Donna Bugat -v- State of Victoria, Australia & Ors: I am being illegally detained without legal representation or trial in Victoria, Australia, stopped from travelling & living in my own home in Breizh, France by politicians using prolonged physiological stress & distress of draconian adoption legislation that undeniably caused my cancer (after British fmr PM Johnson was paid £250,000 per annum by Barclay Brothers to maliciously attack me to hide existence of my High Court Habeas Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 etc that saw Daily Mail Chair of UK Parliamentary Press Gallery Benedict Brogan transfer to Telegraph after I complained about what he did too) (09.12.2022)
I am labelled ‘adopted’ but I am legally entitled to have a genuine… CHOICE to say no to being labelled ‘adopted’ and no to draconian adoption legislation, and by email if that is what I have decided. I cannot legally be labelled and treated like a criminal because I renounce the label adopted along with draconian adoption legislation that is not a decision I have to pay money to or have the permission of anyone to do.
There isn’t even ever the pretence of any legal representation or a trial, let alone with a civil jury, if you have been labelled adopted by others. Yet people who are not labelled adopted by others do not have to pay whatever money is demanded by to, and have the permission of, a ‘court’ before they collect for example a passport in their own identity.
I would prefer to right the historical wrong of my being labelled ‘adopted’ in my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in the UK from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 etc.
The reality is a political lie does not change or improve with age.
This was the lie the Westminster Village spread on Mothers Day 2006 when they tried to pretend what was agreed was my civil lawsuit could be a criminal prosecution against me:
The politicians who use vulnerable children to buy votes through the global adoption racket did not make it mandatory for courts to make, keep or produce accurate and contemporaneous records. This is probably because politicians did not bother to agree to have an international civil court with the choice of juries, for people labelled adopted by draconian adoption legislation to go to.
It so happens the… Murdoch matriarch was directly involved in the illegal adoption of me:
The Blair years in Britain exemplified the political classes attempting to financially profit from widespread legislative excesses in the UK, that included the political ban on peaceful freedom of expression in ss 132-138 – 138 SOCPA 2005 that we forced off the statute books. The likes of Corbyn were entirely complicit, staying silent about what Livingstone did as Mayor of London, to those of us in Parliament Square, Central London.
Blair grandstanding when he should have been resigning:
The Westminster system does not make it mandatory for British Magistrates Courts to make and keep accurate and contemporaneous records, because the political classes have shown they are not interested in having civilised legal arguments about the limits of legislative power. I have consistently maintained that if politicians refuse to make it mandatory to keep accurate and contemporaneous court records in British Magistrates Courts they have no legal grounds to dispute differing recollections of what can only be construed as deliberate abuses of processes. The true objective of the state apparatus is to bully law abiding civilians into submission, so the political claim by the British far from Commonwealth that their legal system is adversarial is actually nothing more than an excuse that is intended to hide the true objective.
The now former PM Johnson enthusiastically followed on from Livingstone as Mayor of London and boss of top cops when, while he was being paid a salary of £140,000 by the public, compared also being paid £250,000 per annum by the Barclay Brothers to maliciously prosecute myself and others as ‘chicken feed’ in a cynical attempt to publicly distract from what he was doing. In fact it was ‘chicken feed’ for… the Barclay Brothers to pay Johnson £250,000 per annum that came with the most expensive free publicly funded lawyers to maliciously prosecute etc myself and others to try and hide my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day on 26th March 2006. A Daily Mail Chair of the Parliamentary Press Gallery called Benedict Brogan transferred from the Daily Mail to the Telegraph as their political editor, after I complained to the Daily Mail legal department about Vitol Oil paying them to try and cover up my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day 2006. Brogan had publicly stated in a seriously libellous hit piece while Johnson was a Telegraph ‘journalist’ posing as Mayor of London that all the state and robber media barons in Westminster wanted police to arrest me. Vitol who paid the British unelected Labour Lord Malloch Brown to falsely claim he believes in democracy, did pay the former Tory MP Alan Duncan £160,000 to commit perjury, that really only served as further window dressing to try and hide the… existence of my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day on 26th March 2008.
