Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Premier Andrews cannot sign statutory declaration denying he is intentionally causing me life threatening harm & trying to stop my recovery from cancer & illegally stopping me getting Australian passport in my own identity, so I can also have opportunity to choose to have medical treatment elsewhere, while… he is in breach of my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order (that is the same as my signing a statutory declaration) from 16th April 2008 in UK over Mothers Day 2006 etc while I was in Parliament Square, Central London because he knows I do not need politicians ‘permission’ to renounce legislative overreach of draconian adoption legislation anywhere, that has also stopped me from for the first time in my life, peacefully living in my own home in Breizh, France, at least privately with my Mediterranean background that is publicly & officially hidden, oppressed, repressed, and banned by draconian adoption legislation in Australia, while I support creation of International Civil Court with choice of juries to help peacefully transform global legal landscape (10.01.2023)
‘Schrodinger’s Cat-a-lan’
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
I am a ‘Schrodinger’s Cat-a-lan’, because politicians will say I exist in some shape or form, when they want to use an extraordinary adoption court order, against me, to label me adopted, and including to maliciously prosecute me over that, under the guise of additional legislative over-reaches, like the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 (I helped force off the statute books) in the UK, but illegally try and stop me from existing when I have a superior court order or civil jury lawsuit against politicians.
I simply had no realistic opportunity to publicly renounce draconian adoption legislation in the first instance in the Magistrates Courts in the UK.
There are times I have as someone labelled adopted, been unable to appear in person in a court, because I have been held prisoner against my will by government, or for very serious health reasons which can include being in a hospital for an emergency medical operation etc.
It is clearly necessary for a properly constituted court to make and keep accurate and contemporaneous records of proceedings in a court that are in all circumstances available free of charge to at least the person taken to court, and therefore most directly affected by proceedings, for the purposes of appeal etc.
It is self evident no-one can guarantee that every civil servant, police officer, prosecutor, judge, politician, or member of a monarchy is going to be honest and truthful either inside or outside any court.
I was after all, maliciously prosecuted by politicians and members of the British monarchy et al while I was in Parliament Square, Central London because they had an unrealistic expectation that I needed their ‘permission’ to peacefully be me, and uphold the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy.
The evidence is the only way politicians et al could maliciously take me to court and prosecute and imprison me in the UK was by politicians illegally a) refusing to give me legal representation and b) refusing to make and keep, let alone give me, including for the purpose of appeal, an accurate and contemporaneous record of legal proceedings beginning in the Magistrates Courts in the UK. This was despite the fact Magistrates Courts in the UK can… imprison people without a jury.
The British politicians cannot say a Magistrates Court in the UK is a properly constituted court that can also… imprison people, when politicians refuse to make or keep accurate and contemporaneous records of proceedings so that at the very least the person most directly affected has the opportunity to make a proper appeal to a higher court, including … before being imprisoned.
How can Australian politicians in all good conscience, simply go along with Australian citizens being tried in Magistrates Courts in the UK knowing British politicians refuse without lawful excuse to keep an accurate and contemporaneous record of proceedings ?
How can politicians in the State of Victoria, not make it mandatory for everyone who is labelled adopted by their draconian adoption legislation have all the necessary court records, wherever we live, to legally challenge that, wherever we live ?
A Global register:
There should be a global register of people labelled adopted who renounce draconian adoption legislation (who want to be included on such a register) which is the starting point for politicians to provide corrected legal documents like passports in our own identity, and free of charge. The legal reality is anyone labelled adopted accrues any additional nationalities and citizenships other than those we were born with, in our own right, to do with them, whatever we wish.
A global register for people labelled adopted who renounce draconian adoption legislation could easily be achieved with statutory declarations from people labelled adopted renouncing draconian adoption legislation.
The politicians are legally obliged to confirm if someone is adopted if that person asks, because some people have not been told they are adopted, and should not have to find out by paying considerable sums of money to the former Head of the BBC Mark Thompson who is now CEO of Ancestry. It is well documented the British government were endlessly destroying my DNA in the UK (they had in any event illegally collected) because in my case my DNA didn’t match the adopted identity being publicly imposed on me.
