Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Victorian Victims of Crime Commissioner re: It is… unjust for me while now also having recurrent cancer to be forced to give… reasons for not wanting to be forced to stay adopted, after a recurrent Ms GLASS fmr UK IPCC Commissioner, now hiding away as Victorian Ombudsman in Australia was directly involved in torture & attempted murder of me in UK, precisely because she always knew ANY CIVIL -OR- CRIMINAL JURY IN EITHER UK -OR- AUSTRALIA, would know she has… undeclared conflict of interest (ie is corrupt & committed perjury at Leveson in UK etc) & could not be protected by a parliamentary vote in Victoria, over UK Mothers Day 2006 etc too (the last thing she would want is International Civil Court with juries) while I remain legally entitled to for example a permanent stay on adoption court order in Australia incl within my UK High Court Habeas Court Order from 16th April 2008 & compensation etc (04.04.2023)
re: Victorian Victims of Crime Commissioner & my witness statement dated 02.02.2023 etc
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The biggest myth that politicians, state broadcasters, robber media barons and civil servants are still peddling about what they call adoption is that somehow forced adoption (which in legal terms is child and human trafficking within a state, country or internationally) is a historical issue which is misleading on a number of fronts. The politicians ‘adoption court orders’ still continue to force adopted people to stay adopted for the convenience of others.
It should however be self evident there are no legal grounds that mean anyone who is adopted needs to give… reasons for not wanting to be forced to stay adopted and to have to buy our way out, just like people who want to stay adopted do not have to give reasons to stay adopted or to pay money to stay adopted.
My own case really does conclusively prove that politicians and civil servants do not really want to know the… reasons someone who is adopted does not want to be forced to stay adopted.
In fact, there is nothing in draconian adoption legislation that can actually stop someone who was adopted as a vulnerable child having our own court order like a permanent stay on the adoption court order that can be within for example a Habeas Corpus Court Order. I have never taken part in or agreed to an adoption court order made about me.
A Ms Glass is not telling the truth, because of course she illegally failed to declare her conflict of interest that means she cannot hide behind a parliamentary vote, in Victoria, which is the only reason she slithered straight from the UK IPCC to the Victorian Ombudsman in Australia in March 2014:
I was illegally sent 12000 miles away from my own friends, family and Australia when I was a teenager, to try and force me to stay adopted. And then when I was an adult in Parliament Square, Central London politicians like the former Foreign Minister Downer disgustingly used adoption to try and falsely claim I was not an Australian citizen. He was only able to try that on, because a Ms Glass was illegally trying to cover up my civil jury lawsuit from Mothers Day 2006 that had already become multiple other civil lawsuits by then. These are people that hid my Mediterranean heritage too, completely indifferent to the loss, harm and distress that has caused me.
A Ms Glass does have an… undeclared conflict of interest (which is illegal):
The irony is that a Ms Glass knows the only reason I am in Victoria, Australia is because she illegally covered up what she did in the UK. She is the single common denominator in terms of a civil servant throughout my own case in the UK, that covers multiple legal jurisdictions because of adoption.
It puts a slightly different blush on the matter when you know a Ms Glass is illegally covering up the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK over civil jury lawsuits from Mothers Day 2006, which if she had disclosed, she could not have become the Victorian Ombudsman. A Ms Glass is not going to stand up in any court before a jury in either the UK or Australia and deny what she has done:
It is clearly unjust for me while now also having recurrent cancer to give… reasons for not wanting to be forced to stay adopted, while a recurrent MS GLASS fmr UK IPCC Commissioner is now hiding away as Victorian Ombudsman in Australia because she was directly involved in torture & attempted murder of me in UK, precisely because she always knew ANY CIVIL -OR- CRIMINAL JURY IN EITHER UK -OR- AUSTRALIA, would know she is corrupt and has… undeclared conflict of interest (& committed perjury at Leveson in UK etc) and could not be protected by a parliamentary vote in Victoria, over UK Mothers Day 2006 etc too, while I remain legally entitled to for example a permanent stay on adoption court order in Australia incl within my UK High Court Habeas Court Order from 16th April 2008 and compensation etc.
The last thing the selfish likes of a Ms Glass want is an International Civil Court with the choice of juries.
I have also been illegally stopped from living in my own home in another country.
