Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Premier Andrews & a Mr Moran, his legislative draftsman & not so anti corruption aficionado, along with Health Commissioner know I am entitled to genuine… choice to prioritize my… legal immunity from prolonged life threatening adoption being used against me to harm my health, incl to cause cancer while hiding my… Mediterranean background, that resulted in politicians who illegally stopped me living in my own home in Breizh, France, had to include me on ‘priority housing’ list in Australia (being an Australian Ambassador to United States which comes with a house, albeit not as beautiful as my own home, could be opportunity to help promote International Civil Court with choice of juries that would transform global legal landscape !!) because politicians & media execs in UK & Australia like Rudd (Australia) Blair, Brown, BBC Thompson & Telegraph Johnson & Swaddle, Wokingham & Westminster councillor & adviser to a Lord Sugar (UK) advised they can’t sign… statutory declarations to claim they have no conflicts of interest in using public office to try & have legal immunity over my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc, because it is clearly unreasonable to be forced to sell my own home in UK in 2006 & then be forced to leave my own home in Breizh, France in 2019 & return to Australia so politicians can intentionally make me homeless while they unlawfully claim courts can refuse to record facts of adoption cases & to withdraw adoption court orders (29.12.2022)
N.B: I would guess the fmr Australian PM Rudd’s not so innocent, former ‘media adviser’ called Ms McKenzie (below) who spun herself into a financially lucrative ‘role’ that could only be called a clearly… political appointment at the DOJ in Victoria, of which the ‘Adoption Information Service’ became a part of) has planned to hook up with Rudd again.
It was seriously not okay for a Ms McKenzie to send the email below, to me on 7th September 2022 when I was so seriously ill with cancer (the real reason the email below was sent to me on 7th September 2022 is because that is the anniversary of when the Australian Labour party lost the Federal general election in 2013 – of course there was a lot that happened in Westminster in 2009 & 2010 before -I- was exiled from the UK in 2013):
I do not personally consider that it is either sensible or legal to have compulsory/mandatory voting in state or federal elections in Australia because it a) creates an entirely false perception of public support for any politicians because it means people are forced to vote under duress, rather than out of choice, and b) means there is no incentive for either of the major political parties to serve up anything other than at best, left-overs. I think it is more likely than not, an independent candidate in Mulgrave in the State election in Victoria, in Australia, would have beaten the latest Premier if they had both had the same… financial resources. The latest Victorian Premier whose only career is literally factional back-room politics (which is not really about members of the public) had an extremely unfair advantage with the financial resources poured into just trying to keep him in public office. There wasn’t actually much difference between the overall number of votes the two major political parties received, across the state, that did however result in a vast difference in the number of seats allocated to the two main political parties, which is interesting. The Federal election earlier in the year, in Australia, simply saw people vote… against the previous PM, rather than for the latest PM, which is a generally recognised trend national politics follows over time, anywhere. Australia is seriously ‘over-governed’ with sooooo many overpaid politicians.
It is observable that politicians… ‘media advisers’ can secure alternative financially lucrative … political appointments posing on the taxpayer dime as… civil servants which they most certainly are not.
_______________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
________
*The politicians are illegally continuing to put my life at risk with draconian adoption legislation*
_______
The politicians sought to hide I am adopted which is often used by politicians and others to erase all or part of a persons identity including heritage like for example my Mediterranean background, for political or cultural reasons etc. It was a very strange experience to have my Mediterranean background deliberately hidden from me, while I was growing up, as though it did not exist, and could be politically erased at the whim of any politician which is pretty creepy anyway. It put me at a serious disadvantage in so many respects, apart from the fact it is neither nice or respectful to be lied to by adult strangers for so long.
I did while in Parliament Square, Central London in the UK force a political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in the legislative overreach of ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 off the statute books, because politicians were illegally trying to avoid my wider civil jury lawsuit that would have also resulted in jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation too.
I do not reasonably believe that my health is less important than what is really, political draconian adoption legislation, and politicians have never produced any insurance cover for draconian adoption legislation.
My case highlights that politicians simply do not care about due process with regard to draconian adoption legislation because they could not possibly claim it was reasonable to force someone adopted in Australia, who lives overseas, to leave our own home overseas, to return to Australia and be homeless while paying money to a court in case the court… “might” withdraw the adoption court order. That is a legal absurdity.
