Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I am trying to optimize my quality of life with further onerous medical treatment for recurrent cancer, that also means I need my own identity ‘officially’ recognized, because it was always outside my control that a fmr Director General of ASIO Tudor Harvey Barnett who posed as my godfather used Combe-Ivanov spy scandal in 1983 to distract from & illegally avoid lawsuits over adoption spy scandal & leverage draconian 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, based on me, so I could not legally challenge it, when I was for example in Israel & Monaco too, that also led to Murdoch getting American citizenship in 1985 despite his family trafficking me to intelligence services (after French republic et al purported to use adoption in convoluted submarine & royal succession ’crisis’ in principality of Monaco in 1918 before Treaty of Versailles 28th June 1919) (17.05.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I remember very clearly as a small child, wondering how I was ever going to find my own way home, because I never believed any of so many lies I was told about what was called adoption by others.
This is where I was raised:
When I was a teenager I was sent 12,000 miles away from any friends or family in Australia, because I was unknowingly living near my own family and everyone knew that not only could the government not legally stop me from living with members of my own family, but that all the lies I was told about what was called adoption would come out.
It should have been within my control to stop being forced to be adopted, without needing to return to Australia.
The draconian adoption legislation in Victoria in 1984 was based on me, and intended to illegally avoid lawsuits over the adoption spy scandal because I was trafficked by the Murdoch family to the intelligence services.
A fmr Director General of ASIO Tudor Harvey Barnett who posed as my godfather used Combe-Ivanov spy scandal in 1983 to distract from & illegally avoid lawsuits over adoption spy scandal & leverage draconian 1984 adoption legislation in Victoria, based on me, that also led to Murdoch getting American citizenship in 1985 despite his family trafficking me to intelligence services.
The draconian adoption legislation in Victoria from 1984 is in some ways as convoluted as the French republic et al purporting to use a version/s of adoption in the submarine and royal succession ‘crisis’ in the principality of Monaco in 1918, before the Treaty Of Versailles on 28th June 1919. Both examples have no logical connection to putting the best interests of people labelled adopted by others, first.
I immediately understood what Brian was doing in Parliament Square, Central London, opposing the sanctions on Iraqi children, because I was trafficked as a small child by the sanction called adoption by others. Blair et al acted illegally in bad faith when they made ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 against Brian because elected and unelected politicians, and the monarchy (since 1999 which was the same year there was a referendum on the monarch in Australia) had in fact agreed to ban any peaceful campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London long before the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation. I helped force ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 off the status books in the UK, before the British government then made ss 141-150 of the PRSR Act 2011 against me too, although the reality is I did ‘win’ for example HQ11X00563 & HQ12X03564 because the government et al had no recognised defence in law to the reality they actually… intended to ban peacefully campaigning by anyone in Parliament Square, Central London. It’s fair to say I was relieved to be 12,000 miles away, several weekends ago, when there was another cut and paste ‘state’ occasion in Westminster. The fact is the British monarchy do not support peaceful freedom of expression in a public space, so it is arguable there is no realistic prospect, certainly at this time in Australia of any genuine referendum/s about the British monarchy who arbitrarily impose state governors and a federal governor general in Australia.
So I have unusually had legislation illegally made against me in Victoria, Australia, that is obviously used against other people too, along with having illegally had legislation made against me in the UK too, that obviously also affects other people too.
I think the only two same protagonists in the adoption scandal from 1984 are Murdoch and me, which is why he shouted longest and loudest about getting rid of me in the UK.
One hundred years since the Treaty of Versailles:
I should have been able to formally reject adoption while I was living in my own home in Breizh in France, but instead I left France on 28th June 2019, one hundred years after the Treaty of Versailles on 28th June 1919 because there is no simple and straightforward way to refuse to be forced to stay adopted, despite the fact there is a legal obligation to give everyone labelled adopted a genuine opportunity to reject being forced to stay adopted, regardless where we live.
It is a self evident reality, no-one who is labelled adopted needs to give anyone else any… reasons for refusing to be forced to stay adopted. The Victorian Police did not take me to court over my peacefully wanting to put my own witness statement on the court record in my own ‘adoption’ case 352, on 21st December 2021, and nor did anyone produce any legal grounds that would prevent me from putting my own witness statement on the court record in a case that is after all in every way, about me. My not wanting to be forced to stay adopted has everything to do with wanting to move on with my own life and nothing to do with the fact that it was also outside my control that draconian legislation in Victoria in 1984 was based on me, and also intended to stop me being able to challenge it from overseas, after I was also forced to leave Australia as a teenager.
I have been undergoing onerous further medical treatment for the past five weeks now, for recurrent cancer, so it is obviously very distressing for me that while all the medical staff are really kind and caring, I am still being forced against my will to stay adopted. It is cruel and spiteful to force me to stay adopted while I am trying to optimize my quality of life that includes having my own identity that is used by friends and family, officially recognized.
The draconian adoption legislation was made a long time ago in 1984 and it is time that what is called adoption catches up with the times we live in, where it should be legally possible for people labelled adopted by others to stop being forced to be adopted without having to give… reasons, to anyone else.
I am trying to improve the quality of my life with onerous medical treatment for recurrent cancer, so I also need to be able to have my own identity officially recognized so I can peacefully move on with my own life.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 