Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: FAO Federal Court re Letters of Claim, Jurisdiction & civil jury for Declaratory/Court Orders 1. The Defamation & Fraud by Statewide Jobs Inc which is intended to stop my recovery from cancer & is causing me life threatening harm etc 2. Unlawful for State & Federal Ministers & Labour & Liberal political… parties to a) refuse to make it mandatory to report & record political torture & attempted murder of me as an Australian citizen b) to try & force me as a victim of torture & attempted murder to ‘agree’ it is ‘civil matter’ (the only argument by the undeclared conflicts of interest of Rudd & Murdoch et al is they did not succeed) c) fail to declare politicians like Rudd et al’s conflicts of interest 3. Health Commissioner legally obliged to provide complete set of hospital records from cancer to me, so I can get further medical treatment of my own choosing (one record central to decision making, a specialist said I needed for further medical treatment is missing) 4. A civil jury order politicians have breached my Habeas Corpus Court Order: I do not believe State & Federal Ministers & Labour & Liberal political parties have… jurisdiction to use adoption court orders & draconian adoption legislation against me as an adult adopted person without proof of my fully informed & written consent which they do not have (19.01.2023)
Hi,
I do not reasonably believe politicians, their political parties and privatised public services do or will fulfil basic legal obligations including timely and legal response to Letters of Claim, because they know they have no recognised defence in law.
- The company known as Statewide Jobs Inc who are publicly funded, have in my own case recklessly and maliciously committed defamation and fraud, while appearing to be one of these jobs given to politicians mates outfits, because they do not have professional basics like:
a) a published complaints system managed by an identified person
b) any published occupational health and safety system to protect members of the public that is managed by an identifiable person
c) a published whistleblower policy
and so on.
The company is intentionally trying to stop my recovery from cancer, and is causing me life threatening harm.
I obviously do not need to explain myself to Centrelink or anyone else because I have taken all reasonable steps to fulfil any legal obligations.
I reasonably expected the… politicians proxies at Jobs Statewide Inc to admit in writing on 18th January 2023, to Centrelink and myself they had lied in whatever information they gave behind my back to illegally stop my jobseeker with the intention of stopping my recovery from cancer and causing me life threatening harm while also intentionally trying to make me homeless.
I have been unable to proceed because of the actions of Jobs Statewide Inc with arranging to look at a flat in Melbourne, Australia, because of their unlawful actions, which does of course further compound my being illegally stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France because of the corrupt adoption industry etc.
There is no reasonable expectation Jobs Statewide Inc will professionally respond to a Letter of Claim before 20th January 2023, so I should be able to in the absence of that have a court order against them, because their malicious intention has already been to commit defamation and fraud by dishonestly portraying I am at some fault where it is proportionate to cause me serious harms and losses to intentionally make me homeless. The Jobs Statewide Inc have the opportunity now to contest my assertion.
It is clearly not my ‘fault’ that a lift I need to safely enter and leave a building where I am supposed to be staying, was not working, so I could not attend a meeting with the cowboys at Jobs Statewide Inc. in Prahran which is at the very least three different tram journeys away. There is also the problem of my sudden intolerance to heat following being diagnosed with cancer and having had a major operation etc etc etc etc.
I properly fulfilled any possible legal obligation to inform Statewide Jobs Inc on Thursday 12th January 2023 that because of circumstances beyond my control I would be unable to attend a meeting on Friday 13th January 2023, which they did not complain about.
I then received a rude, offensive and juvenile message on Friday 13th dishonestly suggesting I had failed in my legal obligations in some way without outlining how, so a person could not reasonably know what was really alleged. I then properly continued to fulfil any legal obligation, by responding that I wished for Statewide Job Services Inc to change me to a different service provider and send that different service provider a copy of my email that was sent on Thursday 12th January 2023 notifying Statewide Jobs Inc that I was unable through circumstances beyond my control to attend a meeting.
The shocking email sent by the company while I was in hospital being treated for cancer is an example of their more than unprofessionalism. It was unreasonable to send me an email while I was still in hospital and before I was even released from hospital that completely ignored the reality of cancer because that was an inconvenient fact for the company, for them to say it was…compulsory for me to attend some nonsense a few days later.