It is clearly illegal for politicians and civil servants to refuse to have a 24/7 service available to remedy adverse consequences from draconian adoption legislation, for anyone labelled adopted, regardless of whenever any politician or civil servant may choose to agree any holiday between… themselves.
It is clearly completely unreasonable for politicians to claim I cannot protect and try and improve my own health, instead of being adversely affected by draconian adoption legislation. It can only be more important for me to have the space to try and recover from cancer and a major medical operation about cancer without politicians using draconian adoption legislation against me to knowingly try and stop me protecting and improving my health.
I would have lived in Jerusalem if I had not been adopted, because I was sent away from Australia as a teenager because I refused to go along with the political deceit of draconian adoption legislation. I did not enjoy the same… opportunities a Mark Regev who was also born in Melbourne, did have. I do not personally believe a Jewish State is contingent on either the Balfour Declaration or Zionism because people who are Jews must be entitled to a country on the Mediterranean like Catholic and Muslim people because there are clearly people who are Jews who are indigenous to the… Mediterranean. It is actually far more common than it is publicly admitted for people with a… Mediterranean background to have family members who are or have been Jewish, Catholic, or Muslim. There is a fascinating history about the Phoenician Purple people who preceded the Catalan thalassocracy. The Gondwana era saw the land masses including what is for example called Arabia, and what is now called Australia, joined together. It is interesting that humans can travel so far into outer space, yet we do not yet have the capacity to safely even begin to really explore the depths of the oceans in our own world.
It is therefore very serious when politicians casually try and erase part of or all of someone else’s background using the label of ‘adoption’ because the reality is politicians are doing that for all sorts of selfish and often hidden reasons of their own.
There is no-one who has the right to say it is okay to erase someone else’s identity and background for their own reasons because we all contribute in our own way to the bigger puzzle that is the beauty of life that is a never ending exercise in learning so much, far beyond ourselves.
I knew about the importance of protecting civilians peaceful freedom of expression because I had lived and worked in Central London during the terror of the IRA bombing campaign on the mainland that we now know involved the British intelligence services. This was before I was on a kibbutz at Yad Mordechai in Israel, near Gaza in 1984 after I witnessed the American warships leaving Beirut, in Lebanon, before we could land in Haifa in Israel.
I know as someone labelled adopted who is a member of the public, it is the better choice and more peaceful to try and raise important legal issues in genuine legal proceedings in courts.
Notes:
I did, while a Chair of Governors in a school in Wokingham in the UK hold a meeting to inform staff that I would not be making any cuts in school services for children so I would not be making any staff redundant either when Labour’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, a Mr Brown sought to steal money from school budgets to help fund the Iraq War. The Conservative and Lib Dem Councillors in Wokingham whose MP is a Mr Redwood, a Conservative politician were furious about my decision, and the fact other schools did the same. The Conservative council Leader of Wokingham Borough Council illegally phoned me at my home and threatened me, which I reported, and he was spoken to.
I was later then blacklisted from my paid employment as a healthcare worker when I was first in Parliament Square, Central London. This was orchestrated by a Ms Gilder who was at that time a Lib Dem Wokingham Borough Councillor who had been appointed as a school governor before becoming a Reading East Conservative Town Councillor because of course I do happen to know about her corruption. The company who employed me as a health worker relied on government contracts. A Ms Gilder is connected to a Mr Swaddle who portrayed he was an adviser to a Lord Sugar, and was a Conservative Wokingham Borough Councillor who then became a Westminster City Councillor to help try and cover up I won for example HQ11X00563 in London in the UK.
I lived in a part of Earley, in Reading, on the border between political and racial divides, which were also complicated by historical political boundaries (ie: gerrymandering) between Reading East, and Wokingham which is the wealthiest political area in the UK.
A Mr Swaddle obviously had a political motive to cover up -I- won for example HQ11X00563 (which is included in my own statutory declarations in Australia)
Most people would understand why when exiled from the UK, I tried to make a safe space for myself in Breizh, France and get on with my own life, with my own identity.
The former Labour PM Brown was clearly advised he could not sign the ‘Brexit’ Lisbon Treaty on 13th December 2007 after I ‘won’ a decisive legal ‘victory’ at Southwark Crown Court earlier that day, that meant he was legally obliged to resign instead. Blair had been legally obliged to resign on Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 instead of grandstanding in front of the Australian Parliament on 27th March 2006.