I remain legally entitled to a free of charge transcript that proves this is not an accurate and contemporaneous record of what -I- said on 21st June 2010 in the High Court in the UK on the witness stand, that Jans Luba et al subsequently tried to hide:
I was illegally denied legal representation on 23rd June 2010 on the same day there were revolving PM’s in Australia, and Luba et al began to illegally try and hide what -I- said on the witness stand in the High Court in the UK on 21st June 2010 that Luba horse-traded to become a Judge:
It goes without saying that Johnson had an identifiable financial conflict of interest because he would not have collected the £250,000 bonus from the Barclay Brothers that included the premeditated political torture and attempt murder of me unless he had done what the robber media barons wanted.
Johnson illegally refused to hand over to me (by email would have been fine) the CCTV of the premeditated political torture and attempted murder of me while he was a Telegraph ‘journalist’ posing as Mayor of London:
The Barclay Brothers did have the nerve to threaten me while I was living in my own home in Breizh, France because I criticized their so called ‘journalism’ because of course they had illegally paid Johnson to orchestrate my being threatened and violently attacked etc. It is claimed the Barclay Brothers were in business with for example the latest French President Macron until 4th May 2012 (the same date I won HQ11X00563 that I really won in January 2011)
A District Judge Snow in the UK, essentially played on the fact that since draconian adoption legislation can be used to illegally detain/imprison without legal representation or trial someone labelled adopted who does not go along with what politicians label adoption (that is not what I call it) that he could do that too, because that is what he did to me. And that is why I have my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order in the UK.
I would happen to know this ‘case’ of political persecution below about Steve actually originated over…. ten years ago in Parliament Square, Central London on 18th June 2012, in the Johnson and Snow era, but is still weaving its way through the snakes and ladders of British courts who released Steve on Monday afternoon:
The District Judge Snow who is now part of a Criminal Procedure Committee in the UK, and personally has no interest in courts keeping an accurate and contemporaneous record has a… massive conflict of interest in trying to interfere in people’s right to have legal… assistance of their choosing, the day after Steve Jago had asked me to be legal assistance for him in the Court of Appeal in the UK on 22nd November 2022 by video link. It goes without saying District Judge Snow could not explain to a civil jury why I have my High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 over Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 because of what he did too.
This is clearly… political woo:
District Judge Snow has a massive conflict of interest (a Lord Justice Davis was one of the judges in a truncated hearing Court of Appeal on 22nd November 2022 in the UK I witnessed by video link) while politicians claim members of the public have to go through all the courts in the UK before going to ECHR which is not strictly true:
The late Lord Myners, who claimed to be adopted, and was a Labour City of London banker, Trustee of Tate Britain and Chair of the Guardian when he paid the con-artist Mark Wallinger to try and hijack what we were doing, with their ‘State Britain’ rip off, not only did not support peaceful freedom of expression, but he did not want civil jury nullification of draconian adoption legislation. This is despite the fact there are all sorts of serious legal injustices that continue because of the absence of proper record keeping. The likes of the Liberal Victorian MP Matt Bach who claims to be adopted and supports whatever Labour or Liberal politicians do to me, including when I was diagnosed with cancer, could not profit from all of that if there is a genuine… choice for people who are labelled adopted by draconian adoption legislation to say no.
The truth is the incredibly disrespectful Goldsmiths University worked… with Johnson and his Metropolitan Police to illegally stash our stolen banners in the City of London ‘Museum of London’.
This is shameful propaganda sponsored by the likes of MI5 et al :
Ms Ismail cheapens what really goes on (imagine paying £1200 for goodness sakes !!) because of course while Brexit Britain harps on about ‘illegal immigrants’ it is hiding its shame over… exiles:
The former British Labour Foreign Secretary Mr David Miliband who adopted children in the United States of America, grandstanded with his rather large security entourage in tow at something called the Muslim News Awards on 26th March 2008 (26th March 2007 was the landmark Contempt of Court case to try and hide Mothers Day on 26th March 2006 too) in the Grosvenor Hotel on Park Lane when Brian and I were not ‘allowed’ by the government to sit together.
