Donna Bugat -v- Victorian Premier (& fmr Health Minister) & Health Commissioner in Victoria, Australia & Ors: I do not reasonably believe Victorian Premier (& fmr Health Minister) who treats cancer patients differently for personal political reasons & Health Commissioner in Victoria, Australia, have any legal or health grounds to stop my genuine… CHOICE to renounce being labelled adopted & draconian adoption legislation through my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in UK from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 26th March 2006 etc & receive compensation incl. universal free healthcare of my own choosing instead (12.12.2022)
… choice…
My own identity of Donna Bugat is essential to my peaceful freedom of expression, and legal right like anyone else to self determination.
The use of draconian adoption legislation has always seriously harmed and never helped my health. It’s bad enough to be diagnosed with cancer and everything that goes with that, that confirms to me beyond any reasonable doubt, there is no space in my life for the deeply offensive and discriminatory label of adopted or the accompanying draconian adoption legislation that has subjected me to so much trauma.
The label adoption is recklessly bandied around by politicians all around the world to mean anything politicians flippantly want it to mean on any given day, that is different in every country, and even if your adoption traverses multiple jurisdictions. This has only been possible because politicians have not agreed to an International Civil Court with the choice of juries that most civilians would agree to. The fact politicians have not yet agreed to an International Civil Court with the choice of juries, does not mean the introduction of genuine choice for anyone labelled adopted is not possible.
The immediate problem in my own case is the Victorian Premier treats cancer patients differently for political reasons, despite the fact I do not reasonably believe the Victorian Premier (& fmr Health Minister) & Health Commissioner in Victoria, Australia, have any legal or health grounds to stop my genuine… choice to renounce being labelled adopted & draconian adoption legislation through my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in UK from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 26th March 2006 etc & receive compensation incl. universal free healthcare of my own choosing instead.
I reasonably believe a named person from the Health Commissioner’s legal department is legally obliged to provide me with a written acknowledgement of receipt of my email (by email is fine) without delay. I am legally entitled to notify a Health Commissioner in the legal manner that is most convenient to me.
My adopted name was illegally leaked so a political lie could be told:
I recently acted as legal assistance on 22nd November 2022 for an old friend Steve Jago in the Court of Appeal in London in the UK. This essentially consisted of my bearing witness in Australia to what I saw take place by video link in the court in the UK. I obviously wasn’t well enough to help out as I would like to have done, or to travel, but I also did not want to be discriminated against because of all the health issues caused by cancer. The following day the Criminal Procedure Committee in the UK that included the Judge who has the most serious conflict of interest over my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 etc issued ‘guidance’ over the use of ‘McKenzie friends’ so we just confirmed we don’t rely on the British McKenzie -v- McKenzie or accompanying case law, because politicians et al know it is well established a person has the legal right to legal assistance of a person’s choosing.
I do not reasonably believe the Victorian Premier actually has insurance cover for draconian adoption legislation that I have asked to see and has not been produced, including in a timely manner. (I don’t think politicians had insurance cover for the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 legislation we forced off the statute books in the UK that was like adoption legislation is being used, to try and criminalise people for solely political reasons) The Victorian Premier is not only illegally pretending there are no serious problems with draconian adoption legislation, he is also legally responsible for falsifying government records behind my back to try and hide the physical and emotional harm being caused by the deliberate recklessness of politicians.
The political lies of Murdoch et al only grew with what is not an accurate and contemporaneous record of what I said on the witness stand in the High Court on 21st June 2010:
I don’t really personally care what politicians and the state broadcasters and robber media barons say about what they label adoption, so long as there is a genuine… choice for someone labelled adopted to opt out and say no (I will never personally agree that draconian adoption legislation has ever been legal).
The political association of the label adoption with… healthcare only serves to intentionally distract from the true reality that forcibly imposing the label of adoption and draconian adoption legislation on someone, and particularly when first a vulnerable child, can and does cause prolonged physical and emotional harm. There has never been a single case where there was no option but adoption because the label of adoption is not and has never been based on any legitimate legal or health objective.
