Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I am now currently being treated by two hospitals in Melbourne for recurrent cancer etc, so this serves to notify a Federal Court in New South Wales, Australia & a Superior Court in Delaware, United States that Murdoch family are only able to continue to commit perjury in satellite/derivative cases in multiple legal jurisdictions because they have already illegally failed to transfer the deterrent sanction of $1.4 billion dollars compensation to me in for example HQ11X00563 over refusal to hand over CCTV of torture & attempted murder of me in UK in a timely manner, because Murdoch family trafficked me as a small child to hide my Mediterranean heritage etc, so my lawsuit/s takes/took precedence & stood in way of their BskyB deal (13.04.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I am now currently being treated by two hospitals for recurrent cancer. The medical case (unlike the straightforward legal case against the Murdoch family) is and has been complicated by an anatomical anomaly in the same general location as the original and now recurrent cancer which has made any medical treatment complicated and difficult. I have agreed however to proceed with further medical treatment at this time. I was originally diagnosed with cancer on 23rd August 2022, before I nearly died when the cancer hemorrhaged, so I had to have blood transfusions so I could have a major operation, so trying to recover from that in stressful circumstances anyway, was very difficult, before I was recently informed the cancer has recurred. The oncology specialists said they had hoped their hand would not be forced by a recurrence because of the complications.
The same day I was diagnosed with cancer:
I had… no choice but to peacefully try and defend myself in the UK as best I could, once malicious ‘news’ articles were illegally published in what was really a trial by media, cynically seeking to avoid a civil jury trial in court. The reality is I have suffered prolonged and life threatening stress and distress because I was trafficked as a small child by the Murdoch family to ‘officially’ hide my Mediterranean heritage etc. The reason the torture and attempted murder of me happened is because my case and lawsuit/s happened to stand in the way of their BskyB deal. The fact they are continuing to commit perjury across multiple legal jurisdictions does not change it is still perjury regardless of which legal jurisdiction they are committing perjury in. My own case is different from the cases in New South Wales or in Delaware in the sense those cases are essentially confined to competing business interests.
It’s clear I never needed to give…. reasons in any court for refusing to go along with being trafficked by the Murdoch family (regardless of whatever political label anyone else wanted to put on that) who have financially profited from my not having the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me in a timely manner which could easily have been sent to me by email years ago (because I had standing High court order in for example HQ11X00563 for service by email which it was also known proved it was legal for me to notify of peacefully campaigning under the now repealed ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005) It was my legal right to decide how I wished to proceed which could not legally be obstructed by withholding the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me. It had previously been dishonestly claimed in an earlier incident on the same date of 4th September in a different year that there was no CCTV in a corridor of what happened where it was proved in court, independent video footage was also illegally destroyed.
I already had a High Court Order saying I could be served by email:
It should be self evident that I should never have needed to return to Australia.
My personal view is it would be much harder to traffic vulnerable children within countries or across international borders if there was an International Civil Court with the choice of juries. There are after all all sorts of other international courts, for governments, and big business. I guess it is possible juries could be used to choose judges in an International Civil court. My own lived experience makes me suspect that the likes of the Murdoch family would be more likely to be deterred by an International Civil Court with the choice of juries for civilian populations.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Related:
Donna Bugat 