Why Victoria ? (and of course it is illegal that …. adopted people who are seriously ill are not being prioritized for compensation, so Victoria is not exactly progressive when it comes to forcing people to stay adopted – it was easier to get married in New Zealand and happily divorced in the UK because I don’t like collecting pieces of government papers like marriage, because I am adopted)
I already had and have civil jury lawsuits on essentially the same subject matter in the UK:
Ms Glass knew any civil or criminal jury would know she was corrupt because any even cursory investigation would show my adopted name was illegally published along with the false claim I could face a malicious criminal prosecution in the UK (that adversely affects you elsewhere too) with the sole intention of illegally trying to cover up it was already agreed on that date, before I was released by an Inspector Lyons that this was my unprecedented civil jury lawsuit:
The politicians and civil servants illegally tried to stop transformational civil jury lawsuits, not just about ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (which I helped force off the statute books) but about adoption that is far more far reaching than for example either the British Commonwealth or European Union.
A Ms Glass illegally waffled on in the UK with irrelevant jargon about ‘operational’ or ‘direction and control’ matters (in for example January 2007 when Murdoch et al sought to suffragette me when I was pushed into a road) when she was the London Commissioner for the IPCC, to try and hide my adopted name was illegally leaked on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 with false information publicly trying to portray what was my unprecedented civil jury lawsuit could somehow be reversed into a malicious prosecution against me. It is a matter of fact and public record it was not legally possible to turn my Mothers Day 26th March 2006 civil jury lawsuit into a malicious prosecution of me, that nevertheless spawned an exponential rise in and multiplied my civil jury lawsuits.
“It is a matter of record that decisions are taken at the highest level in relation to Mr Haw & Ms Tucker within the MPS, including at Commissioner level“:
The reason a Ms Glass (Ms Glass was unable to provide… reasons for anyone, including hrself illegally trying to cover up Mothers Day was a civil jury lawsuit) was directly involved in the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK is because she knew that any civil or criminal jury in either the UK or Australia would immediately know and could only conclude that she is and was completely corrupt because any even cursory investigation over Mothers Day 26th March 2006 would know that what was published was untrue.
My email about on 3rd July 2007 about wanting to urgently proceed with the civil jury lawsuits (while the IPCC Chair Hardwick, sought to cover up on 3rd July 2007, for Glass over January 2007) resulted in my being kidnapped during live proceedings inside a court at South Western Magistrates Court on 19th July 2007 to stop me giving evidence:
The politicians and civil servants routinely sought to illegally stop me giving evidence in courts, because of Mothers Day.
(old man Bindman whose stock in trade was getting Labour politicians off the hook, was only ever interested in using ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 to bag a knighthood etc for himself, by betraying campaigners)
They knew what was going to happen to me on 19th July 2007 (on 18th July 2007 the government had admitted in Camberwell Magistrates Court to illegally using Special Branch too):
The politicians and civil servants and the Australian High Commission in London, treated two Australian citizens, a Ms Glass and me, involved in the one case, about me, completely differently. The only reason a Ms Glass transferred from the IPCC in the UK, to became the Victorian Ombudsman in Australia in March 2014 was to illegally try and continue covering up her direct involvement in the torture and attempted murder of me over Mothers Day 26th March 2006 in the UK. Ms Glass has an undeclared conflict of interest that means she cannot hide behind a parliamentary vote in Victoria.
Hardwick, Glass and Williams were always passing the buck:
My case is another example of why there should be an International Civil Court with the choice of juries.
It’s stating the obvious there was obviously collective amnesia in Westminster about Epstein too.
It is a matter of fact that Ms Glass et al never wanted to do what the public thought she was being paid to do, to meet with me to take any witness statement from me, because Glass et al always knew exactly what they were illegally trying to cover up over Mothers Day etc.
The lie over Mothers Day only grew larger and therefore increasingly dangerous for me.
There are clearly no legal grounds to force someone adopted in Victoria, Australia to have to leave our own home in another country, to return to Victoria, Australia to be homeless and have recurrent cancer, while trying to stop being forced to stay adopted.