I have only ever been bullied and worse about being adopted, and by the very people who claim to be helping people labelled adopted. There is no reason why I should continue to suffer very real harm and loss
There can be and are obvious conflicts of interest when any health service does not acknowledge and support the right of someone labelled adopted to say no to being labelled adopted and no to draconian adoption legislation. This should include having proper support in any courts which should be an unnecessary ordeal.
It turns out the latest Victorian Premier was the Health Minister in Victoria, Australia, when he knew I obtained a High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in the UK from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 etc (I see no legal reason why I would need another Habeas Corpus Court Order in for example Australia) that led to the for example subsequent premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me. The pre-mediated political torture and attempted murder of me was orchestrated by a British (MP) former Mayor of London and boss of top cops (& PM) called Alexander Boris Johnson while he was also employed by the Barclay Brothers to pose as a ‘journalist’. Mr Johnson was routinely having me unlawfully arrested & maliciously attacking me inside and outside numerous courts, in return for an annual bonus of £250,000 per annum from the Barclay Brothers. Vitol Oil paid a former Tory MP & Minister Alan Duncan £160,000 to commit perjury while colluding with a Daily Mail political editor called Benedict Brogan . (In fact the Barclay Brothers had three Daily Telegraph ‘journalists’ including Johnson, the political editor Brogan who had transferred across from the Daily Mail and a ‘royal’ reporter physically threatening me etc (which is slightly more serious than mere harassment) The Barclay Brothers ridiculously threatened me while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France because I criticised their supposed ‘journalism’.
I have never been able to get any kind of… healthcare over the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me, because that is inconvenient for the Victorian Premier who prefers to live in a state of denial, instead of even the simple reform of draconian adoption legislation with the introduction of a genuine… choice. There is a medical issue that was highlighted when I was diagnosed with cancer that was a problem when the premeditated torture and attempted murder of me took place, that I only survived because my best friend heard me scream out and the government knew they would find it difficult to explain away the murder of both of us at the same time.
I cannot see how it is possible for me to get proper healthcare over the torture and attempted murder of me, when the politicians try and pretend it never happened !! despite my signing statutory declarations and having lawsuits. I have taken all the reasonable steps I could to try and protect myself.
My case proves it is way beyond unreasonable and irrational for politicians to expect someone labelled adopted to leave our own home overseas to return to Australia and be homeless, for goodness sakes, while trying to extricate ourselves from politicians draconian adoption legislation. It was by contrast no problem to get divorced in the UK, after being married in New Zealand.
The Victorian Premier’s biggest ally in terms of adoption is Murdoch and his Liberal party mouthpiece Mr Bach who is only useful as long as he continues to recklessly promote draconian adoption legislation instead of a genuine….choice.
I still remain legally entitled to a free of charge court transcript and recording of what -I- said in the British High Court on 21st June 2010 before I was illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 which was the same day as the revolving PM’s in Australia. The simple fact is Johnson did not and could not have legally brought any malicious prosecution against me (on behalf of or not on behalf of the monarchy) while covering up the CCTV of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me. It makes no difference to me who legislates or rubber-stamps legislation, although it is legally problematic having an unelected governor general imposed by the politicians in Westminster. The reform in the British House of Lords has included Australians like Hintze who paid substantial amounts of cash to rubber stamp legislation that is favourable to themselves. The question is always what are the limits of legislative power and I reasonably believe that draconian adoption legislation that does not have a genuine choice to opt out constitutes legislative over-reach.
There are obviously no legal grounds for politicians in Britain, Australia or France to try and go around or overtake Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 when it was literally agreed I had a civil jury lawsuit before the BBC illegally leaked my adopted name falsely suggesting I could be prosecuted.
The fact the many iterations of deeply disrespectful and offensive draconian adoption legislation do not make it mandatory for accurate and contemporaneous court records to be made, kept or produced originates in the case of Australia, in the UK, where politicians refuse to make it mandatory for politicians to make or keep accurate and contemporaneous court records which only assists systemic political corruption.