The facts are the BBC did when the Director General was a Mr Thompson (before he shuffled off to a NY Times & Ancestry) unlawfully publish false reports of my unlawful arrests etc on Mothers Day 26th March 2006, a State Opening on 25th May 2010 and on 16th January 2012 that politicians and media executives etc knew at all times could never be… repeated in any court, and particularly in front of a civil jury.
The politicians and media executives knew this false report published by the BBC of my unlawful arrest on Mothers Day 26th March 2006 could never be… repeated in any court, because it was completely untrue, and intended to distract from my… civil jury lawsuit/s:
The politicians et al could never produce a witness statement from an Inspector Lyons, who I spoke with, because what was published was untrue.
I do not reasonably believe that what is called the ‘Good Law Project’ in the UK who feature the Lords, Baron Wood of Anfield (a fmr ‘Special Adviser’ to Brown, et al) on its board could possibly call itself a non-profit or bave any charitable status. Its sole purpose is to replace legal aid representation for members of the public, including when facing imprisonment, with popularity contests for political funding for cases that will primarily benefit politicians like Brown et al, and wealthy sponsors.
The former British PM Brown & Baron Wood of Anfield are only illegally using the ‘Good Law Project’ as a public front to launder money etc to… themselves.
It is worthwhile to mention that I was stopped from completing my university degree in Health & Social Care, after my little sister I was raised separately from ‘suddenly’ died, because I refused to go along with what is really a political narrative of adoption that is very distressing. I was obviously then forced to sell my home in the UK in 2006 because my lawsuit over Mothers Day was not settled in a timely manner.
I could not really find it within myself to under any circumstances also write essays in support of the political narrative of adoption that was within the context of a university degree, supposed to be portrayed as being part of health and social care in the whole PPE (politics, philosophy and economics) gig.
I do not reasonably believe from my own ‘lived experience’ of being maliciously persecuted and prosecuted by the British monarchy (regardless of what I may personally think of the inequality of the… institution of monarchy) while I was in Parliament Square, Central London (and I cannot see the monarchy actually overtly involved on Mothers Day) that what is called international law, particularly over land, is settled.
There hasn’t been anyone willing to hand over o me, the CCTV of the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me that a reasonable person would understand would have an adverse impact on my health:
The reality is this is not an accurate and contemporaneous record of what -I- said on 21st June 2010 before I was illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 on the same day as the revolving PM’s in Australia:
The monarchy (as far as I am aware) were not directly involved on Mothers Day 2006.
The property imbroglio over Parliament Square in Central London arose because a Labour Deputy PM and sleazebag called Prescott ridiculously purported he could (in the GLA Act 1999) give some of the public land in Parliament Square, to the monarchy (whose lawyers who spoke to Brian and myself, knew the monarchy could not then bring prosecutions against members of the public) in return for a peerage (& was also quite possibly a payoff for him being a bagman between Blair & Brown & agreeing to not promote abolishing the House of Lords, which could weaken the institution of monarchy too. It is and was, legally and politically particularly ‘awkward’ to explain the anomaly of the British House of Lords being part of the EU especially if that was ever challenged in the ECHR etc regardless of whether or not the UK was in the EU, because of course the ECHR is completely separate to the EU)
This is not an accurate report below about the significant fact -I- was illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 while politicians illegally refused to hand over the CCTV to me, of the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me, because I am (illegally) labelled… adopted:
I am being serious when I point out it was significantly more serious I was illegally being denied legal representation when Johnson had no legal authority to maliciously try and prosecute me to try and cover up the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me over Mothers Day etc compared to the revolving doors of a couple of PM’s in Australia that resulted from that:
Of course the ‘highly unusual’ case (above) did mean I also had legal grounds to claim political asylum outside the British Commonwealth.
The British ‘chicken-feed’ Johnson, was actually being paid by the Barclay Brothers to pose as a journalist which he really was not, while Mayor of London (and still a US citizen too) while he and the Telegraph were illegally claiming vast sums of… public money for their own free… legal representation:
Johnson had very serious conflicts of interest, which is probably why he was chosen to take over from the also discredited Labour Mayor of London Livingstone.
The politicians obviously knew I had been on a kibbutz in Israel earlier in 1984, when I was traveling with an American friend when I was 22 years old:
The former Conservative Vitol Oil Minister published a false account of his time in politics because of course it conceals he had to first along with the Daily Mail illegally hide the existence of my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 where Alan Duncan literally collected a £160,000 brown envelope.