In fact what is the priority is to not bully and harass a cancer patient while they are in hospital and are going to have or have had a major operation, or are trying to… recover from a life threatening ‘change of circumstances’. It is common-sense that is needlessly and recklessly putting stress on a cancer patients and putting that patient at further risk of adverse, health outcomes.
The more recent response of the unprofessional bullies and con-artists at Jobs Statewide Inc was to fraudulently and with defamatory malice abuse the considerable public trust placed in them to unilaterally cut me off from jobseeker with the intention of making me homeless, while I try to recover from cancer !! I reasonably believe they committed the fraud and defamatory malice because they knew that had lied and instead of simply referring me to another provider because they are clearly in the wrong, wanted to cause me as much harm as they possibly can.
The problem that is immediately obvious with these privatised cowboy outfits spawned by the likes of the former Labour PM Rudd and his undeclared conflicts of interests is that politicians and political parties have set them up with public money without any proper or legal checks and balances and due process. It is simply unacceptable that some cowboy outfit who has not a single published policy to protect members of the public could so easily fraudulently and with defamatory malice use that position to just arbitrarily and without giving proper reasons in writing cut a jobseeker payment to intentionally try and make someone homeless.
I clearly did fulfil any legal obligation and in so doing was treated unlawfully with actions that are clearly… disproportionate because there is no question they did know the situation in advance and did not complain it was somehow my fault.
I reasonably suspect the ruthless efficiency of Jobs Statewide in only in acting unlawfully is because they know it is disproportionate to cut of the supposed safety net of jobseeker to intentionally make… anyone homeless. It is either a safety net or it is not. There is a problem with politicians hiring proxies like Jobs Statewide Inc to change what is supposed to be a safety net into something that unlawfully acts on the whim of politicians who all too often have undeclared conflicts of interest.
I reasonably expect Jobs Statewide Inc to admit liability and provide very substantial compensation that acts as a deterrent to them acting unlawfully again.
I also reasonably expected state and federal politicians to investigate what is going on. My local state and federal MP’s along with the Ministers responsible have a legal obligation to speak with and investigate Jobs Statewide Inc. These include Ms Nina Taylor who is the local state MP and the invisible Federal MP Mr Burns, in the area I live, along with a Federal Minister Mr Burke.
(I remember the Crown Persecution Service in the UK were legally obliged to withdraw a malicious hit-piece they circulated behind my back – someone else told me about- over the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in 132-138 SOCPA 2005 I helped force off the statute books while in Parliament Square, Central London)
- I reasonably need a civil jury court order/declaration it is unlawful for State & Federal Ministers & Labour & Liberal political… parties to a) refuse to make it mandatory to report & record the political torture & attempted murder of an Australian citizen that happened while being illegally detained and was because Rudd et al have undeclared conflicts of interest b) to try & force a victim of torture & attempted murder to ‘agree’ it is ‘civil matter’
(the only argument by the undeclared conflicts of interest of Rudd & Murdoch et al is they did not succeed)
- The Health Commissioner does not have a reasonable excuse and has not given any explanation for failing to provide me with, including in a timely manner, a complete set of hospital records from cancer to me (which any patient must have an absolute right to in their own case) so in my own case, I can get further timely medical treatment of my own choosing (one record central to decision making, recently, but will continue to be central to any other medical treatment, is a record a specialist said I needed for further medical treatment that is…. missing)
I think it is probably true that the Health Commissioner is legally obliged to also provide a complete set of the records the State of Victoria (ie: the DOJ and courts) claim to have relating to my adoption in Case 352)
- I do not reasonably believe politicians et al have… jurisdiction over me with regard to adoption once I became an adult and that, that is the reason for 1-3.
I do not believe State & Federal Ministers & Labour & Liberal political parties have jurisdiction to use adoption court orders & draconian adoption legislation against me as an adult adopted person without proof of my fully informed & written consent which they do not have.
I would like an order from a civil jury of necessary that politicians have breached my Habeas Corpus Court Order
I think it is defamatory etc for politicians to not call me by my real name of Donna Bugat and it is disproportionate for them to fail to provide me with an Australian passport in my own identity, so I can make my own decisions about where I live and the medical treatment I have.
A kinder evolution is possible
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 