Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I am trying to optimize my quality of life after recurrent cancer diagnosis, which means having my own identity… officially recognized too…so I am legally entitled to… official extracts from County Court… register in Melbourne of a) adoption hearing Case 352, 28th May 1963 & b) County Court having me unlawfully arrested twice on 21st December 2021 to illegally stop me filing my own witness statement in adoption case about me !! or my going to Supreme Court etc because 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria while based on me, cannot mean anyone being limited to going to legal absurdity of County Court in Melbourne who illegally refuse to let me file my own witness statement (fmr Australian PM & FM Rudd who is now an Ambassador knew he did not have legal immunity from prosecution in… UK either over torture & attempted murder of me & could not retrospectively rely on British legislation incl ss 141-150 &… s 153 of PRSR Act 2011 then also made against me, when he knew he was also illegally concealing CCTV… before & when he accepted $1.4 billion from Johnson & Murdoch et al in UK laundered through Ingeus with British government -Ingeus ‘business’ relied solely on… government contracts – while illegally trying to sidestep HQ11X00543 & HQ12X03564 etc incl with juries (01.06.2023)
My own identity is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
It is not for me to explain why the County Court in Melbourne illegally stopped me from filing my own witness statement in an adoption case (352) about me, and worse by having me unlawfully arrested twice, including to illegally stop me going across to the Supreme Court to complain. The Victorian… Police Minister at the time always refused to explain, and of course no adopted person should ever be arrested for trying to file a ummm… witness statement in our own case.
It is self evident it is a legal absurdity for politicians to claim someone who politicians have labelled adopted can only “apply” to extract ourselves from being forced to stay adopted, in a court that ummm… refuses to let the person labelled adopted file our own witness statement !! in a case about us, involving the very serious legal issue of an adoption… court order.
The politicians made the 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia based on me (although it affects other people too) after I was sent away from Australia and was living overseas, for the purposes of their trying to circumvent lawsuits because people who are forced to stay ‘adopted’ are really being trafficked.
I helped repeal ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation in the UK that was illegally made against Brian because he opposed… sanctions imposed on Iraqi children too before 9/11 and the Iraq War happened. The British government then made legislation in 2011 in the UK, that was against me too, to also illegally try and retrospectively give legal immunity to the fmr Australian PM and FM Rudd who is now an Australian Ambassador in s 153 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011. The DPP at that time was Starmer (now the leader of the British Opposition and double act with Johnson when he was Mayor of London too).
It is strange/unusual but true that the former Australian PM and FM Rudd could have been prosecuted… in the UK for the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK that happened because draconian adoption legislation from 1984 in Victoria, Australia was based on me. Rudd knew he did not have legal immunity over what happened to me in the UK that happened because of that 1984 legislation in Victoria, Australia. Rudd knew he could not have avoided at the very least civil jury lawsuits.
The Murdoch family, Rudd, Johnson and Starmer were up to their ears in it all (Murdoch got his American citizenship on the significant date of 4th September, in 1985):
It’s a legal impossibility to know how the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, ended up with this person who never had any locus standii, and could hav snt the CCTV to m by email (I was not even ever legally obliged to be in the UK to have the CCTV):
Rudd obviously knew he was intentionally covering up the existence of the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK… before he illegally laundered $1.4 billion through from Johnson and Murdoch et al through Ingeus. Ingeus was far from being a successful commercial enterprise with customers who support them, instead a predatory organisation that relied solely on unusual government contracts based on the worst kinds of victim blaming… quackology.
Murdoch was shouting the loudest and lying the most in the British House of Lords in July 2011, trying to cover up the Murdoch family trafficked me, because my lawsuits stood in way of his BSkyB deal etc then too (the 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia, helped him get American citizenship):
The politicians have always been cherry picking what information they give to people who they have labelled adopted (because many are really trafficked) that are only.. photocopies of some information. The politicians have been withholding all sorts of information like … official extracts from… court registers of court hearings, from people politicians have labelled adopted because that makes it difficult for people to file paperwork in… other courts.
The County Court repeatedly refused to let me see the court… register, always making excuses that the correct person was not there, but never making an appointment when a person who did have access to the… register would be available. The County Court also illegally stopped me filing any witness statement in the adoption case that is about me !! by having me arrested twice on 21st December 2021, to illegally stop me filing a witness statement, and to stop me complaining to a different court about that. It cannot be legal for politicians et al to stop someone politicians label adopted from filing a witness statement incl refusing to stay adopted (the adoption label is really hiding being trafficked)
There is nothing in any adoption legislation that says, or could say someone who is labelled adopted can be stopped from filing a witness statement in adoption cases about our own adoption.
The politicians and courts et al have not been giving everyone the actual… official extracts from court registers (… photocopies from for example the so called ‘Adoption Information Service’ are not the same) about adoption cases so that people who are being forced to stay adopted can go to courts other than the court that did the dirty deed. (The first time I ever saw some… photocopies of any part of the alleged adoption … court records was in July 2019) It is unreasonable to expect that people like myself who were sent away overseas would need to return to Australia to extract ourselves from an adoption court order. The only reason the 1984 legislation did not provide any easily accessible process including for people living overseas, is because it’s only true purpose was to illegally try and sidestep lawsuits. It was known in my own case that I was being forced to stay adopted despite the fact I could not possibly need to give… reasons to anyone for not wanting to be forced to stay adopted. My own case more than proves why people who are labelled adopted are being… unnecessarily harmed by draconian adoption legislation. It was always outside my… control to have the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me etc etc.
It is common-sense that people labelled adopted by others have the absolute legal right to say no to being forced to stay adopted without needing to give reasons, just like people who want to stay adopted do not need to give reasons.
A kinder evolution is possible.
The reality is there are no legal grounds to stop people labelled adopted providing witness statements in any courts, refusing to stay adopted, which has never been the only or always the best option.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 