This is a false account ghostwritten for a former Conservative MP called Duncan to try and hide… my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 (Duncan was recorded on… Telegraph TV on February 26th 2008, illegally starting to publicly lie, about me, before being shut down from continuing while I was still illegally detained):
This is not an accurate account by Duncan of his umm… perjured witness statement… about and against me, from February 2008 etc etc over… Mothers Day 2006 (because the lie over Mothers Day obviously only exponentially grew, rather than changed, that included Duncan did actually libel… me in the Daily Mail in August 2008, before Benedict Brogan, their political Editor and chairman of the parliamentary press gallery then switched to the Telegraph after I complained – many journalists in Westminster pretty much work with/for any of the news organizations)
I remember when a NY times journalist was babbling away to me in 2011, about how he (the journalist) was friends and travelled with a US General called Petraeus, that I observed, it was not like a General Petraeus was being, or was ever likely to find himself prosecuted by the errr… British monarchy for goodness sakes, because he defended peaceful freedom of expression, which was what I was doing.
It looks like it is more likely than not, the monarchy’s more recent soap opera is about the royals and media trying to control any genuine public debate over the inherent inequality of the institution of monarchy, including more generally. Most people would agree there should be an International Civil Court with the choice of juries to help first and foremost protect… vulnerable children, while of course no political or religious leader could ever claim to represent all people. The EU has obviously not properly settled the central legal issue in Brexit, of members of the public having EU citizenship without that being contingent on whether or not politicians may later decide to leave the institution of the EU. It is sometimes the case that an adopted person is not informed by someone who poses as a parent that the person posing as a parent has renounced a citizenship of their own. A person who is labelled adopted must have acquired any additional nationalities and citizenships, to our own, in our own right, to do whatever we wish with. The institution of the UN is obviously not based on any agreement between countries about the peace and harmony of the rule of law and democracy.
The reality is however hard I try and protect and improve my health, the politicians are at the same time intentionally and illegally trying to harm my health using life threatening adoption legislation. So it is extremely difficult for me to protect and improve my health which I should be able to do as my priority.
I remain legally entitled to have a genuine choice to renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation that is not and could not be contingent on my having to leave my own home in Breizh, France so politicians could intentionally make me homeless in Australia on the basis politicians falsely claim courts can refuse to keep proper adoption records etc.
I was only unlawfully arrested in the County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 (when I was not even voluntarily in the country, and was trying to leave the country) because… politicians did not want an accurate and contemporaneous record of my (illegal) adoption being kept, and to withdraw an adoption court order etc.
I should have been able to renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation while in my own home in Breizh, France.
The fact some people may choose to be adopted does not mean people labelled adopted do not need to have a genuine… choice that includes saying no to adoption and no to draconian adoption legislation.
Premier Andrews illegally and intentionally distracted in 2015 from the fact that the true discrimination in adoption is by politicians who are buying votes, towards people labelled adopted who are being illegally denied any genuine… choice to say no. It is clear that Premier Andrews knew that including when he made a legislative draftsman, a Mr Eamonn Moran KC his not so anti corruption aficionado at the Victorian Inspectorate. A Mr Moran KC knows full well that draconian adoption legislation is a legislative… overreach because there is no… genuine choice for someone arbitrarily labelled adopted to say no.
The Premier was clearly just trying to buy votes, while illegally trying to hide the actual discrimination is against people labelled adopted who are never given a… genuine choice to say no to adoption by anyone of any race, religion, sexual orientation, or politics or none:
It could never be said that Premier Andrews was impartial or unbiased because he was jumping on the political bandwagon to cynically buy votes. It makes it even clearer that he staged a completely phoney Inquiry in 2019 etc to try and sweep the genuine legal problems with draconian adoption legislation under the carpet. He was never going to let me say anything in a court and particularly when he knew he had falsified government records to make it appear I ‘own’ property in Australia. The political persecution has just been horrific.
