Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I do not & have never given my own fully informed… medical consent to be forced to stay ‘adopted’ against my will while politicians ‘official’ adoption records… illegally fail to properly… include & recognise legal & medical… genetic information, because ‘adoption’ can cause confusion between medical professionals too & has in my own case, undeniably resulted in prolonged life threatening harm including cancer etc because my being ‘adopted’ was also illegally used to send me overseas as a teenager to avoid my setting legal precedents by being registered homeless & given social housing in Australia instead, with what is also really supposed to be a safety net of a ‘universal basic income’ no questions asked with fully comprehensive healthcare & insurance that can exist in an unlimited clean renewable energy Australia while I remember one of my civil jury lawsuits HQ12X3564 is intended to mean Parliament Square, Central London in UK remains a public space (27.01.2023)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else, to self determination.
A real issue for… me, has really always been about… my being able to make my own decisions, regardless of whoever claimed to be parents etc.
There are no words to adequately convey how incredibly distressing and re-traumatising it is for me, whenever medical professionals ask for my… medical consent for medical procedures, because I am at the same time, being… forced against my will to stay ‘adopted’ regardless of the prolonged life threatening harm that has and does cause me that has undeniably in my own case, however anyone looks at it, caused cancer etc.
It is fair to say I have not really processed what has happened so far about the cancer. Several days after I was released from hospital after the second emergency admission to hospital in three weeks relating to the cancer, because cancer obviously does not work to a human timetable, was the cancer started to haemorrhage while I was not in hospital, before I actually had the major cancer operation. This also meant I needed blood transfusions before I could have the actual cancer operation, and there are outsanding complications etc anyway. I was very traumatised by nearly losing my life from such a serious complication of cancer, before the actual medical operation I then had to survive too. I am obviously also quite stressed if I should need another medical operation in the near future, related to another medical condition.
The politicians have also created a very serious identifiable legal problem with medical records because what is the ‘official’ political record of ‘adoption’… illegally fails to recognise and acknowledge an ‘adopted’ person has the absolute legal right to include known genetic information in medical records, to avoid what can all too often be medical confusion between medical professionals about ‘adoption’.
I only remembered genetic information from my own family… after a specialist ordered a heart ultrasound for and I had the major cancer operation, because I have been forced to repress so many memories. It is not the case that I need to give a reason to any medical professional to have my medical records including that heart ultrasound, because they are first and foremost my medical records that should include genetic information I know AND the fact I do not give my… medical consent to be forced to stay ‘adopted’.
It is too distressing for me for my own medical records to not include the basic fact, I do not give my… medical consent to being forced to stay ‘adopted’.
Any royal commission would reasonably know government agencies do actually always need legally reviewable court orders before trying to interfere with basic safety nets that should never be used by politicians to intentionally try and make someone homeless. A safety net is either a safety net or it is not. It would for example be disproportionate in any circumstances to use a safety net such as any form of ‘income support’ subject to any sort of political whim of (not so) ‘mutual obligation’ that could result in a person becoming homeless without a government agency or their proxies, having first obtained a legally reviewable court order.
I remember one of my… civil jury lawsuits HQ12X3564 is intended to mean Parliament Square, Central London in UK remains a public space.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 