It is a complete and utter lie that politicians have ever respected even the privacy of minors labelled adopted:
It turns out Miliband was using public money to hold an ‘event’ in London supposedly ‘sponsored’ by various government agencies, to give him an opportunity to grandstand:
A BBC journalist hastily left the table I was seated at without a word when I introduced myself to other people on the table, where it turned out the actual sponsors of the ‘event’ were I kid you not, the likes of the MET Police, and Crown Persecution Service. The Channel Four most politically inspiring award Brian won on 7th February 2007 was in a room full of politicians which was dreadful too. So on 26th March 200… 8, one of the ss 132-138 SOCPA 2005 prosecutors (who was found to have libelled me) was seated on the next table which was unpleasant. The dreary government sponsored event was only livened up when Brian gave an impromptu speech to a Labour Minister Ms Blears.
The Liberal Victorian MP, Matt Bach is a Murdoch protege and no one seriously believes that Murdoch suddenly grew a conscience about vulnerable children in any kind of care setting. The truth is Bach is only useful to Murdoch as long as he promotes adoption. The Liberal Bach was parachuted in to replace someone called Woolridge who took a $250,000 per annum golden handshake with a phoney gender equality quango in Australia because she worked against me with the Labour Rudd & Gillard administrations while I was in Parliament Square, Central London. It is a statement of fact the… only reason Rudd pocketed a $1.4 billion brown envelope from the British Tories he laundered through a partners company of which he is a financial beneficiary, was by agreeing to continue to spin draconian adoption legislation. When I was forced to return to Australia in 2019 so Johnson could become PM, the Victorian Labour party intentionally then tried to make me homeless by falsifying government records behind my back to dishonestly try and claim I owned property in Australia, which was found out to be the lie it was, when I was asked a hundred questions when I got cancer because of course I was illegally being stopped from living in my own home in Breizh, France during the global pandemic too, by the state Victorian government who use draconian adoption legislation to unlawfully interfere in travelling and freedom of movement even when there is not a global pandemic.
It is extraordinary that Murdoch goes on about the lawyer called Gobbo and police informants in Australia while staying completely silent about the omnishambles of the albeit staged inquiry into the illegal use of undercover agents in the UK. It frankly beggars belief that Victorian politicians offered a Sir Ken Jones from ACPO in the UK, the DAC role (along with Australian citizenship !!!! IN HIS OWN NAME, that was obviously contingent on my never returning to Australia) while he was mired in corruption… in the UK about undercover police illegally used against peace campaigners like me. The latest Ombudswoman in Victoria, Australia, did a marvellous impression of an ostrich while ensconced in the IPCC (now called IOPC in the UK) when 100 lawyers left.
A Nick Hardwick from the police watchdog, claims he did not keep a written record of a meeting with the MPA or DPS at 8am on 8th December 2006 in the UK about Brian and I, before not being able to explain away how that didn’t preclude him from writing and producing a signed witness statement.
There is a real problem with the State and Federal governments in Australia dictating that so called counselling over what politicians label adoption does not include being accompanied to… court, because of course someone labelled adopted should be able to speak for ourself in a court and that is simply not happening.
It should go without saying that most people would consider being illegally detained in Australia could be… depressing, before even getting to the fact it undeniably caused cancer that I was diagnosed with in 2022 (that I probably had since at least July 2021) that I would clearly not have got if I was living in my own home in Breizh, France, able to get on with my own life with my own identity. Of course it is… depressing to have to battle on to have my own identity, that is thankfully something most other people can take for granted. My case proves beyond all reasonable doubt it is unreasonable and unrealistic to demand that people labelled adopted in the State of Victoria who live overseas, need to return to the state to try and unravel the whole sordid business, mired in so many decades of corruption. It is extraordinarily difficult to try and in some respects depressing to try and recover from even such a major operation about cancer when I am not in my own home in Breizh, France where everything was familiar to me, so every day is a major struggle in so many ways.
The reality is I had that physiological sick feeling in the pit of my stomach before I had cancer and it is still there after a major operation to remove the cancer, because I am still being illegally labelled ‘adopted’ by draconian adoption legislation that illegally detains me without legal representation or trial to stop me traveling or living in my own home.