The original malicious ‘White Rose’ prosecution brought against me on 22nd February (2006) in one of the last cases at Bow Street Magistrates in Central London, in the UK, after instead of being summonsed, I was unlawfully arrested on 20th December 2005, and not given any legal representation or interviewed before just being charged under ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 despite the fact I was not even obliged to attend court myself in what was supposed to at most be a summary only matter, the proceedings in the court were nevertheless, unlawfully based entirely on politicians refusing to make or keep accurate and contemporaneous records of legal proceedings in Magistrates Courts in the UK.
They had to try and cover up my… civil jury lawsuit from 26th March 2006 over Mothers Day 2006 had overtaken the malicious White Rose prosecution against me from 22nd February (2006):
-I- therefore properly & legally notified the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police on 3rd March 2006 that I was peacefully campaigning in public spaces, including with Brian whenever we might… choose to do so without first needing a Judge’s permission to peacefully do that. And that since I could not by peacefully campaigning openly in a public space possibly commit any harm that met any civil or criminal threshold under ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police could not impose any conditions on me using ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 etc etc.
The London human rights lawyers, separately appealed to the High Court, over the malicious’ White Rose’ prosecution from 22nd February 2006 over 20th December 2005, on 15th ‘Ides of’ March 2006 that included a barristers opinion in the case stated that “the judge (“glossed over” which is legalese for)… changed his reasons when challenged. It was clearly a malicious prosecution despite the arresting police officer not appearing or providing any evidence of whatever he complained about that was supposedly so serious to arrest me and charge me without my having legal representation or being interviewed, that the government did not want the arresting police officer to be cross examined about, the prosecutor and judge went ahead, in the knowledge of course that ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 was in every respect a significant legislative over-reach beyond an already problematic Public Order Act from 1986.
In fact and law, while the District Judge did change his reasons in the malicious ‘White Rose’ prosecution against me from saying:
a) I “should not as a single (working) parent be spending my money coming to London to protest” (which I did not understand constitutes of itself any known civil, let alone criminal offence) to
b) I would essentially be committing a criminal offence, if I did not first have the permission of a judge to accept an offer from Brian to campaign with him, when that offer being made by Brian did not constitute a criminal offence, but acceptance of that offer by Brian did constitute a criminal offence (which I also did not understand of itself would constitute a civil, let alone criminal offence)
did actually mean -all- the District Judge’s reasons were unlawful.
I was then unlawfully arrested on Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 in Parliament Square, Central London when it so happens I had on me that thing called… evidence that I had properly notified the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police on 3rd March 2006 that I was peacefully campaigning etc etc etc etc. The BBC then illegally published my adopted name and a false report, they purported was from New Scotland Yard, that there could be a… criminal prosecution of me in the knowledge that was untrue and could only be “void ab initio”. The true record is it was in fact agreed on Mothers Day 2006, there was only my civil jury lawsuit that could proceed.
The two Blair’s and the BBC lied when they published a report that I could face a criminal prosecution over 26th March 2006 which could only be “void ab initio” because they knew they had… already agreed there was only my civil jury lawsuit:
The use of all sorts of war to traffic vulnerable children by using the label ‘adopted’ is well known.
I was not “released pending a decision by the CPS” because it was already agreed on Mothers Day, there was only my civil jury lawsuit.
It is simply unacceptable for the BBC to publish what they know are false reports including because they are not attributable to anyone (the BBC did after all also publish a false report of my unlawful arrest before a State Opening on 25th May 2010 that is directly attributed to what the BBC claim is their… own audio for goodness sakes, that completely contradicts the complete audio and video footage)
The truth is no-one wanted me to have the civil jury nullification of legislative overreaches like draconian adoption legislation or ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 etc.
___________
There was actually another headline neither the BBC (or Guardian et al) wanted to publish with their accounts that differ about what I was supposedly heard saying on BBC London, on 25 May 2010 when Brian was arrested and what I said when I was arrested:
_________
Schrodinger’s Cat-a-lan:
It was also a legal impossibility for me to have a… civil jury lawsuit from Mothers Day 2006, which is a matter of fact, including the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police did not in my case at any time disclose an… undated document, claiming he had delegated his authority, before later producing an… undated document in other people’s… criminal cases claiming he had at some unknown time delegated authority under ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005.
