Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: My… ‘official’ refusal to give my fully informed… medical consent to my being forced against my will to stay ‘adopted’ which politicians knew they needed to have & did not have & could not take me to court to oppose, means Health Commissioner et al are legally obliged to guarantee is recorded… free of charge, for me, in my medical records, that does legally take… precedence over ‘void ab initio’ political ‘adoption court order’…(that in my own case has only caused me prolonged & ongoing life threatening physical & emotional harm & distress, incl after being diagnosed with cancer etc as an adult, because incorrect housing records were actually made when I was a… teenager, to hide I was homeless, while it was also proved my medical records haven’t properly included known… genetic information from family members incl. my grandfather, just because I am labelled ‘adopted’ while other ‘official’ records are deeply offensive because I am not ‘officially’ known as the older sister of my little sister who died, and… yet politicians know !! I was punished & sent 12,000 miles away as a teenager so I wouldn’t know & couldn’t live with any family members who they all knew were living nearby in Prahran, when at the very least I should have been registered as homeless & put on a housing list instead & I would have had the opportunity to try & protect & save the life of my little sister who died, so the reasons former Australian PM Rudd et al have illegally failed to ‘officially’… declare the existence of my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006, along with later CCTV of the kidnapping, torture & cold-blooded attempted murder of me in the UK which happened after questions were asked about why my DNA was repeatedly being destroyed by politicians, and Rudd then also… hid my Mediterranean background when I began living in July 2013 in my own home in Breizh, France, is because I set… legal precedents incl. it was a) unlawful to send me away from Australia as a teenager & to b) then force me to return to Australia too, because ‘adoption’ is really only about whatever suits… politicians (01.02.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else, to self determination.
I reasonably believe politicians who sell the sunny uplands of a utopia they flippantly label ‘adoption’ along with positing it as being some kind of ‘healthcare’ have in fact been deliberately distracting from and avoiding the very serious legal issue of an absence of medical consent as either a child or adult, from people who are adopted, to adoption because it is well known adoption can of itself unnecessarily cause all sorts of adverse health outcomes too.
** The politicians do illegally use quasi-medical sounding mumbo jumbo to try and justify adoption and falsifying the medical records of adopted people, while hiding adverse physical and emotional outcomes of adoption, so politicians are in a practical sense an as yet not properly regulated authority with adoption which is included in the medical sphere, while politicians spin their role in the supposed ‘safety nets’ of job seeker and disability support pension with quasi -‘medical’ sounding mumbo jumbo too that doesn’t really make any human or legal sense. No reasonable and rational responsible adult would ever believe that the likes of Murdoch et al who promote the cult of celebrity ‘adoption’ ever cared about vulnerable… children who are also labelled ‘adopted’ because they can serve as a useful ‘tax haven’ for dodgy wealthy people. There is all sorts that goes on behind the ‘veil of secrecy’ used by the global multi-billion dollar ‘adoption’ industry**
What is really an adoption “science circus” unsurprisingly finds… the Australian government collaborating with a… Ms Gloag (see below) and her Scottish clan who essentially believe wealthy people “need more space just because they do, so there” (refer Gloag para 55 of Scottish ‘right to roam’ case in 2007) who run an adoption racket in Africa, AT THE SAME TIME Australian politicians were illegally forcing me to return to Australia instead of being able to renounce adoption while living in my own home in Breizh, France:
It’s about time politicians et al focused more on the… basics like the importance of … medical consent, because not everyone wants to be in their adoption circus which is an obscene and not so scientific abuse of medical consent.
This is a state and national organization who do clearly know… politicians need regulating because of politicians quasi medical mumbo jumbo in areas like adoption and job seeker & disability support pensions:
The likes of the unscrupulous Rudd were not going to be able to keep cashing in laundering what was supposed to be my compensation through his poverty profiteering ‘family’ business in the UK & France while Australian PM & FM too, if I was on welfare in those countries.
I am labelled adopted, and I don’t care how many people from the cult of celebrity, politicians and press barons like Murdoch et al give free publicity to, trying to disgracefully sell their quasi -‘medical’ quack-ology about adoption, I am not buying it, and I am not… legally or… medically obliged to and it is actually… criminal to try and force me to.
It’s not like politicians could say in my own case they did not know who I am as soon as I walked into Parliament Square, Central London, because of who posed as my parents and godparents (which is far more common an occurrence for adopted people than is publicly admitted)
The politicians… did know they needed and did not have any kind of medical consent, fully informed or otherwise to force me to against my will to stay adopted, that politicians know takes precedence over their political adoption court order.
