Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I do have legal immunity to renounce legislative overreach of adoption & draconian adoption legislation & try to recover my health & advocate for transformational International Civil Court with choice of juries for civilians (Victorian Premier Andrews breached ‘non refoulement’ forcing me to leave my home in Breizh, France to return to Victoria, Australia in July 2019 on false pretext I have to be in Victoria, Australia to argue against being labelled adopted by draconian adoption legislation while politicians were instead intentionally trying to make me homeless, incl when I was diagnosed with cancer, after Andrews knew he had falsified government records to make it appear I own property in Australia, during his own phoney adoption ‘Inquiry’ that included I was unlawfully arrested because I went to court instead on 21st December 2021, when Andrews knew that he like British ‘chicken feed’ Johnson who did not have legal immunity either as Mayor of London when they illegally hid CCTV of torture & attempted murder of me in UK, despite knowing that didn’t change they still could not hide or legally overtake my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, over Mothers Day 2006 when BBC Director General Thompson published a false account of my unlawful arrest they could not repeat in any court, that BBC repeated when they unlawfully published another false account of their own recording !! of my unlawful arrest at State Opening in 2010 they could not repeat in any court either before Thompson decamped to United States after another false report by BBC was published on 16th January 2012 they could not repeat before any court, while it is hardly surprising Rudd who collected $1.4 billion dollar brown envelope from British Tories because he was Australian PM &FM at the time, would want to pose as Ambassador to United States to try & hide behind legal immunity) (20.12.2022)
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression and legal right, like anyone else, to self determination.
I reasonably believe I do have legal immunity to renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation, and try to recover my health, and advocate for an International Civil Court with the choice of juries for civilian populations.
I do not reasonably believe that politicians and courts have ever had sufficient ‘legal standing’ (locus standii) to arbitrarily label vulnerable children adopted to forever switch identities, including nationalities and citizenships.
The BBC, NSY et al could never repeat this false account of my unlawful arrest in any court:
The former British PM Blair had the BBC state broadcaster illegally leak my adopted name and publish a false account of my unlawful arrest on Mothers Day on the 26th March 2006 in the UK they could never repeat in any court, so the always self important Blair could for example grandstand in front of the Australian Parliament the following day, instead of resigning.
Those who are self important politicians don’t care about an International Civil Court with a choice of juries for civilian populations.
It turned out the British Labour Deputy PM Prescott, had also purported while Secretary of State in the Department of Transport that he could use the GLA Act 1999 to offload some of the public land in Parliament Square, Central London to the monarch, in return for a peerage in the House of Lords.
The likes of Corbyn, Benn and Pilger were compromised by the fact they stayed silent about the violent attacks by their colleague Livingstone on myself and others including Brian, while Livingstone abused his position as Mayor of London.
The also always self important follow up act of ‘chicken feed’ Johnson then illegally concealed while a Mayor of London with a very many conflicts of interest, the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me in the UK on his watch.
The ‘chicken-feed’ Johnson illegally refused to hand over to me (by email would have been fine) the CCTV of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me, including in a timely manner:
This was followed by the BBC state broadcaster unlawfully publishing a false account of their own !! recording of my unlawful arrest before the State Opening on 25th May 2010 they could not repeat in any court. I was unlawfully stopped from speaking for myself in the High Court on 21st June 2010 before being illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 which was the same day as the revolving PM’s in Australia.
I was speaking about while actually holding others perjured witness statements:
I was unlawfully stopped in the High Court while trying to speak for myself on the witness stand on the 21st June 2010 before being illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 which was the same day as the revolving PM’s in Australia.
The ‘chicken feed’ Johnson who was posing as the Mayor of London while still a bought and paid for journalist for the equally unscrupulous Barclay Brothers were not even entitled to… publicly funded legal representation, let alone to try and maliciously prosecute me to try & hide the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me etc etc:
They could not, even if they illegally concealed the CCTV of the torture and attempted murder of me, hide the existence of and overtake my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008, over Mothers Day 2006, whatever they did while trying to stop me speaking for myself.
The ‘chicken-feed’ Johnson was illegally getting free publicly funded legal representation firstly from the same ‘flexible’ brief Livingstone had used:
The Director General of the BBC, Mr Thompson decamped to the United States after the BBC published a third unlawful account on 16th January 2012 they could not repeat in any court either, when I was very clearly discriminated against.
The politicians and BBC et al obviously profited from illegally trying to ‘overtake’ my civil jury lawsuit that was filed, with their phoney Judicial Review from the party who did not have a lawsuit filed from for example 16th January 2012, because they were not being discriminated against:
It is possible for journalists to sometimes help members of the public speak for ourselves, with our agreement, but it is never okay for journalists to try to or claim they do speak for or instead of members of the public who choose to speak for ourselves.
It would obviously be unreasonable for Premier Andrews to force me to yet again start over, in Victoria, Australia, and with the same adopted identity, when I should have been free to move on with my own identity and life while living in my own home in Breizh, France.
Premier Andrews in Victoria, Australia, breached ‘non refoulement’ forcing me to leave my home in Breizh, France to return to Victoria, Australia in July 2019 on the false pretext I have to be in Victoria, Australia and go to the County Court in Melbourne to argue against being labelled adopted by draconian adoption legislation while politicians were instead intentionally trying to make me homeless, incl when I was diagnosed with cancer. I was diagnosed with cancer after Andrews knew he had falsified government records to make it appear I own property in Australia, while he was trying to hide trying to make me homeless, during his own phoney adoption ‘Inquiry’ that included I was unlawfully arrested because I went to court instead on 21st December 2021, because I was understandably trying to go home. There is no easily accessible process for someone labelled adopted in Victoria, Australia, but living overseas to unravel the legal quagmire caused by draconian adoption legislation that is wholly political, while seeking proper redress. Premier Andrews knew that he like British ‘chicken feed’ Johnson when he was Mayor of London did not have legal immunity when they illegally concealed the CCTV of the torture & attempted murder of me in UK, over Mothers Day 2006 etc etc etc etc. It is hardly surprising the former Australian PM & FM at that time called Rudd who was given a $1.4 billion dollar brown envelope by the British Tories, would want to hide behind legal immunity to pose as an Ambassador to the United States.
I proved that I could and would legally appear in court by video link, while in Australia, when my friend Steve asked me to be his legal assistance in a variety of British courts, while I obviously have a number of health issues and limited mobility while trying to recover from such a major medical operation etc etc while also not living in my own home in Breizh, France.
It would be unreasonable of Premier Andrews et al to try and force me to remain homeless in Victoria, Australia, living with the same old adopted identity, and trying to recover from a major medical operation etc etc resulting from being diagnosed with cancer, when I should always have been able to be free to live with my own identity and own life, in my own home in Breizh, France.
I have not done anything wrong, and it is unlawful to… punish me for being arbitrarily labelled adopted by draconian adoption legislation.
The only International Courts there are currently are really only for politics and governments.
It is impossible to guarantee there will never be self important or unscrupulous politicians, and their legislative overreach, so I genuinely believe an International Civil Court with the choice of juries for civilian populations that could be based in Jerusalem is a constructive way to help transform the global legal landscape.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 