__________
The same Judges in the malicious White Rose Prosecution & landmark Contempt of Court:
The same District Judge who was involved in the malicious ‘White Rose’ prosecution on 22 February 2006 which was… overtaken by my civil jury case from Mothers Day on 26th March in 2006, was then involved in falsely accusing me of an alleged Contempt of Court on 26th March 200… 7 at Horse-ferry Road Magistrates in Westminster. The alleged Contempt of Court that arose on 26th March 200…7 (that attracted a further abuse of process with our being tried in the Magistrates Court for an alleged Contempt of Court on the 26th March 2007 on the 29th March 2007 because the Judge had not actually cited us for an alleged Contempt of Court on 26th March 2007) resulted in an infamous landmark High Court ruling on supposed jurisdiction (because members of the judiciary were arguing among themselves about a case no-one wanted) was of course a distraction from the fact politicians illegally refuse to have courts beginning with the Magistrates Courts in the UK, make and keep accurate and contemporaneous records of legal proceedings that are available free of charge to at least the person taken to court, and so directly affected by court proceedings. There is a jurisdiction question of a quite different kind, of what jurisdiction do politicians really have to try someone in a court that can imprison people, when politicians do not want to make or keep any accurate or contemporaneous records of those proceedings.
In fact, the same District Judge from the malicious White Rose Prosecution on 22nd February 2006 (who still hadn’t produced a case stated for that, over a year later !! on 26th March 200…7) had maliciously issued six further illegal ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 summons against me on Friday 23rd March 2007 for a hearing on Monday 26th March 200…7 that he was forced to place ‘sine die’ after I/we were unlawfully arrested for an alleged Contempt of Court (when I was only at the court by happenstance as a McKenzie friend for Steve Jago) because the District Judge had illegally refused to even hand over to me a copy of his seriously dodgy summons, against me, I had not actually received, so I could legally challenge them… elsewhere.
It was then not only the same District Judge in the Magistrates Court, but then the same two Judges in the High Court in the inextricably linked malicious White Rose (22nd February 2006) & Contempt of Court (26th March 200…7) prosecutions.
The same High Court Judges simply sought to deflect the two cases away from the High Court by:
a) simply ‘forgetting’ to invite me to a/any hearing in the High Court over the malicious ‘White Rose’ prosecution in the Magistrates Court, they had tried to claim had not been heard in a timely manner (between February 2006 – November 2007) because the case had been ‘lost’ in ‘Town & Country Planning’ when I had previously inquired about the unreasonable delay compared to other people’s cases, before the administrative court staff confirmed then having a hearing without informing me, did also make a hearing ‘ultra vires’.
(In other ss 132-138 SOCPA cases in the High Court, London human rights lawyers had unbelievably and without telling their clients in advance, appealed the other cases on human rights grounds before changing their minds and conceding en masse, any human rights grounds before a High Court hearing which it was noted I never agreed to do, and so I was also illegally denied legal representation. The London human rights lawyers did that… after they knew it was ‘void ab initio’ to prosecute me, that led to Brian being found to have no case to answer)
b) spinning the jurisdiction argument to distract from the fact… politicians are refusing without lawful excuse to make or keep accurate and contemporaneous records of legal proceedings beginning in the Magistrates Courts which can imprison people without a jury
I was shockingly literally kidnapped from inside Southwestern Magistrates Court in London in the UK on 19th July 2007, to stop me giving evidence on a witness stand in a court, where I later won that malicious prosecution when the CPS had to concede it was “the government who put in place a sequence of events that put my life at risk” The next day when the government had to produce me before ‘a court’/any court, after I was completely traumatized, they took me… back to Horse-ferry Road Magistrates Court in Westminster who by ‘happenstance’ also had to… withdraw an unlawful ‘Community Court Order’ they had imposed on me in May 2007, to illegally try and stop me peacefully campaigning in Parliament Square, Central London that I had appealed (to and ‘won’ everything about that wider malicious prosecution in Southwark Crown Court on 13th December 2007) that the Magistrates Court knew they unlawfully imposed in breach of a Crown Court Order from 8th March 2007, when Southwark Crown Court said Parliament Square was my home, so nothing like bail conditions or a Community order could be imposed as what would really be political means to a) stop me peacefully campaigning in Parliament Square or b) to try and imprison me by the back door.