A refusal by an adopted person to give medical consent, to adoption, at any time, because adoption can for example be very unnatural from the perspective of an adopted person, must legally take precedence over what is really only a political ‘adoption court order’.
It was for… politicians to take me as an adopted person to court if they thought something as serious as an adopted person refusing to give my medical consent to being forced against my will to stay adopted did not take precedence over the political adoption court order, because politicians did reasonably know they did not have medical consent which is one of the most important consents there can be. There are no political excuses to ignore that absence of medical consent which should be recorded free of charge in medical records.
The former Australian PM and FM has illegally also failed to officially declare the existence of my High Court Habeas Corpus High Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 and the CCTV of the kidnapping, torture & attempted murder of me behind closed doors because politicians were trying to stop anyone helping me (but Brian heard something happening so he became a witness) that in my own case was just about the reality I had made legal precedents, politicians could send me away as a teenager or force me to return as an adult just to punish me politically out of nothing more than political spite. Rudd knew the medical records were a problem because he knew and was complicit in the British government repeatedly destroying my DNA because it isn’t the same as their ‘official’ version of who they say I am.
The politicians and press generally mislead the public when they say they speak for or instead of members of the public, because they are really only supposed to help and not unreasonably hinder, and politicians most certainly cannot try and say that politics can replace the right of someone to give our medical consent or to with-hold our medical consent. It was politicians who sell ‘adoption’ as ‘healthcare’ which it certainly is not when politicians try and stop someone labelled adoption from giving or with-holding our medical consent to ‘adoption’ regardless of any prolonged and ongoing life threatening physical and emotional harm.
The fact of who, the people who posed as my parents and godparents etc were, was always an irrelevance to me. The reality is civilised society is supposed to be based on politicians living within the peace and harmony of the rule of law, instead of abusing that public office to try and legislate to treat themselves differently.
The British and Australian politicians knew I had illegally been sent 12000 miles away as a teenager, and exactly why, that was only about using an adoption court order they didn’t even give me a copy of while I was living overseas, to punish me and make me homeless 12,000 miles away from anyone I knew. I was living nearby members of my own family who were at that time living in Prahran, and politicians stopped me having the opportunity to try and protect my little sister and save her life. It is sooooo deeply offensive that I am not even ‘officially’ known as the older sister of my little sister who died. And of course I eerily found myself in hospital after I nearly died on the anniversary of my little sister’s death and so I couldn’t even go to the spring house at the Garden of No Distant Place and leave a card and some flowers because I was in hospital and then had the operation so I was still in hospital on the anniversary of her funeral too. I have learnt through the serious illnesses I have had how important it is for known genetic information to be included in medical records of adopted people because adoption can cause a lot of confusion among health professionals too.
And ‘somehow’ because… government agencies were not properly recording my housing situation or even something like cancer, the failure to properly record that information meant I wasn’t flagged for a medical assessment by government agencies. If a politician is ill in any way, they have their private health cover and vast salaries to protect them while they are living in their own home and can travel wherever they like to get medical treatment. The politicians basically collect a very large salary to just go along with party politics which left them completely free the past few years to stay in their own homes.
My personal view is politicians ‘robo-debt’ commission is actually legally obliged to consider that politicians… know there is a wider systemic problem because politicians are legally obliged to either accept that jobseeker and disability support pension are ‘safety nets’ and therefore not subject to not so ‘mutual obligations’ or they do not. It must be disproportionate and therefore unlawful to stop anyone’s supposed ‘safety net’ of job seeker or disability support pension without a court order, if that would also make someone homeless. The politicians should need to get a court order to stop someone’s job seeker or disability support pension etc. I believe it is probably a recognition of that which is leading to trials of universal basic income elsewhere. The only real reason politicians who have a culture of bullying the most vulnerable and weakest members of the public, including when people are labelled ‘adopted’ as children, is just so that they can publicly ’scapegoat’ and vilify some people. I mean I was sent 12,000 miles away as a teenager only to be maliciously called a criminal in Parliament Square, Central London, when and because I forced a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 off the statute books.
