Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: re: I have now also been diagnosed with “recurrent” cancer requiring further medical treatment, while it is clearly unjust for me to need to give… reasons in any court for not wanting to be forced to stay adopted that people who do want to stay adopted do not have to do in any court (which is why politicians hid behind now Lord Pannick et al to illegally delay my civil jury lawsuits etc from Mothers Day 26th March 2006 in the UK from April 2006 onwards to stop me having a permanent stay of adoption court order & receiving substantial compensation to help deter politicians from forcing anyone else to stay adopted, that could also have resulted in all of Parliament Square, Central London being returned to public ownership & politicians helping to build peace in perpetuity by instead of buying nuclear propelled submarines, prioritizing transformational change in legal landscape by helping to fund an International Civil Court with choice of juries (27.03.2023)
Re: my witness statement dated 02.02.2023
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I was as a teenager sent 12000 miles away from Australia to try and hide my Mediterranean cultural heritage from me, and force me to stay adopted.
I later remember witnessing American warships leaving Beirut in Lebanon on the Mediterranean in 1984 before I was traveling in the Middle East, that included staying on the Yad Mordechai kibbutz near Ashkelon in Israel, and going to Gaza before there was a rabbit proof fence. Brian was later in Berlin in 1989 when that rabbit proof fence came down, and he was in Parliament Square, Central London, opposing sanctions on children before the Afghanistan War in 2001 or the Iraq War in 2003. In for example, France, my real surname Bugat is synonymous with the nuclear industry including medicine, power stations and weapons. Brian and I both opposed, while campaigning together in Parliament Square, Central London, the monetization of nuclear waste that resulted in the manufacture of depleted uranium munitions that were also used in for example the Iraq War.
This could not ‘overtake’ my High Court civil jury lawsuit from Mothers Day 26th March 2006:
The British government claimed a little disingenuously when speaking to me, in 2006 that “you came under the wire and we didn’t see you coming”. That only goes to explain why money politicians say they would like to spend on nuclear propelled submarines would obviously be better spent on helping to build peace in perpetuity with an International Civil Court with the choice of juries for civilian populations. An international Civil Court with the choice of juries would transform international law for civilian populations.
Lord Pannick is clearly not an advocate for human rights:
It is clearly unjust while I have now also been diagnosed with recurrent cancer requiring ongoing further medical treatment for politicians to claim I can be forced to go through onerous court proceedings to give reasons why I should not be forced to stay adopted while people who want to stay adopted are not forced to go through onerous court proceedings to give reasons for their decision.
It would be sensible to return all of Parliament Square, Central London to public ownership in perpetuity (Johnson could not maliciously prosecute me because of his numerous undeclared conflicts of interest):
The legal reality is politicians intentionally illegally ‘sidestepped’ my civil jury lawsuit from Mothers Day 26th March 2006 where Brian was an interested party, with malicious satellite litigation against Brian in April 2006 when Lord Pannick et al lied to a court so the former PM Blair could grandstand in front of the Australian Parliament on 27th March 2006 etc etc. Then when Bindmans ran out of excuses the partner Tony Murphy switched with a partner from another firm etc etc. Of course Lord Pannick knew that not only was ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 that I forced off the statute books, unlawful, but that even the Public Order Act 1986 is not really necessary because there was already sufficient legislation/law.
The former Australian Labour PM Rudd knew he had an undeclared conflict of interest with his 07 campaign while I was in Parliament Square Central London and he illegally used public office in Australia to privately launder money ($1.4 billion) in the UK etc which is why I was illegally denied legal representation in the High Court on 23rd June 2010 on the same date Rudd spun the political switch to Foreign Minister etc etc before now becoming Australian Ambassador to the United States.
The High Court in London on 23rd June 2010:
It is undeniable that former Australian Labour PM, FM and now Australian Ambassador to the United States Rudd, and former British Mayor of London and PM but still MP Johnson have only been able to profit by harming me.
The politicians knew a civil jury over Mothers Day 2006 would not only nullify ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation but draconian adoption legislation too. The reality is I do not have to go to court to give reasons why I need to essentially buy my way out of adoption, while people who want to stay adopted do not need to pay money to go to court to give reasons to stay adopted.
A permanent stay on an adoption court order should help someone who is being forced to be adopted take back control and negotiate a fair withdrawal agreement, so for example our own inter-generational family members cannot be adversely affected.
A civil jury would have at the very least awarded a permanent stay on the adoption court order used against me, along with very substantial compensation to deter politicians from forcing people to stay adopted. The legal reality is politicians cannot oppose my having at the very least a permanent stay, on my terms, of the adoption court order.
I already had a High Court Order from April 16th 2008 against this person which was his motive to stalk me when he obviously did not return my legally privileged material to me that was stashed in the Museum in the City of London:
I do not know a person called Sir Mark Rylance (who does not speak for or instead of either Brian or me including through the BBC or Guardian) who I did not ever see when I was in Parliament Square, Central London for many years campaigning with Brian, because Rylance is one of Livingstone et al’s cronies who would want to stuff a statue of Brian outside the Imperial War Museum. The politicians et al knew they stole my legally privileged information which they stashed in the Museum of London in the City of London that I pointed out in HQ11X00563 that I won, that it was not for them to dictate to me what was my legally privileged information. I won for example HQ11X00563 that shows (like Hansard from 1949 about Parliament Square) that all of Parliament Square should remain in public ownership in perpetuity which is what Brian would obviously have preferred to see happen instead of a statue outside the Imperial War museum.
This is my real name:
It is self evident it was clearly illegal for politicians to cynically legislate in ss 141-145 of the Police and Social Responsibility Act 2011 that the the structure of my body is a criminal offence (including retrospectively) That legal “absurdity” introduced by the former British PM, TM while Home Secretary in the Commons along with Baroness Browning who was from Reading where I had lived, who was a government Minister at that time in the House of Lords while Johnson was Mayor of London etc etc.
I do personally advocate for the transformational change of an International Civil Court with the choice of juries, because it is obviously not possible for anyone to guarantee that politicians et al will never exploit the weakest and most vulnerable civilians.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 