It is not a co-incidence that then Glass et al are then illegally covering up the identity of male assailant who violently punched me in the head on 17th August 2008:
Glass knows I made a formal complaint about the male assailant who violently punched me in the head who everyone refused to identify, and that when I refused to drop the formal complaint after Livingstone spoke to me on the phone, he had a PS/Acting Inspector Cole unlawfully arrest me to try and cover up. The facts and optics of that didn’t look too good for the Labour Mayor Livingstone so he later sent people down to unlawfully arrest Brian too, to try and distract from why he unlawfully arrested me. Then they sent along the so called journalist Andrew Gilligan who was with the London Evening Standard at the time on a fishing expedition, but I refused to speak to him. They published the cover up that avoided the fact of our lawsuits against Livingstone in the London Evening Standard the next day.
Glass knew the former Labour Mayor of London Livingstone had been illegally withholding a whole trove of emails from 2007 which were basic disclosure that showed political interference with police towards us.
The IPCC et al were always going behind our backs.
Glass et al knew the their letter dated 3rd July 2007 was a lie, because they knew there was endless political interference and tittle tattle going on behind our backs in for example March 2007, that was directly related to mothers Day 2006 that they never wanted seen by any… civil jury, and was not being legally disclosed in malicious prosecutions against us in 2007 etc:
The records in the UK show that it was often the case that politicians went to extreme lengths to stop me giving evidence in courts, let alone before a civil jury.
The Australian High Commission in London, treated two Australian citizens involved in one case, mine , completely differently.
There is not just a perception of bias and prejudice of Ms Glass towards me, but indeed an actual bias and prejudice that she has not declared which also involves numerous legal cases and lawsuits I won like HQ11X0563.
Glass knew the former Labour Mayor of London Livingstone illegally tried to force me to drop my formal complaint about them covering up the male assailant punching me in the head. Livingstone phoned me and when I refused to drop the complaint he had a PS/Acting Inspector Cole unlawfully arrest me to try and cover up. He tried to distract from the facts and optics of all that including that he called me, by later having Brian unlawfully arrested the next day. Then on 26th October 2007 they sent down a so called journalist called Andrew Gilligan on a fishing expedition to try and do the whole trial by media gig, because they knew Livingstone would face a massive civil lawsuit the next day because he could not maliciously prosecute me, to try and hide him phoning me etc. I refused to speak to Gilligan because he was trying to spin a trial by media about a violent attack on me. Brian and I were in the High Court in satellite litigation the next day because the now King who obviously did not want peace campaigners, like Brian and myself, in Parliament Square, while he wanted to unveil his statue of Lloyd George. It should go without saying that all of Parliament Square, Central London should be returned to public ownership in perpetuity, which is what Brian would have preferred instead of statue of him being tucked away near the Imperial War Museum, when Brian campaigned in Parliament Square, Central London.
The British government did after all legislate ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 against Brian and then 141-148 (s 142 a inevitably extends the area) etc of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 against the… structure called my physical body.
It is really not surprising that it was reported on 25th February 2008 that 100 lawyers resigned from Glass’s IPCC because what was going on in Westminster was and still is institutional corruption:
Glass knew that I was then unlawfully arrested again on 26th February 2008 involving the same Cole et al still desperately trying to cover up the violent attack on me on 17th August 2008 etc (which remained true along with the BBC et al before the State Opening on 25th May 2010).
The institutional corruption, meant Cole knew he was committing perjury so he did not care what he said because in fact when he said he had (what I would know is a perjured) witness statement from a… politician, all I simply asked was to see it, and then calmly ripped it up in front of his face, and then left the room while returning to the police cell:
In fact, Cole then followed me and was jumping up and down about my calmly ripping up the equally perjured witness statement from the MP for Vitol Oil who was paid £160,000 pounds to commit perjury. Cole did say in the custody area while I was walking away from him that he was further arresting me for ‘criminal damage’ to a perjured witness statement (which wasn’t a legal point anyone wanted to test before any civil jury) which the custody sergeant declined to do. It is of course entirely possible that the male assailant who violently punched me in the head was a mercenary working for Vitol Oil. They knew they could not arrest me for an alleged S5 Public Order when I was with a whole group of other people because it never happened (but explains why the politician approached and went past me to make something up later) so the same Palace of Westminster Police who were also illegally hiding the identity of the male assailant who violently punched me in the head, had to get Belgravia to ‘arrest’ me on some other red herring. It was very cowardly of the male assailant to violently punch me in the head and then flee into the Palaces of Westminster, and it was very cowardly of everyone to refuse to identify the male assailant.
The vitriol from the Tory MP and then Minister for Vitol Oil, a Mr Duncan was still directed towards… Mothers Day.