I personally view the latest Australian PM who curiously claims he had a ‘tough upbringing’ with his own mother while living in the security of council housing, as lucky !! so it is not uncommon for people to have different perspectives depending on varied lived experience. The latest Australian PM should not once again pretend that any lived experience, means that a politician speaks for and instead of others, because they are only really supposed to help, instead of trying to use what they claim is their own lived experience to dismiss the lived experience of others, like the Murdoch adoption groupie & Victorian MP, Mr Bach does. The latest Australian PM knew and was at least with his own mother and had his own identity and wasn’t made… homeless as a teenager and sent… 12,000 miles away from anyone because he was being… punished for not going along with being adopted. The latest Australian PM who never cared about any of the problems adopted people can face, thanks to selfish and thoughtless politicians, like himself, certainly doesn’t speak for or instead of me politically either. The fact some people may want to be adopted has never meant such draconian legislation could be imposed on anyone else.
It is even worse when a politician claims any illness they may claim they have means they speak for or instead of anyone else with that or a similar illness because it is a very serious right, not to be flippantly interfered with by politicians, to have the… choice to give or withhold what should be fully informed… medical consent.
There is literally no valid excuse for people labelled adopted to not have a genuine choice to just say no to and renounce draconian adoption legislation that could be recorded by any government agency but I personally believe is probably best recorded in medical records. I signed an agreed Advanced Care Directive in my own case that states my real identity as opposed to my adopted identity and that I only really want to be known as Donna.
I mean whether or not I am actually well enough to travel at the moment, it is seriously disproportionate and unlawful to, for what are really only… political… excuses, stop me from having a passport in my own, rather than adopted identity, so I am stopped from living, working, travelling and having an opportunity to get medical treatment elsewhere, because of nothing more than what is political spite. I am not stopping my being registered on an electoral roll either in my own identity, that only doesn’t happen, because of nothing more than political spite. I couldn’t recently get a better deal for my mobile phone because I no longer have a valid passport in even my adopted identity and haven’t been given one including free of charge in my own identity, so every day I am forced against my will to lie about my real identity solely because of nothing more than spiteful politicians, who don’t want ALL adopted people to have a… genuine… choice.
There are huge contradictions with what politicians claim are progressive politics including a free for all for anyone who wants to ‘adopt’ a vulnerable child that disgracefully hides the absence of genuine choice for ALL people labelled adopted. It isn’t about who are parents and who pose as parents because they simply are not affected in the same way, because they know who they are and so on and so forth, but it is the medical consent of the person who is most affected who is the adopted person which is completely bypassed as both a child and adult which is again completely different from other out of home care people automatically age out of at adulthood.
The political ‘adoption court order’ should just be re-named the politically spiteful & legally meaningless order of nastiness. It really is a vulgar continuation of a slave trade mentality among the political classes who all to often persist with the corrupt notion that it must be necessary for someone such as me who was adopted in for example Australia, to leave my own home in another country to return and become homeless in Australia to pay whatever sum is asked to a court so the court ‘might’ ,remember ‘might’, give their ‘permission’ to withdraw a seriously bogus ‘adoption court order’ the same court made, I have never as an adopted person so much as given any let alone medical consent to as either a child or adult anyway. It’s not like government agencies have ever given a toss about any harm adoption causes.
The politicians have in my own case illegally and opportunistically used an ‘adoption court order’ as punishment and to actually stop me participating in politics in my own identity. There was nothing stopping Rudd & Co from making it possible for me to renounce draconian adoption legislation at the Australian embassy in London or Paris, because Rudd did know he was also illegally ‘officially’ hiding my… Mediterranean background when the Australian government knew I began living in my own home in Breizh, France in July 2013. I had the same surname as a head of nuclear energy in France too, although I lived in the nuclear free autonomous region of Breizh. Rudd illegally failed to ‘officially’ disclose he was legally responsible for my not having legal representation on 23rd June 2010 in the High Court in the UK when there were the revolving PM’s in Australia. The documentation over my being illegally denied legal representation on the 23rd June 2010, was to put it as politely as possible “insufficient” including for a judge to record it as such on 23rd June 2010. Mr Starmers Doughty Chambers who had an undeclared conflict of interest have never produced a single shred of paper from their Mr Harris, an SC who said he was based in Hong Kong, because of course I had not done anything wrong. I had never even met the guy or had the opportunity to actually instruct him, because Starmer et al illegally failed to disclose their undeclared conflict of interest over the CCTV. The idea that Blair was some kind of left wing human rights lawyer led to rather ridiculous notions of others who claimed to be human rights lawyers in London. The rule of law with its checks and balances and safeguards like due process, is the central principle that is necessary to have, before there is the luxury of human rights that Blair deliberately perverted any genuine possibility of being, by effectively saying… politicians had a superior right to such a wide “margin of appreciation” they could completely ignore the rule of law itself, until and unless someone was able to overcome the legal obstacle course of the snakes and ladders of courts on the way to the EU. In our own cases politicians simply would not let us near the ECHR because the ECHR could only confirm our own legal right to progress our civil jury lawsuits without being attacked by politicians.
