you seriously ill.
It has never been a… legal problem to facilitate an easily accessible and legal process to guarantee someone labelled adopted can have a renunciation of the adoption court order properly registered without needing to go through any court proceedings, because there are civil court agreements made and registered outside any court proceedings all the time. The problem is political and about political over-reach by politicians et al who are then trying to avoid lawsuits. I have some unwanted experience of that with the draconian adoption legislation in 1984 in Victoria, Australia that was based on me because identifiable people wanted to avoid lawsuits, and then ss 141-150 & 151 of the PRSR Act 2011 in the UK for the same reasons, where the two same people involved are Murdoch and me.
The politicians are still acting illegally while & despite knowing I have been diagnosed and going through onerous medical treatment for recurrent cancer, because I have always been legally entitled to have my… renunciation of County Court adoption court order from Victoria, Australia, immediately registered with for example my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 in the UK and or with a Victorian Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in Australia too, without my needing to physically attend a court in person, or go through any legal proceedings and regardless of where I live or the refusal of the County Court in Melbourne to provide to me, in a timely manner with…. official extracts of the court… register of hearings etc for use in another court incl overseas (I only have since July 2019 some photocopies from unhelpful AIS in Victorian DOJ of alleged County Court adoption documents) – instead of being forced to go through the onerous, unfair, and unreasonable, uncertainty of ‘applying’ to a County Court in Victoria, Australia that was only ever really about politicians et al trying to avoid lawsuits & includes being forced to return to the state of Victoria & country of Australia) because/in same way Federal politicians in Australia like the toxic hypocrisy from Labour’s Gallagher who has undeclared conflicts of interest so would not give freedom to anyone to renunciate adoption, but personally benefits from having been able to automatically have renunciation of foreign citizenship registered by Home Affairs in UK, without needing to return to the UK or go through any court proceedings there (and in the case of Australian & Belgian dual citizens another toxic hypocrite, called Cormann from the Coalition who is now head of OECD had Belgian citizenship returned when leaving Australian politics, all of which didn’t affect their biological family members) while Australian born Murdoch who traded his Australian citizenship for money should have his American citizenship reviewed, or I should have a green card as compensation too, because I doubt Murdoch declared his family interest in child trafficking.
If I had always had the official court extracts of the adoption case/hearings from the County Court register I could never have been sent 12000 miles away as a teenager, or forced to return, based on the false pretext of draconian adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia from 1984 that was based on me, by identifiable people who had undeclared conflicts of interest and want/ed to avoid lawsuits against them.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 