What sort of Attorney Generals would… repeatedly threaten to ummm… imprison me, because I wanted politicians to make and keep accurate and contemporaneous records of proceedings in courts, so I couldn’t be illegally imprisoned ?
A passing lawyer said I was the first time, politicians had repeatedly failed to even be able to get a malicious prosecution against me off the ground in the Magistrates Courts in the UK.
And yet I have been unlawfully imprisoned throughout my life, by draconian adoption legislation.
I have my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from the 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc etc because politicians very seriously breached their duty of care, and threw away even any pretence of the peace and harmony of the rule of law.
It was obviously then a legal absurdity for any member of the monarchy to claim they could pursue claiming a legal title over a part of the public space in Parliament Square, Central London, and then keep legislating to try and make that somehow true, when it could never be legal anyway, as I proved when I won ‘satellite’ litigation in for example HQ11X00563. I dare say anyone “could” register a political party on the basis that if it was elected with a majority of votes and seats that automatically abolished the inequality of monarchy without needing a referendum, and could enact a new Constitution that had been published and agreed by party members in advance.
The politicians did not want us to leapfrog to the ECHR in this scandal about the inequality of monarchy:
The former Mayor of London who was a journalist, when he posed as the Attorney General for the monarch, while being paid a considerable sum of money that was chicken feed for the Barclay Brothers who employed him and bought all the free legal representation that went with that for them too:
I was the one who was violently punched in the head (that damaged my left eye) by a male politicians et al refused to identify in 2007:
There was plenty of inequality on offer from the journalist Johnson, the Barclay Brothers and the monarchy (and the collection of tax havens) :
The former Mayor of London & British Tory PM Johnson illegally refused to hand over to me the CCTV of the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me he orchestrated (that I have signed statutory declarations over in Australia too because of course I have never needed to be in the UK to have the CCTV sent to me by for example email:
Brian was able to get a new passport in the UK to go to Germany for alternative, and hospital medical treatment he could not get in the UK, before he had to have the operation in Germany. The news media all falsely claim/ed Brian died in Berlin, but I was with him when he sadly he died in a hospital in… Bremen, Germany.
There was very serious political persecution:
I was not allowed to travel from Australia, to help look after Neil who had been my boyfriend, when he was transferred from a hospital in Enschede in the Netherlands, to Ter Apel refugee centre, after he was forced while seriously ill, to claim political asylum, which he had not wanted to do (and happened while I was illegally detained in hotel quarantine in Melbourne, in August 2020 while a Ms Mackenzie who had worked for the former Australian PM Rudd, as a media adviser, was a political appointment at the DOJ in Victoria, before Neil died on 2nd October 2020 in a hospital in Essen in the Netherlands. Ms Mackenzie is also legally responsible for falsely circulating information that I own property in Australia, to try and hide the politicians were intentionally trying to make me homeless, including during a global pandemic:
I did know it was illegal for a Ms MacKenzie to contact me shortly after I was diagnosed with cancer in 2022, because I did know she had a longstanding conflict of interest with the former Australian Labour PM Rudd, and was a political appointment:
Ms McKenzie had obviously directly benefited from my being illegally detained in hotel quarantine in August 2020. There is nothing ‘wrong’ about me just being me, instead of the fake political identity imposed on me.
(I had complained to Victorian police !! in July 2022 when I was trying to leave the country !! that I had been illegally detained in hotel quarantine in August 2020 and that politicians had been falsifying records behind my back to try and make it appear I own property in Australia, which a Ms McKenzie was still trying to cover up on 7th September 2022 when she wrote to me, because she was involved in trying to intentionally make me homeless.
There was of course nothing remotely innocent about Rudd and McKenzie and the revolving doors of PM’s in Australia on the same day (23rd June 2010) I was illegally denied legal representation in the UK… again.
The Big Brexit that took place exactly six years later on 23rd June 2016, was presumably essentially about the inequality of politics and tax havens, because that is rather similar to draconian adoption legislation that politicians claim means whatever they want it to mean on any given day.