(It was pretty weird behaviour of Cole to try and arrest me for criminal damage of a piece of paper because all I did was rip up what would have been my copy of the perjured witness statement they would have to hand over to me at some time anyway)
The corrupt MP and then Minister for Vitol Oil made the mistake of going on ‘Telegraph TV’ (a Johnson et al sideshow) while I was illegally detained to have a rant that was so extreme and involving threats to use gas and guns (the MP would never dare repeat before any civil jury) that the ‘presenter’ had to shut him down, because he was out of control:
The Minister for Vitol Oil is an extremist of all sorts, who desperately wanted me out of the European Union over… Mothers Day.
On 25th March 2008, prior to my getting a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order, Brian made me go to what was called a Muslim News Awards in the Grosvenor Hotel in Park Lane. It turned out to not be what the label on the can said, but instead a surreal government funded event where various departments of government and the media like Glass’s IPCC, the Crown Prosecution (Persecution) Service, and media like the Daily Mail and BBC would sponsor/buy tables for themselves (so not something you would choose to go if you knew beforehand – someone gave me a list of attendees afterwards when I was back in Parliament Square, after Brian gave a somewhat impromptu speech that evening. A BBC journalist had hastily left the table I was seated at:
The ghastly Johnson and Johnston.
Mr Bannister the Managing Editor of the Daily Mail.
The Chief Executive of HM courts etc.
A gruesome person from the CPS who I had filed a formal complaint against because of a libelous article the… CPS disgracefully published about me, they had to withdraw, was seated at the next table.
Th Met’s Tarique Gaffur who covered up what was going on, was there along with Hague.
Glass’s Nick Hardwick from the IPCC. It really wasn’t somewhere I would be likely to go if I had known what kind of government ‘guests’ had essentially invited themselves.
A “press officer for the CPS” for goodness sakes etc etc incl now Lord Paddick (not to be confused wth Lord Pannick) and not forgetting:
It’s not really surprising that I have a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 because I did not even need to attend a Magistrates court over an alleged S5 Public Order that is not even imprisonable.
This is me below, reading the above, outside Holloway (because they were forced to release me):
The Commissioner et al, and of course Glass covered this up and never complied with the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008:
Glass knows the now Lord Blair (who has amnesia about the case he was involved in against Brian in the Court of Appeal in… April 2006 despite knowing they could not ‘overtake’ my civil jury lawsuit from Mothers Day 26th March 2006 where Brian was an interested party) did see the Lord Pannick (who is different from Blair’s sidekick Lord Paddick) claim in that, that Brian was… not exempt from ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 which was how the police ran it too (0f course Lord Blair is shy about admitting there was no power of seizure of banners in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 which is why he ridiculously purported he could distract from that significant detail, by claiming he could instead rely on s 3(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967, which didn’t change there was no power of seizure of a banner:
This was when another now former British MP… Lembit Opik had me unlawfully arrested, when I was then violently dragged into the Palaces of Westminster where I was violently attacked by someone from Manchester:
This is the same stalker Cole (he was literally a stalker) in my personal space on 25th May 2010, before the State Opening yelling at me because I happen to be holding on to another perjured witness statement they had to unlawfully arrest me, to be able to publish and circulate their alternative lies:
Glass et al all knew they were illegally covering up the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
Glass illegally covered up the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
This was just patently nonsense by the former Tory Mayor of London and PM and still MP who only became that by covering up Mothers Day, along with my High Court habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 during the Mayoral elections and then the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me (he only became PM and Duncan only resigned) when they forced me out of the EU in July 2019.
The switch between PM’s on 23rd June 2010 with Glass benefiting from my being illegally denied legal representation too:
I nevertheless ‘won’ the overall malicious litigation against me in in HQ11X00563 (while a Rudd, the former Australian PM and now Australian Ambassador to the United States, collected the $1.4 billion brown envelope from the Tories because I was illegally denied legal representation, while Glass then went on to commit… perjury in Levenson to try and hide the legislation then being made against me in s 141-148 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011.
It’s the civil… jury that Glass never wanted.
The reality is Glass always knew a civil or criminal jury in either the UK or Australia would know she acted maliciously against me by illegally trying to cover up my civil jury lawsuit that became another 48, along with my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order and the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me.
