Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I have legal right to make my own … CHOICE… to renounce adoption & draconian adoption legislation (there is no other possible explanation other than Australian Victorian Premier & fmr Health Minister Andrews and British MP, PM & fmr Mayor of London Johnson who had £250k annual bonus to maliciously target myself & others must have colluded to illegally try and stop my making my own… choice, with torture and attempted murder of me in UK, and then forcing me from my home in Breizh, France in July 2019 and falsifying government records in Australia to hide intentionally trying to make me homeless including when I was diagnosed with cancer, by falsely claiming I owned property in Australia) (13.12.2022)

…. CHOICE…

I am not despite my real name being Donna, an ‘Immaculate Conception’ regardless of the multiplicity of lies told by politicians and their draconian adoption legislation.

I have the legal right to make my own… CHOICE… to renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation.

The reason I am maliciously targeted by unscrupulous politicians is precisely because I am legally entitled to renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation that has caused me so much life threatening and prolonged physical and emotional harm.

I always knew from when I was a small child that the never-ending lie called adoption was completely unnatural. This conscious knowledge only grew as I became older and then an adult, so I had an even greater and always growing awareness of the enormity of the never ending lie called adoption and the damage caused by that.

It’s clearly discriminatory and unlawful for politicians to refuse to issue an Australian passport, medicare card and other documents like a drivers licence in my own identity, and all at no financial cost to me.

It’s particularly dishonest when it comes to healthcare for politicians to try and maintain forcing a false identity on someone labelled adopted. That means that either I have to go along with the lie called adoption which is intended to exclude important information about familial health, or I have to explain the true situation ad-nauseum to an array of health professionals, and sometimes when faced with an entire medical team I have never even met before. Either mean being forced to constantly relive the whole trauma of adoption while still vulnerable. There are very real and life threatening adverse consequences for my health that come with being forcibly labelled adopted by politicians.

It’s difficult enough to try and manage a serious illness like for example cancer, without also having to keep reliving the ongoing trauma of adoption.

There is simply no space in my life for the ball and chain of adoption and draconian adoption legislation.

Blair was legally obliged to resign on Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 instead of grandstanding in the Australian Parliament the next day after my adopted name was illegally leaked to try and hide politicians were trying to stop civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation:

The politicians have always used war as an ‘opportunity’ to even more easily prey on vulnerable children they want to label adopted:

Blair was really just a mouthpiece for Murdoch and ‘the matriarch’ in Australia it so happens was, while posing as a ‘philanthropist’ directly involved in the ‘adoption’ of me:

(there is no other possible explanation than the Australian Victorian Premier & fmr Health Minister Andrews and British MP, PM & fmr Mayor of London who had £250k annual bonus to maliciously target myself & others must have colluded to illegally try and stop my choice, with torture and attempted murder of me in UK, and then forcing me from my home in Breizh, France in July 2019 and falsifying government records in Australia to hide intentionally trying to make me homeless including when I was diagnosed with cancer, by falsely claiming I owned property in Australia)

The reason Johnson demanded the annual bonus of £250k from the robber media barons in Westminster was because he was illegally trying to hide with state violence my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006. The latest Labour Leader of the so called Opposition in the UK Starmer was in fact Johnson’s ‘wingman’ when he was DPP and illegally… protecting Johnson when he was Mayor of London and did not even have the pretence of legal immunity.

I helped force the political ban on civilians peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 in the UK off the statute books while I was in Parliament Square, Central London, because it was an egregious example of legislative over-reach supported by all the political parties in Westminster. The truth is there was not a single politician, journalist, London human rights lawyer, police officer, prosecutor, judge or member of the monarchy who congratulated us on forcing the legislation off the statute books.

I did quite well for someone who through being labelled ‘adopted’ has never been “allowed” to speak for myself.

The Australian politicians disgracefully and illegally specifically used draconian adoption legislation while I was in Parliament Square, Central London to try and deny I am an Australian citizen, while the British government repeatedly illegally literally seized my passport and sought to illegally detain me at for example Stansted in the UK or Calais in France when I was coming and going from the UK, but would always have to return my passport etc. The forcible use of draconian adoption legislation on people labelled adopted does constitute very serious political harassment, and then some.

I remain legally entitled to a free of charge transcript of what -I- said on the witness stand in the High Court on 21st June 2010 that was never challenged, while the coward Johnson only spun his £ 250k annual bonus web of deceit outside a court in the press because he could not legally bring a malicious prosecution against me to try and hide he orchestrated the life threatening political torture (which has universal jurisdiction and no statute of limitations) and attempted murder of me. I ‘won’ in the satellite litigation of HQ11X00563 when Johnson’s lies unraveled.