I was threatened by an unknown male in Australia in December 2019 (the authorities never investigated) that my adoption case (352) would never go (back) to court which apart from the being contrary to even draconian adoption legislation in Australia, also ignores that politicians in both Australia, the UK and France cannot go around or overtake my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006, or the fact of my own lawsuits and the fact I won HQ11X00563 which was brought against me.
.
When I was diagnosed with cancer in August 2022 people from various agencies inevitably started asking me one hundred questions etc. The undeniable truth shown is and was the Premier did illegally stop me living in my own home in Breizh, France in July 2019 and intentionally made me homeless, in Victoria, Australia including during a global pandemic with such prolonged stress and distress taking place while I was also literally assaulted and unlawfully arrested by Victoria Police because I do not go along with being labelled adopted and punished !! by draconian adoption legislation that has only caused me life threatening harm, that now includes being diagnosed with cancer. I did not voluntarily return to Australia and would not have got cancer if I had been able to renounce the label adoption along with draconian adoption legislation while still living in my own home in Breizh, France. I was living in Breizh, France after I was forcibly exiled from the UK.
I was forcibly exiled from the UK because I have multiple civil jury lawsuits that while arising from our forcing a political ban on free speech in ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 off the statute books would also have resulted in the civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation. I was originally forced to leave Australia as a teenager because I refused to go along with draconian adoption legislation etc etc etc.
It is a matter of fact the Victorian Premier personally knew about and lied by falsifying government records to claim I owned property in Australia to illegally avoid the legal duty to at the very least provide social housing during the global pandemic. The Premier has no legal authority to cover up anyone falsifying government records behind my back to give the false impression I owned property in Australia which I repeatedly pointed out to government agencies made it look like I had lied.
The government fraudulently only provide very limited and government controlled counselling that is supposed to address problems about adoption that completely avoids the very serious and often multiple practical problems someone labelled adopted can face such as systemic political corruption. The government is clearly only pretending to offer counselling about problems arising from adoption when it is in fact at the very same time falsifying government held records behind someone’s back to claim that person owns property in Australia. I only first became aware by happenstance in May 2022 that the State government had been doing that since October 2020, but despite complaining about the lies, including to Victoria Police, the politicians refused to amend the records. I had originally formally complained about being illegally detained in hotel quarantine in Melbourne in August 2020 because I wasn’t being “allowed” to live in my own home in Breizh, France because I refuse to go along with being labelled adopted or draconian adoption legislation.
I am illegally being detained without legal representation or trial in Melbourne by politicians who are legally obliged to recognise that I am legally entitled to have the genuine… choice to renounce the label adoption and draconian adoption legislation. I do not need to justify this or have the permission of anyone else.
Indeed the politicians, police and courts have only acted in… bad faith towards me, while more generally they do not bother to keep anyone labelled adopted up to date with whatever their latest changes to adoption legislation may be because the legislation has only ever been about whatever suits politicians. The politicians have never cared about the reckless legal quagmire they place many people labelled adopted in.
One word… choice… can change the politicians abuse of process that is draconian adoption legislation.
The politicians clearly had me unlawfully and violently arrested while I was quietly sitting in a chair the County Court in Melbourne on 21st December 2021 (when I now know I had cancer) because the politicians did know and did not want me to know they had also falsified government records to falsely claim I own property in Australia to try and hide they were also intentionally harming me by trying to make me homeless and also claim I had abandoned my home in Breizh, France. The police knew what they were doing was unlawful because they de-arrested me when I said I was entitled to a lawyer to witness my witness statement, and them re-arrested me and bundled me into a police car and dropped me outside CBD and said I could not enter again that day when I said I was going across the road to the Supreme Court to complain about what was going on in the County Court. The police had tried saying they could make up something to take me to a different court which I pointed out would not change I wasn’t even voluntarily in the country or going to the County Court which is what the government were forcing me to do.