I would also understandably reasonably believe that Glass is and has illegally used public office to try and hide a medical record of mine too (that two medical professionals have both separately confirmed is inexplicably “missing”) because that medical record could also further implicate her in the torture and attempted murder of me.
In any event a civil jury would know that Glass had no reasonable excuse to be wholly complicit in illegally withholding the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, from me, and that it was always my choice what to do with that CCTV too. All Glass cares about is collecting her pension and perks, literally at my expense.
It really is a case that is an example of why there needs to be an International Civil Court with the choice of juries, because Ms Glass has never wanted to speak the truth to at the very least, a… civil jury.
It’s speaking the truth to a civil jury that bothers a Ms Glass.
My own interest is having a permanent stay on the adoption court order incl within the for example my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order too, so my own identity of Donna Bugat, is officially recognized, and my own family’s legal positions are protected, along with compensation that includes paying all the costs of changing documents or something like a free Australian passport to my real name. It is possible for example that I may need some medical treatment in another country (I have to keep an open mind to that possibility) because there are quite a few medical complications around the recurrent cancer because I did not have the necessary stability to try and recover from the major operation, so I now need further medical treatment for what is now termed recurrent cancer.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Notes:
This is illegal because it is obviously ignoring and excluding adopted people who are seriously ill (last time I looked recurrent cancer is a serious illness and all my civil jury lawsuits in the UK make clear that I have been “adversely affected” by what politicians call adoption)
The reality is the courts were always legally obliged to provide an adopted person with at the very least a copy of the adoption court order that no-one needs to legally ask any other government department for to try and at best distract from that:
It’s the secretive… adoption court orders that are arguably the most problematic, and the information being published by the County Court is misleading because it doesn’t for example cost anything to have a Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Order to stop being forced to stay adopted:
My considered view is that it is seriously illegal for the County Court to claim people need to buy our way out of being adopted that we never bought into anyway.
It is also misleading and very disrespectful to suggest that someone who was adopted as a vulnerable child needs to ask another government department, instead of a court for at the very least a copy of the adoption court order made by the courts. It’s not usual to ask another government department for a copy of a court order.
And yet politicians et al portray someone adopted in Australia, but living… overseas needs to leave our own home in another country and become homeless and get recurrent cancer in Australia while being forced to argue that it is stating the obvious it is illegal to force someone to stay adopted. The really said thing is punishing people who do not have to give… reasons for not wanting to be forced to stay adopted, when people who want to stay adopted do not have to. It is so discriminatory, and soooo disrespectful:
In fact, the illegal practice of trying to force people to give…. reasons for not wanting to be forced to stay adopted, puts many adopted people in harms way in all sorts of ways that any responsible politician or civil servant would know. My own case does conclusively prove that politicians and civil servants do not really want to know the… reasons someone who is adopted does not want to be forced to stay adopted.
This is very cynical and quite misleading because… adopted people who don’t always have our homes in Australia, are being forced to stay adopted which of course continues today, along with the adverse consequences of that, to our health:
A common problem for adopted people who are being forced to stay adopted, is we do not… automatically age out of adoption court orders at adulthood like other people in out of home care do (my own parents automatically aged out of legislation used against them so the state could grab me, and my parents asked for me back which was covered up) and there is no statute of limitations placed on the…. adoption court order made against us. What about those who don’ know they are adopted, and what about people like myself who was living in my own home in Breizh, France (I said god sent me to the wilderness because he knows I like peace, although I am currently living in Melbourne because of the recurrent cancer. I have surprised myself in that I quite like living in relatively stable housing in the city in Melbourne too, because there is the bustle during the day before most people go home in the evening and it is generally easier for me to go to hospital/s, although I can obviously never know how I will feel from day to day) It’s fair to say I don’t miss London, but I do miss my own home in Breizh, France because that was where when I was exiled from the UK, I began to be able to live with and experience my Mediterranean heritage that has always been ‘officially’ denied.
This is quite cheeky when you think how much… politicians spend on themselves (remembering that Rudd received a $1.4 billion dollar brown envelope from the British Tories, to try and rip me off over my lawsuits in the UK which staff at the Australian High Commission in London said was a unique case of this kind because of the ‘complication’ of my ‘adoption’) and their vanity projects like submarines:
The… reason I advocate for the transformational change in international law of an International Civil Court with the choice of juries based in for example Jerusalem, is quite simply peace.
Donna Bugat 