This Murdoch Law report which is not an accurate and contemporaneous record of court proceedings, bears no relationship to and literally is a complete distraction from what -I- said on the witness stand on 21st June 2010 that was never challenged or disputed by anyone:

The Victorian Premier Andrews has instead of serving and protecting an Australian citizen (I have never personally thought of myself as Victorian) essentially been colluding with and covering up for the British MP, PM and former Mayor of London Johnson, because there is no other possible explanation for falsifying government records in Australia to falsely claim I own property in Australia to try and hide intentionally trying to make me homeless including during a global pandemic and when I was diagnosed with cancer. The Victorian Premier Andrews has been protecting the British MP Johnson and vice-versa. It would be unreasonable to expect me to just put my trust in politicians again after such serious breaches of the public trust by politicians. The Premier knew that the only purpose in falsifying government records to falsely claim I had property in Australia was to harm me and intentionally try to make me homeless. The politicians sought to persist with the lie about my owning property in Australia.even after I was diagnosed with cancer and their lie was found out by others. The politicians not only made no attempt to correct the lie when I first discovered it by happenstance in May 2022 but actually refused to amend the lie. The lie was only mostly removed from the governments own records when numerous government agencies had to put up or shut up and identify to numerous other government agencies where the alleged property I owned in Australia which no-one could do. The Victorian Premier did not care about falsifying government records in Australia to intentionally make me homeless because he was already covering up the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me, because I do have the choice to say no to adoption and draconian adoption legislation.

I am correct in saying there is a presumptive right to free unlimited universal healthcare of my own choosing because time and again it has been shown politicians have put their own selfish personal interests before the physical and emotional health of someone they label adopted.

The Victorian Premier clearly treats cancer patients differently for solely… political reasons.

It’s a fact of life that even if politicians did care about civilians, politicians cannot guarantee there will never be unscrupulous politicians and legislation must reflect that. The draconian adoption legislation which excludes any genuine choice for someone labelled adopted is an extremely egregious example of legislative over-reach.

The politicians repeatedly illegally hid the identity of ‘unknown males’ who made life threatening attacks on me (in this example I was violently punched in the head in full view of members of the public on a summers evening):

It is common-sense and common decency in every civilized society, that everyone who has been labelled adopted has the CHOICE to at any time say no to and renounce being labelled adopted and draconian adoption legislation. There has never been a case where what politicians label adoption which is a solely political, rather than legal or medical social construct, has been the only or best option.

(There is no identifiable difference between the disrespectful and discriminatory likes of:

a) the NSW government in Australia who illegally fund the Murdoch cult of celebrity and accompanying groupies from ‘Adopt Change’ who live in the United States too, to promote… choice free adoption in Australia with the cheap and vulgar ‘forever family’ slogan because of course what politicians prefer to label adoption has traditionally included child slavery and buying a spare heir.

The for example NSW government are still lying about what they call adoption because it is still not even mandatory for someone who is labelled adopted to be informed by the courts they are adopted, or for adopted people to be given adoption court orders including from the courts, or for people labelled adopted to be notified of whatever the latest legislative sleights of hand related to adoption happen to be. There is no such thing as ‘open adoption’ because the person labelled adopted has no genuine… choice, because draconian adoption legislation has only ever been about whatever suits… politicians.

The politicians in Victoria, are like their counterparts in NSW, not just bad with draconian adoption legislation but are also bad at child protection legislation more generally too, because as draconian adoption legislation shows, the legislation is solely about whatever suits… politicians.

and

b) the BBC state broadcaster peddle the victim blaming psychobabble of… choice free adoption (the BBC is choice free itself, because people have no choice about a TV licence fee despite the fact the BBC make more than enough money selling their programs/propaganda elsewhere)

In my own ‘case’ my own parents, a few months after I was born, automatically aged out of legislation used against them, that led to me being illegally trapped by draconian adoption legislation (the records that do exist only show corruption) while it was falsely claimed I could not similarly automatically age out of adoption at adulthood. So I never even had a childhood and was while a teenager sent overseas and have been forced from jurisdiction to jurisdiction to jurisdiction to jurisdiction because I never wanted to just go along with draconian adoption legislation because, I am like anyone else, entitled to build my own life with my own identity, and speak for myself. I should have been able to celebrate becoming an adult and making my own decisions, but that never happened because draconian adoption legislation has only ever been about what suits… politicians.

I am not an ‘immaculate conception’ regardless of politicians meetings etc at for example 8am on 8th December 2006 etc which is the annual date of the ‘Feast of the Immaculate Conception’.

I don’t think anyone seriously believed the blond haired, blue eyed ‘baby Jesus’ in what was at that time openly ‘whites only’ Australia who died of cancer, was my brother :

The Crab-apple Close Reserve (which involved one of those seriously dodgy government land deals after I was forced to leave Australia as a teenager) is all that is left of where I was raised.

c) adoption ‘parties’ on tv where vulnerable children who are minors are literally being forced to sell themselves at ‘parties’ and on TV which is just so obscene)

The politicians lie when they claim there is this thing called privacy for vulnerable minors who are in every way being exploited by adult strangers including politicians who can and do write legislation solely to suit themselves.

The common thread across the politicians draconian adoption legislation is the illegal removal of the right of someone labelled adopted by draconian adoption legislation to have the -choice- say no at any time. The politicians have obviously sought to cynically hide this and indefinitely delay compensation by broadening what they label adoption.

The politicians in Victoria waffle on about able-bodied people building endless ‘infrastructure’ while politicians cannot even make Melbourne anything approaching a disability friendly city because politicians are incapable of even providing low level trams on all the tram routes for goodness sakes.

A kinder evolution is possible.

This statement is true.

Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)

donnabugat Avatar

Published by

Categories: