Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: Re: email from Health Commissioner dated 23rd December 2022 about my email on 22nd December 2022. Premier Andrews & Health Commissioner (who is legally obliged to provide details of lawyers & insurers) are legally jointly & severally responsible for continuing to cause me harm & putting my life at serious risk, including because of deliberate errors and omissions (23.12.2022)
Health Commissioner,
I am certain that a personal choice on your part to be absent at any time, does not translate into your not being legally responsible, at any time, including for deliberate errors and omissions.
It is not legally acceptable for the Premier or Health Commissioner to continue to cause me harm and put my life at serious risk, including because of any deliberate error or omission on their part.
The whole point is I am obviously entitled to have access to my hospital records, and healthcare, that is not dependant on whatever holidays or absences politicians and civil servants may agree between yourselves.
It is clearly unlawful for the Premier (who is legally responsible) to refuse to hand over any still ‘missing’ health and hospital records which cannot be withheld because he personally chooses to be absent too, including on a holiday.
In any practical sense, Premier Andrews treats being a politician as a permanent holiday because all he ever actually does is illegally try to abdicate any responsibility for the… harm he intentionally causes with his own quite deliberate legislative overreaches.
Kindly provide a copy of your employment contract and the contact details of your lawyers and insurers who you authorise to deal with matters of health in your absence for personal reasons for example between 3pm 23rd December 2022 & 9am 3rd January 2022.
I am sure your contract would include you being able to for example be served with court orders and to produce records and appear in for example court at any time, unless you were unable to for… health reasons.
A kinder world is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Related:
Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors (Case 352 etc): Premier Andrews legally obliged to cease & desist causing me ongoing stress & distress that continues to harm my health & cause a serious risk to my life while I try to recover from major cancer operation etc because he has not shown ‘just cause’ to use political adoption order & draconian adoption legislation against me, I was entitled to be released from with my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in UK from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc that means I could not need to leave my own home in Breizh, France & return to & become homeless in Australia to argue politicians clearly as my case proves beyond all reasonable doubt do ignore adopted people become adults who cannot legally be bound by politicians legislative overreach (22.12.2022)
My own identity is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right, like anyone else, to self determination.
Premier Andrews is unlawfully harming my health, and causing a serious risk to my life while I am trying to recover from a major cancer operation etc.
This is a wholly political policy about using vulnerable children to buy votes that results in ignoring we become adults:
Premier Andrews is legally obliged to cease & desist causing me ongoing stress & distress that continues to harm my health & cause a serious risk to my life while I try to recover from major cancer operation etc because he has not shown ‘just cause’ to use political adoption order & draconian adoption legislation against me, I was entitled to be released from with my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in UK from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006 etc that means I could not need to leave my own home in Breizh, France & return to & become homeless in Australia to argue politicians clearly as my case proves beyond all reasonable doubt do ignore adopted people become adults who cannot legally be bound by politicians legislative overreach
It is clearly unreasonable for politicians to claim someone adopted in the State of Victoria, Australia who lives overseas would need to return to Victoria, Australia to prove I am an adult who could not be bound by the legislative overreach of a political adoption order and draconian adoption legislation.
The politicians have the opportunity to speak with my legal assistance whose details can be provided to them, and is someone I would authorise to act on my behalf to agree compensation.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 