It’s not the case that Starmer & his Doughty Chambers can ever produce their paperwork for me being illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 because of course I hadn’t done anything “wrong’:
My personal view is that no British prince was fighting anywhere in Afghanistan at the same time a certain monarchy were publicly maliciously prosecuting Brian and myself in Parliament Square, Central London, after the latest King did not dare stand alongside peace campaigners like Brian and myself in Parliament Square, Central London on 25th October 2007 which was the anniversary of a supposed treaty on 25th October 1980 to return abducted children, which of course never happens because many adopted people were undeniably abducted as children. Of course Westminster’s very wealthy Russian friends supported journalist Johnson and the monarchy, along with their tax havens, in 2010 etc, over Brian and myself as peace campaigners in Parliament Square, Central London. I did find it quite shocking when I realised that Brian and I were literally the only law in town in Westminster because of the “crime ridden” politics that existed there, way back then. There were the same police who were rapists and murderers then, some of whom are only now being revealed as that now, because of course the people who really did protect the rapists and killers among the police are the… politicians in the ‘Westminster system’ who Australian politicians always fawn all over. Rudd was cashing in big time using his public role to launder money that was supposed to be compensation for me from my civil jury lawsuits, through his unsavoury ‘family’ business based poverty profiteering. It is completely unscrupulous… politicians like the fmr Australian PM & FM Rudd who have always been illegally cashing in on what is supposed to be a ‘safety net’. I think any adopted person who renounces adoption should have free universal healthcare of our own choosing, because it is so commonplace for unscrupulous politicians to do their best to stop accurate and contemporaneous records of adoptions.
I mean this old cobblers below, against Brian and I, made a notoriously corrupt and scurrilous ruling in favour of a Ms Gloag & clan in Scotland in 2007 (who are Brown cronies) where the sheriff, I kid you not (who is part of a private company of Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges) essentially ridiculously claimed in para 55 that rich people just need more space than other people because they just do, so there, incredibly actually look like a walk in the park by comparison to what was served up against Brian and I (I guess the same Gloag clan somewhat unsurprisingly run ‘adoption’ agencies in for example Africa in what some adopted people could justifiably view as just another unscrupulous enterprise using vulnerable people who are adopted as human ‘tax havens’ for wealthy people:
It is quite odd, that a Ms Gloag (who quelle surprise is supported by the Australian government) did actually previously complain in an infamous ‘right to roam’ in Scotland, that mere ordinary humans were a ‘technicality’ that no-one should worry about because only wealthy people matter, so Ms Gloag clearly expects to ‘roam free’ …in Africa too:
The same Australian government who claim I needed to leave my home in Breizh, France in July 2019, because they “might” rescind an adoption court order in Australia if I made myself homeless for as long as they wanted, that really could have been done while I was in my own home in Breizh, France:
The Gloag & Co clan boast of “unique” adoption “contracts”:
It’s so vulgar of a Gloag clan who essentially claim they “need more space than other people just because they are wealthy so there” then posing as “philanthropists” selling vulnerable children to umm… “lonely” people for goodness sakes ?
It very much does matter “how one receives it” ?? and wealthy people should not have the “ability” to traffic vulnerable children anywhere, taking… advantage of an adult failure to have an… International Civil Court with the choices of juries to help protect vulnerable children (which I think most people would assume the likes of the Gloag clan with their “unique contracts” would not like to contribute to):
There are so many examples throughout history of wealthy people using vulnerable children for ‘adoption’ as “spoils of war”.
It is reasonable for a professionally certified copy of the CCTV confirming it hasn’t been tampered with should be sent by email to me, wherever I am, because it does actually belong to me and somehow passed from Starmer in a criminal court to the government lawyers trying to force me to agree it is a “civil matter” !!
It would be obvious to anyone that I would need a professionally certified true copy of the CCTV of the kidnapping, torture and cold blooded attempted murder of me in the UK, to a) try and stop it happening again and b) so it was properly recorded by Australian politicians and agencies too, c) particularly because government agencies and insurers would always say it was relevant information in Australia if I… wasn’t an Australian citizen, but because I am an Australian citizen who was adopted which is why it happened it has not been properly recorded on records.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 