Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: FAO Victorian Victim of Crimes Commissioner who is legally obliged to facilitate my immediate release from County Court adoption court order with free uncontested Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Court Order because I could not possibly need to attend any court to give reasons, incl after being diagnosed with recurrent cancer etc etc (I have already explained in witness statements, draconian adoption legislation from 1984 in Victoria that falsely claims people need to pay money to & have permission of strangers incl courts to be released from an adoption court order was based on me, after I was sent away from Australia as a teenager because Murdoch family et al who trafficked me to intelligence services are/were illegally using legislation to try & stop… lawsuits which obviously happened to me in UK too when ss 141-150 & 153 of PRSR Act 2011 was also made based on me, after I helped repeal ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 which was made based on Brian because he opposed political sanctions imposed on children… before 9/11 & Iraq War – ie: refer UK email officianados Hugo Keith KC & Piers Doggart KC) (02.06.2023)
My own identity is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
There clearly needs to be a genuinely easily accessible legal process that actually benefits everyone who is labelled adopted, instead of just those who want to stay adopted.
If the Victorian Supreme Court need any court extracts from the County Court… register the Victim of Crimes Commissioner will need to organize that because the reality is people like myself who were incorrectly labelled adopted to cover up my being trafficked do not always want to go to or cannot go to a court in the country the adoption court order originated. This can include because we live in our own homes in other countries, and or are ill like I have been diagnosed with recurrent cancer etc and people can be undergoing onerous medical treatment too etc etc. There is no genuine purpose in making people labelled adopted physically go to any court to be released from an adoption court order.
It is self evident that the likes of a Ms Falkingham and a Ms Corri McKenzie (who was Chief of Staff to fmr Australian PM, FM and now Ambassador Rudd for goodness sakes) who flitted from the DOJ to the NDIA in Victoria, are not civil servants, and have no interest in serving members of the public. so they have not been honest in properly informing people who have been labelled adopted by politicians we must have the choice to have a free uncontested Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Court Order to immediately release ourselves from adoption court orders, instead of paying money to go through the uncertainty of a political obstacle course in the County Court over the 1984 adoption legislation based on me that is undeniably really only all about trying to circumvent lawsuits (by falsely claiming without any valid legal grounds people need to pay money to and give reasons to the County Court to get permission to be released from an adoption court order) The reason I was unlawfully arrested for the second time at the County Court on 21st December 2021 was because I was honest and said I was going across to the Supreme Court to complain about what happened and the County Court knew I wasn’t responsible for (for example) the County Court repeatedly and illegally refusing to give me access to the court… register to get an… official extract of the alleged court hearing about the adoption court order in Case 352 on 28th May 1963, that I was always entitled to have to use in a different court including in a different country. The not so informative ‘Adoption Information Service’ located within the DOJ cherry pick information (for political reasons that suit politicians and their political apparatchiks like Falkingham and McKenzie who are not civil servants) so people are at most fobbed off with a few photocopies and not official extracts of court records/the court register. I never even saw any photocopies of any alleged… court records until July 2019 when Falkingham and McKenzie were illegally covering up a complete set of records should have been given to me, before I was sent away from Australia as a teenager that I wasn’t given because it would have been difficult to force me to leave then. The 1984 legislation in Victoria that is based on me was only made for a political, rather than a legal agenda, so the politicians, County Court and DOJ et al are not trying to help adopted people by staying silent on the fact the Supreme Court do free Habeas Corpus Court Orders that should be able to immediately release people labelled adopted from adoption court orders without anyone labelled adopted needing to give reasons, or even go to court.
The Livingstone and Johnson administrations both illegally failed to disclose emails from for example 8th March 2007 in numerous cases (that both Hugo Keith KC and Piers Doggart must have known) along with the Johnson et al illegally refusing to hand over the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me:
The case above had illegally failed to disclose these emails:
Hugo Keith just ‘forgot’ to disclose 8th March 2007 emails in this case too:
I was kidnapped from inside a court during live proceedings on 19th July 2007 (between 4th and 27th July 2007 above) to stop me giving evidence.
The 8th March 2007 emails were illegally withheld in CO/11193/2007 below which was never concluded (I properly complained in High Court in Johnson’s malicious prosecutions in for example 2010-2011 that he was illegally trying to ‘overtake’ this case below etc:
There was just a lie fest in the UK with politicians like Livingstone and Johnson as Mayors of London illegally using Treasury Solicitors like a Hugo Keith KC and Piers Doggart KC who do inquiries too (which are designed to publicly produce a result that has been agreed in advance) to hide they illegally failed to comply with basic disclosure of politicians emails behind our backs to top cops in for example CO/11393/2007 that both Johnson and Livingstone illegally tried to overtake, with Johnson also illegally failing to hand over CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me. Hugo Keith illegally forgot to disclose Livingstone et al’s emails in …. as did everyone in CO11393/2007 which I properly complained in the London High Court that Johnson was also illegally trying to overtake. Hugo Keith KC boasted he was off on his holiday to the Bahamas thanks to the superfluous pay per page bundle he delivered when the British government were dishonestly trying to say the top cop had at some unknown time delegated authority (which he never suggested in my case about Mothers Day etc, or in his own published biography, which was further contradicted by… emails from Livingstone et al, Hugo Keith illegally failed to produce, along with the Hansard from the House of Lords on 23rd May 2000. Brian and I simply handed up a skeleton argument to Lord Pip et al that “nothing was prescribed by law” so the court ruling in ended up consisting of a threat that we had better agree terms or else. The emails from Livingstone et al highlight that Piers Doggart KC looks very dodgy giving victim status and free legal representation to the quisling Livingstone !! in the supposed undercover inquiry in the UK when it was Livingstone illegally using undercovers !! while Mayor of London (which Piers Doggart knew himself in July 2007) Johnson and Livingstone obviously both used the… same undercovers and the same legislation like ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005. Their difficulty in hiding what they did was the openness of the way we campaigned. and the fact they knew they could not repeat their lies before a… civil jury. It’s not for me to explain the ‘mystery’ of how a Ms Glass who went from being a London Commissioner for what was previously called the IPCC in the UK, to being the Victorian Ombudsman, in Australia, while somehow ‘missing’ Livingstone et al’s emails.
What was lurking in the background of cases in the UK, was the fact I was trafficked from Australia, which is why politicians were falling all over each other to illegally stop any civil jury lawsuits. I have been through a lot because I was illegally sanctioned by a corrupt adoption court order when I was a small child, that has resulted in my being trafficked around the world.
The benefit of a free uncontested Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in Victoria, Australia, is that I am immediately released from the adoption court order, which is the priority, and can then… separately pursue any lawsuits that arose because of it, because it doesn’t have to all be dealt with together.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 