The only reason politicians could no longer deny they had falsified their own government records about real estate (I had previously complained about after finding out in May 2022, the state government had been falsifying records since 20th October 2020, and I didn’t even know until someone else told me, quite some time after I was diagnosed with cancer, the federal government were also trying to claim I own property in Australia too) because when I was diagnosed with cancer, I was obviously asked 100 questions about my… housing. So eventually politicians (who could not actually identify where the property they alleged, I owned in Australia, was) could no longer maintain their lie in their own government records, that I own property in Australia, which was a very serious political lie that was… intended to cause me very serious harm including making me homeless during a global pandemic:
I almost died when I was released from hospital after I was diagnosed with cancer (I was in and out of hospitals) because of politicians lies about my… housing, when I was being subjected to the most unbelievable stress and distress. I was, a few days after being released from hospital for the second time, re-admitted on… 1oth September 2022 as an emergency when the cancer was haemorrahaging (that no-one could possibly have thought I could have managed myself !!) so I had to have blood transfusions and a major medical operation to remove the cancer etc expedited. It seemed like a surreal nightmare when at some point on what was the same date, of 10th September that my little sister I was raised separately from had died, a surgeon first came and spoke with me, to try and explain -how- she might have to do an emergency operation she and the hospital had never done, that was separate to, and not about removing the cancer, that other staff said they refused to agree to, and instead expedited the major medical operation that included removing cancer. There are and were complications in any medical operation and other treatment, related to my having genetic anatomical abnormalities, anyway. The nurses were really kind to me giving me extra blankets and hot compresses, and so on, to help me get warm again after so much blood loss, and trauma. I personally found it was always a lot easier talking with nurses in the hospital, because they look after you all the time, compared to it can be quite overwhelming when you are very seriously ill to be surrounded by a medical team of complete strangers, asking all sorts of questions, however necessary the questions are.
I should not ever be put by… politicians, at unnecessary risk of what happened, happening… again:
I have to try and do my best, to try and protect and improve my health to try and stop what happened, happening again.
That experience just confirmed to me that my health really is so much more important than the draconian adoption legislation used on me. It’s simply unacceptable for politicians to continue to use draconian adoption legislation that is really only about whatever happens to suit politicians, against me, because it is literally standing in the way of my being able to protect and improve my health.
That was the very clear message from 10th September… 2022.
________
**The politicians are illegally continuing to put my life at risk with draconian adoption legislation**
________
I could never personally concede that draconian adoption legislation is compatible with the peace and harmony of the rule of law, but it is possible to guarantee anyone labelled adopted has the genuine choice to say no to adoption, and draconian adoption legislation.
It is a legal absurdity for politicians to legislate that someone adopted in Australia, but then living overseas would need to return to Australia and pay money to a court to see if the court “might” withdraw the adoption court order. A key indicator that wholly arbitrary draconian adoption legislation always has been and still is completely… discriminatory is highlighted by the fact politicians do not make it mandatory for people to even know they are adopted, so politicians could never claim anyone or everyone labelled adopted has ever been fully informed of our true rights.
My personal view is the reason child protection is generally so abysmal can be directly attributed to the political deceit of draconian adoption legislation because politicians publicly normalize commodifying… vulnerable children which is portrayed as a good thing by their cult of celebrity who rely on free publicity for themselves.
I do not personally know of any real reason that a responsible adult of any race, religion, sexual orientation, politics or none could not be a carer of a vulnerable child so long as the responsible adult accepted that a court order about caring for a vulnerable child must be able to be automatically ended when a vulnerable child becomes an adult. A person does not by virtue of being a responsible adult caring for a vulnerable child become an ‘owner’ of that person forever. So for any court order to continue into adulthood, it would require from the person who had become an adult, their informed consent to the shape and form of any continuing court order. It should always have been respected that there are people like myself who are labelled adopted (regardless of the fact it was illegal to label me adopted in any circumstances anyway) who were entitled to instead celebrate becoming an adult and making our own decisions, and particularly after having already been robbed of our childhoods. I was entitled to make my way in the world with my own identity which would always entirely naturally be far more interesting to me, than the background of those who raised me.
I love my own home in Breizh, France that is as my own home, essentially in many respects my own ’embassy’ too, because of course it is entirely disproportionate to refuse to give me an Australian passport in my own identity, because I refuse to go along with draconian adoption legislation that in my own case has only ever been used to harm me.
I don’t personally care what politicians and the press say about adoption, so long as it is guaranteed that people labelled adopted have a genuine… choice to say no to adoption and no to draconian adoption legislation.
The only way politicians et al could ever say there was no discrimination in the use of draconian adoption legislation is when anyone labelled adopted has the genuine… choice to say no to adoption and no to draconian adoption legislation.
It could be quite useful to have ‘priority housing’ for a limited time as an Australian Ambassador to the United States which comes with a house, to quietly help explore and promote the transformational change an International Civil Court with the choice of juries, that could be based in Jerusalem, would provide.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 