I was unlawfully arrested in the County Court house in Victoria, Australia on 21st December 202…1 (I was trying to go home) while quietly sitting on a chair, because politicians also knew they had falsified records on 20th October 2020 to dishonestly claim I owned property in Victoria Australia (which I only first discovered by happenstance in May 2022, that records on 4th October 2022 showed the Federal government who are essentially the left overs from the discredited Rudd and Gillard administrations were then trying to do too) because of course politicians are legally obliged to pay for my housing in Australia because they have illegally stopped me living in my own home in Breizh, France which has then been further complicated by my getting cancer because of such prolonged physiological stress and distress.
The Victorian police (who employ one of Rudd’s former ‘media advisers’) had de-arrested me on 21st December 2021 when I said that I was entitled to a lawyer to witness my witness statement.
I was further unlawfully arrested on 21st December 2021 when I then said I would go across the road to the Supreme Court and complain about what was going on in the County Court because it is a completely and utterly disgraceful way to treat someone labelled adopted, who isn’t even voluntarily in the country.
The Supreme Court did subsequently question why on earth a court would arrest me to take me to a court which is easily explained by the fact politicians have never wanted any kind of accurate and contemporaneous record. The police knew what they were doing was wrong because they tried saying they could take me to a different court which I pointed out would not change the fact of where they had actually arrested me or the fact I was not even voluntarily in Australia.
I was unlawfully arrested at Southern Cross train Station in July 2022 when I was trying to go home !! while we now know I was seriously ill with cancer (which was officially diagnosed on 23rd August 2022 when I was in and out of hospital before the emergency admission on 10th September 2022 when doctors had to expedite the operation because I became dependent on blood transfusions, because the cancer was haemorraghing etc. I don’t think my PTSD was really helped by being released from hospital several days before that life threatening medical emergency that a patient could not possibly manage saw me re-admitted to hospital) The politicians only distract from my right to renounce their label of adoption along with draconian adoption legislation. The Victorian Police literally physically pushed around someone with a walking stick who was seriously ill with cancer, simply because I wanted to go… home. The draconian adoption legislation has only been about whatever suits… politicians.
I could never personally concede that it is or was legal to have adoption court orders that automatically continue into adulthood regardless of if the person labelled adopted objects, and of course those people who are labelled adopted who do want that should have to go to court and argue that for themselves. I could similarly never have personally conceded that draconian adoption legislation is legal, because even a revocation forces someone labelled adopted to agree with being… punished by perverse and politically motivated legislation. The draconian adoption legislation can be used to punish someone labelled adopted along with our real family members, if the person labelled adopted sought a revocation. There are enough unscrupulous politicians in the world for reasonable, rational and responsible adults to know it is not sensible for politicians to legislate to arbitrarily treat a cohort of vulnerable children who cannot vote, as they wish, well outside any scope of any usual family and custody hearings. In my own case my parents automatically aged out of now defunct legislation used against them that was used to hastily label me adopted, that it is claimed I could never automatically age out of at even adulthood. If course if proper court records were made and kept I would not ever have been trapped by draconian adoption legislation in the first place, but whatever the case was, I have legally always had my own rights to make my own genuine… choice that has not been respected.
It is clearly fair and equitable for someone labelled adopted to have the genuine… choice to renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation to instead have free unlimited universal health care of our choosing.
I am legally entitled to and do choose to renounce adoption and draconian adoption legislation in the High Court Habeas Corpus Court Order from 16th April 2008 in the UK over Mothers Day on 26th March 2006. My case has clearly proved it is unreasonable to expect someone labelled adopted in Victoria to return to Victoria, Australia to argue about what has happened.
The politicians and courts didn’t care about the nationalities and citizenships of the adults adopting vulnerable children in Victoria, Australia, so the global adoption industry is widespread and continues today preying on wherever vulnerable children can be found and exploited. I happen to personally be mixed race, and my Italian ethnicity was completely hidden from me, so I refuse to change who I really am to at best suit competing supposed ‘nationalists’ like Murdoch et al anywhere.
A kinder evolution is possible.
This statement is true.
Donna Bugat
(formerly known as Babs Tucker)
Donna Bugat 