Ms McKenzie could not sign a statutory declaration saying she had not intentionally sought to cause me life threatening harm (& I would bet Rudd has recruited Madam to join him on his intended Ambassadorship in the United States)
The politicians and public officials in Australia including Ms McKenzie lied behind my back about my owning real estate in Australia, to intentionally make me homeless while all the stress and distress eventually resulted in my being diagnosed with cancer:
The politicians and public officials actually… persisted in continuing to… lie about my owning real estate in Australia, which is not true, while I was in hospital for an emergency operation. It was only mostly amended after I was released from hospital when the government could not identify the supposed real estate… to other people, so then other people knew they were lying too, and then realized the politicians had been lying during a global pandemic too when they weren’t letting Australian citizens leave the country without an ‘exemption’ they wouldn’t give me.
When I was illegally detained in hotel quarantine in August 2020 (I had been forced to return to Australia much earlier before the global pandemic, in July 2019) the government claimed they had lost my test results, which turned out to be the pretext they used to detain me longer (next to Vitol Oil’s Viva Energy office in Docklands – it was Vitol who paid vast sums of money in bribes to try and illegally stop my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 in the UK) so they could treat me differently from the other people I knew I was detained with in Melbourne.
The politicians benefited from falsifying their records to make it appear I own property in Australia in the knowledge they were intentionally trying to make me homeless, including during a global pandemic, because of course they were legally obliged to include me on the over 55 housing register way back in… July 2019, if and while they were not going to let me live in my own home in Breizh, France.
The former Australian Labour PM Rudd (with the $1.4 billion dollar brown envelope from the British Tories to cover up for example my ‘winning’ HQ11X00563) could not sign a statutory declaration for DFAT or the Home Affairs Department in Australia saying he does not have a conflict of interest in becoming the Australian Ambassador to the United States, The fact a left-over from his political administration might offer him that position without for example putting it out for public tender, does not mean he does not need to and can refuse to sign a statutory declaration over conflicts of interest, such as trying to claim legal immunity.
I personally support an International Civil Court with the choice of juries to help transform the global legal landscape, that could for example be based in Jerusalem and could include a global register of people labelled adopted who renounce draconian adoption legislation, regardless of our race, religion, politics or none.
I am straight but I don’t treat any friends who are LGBTQ + differently, and nor should I forcibly be labelled adopted against my will:
There is obviously no longer my whole physical self because I have since had a major operation to remove cancer and a considerable number of internal organs, although there were and remain complications because of an anatomical anomaly that is usually hereditary, and poses a significant risk factor if I am assaulted, which I have been.
My ‘whole self’ is Donna Bugat because that is really who I am.
I was unable to completely live as who I am, in my own home in Breizh, France, because of draconian adoption legislation, in Victoria, Australia. However, I did privately find some peace and harmony in many ways, because I was able to, for the first time in my life to live with my Mediterranean background despite that part of my background still being publicly and officially hidden, repressed, oppressed and banned by politicians draconian adoption legislation in Victoria, Australia.
My own stone cottage is in my own wood, so I was very privileged to live in my very own nature lovers paradise with the most amazing symphony of birdsong I have ever heard in my life.
It is a fact, Premier Andrews cannot sign a statutory declaration denying he is intentionally causing me life threatening harm & trying to stop my recovery from cancer & illegally stopping me getting an Australian passport in my own identity, because I should also be able to choose or have the opportunity to get medical treatment elsewhere, while… he is in breach of my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order (that is the same as my signing a statutory declaration) from 16th April 2008 in UK over Mothers Day 2006 etc while I was in Parliament Square, Central London because he knows I do not need politicians ‘permission’ to renounce while I am anywhere, the legislative overreach of draconian adoption legislation.
Brian was able to get a new passport in the UK to go to Germany for hospital medical treatment he could not get in the UK, he eventually had to have in Germany. The news media falsely claim he died in Berlin, but I was with him when he sadly he died in a hospital in Bremen.
Premier Andrews should not be able to use draconian adoption legislation from the State of Victoria, to stop me having a national Australian passport in my own identity, so that I also have the opportunity to have medical treatment elsewhere.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 