The Victorian Police Minister then essentially had me unlawfully arrested and de-arrested at Southern Cross train station in July 2022 when I was pushed around while having problems walking while seriously ill with cancer, while politicians were still lying about my owning property in Australia while illegally stopping me leaving the country with a passport in my own identity. It isn’t even possible to go along with a revocation of adoption according to draconian adoption legislation because that leaves simeone labelled adopted along with our own real family members subject to all sorts of punitive punishment by politicians and courts. I think politicians falsify so many records about adoption (after all politicians buy vulnerable children and votes using the label adoption too) because they simply don’t care about someone forcibly labelled adopted because I mean nothing to them. The records that had been falsified by the State government in October 2020, and then the Federal government in October 2022 that claimed I owned property in Australia were only mostly corrected following my having a major operation for cancer in September 2022 when multiple agencies saw it was untrue that I owned property in Australia. I was in and out of hospital with cancer and nearly died after being released several days before I was readmitted as an emergency because I had become blood transfusion dependant so there was no question about my being unable to medically look after myself, so a major operation was expedited, despite a very rare complication during and after the operation that affects any medical treatment. There are only several reported cases of the same rare complication but none involving the same type of cancer.
It is seriously illegal for Victorian police to go around threatening, using intimidation and trying to… criminalise a private citizen for no other reason than renouncing the label adoption along with draconian adoption legislation.
The politicians want me to renounce Australian citizenship instead.
In addition, the Adoption Information Service in the Department of Justice, and the County Court in Melbourne, Victoria have both refused to hand over any or a complete set of adoption records that… both rely on. The County Court did this by always claiming there was only one person who could access their records in the court and that person was never available and they always refused to make an appointment when they would be available. The Adoption Information Service have just always illegally refused to send by email one complete set of records of what they claim to have (because records were illegally withheld from me including when I was living overseas)
There is obviously no legitimate aim convincingly established in civil or criminal law or healthcare to force a vulnerable child to call and treat adult strangers ‘parents’ including after becoming an adult and parent ourselves. The most that can be said about the label of adoption is that it is intended to… punish people who do not want to call an adult stranger a parent, or to be slaves or spare heirs. The politicians claim they can use the label adoption to hide and switch people’s identities, nationalities and citizenships as though the original ones someone labelled adopted are of no value. It is true shocking what goes on behind the political label of adoption.
I know it is possible for carers to be adult enough to accept being called carers instead of trying to impose themselves as parents because they claim they ‘have earned that right’… really ? It is obviously not legal to legislate to force someone to call an adult stranger a parent.
The label adoption is bandied around by politicians all around the world to mean anything politicians want it to mean on any given day. This has only been possible because politicians have not agreed to an International Civil Court with the choice of juries that most civilians would agree to. It is a fact of life it is a legal impossibility for politicians
There are no legal or medical grounds to stop someone labelled adopted making a genuine… choice to renounce being labelled adopted and draconian adoption legislation.
The politicians draconian adoption legislation that is subject to constant change to suit politicians buying votes exceeds any possible state authority.The politicians have claimed changes to draconian adoption legislation benefits people labelled adopted by them but in fact the most egregious defects continue.
The deeply offensive and disrespectful draconian adoption legislation is highly unusual because it still does not make it mandatory for someone to be informed they are adopted, or for everyone who is labelled adopted to have access to and a copy of all the relevant court records and court orders so they can be challenged, while failing to acknowledge it is unreasonable to force people labelled adopted in Victoria, Australia, who live overseas to return to Victoria, Australia and become homeless to try and extricate ourselves from draconian adoption legislation. A fundamental defect in draconian adoption legislation is that it fails to in any legal or practical sense recognise that someone labelled adopted has rights as a child and becomes an adult. The draconian adoption legislation is clearly incompatible and inconsistent with all other family and custody laws for children that also do not continue into adulthood.
In my own case the diagnosis and treatment of cancer while not in my own home in Breizh, France so I have no familiar surroundings to help in any recovery from evena major operation, has created many additional unknowns for me adding to the wholly unnecessary prolonged stress and distress caused by draconian adoption legislation.
A kinder evolution really is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 